Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Aircraft Engine

Effect of Change in Fuel Compositions and Heating Value on Ignition and Performance for Siemens SGT-400 Dry Low Emission Combustion System

[+] Author and Article Information
Kexin Liu

e-mail: kexin@samsung.com

Victoria Sanderson

e-mail: victoria.sanderson@siemens.com

Phill Hubbard

Siemens Industrial Turbomachinery Limited,
Lincoln LN5 7FD, UK

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Aircraft Engine Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 25, 2013; final manuscript received August 25, 2013; published online December 2, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 136(3), 031203 (Dec 02, 2013) (11 pages) Paper No: GTP-13-1274; doi: 10.1115/1.4025682 History: Received July 25, 2013; Revised August 25, 2013

The influence of changes in fuel composition and heating value on the performance of an industrial gas turbine combustor was investigated. The combustor tested was a single cannular combustor for Siemens SGT-400 13.4 MW dry low emission engine. Ignition, engine starting, emissions, combustion dynamics, and flash back through burner metal temperature monitoring were among the parameters investigated to evaluate the impact of fuel flexibility on combustor performance. Lean ignition and extinction limits were measured for three fuels with different heat values in term of Wobbe Index (WI): 25, 28.9, and 45 MJ/Sm3 (natural gas). The test results show that the air fuel ratio at lean ignition/extinction limits decreases and the margin between the two limits tends to be smaller as fuel heat value decreases. Engine start tests were also performed with a lower heating value fuel and results were found to be comparable to those for engine starting with natural gas. The combustor was further tested in a high pressure air facility at real engine operating conditions with different fuels covering WIs from 17.5 to 70 MJ/Sm3. The variation in fuel composition and heating value was achieved in a gas mixing plant by blending natural gas with CO2, CO, N2, and H2 (for the fuel with WI lower than natural gas) and C3H8 (for the fuel with WI higher than natural gas). Test results show that a benefit in NOx reduction can be seen for the lower WI fuels without H2 presence in the fuel and there are no adverse impacts on combustor performance except for the requirement of higher fuel supply pressure, however, this can be easily resolved by minor modification through the fuel injection design. Test results for the H2 enriched and higher WI fuels show that NOx, combustion dynamics and flash back have been adversely affected and major change in burner design is required. For the H2 enriched fuel, the effect of CO and H2 on combustor performance was also investigated for the fuels having a fixed WI of 29 MJ/Sm3. It is found that H2 dominates the adverse impact on combustor performance. The chemical kinetic study shows that H2 has significant effect on flame speed change and CO has significant effect on flame temperature change. Although the tests were performed on the Siemens SGT-400 combustion system, the results provide general guidance for the challenge of industrial gas turbine burner design for fuel flexibility.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Asti, A., Stewart, J.F., Forte, A., Yilmaz, E., and D'Ercole, M., 2008, “Enlarging the Fuel Flexibility Boundaries: Theoretical and Experimental Application to a New Heavy-Duty Gas Turbine (MS5002E),” ASME Paper No. GT2008-50773. [CrossRef]
Carrera, A. M., Andersson, M., and Nasvall, H., 2011, “Experimental Investigation of the 4th Generation DLE Burner Concept: Emissions and Fuel Flexibility Performance at Atmospheric Conditions,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-46387. [CrossRef]
Campbell, A., Goldmeer, J., Healy, T., Washman, R., Moliere, M., and Citeno, J., 2008, “Heavy Duty Gas Turbines Fuel Flexibility,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-51368. [CrossRef]
Blouch, J., Li, H., Mueller, M., and Hook, R., 2011, “Fuel Flexibility in LM2500 and LM6000 Dry Low Emission Engines,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-45387. [CrossRef]
Singh, K., Varatharajan, B., Yilmaz, E., Han, F., and Kim, K., 2008, “Effect of Hydrogen Combustion on the Combustion Dynamics of a Natural Gas Combustor,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-51343. [CrossRef]
Liu, K., Alexander, V., Sanderson, V., and Bulat, G., 2012, “Extension of Fuel Flexibility in the Siemens Dry Low Emissions SGT-300-1S to Cover a Wobbe Index Range of 15 to 49 MJ/Sm3,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-68838. [CrossRef]
Liu, K., and Sanderson, V., 2013, “The Influence of Changes in Fuel Calorific Value to Combustion Performance for Siemens SGT-300 Dry Low Emission Combustion System,” Fuel, 103, pp. 239–246. [CrossRef]
Andersson, M., Larsson, A., and Carrera, A., 2011, “Pentane Rich Fuels for Standard Siemens DLE Gas Turbines,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-46099. [CrossRef]
Rokke, P. E., and Hustad, J. E., 2005, “Exhaust Gas Recirculation in Gas Turbines for Reduction of CO2 Emissions: Combustion Testing With Focus on Stability and Emissions,” Int. J. Thermodyn., 8(4), pp. 167–173. [CrossRef]
Valler, K., Wopera, A., Palotas, A. B., and Whitty, K. J., 2009, “NOx Formation by Synthesis Gas—Natural Gas Co-Firing,” 4th European Combustion Meeting (ECM 2009), Vienna, Austria, April 14–17.
Elkady, A. M., Brand, A. R., Vandervort, C. L., and Evulet, A. T., 2011, “Exhaust Gas Recirculation Performance in Dry Low Emissions Combustors,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-46482. [CrossRef]
