0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Comparative Study of Flange-to-Seal Contact Couplings With Bolt Relaxation Under Creep Condition

[+] Author and Article Information
Jianfeng Mao

Key Lab of Education Ministry
for Power Machinery and Engineering,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
College of Mechanical Engineering,
Zhejian University of Techology,
Hangzhou 310014, China
e-mail: jianfeng-mao@163.com

Weizhe Wang

Key Lab of Education Ministry
for Power Machinery and Engineering,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
Gas Turbine Research Institute,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: wangwz0214@sjtu.edu.cn

Yingzheng Liu

Key Lab of Education Ministry
for Power Machinery and Engineering,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
Gas Turbine Research Institute,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: yzliu@sjtu.edu.cn

Junhui Zhang

Design & Research Institute,
Shanghai Electric Power
Generation Equipment Co., Ltd.,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: zhangjh3@shanghai-electric.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Structures and Dynamics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received January 9, 2014; final manuscript received January 13, 2014; published online February 27, 2014. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 136(7), 072504 (Feb 27, 2014) (8 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1013; doi: 10.1115/1.4026656 History: Received January 09, 2014; Revised January 13, 2014

Future coal-fired steam turbines promise increased efficiency and low emissions. However, this comes at the expense of increased thermal load from higher inlet steam temperatures and pressures leading to severe creep that significantly influences the sealing behavior and high temperature strength of bolted flange-seal couplings. Flanges with different thicknesses were employed for a comparative study. The important stress/creep values in the flanges and U-type seals had been obtained for variations in flange thickness and bolt relaxation while maintaining other leading parameters constant. The variation of contact stresses due to creep deformation plays an important role in achieving a leak proof sealing. In this paper, a two-dimensional finite element analysis of bolted flange-seal couplings has been carried out by taking the relaxation of bolt stress under full-loading turbine service. The creep strength of flanges and U-type seals are investigated by Cocks–Ashby (C–A) equivalent strain method. The multiaxial state of stresses is considered in this method by using C–A multiaxial coefficient. According to ASME allowable creep limit, the C–A equivalent strains of three flange-seal couplings are evaluated and compared. Furthermore, based on the results of contact stresses, the creep behavior of U-type seals is analyzed varying flange thickness. Finally, analysis shows that the thinner flange-seal coupling has larger long-term contact stress, while the U-type seal with the thicker flange has the least creep strength.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Bouzid, A., Chaaban, A., and Bazergui, A., 1995, “The Effect of Creep Relaxation on the Leakage Tightness of Bolted Flanged Joints,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 117(1), pp. 71–78. [CrossRef]
Efremov, A. I., 2004, “Life Extension of Bolted Flanged Connections From a Design Peculiarity's Point of View,” ASME/JSME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, San Diego, CA, July 25–29, ASME Paper No. PVP2004-2242, pp. 67–69. [CrossRef]
Krishna, M. M., Shunmugam, M. S., and Prasad, N. S., 2007, “A Study on the Sealing Performance of Bolted Flange Joints With Gaskets Using Finite Element Analysis,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 84(6), pp. 349–357. [CrossRef]
Abida, M., and Nash, D. H., 2003, “Comparative Study of the Behavior of Conventional Gasketed and Compact Non-Gasketed Flanged Pipe Joints Under Bolt Up and Operating Conditions,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 80(12), pp. 831–841. [CrossRef]
Sawa, T., Ogata, N., and Nishida, T., 2002, “Stress Analysis and Determination of Bolted Preload in Pipe Flange Connections With Gasket Under Internal Pressure,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 124(4), pp. 385–396. [CrossRef]
Bouzid, A., and Derenne, M., 2002, “Analytical Modeling of the Contact Stress With Nonlinear Gaskets,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 124(1), pp. 47–53. [CrossRef]
Nechache, A., Bouzid, A. H., and Le, V. N., 2004, “Analytical Modeling of a Bolted Flange Joint Subjected to Creep Relaxation,” 12th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Arlington, VA, April 25–29, ASME Paper No. ICONE12-49243. [CrossRef]
Maile, K., and Purper, H., 2000, “Creep Behavior of Flanges: Experimental Investigation and Numerical Modeling,” Trans. Indian Inst. Met., 53(3), pp. 121–127.
Bouzida, A. H., and Nechacheb, A., 2010, “The Modelling of Bolted Flange Joints Used With Disc Springs and Tube Spacers to Reduce Relaxation,” Int. J. Pressure Vessel Piping, 87(12), pp. 730–736. [CrossRef]
Efremov, A. I., 2004, “Plant Leakage Reduction Through Creep Limitation of Gasketed Joints,” 11th Nuclear Plant Performance Improvement Seminar, Austin, TX, June 28–29.
Lin, T. J., Li, R. F., Long, H., and Ou, H., 2006, “Three-Dimensional Transient Sealing Analysis of the Bolted Flange Connections of Reactor Pressure Vessel,” Nucl. Eng. Design, 236(24), pp. 2599–2607. [CrossRef]
Yao, H. T., Xuan, F. Z., Wang, Z. D., and Tu, S. T., 2007, “A Review of Creep Analysis and Design Under Multi-Axial Stress States,” Nucl. Eng. Design, 237(18), pp. 1969–1986. [CrossRef]
Wu, L. L., and An, J. Y., 2010, “Life Assessment of Turbine Bolts,” M.S. thesis, North China Electric Power University, Beijing.
Guo, J. Q., Xuan, F. Z., and He, L., 2008, “Stress Relaxation Performance and Prediction Models for Bolt Material of 1Cr10NiMo W2VNbN,” Nucl. Power Eng., 29(6), pp. 119–124 (in Chinese).
Abdel, H. B., and Akli, N., 2010, “The Modeling of Bolted Flange Joints Used With Disc Springs and Tube Spaces to Reduce Relaxation,” Int. J. Pressure Vessel Piping, 87(12), pp. 730–736. [CrossRef]
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Division 1, Subsection NH, 2010, “Class 1 Components in Elevated Temperature Service, Rules for Construction of Nuclear Facility Components (BPVC-III NH-2010),” ASME, New York.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Finite element mesh and assembly profile of flange-seal coupling

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The relaxation curve of bolt stress

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Distribution of contact stress with varying the creep time under max. thickness flange: (a) with bolt relaxation; (b) without bolt relaxation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Distribution of contact stress varying with increasing creep time under mid. thickness flange: (a) with bolt relaxation; (b) without bolt relaxation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Distribution of contact stress varying with increasing creep time under min. thickness flange: (a) with bolt relaxation; (b) without bolt relaxation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Variation of contact stresses at different key locations during creep time under three thickness flanges

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The comparison of contraction quantities of U-type seals under different thickness flanges

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

(a) Temperature and (b) von Mises stress distributions of different thickness flanges at initial creep stage

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

(a) Temperature and (b) von Mises stress distributions of the U ring under different thickness flanges at initial creep stage

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

The multiaxial factor FCA varies with creep time

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

(a) Multiaxial coefficient; (b) C–A equivalent strain plot for different thickness flanges at 0.2 106 creep hours

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

(a) Multiaxial coefficient; (b) C–A equivalent strain plot for U ring with bolt relaxation under different thickness flanges at 0.2 106 creep hours

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In