0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Evaluation of Foil Bearing Performance and Nonlinear Rotordynamics of 120 kW Oil-Free Gas Turbine Generator

[+] Author and Article Information
Daejong Kim

University of Texas at Arlington,
Arlington, TX 76019
e-mail: daejongkim@uta.edu

An Sung Lee

e-mail: aslee@kimm.re.kr

Bum Seog Choi

e-mail: bschoi@kimm.re.kr
Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials,
104 Shinsungro, Yuseonggu,
Daejon City 305-600, Korea

At excitation frequency ratio of 0.05.

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Structures and Dynamics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received August 29, 2013; final manuscript received August 30, 2013; published online November 27, 2013. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 136(3), 032504 (Nov 27, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: GTP-13-1329; doi: 10.1115/1.4025898 History: Received August 29, 2013; Revised August 30, 2013

This paper presents a design approach of air foil bearings (AFBs) for a 120 kWe gas turbine generator, which is a single spool configuration with gas generator turbine and alternator rotor connected by a diaphragm coupling. A total of four radial AFBs support the two rotors, and one set of double acting thrust foil bearing is located inside the gas generator turbine. The rotor configuration results in eight degree of freedom (DOF) rotordynamic motions, which are two cylindrical modes and two conical modes from the two rotors. Stiffness of bump foils of candidate AFB was estimated from measured structural stiffness of the bearing, and implemented to the computational model for linear stiffness and damping coefficients of the bearing and frequency-domain modal impedances for cylindrical and conical modes. Stiffness of the diaphragm coupling was evaluated using finite element analysis and implemented to nonlinear rotordynamic analyses of the entire engine. Analyses show the conical mode of the turbine rotor is the main source of instability of the entire engine when AFB clearance is not selected properly. Optimum AFB clearance is suggested from frequency domain modal analyses and nonlinear transient analyses.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

