0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Flashback and Turbulent Flame Speed Measurements in Hydrogen/Methane Flames Stabilized by a Low-Swirl Injector at Elevated Pressures and Temperatures

[+] Author and Article Information
David Beerer

e-mail: djb@ucicl.uci.edu

Vincent McDonell

e-mail: vgm@ucicl.uci.edu
UC Irvine Combustion Laboratory
Irvine, CA 92697-3550

Peter Therkelsen

e-mail: ptherkelsen@lbl.gov

Robert K. Cheng

e-mail: rkcheng@lbl.gov
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Berkeley, CA 94720

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 2, 2013; final manuscript received September 16, 2013; published online November 5, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Klaus Dobbeling.

The United States Government retains, and by accepting the article for publication, the publisher acknowledges that the United States Government retains, a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for United States government purposes.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 136(3), 031502 (Nov 05, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: GTP-13-1223; doi: 10.1115/1.4025636 History: Received July 02, 2013; Revised September 16, 2013

This paper reports flashback limits and turbulent flame local displacement speed measurements in flames stabilized by a low swirl injector operated at elevated pressures and inlet temperatures with hydrogen and methane blended fuels. The goal of this study is to understand the physics that relate turbulent flame speed to flashback events at conditions relevant to gas turbine engines. Testing was conducted in an optically accessible single nozzle combustor rig at pressures ranging from 1 to 8 atm, inlet temperatures from 290 to 600 K, and inlet bulk velocities between 20 and 60 m/s for natural gas and a 90%/10% (by volume) hydrogen/methane blend. The propensity of flashback is dependent upon the proximity of the lifted flame to the nozzle that is itself dependent upon pressure, inlet temperature, and bulk velocity. Flashback occurs when the leading edge of the flame in the core of the flow ingresses within the nozzle, even in cases when the flame is attached to the burner rim. In general the adiabatic flame temperature at flashback is proportional to the bulk velocity and inlet temperature and inversely proportional to the pressure. The unburned reactant velocity field approaching the flame was measured using a laser Doppler velocimeter with water seeding. Turbulent displacement flame speeds were found to be linearly proportional to the root mean square of the velocity fluctuations about the mean velocity. For identical inlet conditions, high-hydrogen flames had a turbulent flame local displacement speed roughly twice that of natural gas flames. Pressure, inlet temperature, and flame temperature had surprisingly little effect on the local displacement turbulent flame speed. However, the flow field is affected by changes in inlet conditions and is the link between turbulent flame speed, flame position, and flashback propensity.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Lieuwen, T. V., Yang, V., and Yetter, R., eds., 2009, Synthesis Gas Combustion, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Lieuwen, T., McDonell, V., Petersen, E., and Santavicca, D., 2008, “Fuel Flexibility Influences on Combustor Blowout, Flashback, Autoignition, and Stability,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power., 130(1), p. 011506. [CrossRef]
Bell, J., Cheng, R., Day, M., and Shepherd, I., 2007, “Numerical Simulation of Lewis Number Effects on Lean Premixed Turbulent Flames,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 31, pp. 1309–1317. [CrossRef]
Baum, M., Poinsot, T., Haworth, D., and Darabiha, N., 1994, “Direct Numerical Simulations of H2/O2/N2 Flames With Complex Chemistry in Two-Dimensional Turbulent Flows,” J. Fluid Mech., 281, pp. 1–32. [CrossRef]
Driscoll, J., 2008, “Turbulent Premixed Combustion: Flamelet Structure and Its Effect on Turbulent Burning Velocities,” Prog. Eng. Combust. Sci., 34(1), pp. 91–134. [CrossRef]