Bulat, G., Liu, K., Brickwood, G., Sanderson, V., and IgoeB., 2011, “Intelligent Operation of Siemens (SGT-300) DLE Gas Turbine Combustion System Over an Extended Fuel Range With Low Emissions,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-46103. [CrossRef]
Cocchi, S., Provenzale, M., and Ceccherini, G., 2007, “Fuel Flexibility Test Campaign on a 10 MW Class Gas Turbine Equipped with a Dry-Low-NOx Combustion System,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-27154. [CrossRef]
Ren, J. Y., Egolfopoulos, F. N., Mak, H., and Tsotsis, T. T., 2002, “NOx Emission Control of Lean Methane-Air Combustion With Addition of Methane Reforming Products,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 174(4), pp. 181–205. [CrossRef]
Lafay, Y., Renou, B., Cabot, G., and Boukhalfa, M., 2007, “Experimental Determination of Laminar Flame Thickness for CO2 and H2 Diluted Methane/Air Flames,” 3rd European Combustion Meeting (ECM 2007), Crete, Greece, April 11–13.
Cohe, C., Chauveau, C., and Gokalp, I., 2009, “Addition Effect in High Pressure CH4-Air Turbulent Premixed Flames,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 32, pp. 1803–1810. [CrossRef]
Ren, J. Y., Qin, W., Egolfopoulos, F. N., Mak, H., and Tsotsis, T. T., 2001, “Methane Reforming and Its Potential Effect on the Efficiency and Pollutant Emissions of Lean Methane-Air Combustion,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 56, pp. 1541–1549. [CrossRef]
Qin, Q., Egolfopoulos, F. N., and Tsotsis, T. T., 2001, “Fundamental and Environmental Aspects of Landfill Gas Utilization for Power Generation,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 82, pp. 157–172. [CrossRef]
Kishore, V. R., Duan, N., Ravi, M. R., and Ray, A., 2008, “Measurement of Adiabatic Burning Velocity in Natural Gas-Like Mixtures,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 33, pp. 10–16. [CrossRef]
Liu, F., Guo, H., and Smallwood, G., 2003, “The Chemical Effect of CO2 Replacement of N2 in Air on the Burning Velocity of CH4 and H2 Premixed Flames,” Combust. Flame, 133, pp. 495–497. [CrossRef]
Glarborg, P., and Bentzen, L. L. B., 2008 “Chemical Effects of a High CO2 Concentration in Oxy-Fuel Combustion of Methane,” Energy and Fuel, 22, pp. 291–296. [CrossRef]
Fackler, K. B., Karalus, M. F., Novosselov, I. V., Kramlich, J. C., and Malte, P. C., 2011, “Experimental and Numerical Study of NOx Formation From the Lean Premixed Combustion of CH4 Mixed With CO2 and N2,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-45090. [CrossRef]
Dobbeling, K., Meeuwissen, T., Zajadatz, M., and Flohr, P., 2008, “Fuel Flexibility of the Alstom GT132E Medium Sized Gas Turbine,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-50950. [CrossRef]
Liu, K., Wood, J. P., Buchanan, E., Martin, P., and Sanderson, V. E., 2010, “Biodiesel as an Alternative Fuel in Siemens Dry Low Emissions Combustors: Atmospheric and High Pressure Rig Testing,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 132(1), p. 011501. [CrossRef]
Thiruchengode, M., Nair, S., Prakash, S., Scarborough, D., Neumeier, Y., Lieuwen, T., Jagoda, J., Seitzman, J., and Zinn, B., “An Active Control System for LBO Margin Reduction in Turbine Engines,” AIAA 41st Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 6–9, AIAA Paper No. 2003-1008. [CrossRef]
Lafay, Y., Cabot, G., and Boukhalfa, A., 2006, “Experimental Study of Biogas Combustion Using a Gas Turbine Configuration,” 13th Int. Symp. on Application of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, June 26–29.
Lin, Y. C., Matuszewski, M., Daniele, S., Jansohn, P., and Boulouchos, K., 2011, “NOx Emission for Combustion Systems Relevant to Zero Emissions Power Concepts,” European Combustion Meeting 2011, Cardiff, UK, June 28–July 1.
Guo, H., Smallwood, G. J., Liu, F., Ju., Y., and Gülder, Ö., 2005, “The Effect of Hydrogen Addition on Flammability Limit and NOx Emission in Ultra-Lean Counterflow CH4/Air Premixed Flame,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 30(1), pp. 303–311. [CrossRef]
Dam, B., Corona, G., Hayder, M., and Choudhuri, A., 2011, “Effects of Syngas Composition on Combustion Induced Vortex Breakdown (CIVB) Flashback in a Swirl Stabilized Combustor,” Fuel, 90, pp. 3274–3284. [CrossRef]
Dirrenberger, P., Glaude, P. A., Gall, H. L., Bounaceur, R., Herbinet, O., Battin-Leclerc, F., and Konnov, A. A., 2011, “Laminar Flame Velocity of Components of Natural Gas,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-46312. [CrossRef]
Kido, H., Nakahara, M., Nakashima, K., and Hashimoto, J., 2002, “Influence of Local Flame Displacement Velocity on Turbulent Burning Velocity,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 29, pp. 1855–1861. [CrossRef]
Kowkabie, M., Noden, R., and De Pietro, S., 1997, “The Development of a Dry Low NOx Combustion System for the EGT Typhoon,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-60.
Hu, E., Huang, Z., Zheng, J., Li, Q., and He, J., 2009, “Numerical Study on Laminar Burning Velocity and NO Formation of Premixed Methane-Hydrogen-Air Flames,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 34(15), pp. 6545–7557. [CrossRef]
Cheng, T. S., Chang, Y. C., Chao, Y. C., Chen, G. B., Li, Y. H., and Wu, C. Y., 2011, “An Experimental and Numerical Study on Characteristics of Laminar Premixed H2/CO/CH4/Air Flames,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 36, pp. 13207–13217. [CrossRef]
Venkateswaran, P., Marshall, A. D., Noble, D. R., Seitzman, J. M., and Lieuwen, T., 2011, “Turbulent Consumption Speed Scaling of H2/CO Blends,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-45401. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The dry low emission combustor sectional view