“Descriptions of Jinsol Turbomachinery, Ltd., Product Line of Turbo Blowers, Turbo Compressors, and Generators” available at http:// www.jinsolturbo.co.kr/., access date November 2012.
“Capstone Microturbine Solutions Product Index” available at http://www.capstoneturbine.com/prodsol/products/, access date November 2012.
“Descriptions of Neuros Co. Ltd, Product Line of Turbo Blowers, Turbo Compressors, and Generators” available at http://www.neuros.com/., access date November 2012.
Valco, M. J., and DellaCorte, C., 2003, “Emerging Oil-Free Turbomachinery for Military Propulsion and Power Applications,” Proceedings of the 23rd Army Sciences Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, December 2–5.
Howard, S. A., Bruckner, R. J., and Radil, K. C., 2010, “Advancements Toward Oil-Free Rotorcraft Propulsion,” NASA Technical Report No. NASA/TM—2010-216094.
DellaCorte, C., and Valco, M. J., 2000, “Load Capacity Estimation of Foil Air Journal Bearings for Oil-Free Turbo-Machinery Applications,” STLE Tribol. Trans., 43(4), pp. 795–801. [CrossRef]
Kim, D., 2007, “Parametric Studies on Static and Dynamic Performance of Air Foil Bearings With Different Top Foil Geometries and Bump Stiffness Distributions,” ASME J. Tribol., 129(2), pp. 354–364. [CrossRef]
Kim, D., and Varrey, M., 2012, “Imbalance Response and Stability Characteristics of a Rotor Supported by Hybrid Air Foil Bearings,” STLE Tribol. Trans., 55(4), pp. 529–538. [CrossRef]
Wilde, D., and San Andrés, L., 2003, “Comparison of Rotordynamic Analysis Predictions with the Test Response of Simple Gas Hybrid Bearings for Oil-Free Turbomachinery,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38859. [CrossRef]
Peng, J. P., and Carpino, M., 1993, “Calculation of Stiffness and Damping Coefficients for Elastically Supported Gas Foil Bearings,” ASME J. Tribol., 115(1), pp. 20–27. [CrossRef]
Carpino, M., and Talmage, G., 2006, “Prediction of Rotor Dynamic Coefficients in Gas Lubricated Foil Journal Bearings With Corrugated Sub-Foils,” STLE Tribol. Trans., 49(3), pp. 400–409. [CrossRef]
San Andrés, L., and Kim, T. H., 2007, “Improvements to the Analysis of Gas Foil Bearings: Integration of Top Foil 1D and 2D Structural Models,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-27249. [CrossRef]
Ku, C. R., and Heshmat, H., 1992, “Compliant Foil Bearing Structural Stiffness Analysis: Part I—Theoretical Model Including Strip and Variable Bump Foil Geometry,” ASME J. Tribol., 114(2), pp. 394–400. [CrossRef]
Lez, S. L., Arghir, M., and Frene, J., 2007, “A New Bump-Type Foil Bearing Structure Analytical Model,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines and Power, 129(4), pp. 1047–1057. [CrossRef]
Lez, S. L., Arghir, M., and Frene, J., 2007, “Static and Dynamic Characterization of a Bump-Type Foil Bearing Structure,” ASME J. Tribol., 129(1), pp. 75–83. [CrossRef]
Lee, D., Kim, Y., and Kim, T., 2009, “The Dynamic Performance Analysis of Foil Journal Bearings Considering Coulomb Friction: Rotating Unbalance Response,” STLE Tribol. Trans., 52(2), pp. 146–156. [CrossRef]
Kumar, M., and Kim, D., 2008, “Parametric Studies on Dynamic Performance of Hybrid Air Foil Bearings,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines and Power, 130(6), pp. 062501-1–062501-7. [CrossRef]
Kim, D., and Park, S., 2009, “Hydrostatic Air Foil Bearings: Analytical and Experimental Investigations,” Elsevier Tribology International, 42(3), pp. 413–425. [CrossRef]
Kumar, M., and Kim, D., 2010, “Static Performance of Hydrostatic Air Bump Foil Bearing,” Elsevier Tribology International, 43(4), pp. 752–758. [CrossRef]
Kim, D., and Lee, D., 2010, “Design of Three-Pad Hybrid Air Foil Bearing and Experimental Investigation on Static Performance at Zero Running Speed,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines and Power, 132(12), p. 122504. [CrossRef]
Kim, D., and Zimbru, G., 2012, “Start-Stop Characteristics and Thermal Behavior of A Large Hybrid Airfoil Bearing for Aero-Propulsion Applications,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines and Power, 134(3), p. 032502. [CrossRef]
Lee, D., and Kim, D., 2010, “Thermo-Hydrodynamic Analyses of Bump Air Foil Bearings With Detailed Thermal Model of Foil Structures and Rotor,” ASME J. Tribol., 132(2), p. 021704. [CrossRef]
San Andrés, L., and Kim, T. H., 2009, “Thermohydrodynamic Analysis of Bump Type Gas Foil Bearings: A Model Anchored to Test Data,” ASME Paper No. GT2009-59919. [CrossRef]
Radil, K., DellaCorte, C., and Zeszotek, M., 2007, “Thermal Management Techniques for Oil-Free Turbomachinery Systems,” STLE Tribol. Trans., 63(10), pp. 319–327. [CrossRef]
Radil, K., and Zeszotek, M., 2004, “An Experimental Investigation Into the Temperature Profile of a Compliant Foil Air Bearing,” STLE Tribol. Trans., 47(4), pp. 470–479. [CrossRef]
Peng, Z. C., and Khonsari, M., 2006, “A Thermohydrodynamic Analysis of Foil Journal Bearings,” ASME J. Tribol., 128(3), pp. 534–541. [CrossRef]
Feng, K., and Kaneko, S., 2008, “A Study of Thermohydrodynamic Features of Multiwound Foil Bearing Using Lobatto Point Quadrature,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-50110. [CrossRef]
Lee, D., Kim, D., and Sadashiva, R. P., 2011, “Transient Thermal Behavior of Preloaded Three-Pad Foil Bearings: Modeling and Experiments,” ASME J. Tribol., 133(2), p. 021703. [CrossRef]
Kim, D. J., Ki, J. P., Kim, Y. C., and Ahn, K. Y., 2012, “Extended Three-Dimensional Thermo-Hydrodynamic Model of Radial Foil Bearing,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines and Power, 134(5), p. 052501. [CrossRef]
Heshmet, C. A., Xu, D. S., and Heshmat, H., 2000, “Analysis of Gas Lubricated Foil Thrust Bearings Using Coupled Finite Element and Finite Difference Methods,” ASME J. Tribol., 122(1), pp. 199–204. [CrossRef]
Iordanoff, I., 1999, “Analysis of an Aerodynamic Compliant Foil Thrust Bearing: Method for a Rapid Design,” ASME J. Tribol., 121(4), pp. 816–822. [CrossRef]
Bruckner, R. J., 2004, “Simulation and Modeling of the Hydrodynamic, Thermal, and Structural Behavior of Foil Thrust Bearings,” Ph.D. thesis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
Lee, D., and Kim, D., 2011, “Three-Dimensional Thermo-Hydrodynamic Analyses of Rayleigh Step Air Foil Thrust Bearing With Radially Arranged Bump Foils,” STLE Tribol. Trans., 54(3), pp. 432–448. [CrossRef]
Lee, D., and Kim, D., 2011, “Design and Performance Prediction of Hybrid Air Foil Thrust Bearings,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines and Power, 133(4), p. 042501. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

120 kW MGT configuration, rated speed = 45,800 rpm, maximum over speed = 50,400 rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Photo of diaphragm coupling: (a) under lateral load; (b) under moment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

FEA results of diaphragm coupling: (a) with top foil removed; (b) complete assembly

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Photo of radial foil bearing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Photo of load-deflection test rig for radial foil bearing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Load-deflection curve of radial foil bearing: (a) 4 DOF for generator shaft; (b) 4 DOF for turbine shaft

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Coordinate system and variables for 3D rotordynamics simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Log-decrements of four damped natural frequencies

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Transient response from nonlinear rotordynamics analysis: (a) cylindrical mode; (b) conical mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Transient response using linear synchronous coefficients

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Modal impedance curves as a function of excitation frequency at 50,400 rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Transient response from nonlinear rotordynamics analysis with clearance increased by 50 μm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Modal impedance curves for conical mode with radial clearances increased by 50 μm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Ratio of synchronous modal damping to maximum negative subsynchronous damping for conical mode of turbine rotor with different AFB clearances

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Trend of modal impedance curves for conical mode with different radial clearances

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Stable transient response, C = 215 μm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Unstable transient response, C = 205 μm

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In