Cheng, R., 2009, “Turbulent Combustion Properties of Premixed Syngas,” Synthesis Gas Combustion, T.Lieuwen, V.Yang, and R.Yetter, eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, Ch. 5.
Daniele, S., Jansohn, P., and Boulouchos, K., 2009, “Flame Front Characteristics and Turbulent Flame Speed of Lean Premixed Syngas Combustion at Gas Turbine Relevant Conditions,” ASME Paper No. GT2009-59477. [CrossRef]
Marshall, A., Venkateswaran, P., Noble, D., Seitzman, J., and Lieuwen, T., 2012, “Pressure Effects on the Turbulent Consumption Speeds of High H2 Mixtures,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-68305. [CrossRef]
Cheng, R., Littlejohn, D., Nazeer, W., Smith, K., 2008, “Laboratory Studies of the Flow Field Characteristics of Low-Swirl Injectors for Adaptation to Fuel-Flexible Turbine,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power, 130(2), p. 021501. [CrossRef]
Koyama, M., and Tachibana, S., “Technical Applicability of Low-Swirl Fuel Nozzle for Liquid-Fueled Industrial Gas Turbine Combustor,” Fuel, 107, pp. 766–776. [CrossRef]
Chan, C., Lau, K., Chin, W., and Cheng, R., 1992, “Freely Propagating Open Premixed Turbulent Flames Stabilized by Swirl,” Symp. (Int.) Combust., 24(1), pp. 511–518. [CrossRef]
Littlejohn, D., and Cheng, R., 2007, “Fuel Effects on a Low-Swirl Injector for Lean Premixed Gas Turbines,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 31(2), pp. 3155–3162. [CrossRef]
Cheng, R., Yegian, D., Miyasato, M., Samuelsen, G., Benson, C., Pellizzari, R., and Loftus, P., 2000, “Scaling and Development of Low-Swirl Burners for Low-Emission Furnaces and Boilers,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 28, pp. 1305–1313. [CrossRef]
Smith, K., Therkelsen, P., Littlejohn, D., Ali, S., and Cheng, R., 2010, “Conceptual Studies of Fuel-Flexible Low Swirl Combustion Systems for the Gas Turbine in Clean Coal Powerplants,” ASME Paper No. GT2010-23506. [CrossRef]
Johnson, M., Littlejohn, D., Nazeer, W., Smith, K., and Cheng, R., 2005, “A Comparison of the Flow Fields and Emissions of High-Swirl Injectors and Low-Swirl Injectors for Lean Premixed Gas Turbines,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 30, pp. 2867–2874. [CrossRef]
Nazeer, W.Smith, K., Sheppard, P., Cheng, R., and Littlejohn, D., 2006, “Full Scale Testing of a Low Swirl Fuel Injector Concept for Ultra-Low NOx Gas Turbine Combustion Systems,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90150. [CrossRef]
Cheng, R., Littlejohn, D., Strakey, P., and Sidwell, T., 2007, “Laboratory Investigations of a Low-Swirl Injector With H2 and CH4 at Gas Turbine Conditions,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 31, pp. 3155–3162. [CrossRef]
Littlejohn, D., Cheng, R., Noble, D., and Lieuwen, T., 2010, “Laboratory Investigations of Low-Swirl Injectors Operating With Syngases,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power, 132(1), p. 011502. [CrossRef]
Cheng, R., and Littlejohn, D., 2008, “Laboratory Study of Premixed H2-Air and H2-N2-Air Flames in a Low-Swirl Injector for Ultralow Emissions Gas Turbine,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power, 130(3), p. 031503. [CrossRef]
Fritz, J., Kröner, M., and Sattelmayer, T., 2004, “Flashback in a Swirl Burner With Cylindrical Premixing Zone,” ASME J. Eng Gas Turb. Power, 126(2), pp. 276–283. [CrossRef]
Eichler, C., Baumgarther, G., and Sattelmayer, T., 2012, “Experimental Investigation of Turbulent Boundary Layer Flashback Limits for Premixed Hydrogen-Air Flames Confined in Ducts,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power, 134(1), p. 011502. [CrossRef]
Therkelsen, P., Werts, T., McDonell, V., and Samuelsen, S., 2009, “Analysis of NOX Formation in a Hydrogen Fueled Gas Turbine,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power, 131(3), p. 031507. [CrossRef]
Beerer, D., McDonell, V., Therkelsen, P., and Cheng, R., 2012, “Flashback, Turbulent Displacement Flame Speeds, Blow-Out and Emissions Measurements in a Hydrogen and Methane Fired Low-Swirl Injector at Elevated Pressures and Temperatures,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-68216. [CrossRef]
