0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Coal, Biomass, and Alternative Fuels

Automatic Combustion Phase Calibration With Extremum Seeking Approach

[+] Author and Article Information
Enrico Corti

Department of Industrial Engineering (DIN),
University of Bologna,
Viale Risorgimento, 2,
Bologna 40136, Italy
e-mail: enrico.corti2@unibo.it

Claudio Forte

Department of Industrial Engineering (DIN),
University of Bologna,
Viale Risorgimento, 2,
Bologna 40136, Italy
e-mail: claudio.forte@unibo.it

Giorgio Mancini

Department of Industrial Engineering (DIN),
University of Bologna,
Viale Risorgimento, 2,
Bologna 40136, Italy
e-mail: giorgio.mancini@unibo.it

Davide Moro

Department of Industrial Engineering (DIN),
University of Bologna,
Viale Risorgimento, 2,
Bologna 40136, Italy
e-mail: davide.moro@unibo.it

Contributed by the Coal, Biomass and Alternate Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received February 13, 2014; final manuscript received February 17, 2014; published online April 18, 2014. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 136(9), 091402 (Apr 18, 2014) (8 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1083; doi: 10.1115/1.4027188 History: Received February 13, 2014; Revised February 17, 2014

One of the most effective factors influencing performance, efficiency, and pollutant emissions of internal combustion engines is the combustion phasing: in gasoline engines electronic control units (ECUs) manage the spark advance (SA) in order to set the optimal combustion phase. Combustion control is assuming a crucial role in reducing engine tailpipe emissions and maximizing performance. The number of actuations influencing the combustion is increasing, and as a consequence, the calibration of control parameters is becoming challenging. One of the most effective factors influencing performance and efficiency is the combustion phasing: for gasoline engines, control variables such as SA, air-to-fuel ratio (AFR), variable valve timing (VVT), and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) are mostly used to set the combustion phasing. The optimal control setting can be chosen according to a target function (cost or merit function), taking into account performance indicators, such as indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP), brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC), pollutant emissions, or other indexes inherent to reliability issues, such as exhaust gas temperature or knock intensity. Many different approaches can be used to reach the best calibration settings: design of experiment (DOE) is a common option when many parameters influence the results, but other methodologies are in use: some of them are based on the knowledge of the controlled system behavior by means of models that are identified during the calibration process. The paper proposes the use of a different concept, based on the extremum seeking approach. The main idea consists in changing the values of each control parameter at the same time, identifying its effect on the monitored target function, and allowing to shift automatically the control setting towards the optimum solution throughout the calibration procedure. An original technique for the recognition of control parameters variations effect on the target function is introduced, based on spectral analysis. The methodology has been applied to data referring to different engines and operating conditions, using IMEP, exhaust temperature, and knock intensity for the definition of the target function and using SA and AFR as control variables. The approach proved to be efficient in reaching the optimum control setting, showing that the optimal setting can be achieved rapidly and consistently.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Target function sensitivity to exhaust temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

SA and AFR modulation effects

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Combustion model scheme

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Engine model response to AFR and SA modulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

SA and AFR optimization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Target function optimization starting from low AFR and SA values

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Target function optimization starting from high AFR and SA values

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

ESC implemented on the GSXR engine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Optimization effect on combustion parameters

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In