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Effect of WI on lean extinction and ignition limits for standard burner

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Impact of burner design on lean extinction and ignition limits at WI 29 MJ/Sm3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Effect of pilot split on ignition limits, MCV burner 1 at WI 29 MJ/Sm3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of engine start between engines configured with standard and MCV1 burners

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Schematic of high pressure air facility combustion rig

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

NOx emissions against engine load for various WI fuels for MCV2 burner

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Effect of WI on NOx at full load for MCV2 burner

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

NOx and CO emissions versus engine load for various WI fuels for MCV1 burner

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Impact of WI on NOx, combustion dynamics, burner metal temperature and main fuel pressure drop at full load for MCV1 burner

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Effect of pilot split on NOx and combustion dynamics at WI 27.5 and 35 MJ/Sm3 for MCV1 burner

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Influence of N2 concentration on NOx and combustion dynamics at WI 25 MJ/Sm3 for MCV1 burner

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Influence of CO2 addition into natural gas on NOx at full load for two MCV burners

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Impact of H2 on NOx for standard and modified burners

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Impact of H2 and CO on NOx, combustion dynamics and burner metal temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Influence of H2 and CO on equivalence ratio, flame speed and flame temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Impact of C3H8 addition in natural gas on NOx, burner metal temperature and combustion dynamics for three different burner designs




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In