Beerer, D., 2013, “Combustion Characteristics and Performance of Low-Swirl Injectors With Natural Gas and Alternative Fuels at Elevated Pressures and Temperatures,” Ph.D. dissertation, Mechanical and Aerospace Dept., University of California, Irvine, CA.
Therkelsen, P., Littlejohn, D., and Cheng, R., 2012, “Parametric Study of Low-Swirl Injector Geometry on its Operability,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-68436. [CrossRef]
Therkelsen, P., Littlejohn, D., Cheng, R., Portillo, J., and Martin, S., 2010, “Effect of Combustor Inlet Geometry on Acoustic Signature and Flow Field Behavior of the Low-Swirl Injector,” ASME Paper No. GT2010-23498. [CrossRef]
Davis, D., Therkelsen, P., Littlejohn, D., and Cheng, R., 2013, “Effects of Hydrogen on the Thermo-Acoustics Coupling Mechanisms of Low-Swirl Flames in a Model Gas Turbine Combustor,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 34(2), pp. 3135–3143. [CrossRef]
Noble, D., Zhang, Q., Shareef, A., Tootle, J., Meyers, A., and Lieuwen, T., 2006, “Syngas Mixture Composition Effects Upon Flashback and Blow Out,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90470. [CrossRef]
Kröner, M., Fritz, J., and Sattelmayer, T., 2003, “Flashback Limits for Combustion Induced Vortex Breakdown in a Swirl Burner,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turb. Power, 125, pp. 693–700. [CrossRef]
Eggenspieler, G., Strakey, P., and Sidwell, T., 2008, “Experimental and Numerical Study of Flashback in the SimVal Combustion Chamber,” 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, AIAA Paper No. 2008-1025. [CrossRef]
Daniele, S., Jansohn, P., and Boulouchos, K., 2010, “Flashback Propensity of Syngas Flames at High Pressure: Diagnostics and Control,” ASME Paper No. GT2010-23456. [CrossRef]
Cheng, R., 1984, “Conditional Sampling of Turbulence Intensities and Reynolds Stresses in Premixed Turbulent Flames,” Combust. Sci. Tech., 41, pp. 109–142. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Low-swirl injector, back view (left) and front view (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Low-swirl methane flame with illustrative streamlines superimposed. The diverging lines represent the inner flow, while the ellipses represent the swirling outer flow. Flow direction is top to bottom.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

High-pressure vessel and facility

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Cross-sectional image of pressure vessel and combustor test section

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Nonreacting radial profiles of normalized mean and rms axial velocities for LSI-P1. (Inlet conditions: Po = 1–8 atm, To = 380–470 K, Uo = 25–47 m/s.)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Nonreacting radial profiles of normalized mean and rms axial velocities for LSI-P2. (Inlet conditions: Po = 4–5 atm, To = 440–450 K, Uo = 35–48 m/s.)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Images of 90%/10% hydrogen/methane flames from LSI-P1 and LSI-P2 at similar inlet conditions (Po = 3 atm, To = 294 K, Uo = 45 m/s, AFT = 1870 K)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Sequential images of a flashback event

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Pressure drop and axial velocity measurements during a flashback event

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Flashback results for LSI-P1 for To = 400 K

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Effect of To on flashback limit for LSI-P1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Correlation for flashback limit of LSI-P1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Axial profiles of normalized mean, rms axial and rms radial velocities for a high-hydrogen flame with LSI-P2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

ST,LD as a function of u′

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

U/Uo and u ′/UO near the nozzle exit for nonreacting and reacting flows for LSI-P2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Turbulence intensity at leading edge of flame as a function of AFT for flames H-1 through H-10

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In