0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Turbomachinery

Validation of a Three-Dimensional Internal Nozzle Flow Model Including Automatic Mesh Generation and Cavitation Effects

[+] Author and Article Information
Hongwu Zhao, Shaoping Quan, Meizhong Dai, Eric Pomraning, P. K. Senecal

Convergent Science Inc.,
Middleton, WI 53562

Qingluan Xue, Sibendu Som

Energy System Division,
Argonne National Laboratory,
Argonne, IL 60439

Michele Battistoni

Energy System Division,
Argonne National Laboratory,
Argonne, IL 60439
University of Perugia,
Perugia 06125, Italy

Contributed by the Turbomachinery Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received February 18, 2014; final manuscript received February 21, 2014; published online April 21, 2014. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 136(9), 092603 (Apr 21, 2014) (10 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1111; doi: 10.1115/1.4027193 History: Received February 18, 2014; Revised February 21, 2014

Fuel injectors often experience cavitation due to regions of extremely low pressure. In this work, a cavitation modeling method is implemented in the CONVERGE computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code in order to model the flow in fuel injectors. The CONVERGE code includes a Cartesian mesh based flow solver. In this solver, a volume of fluid (VOF) method is used to simulate the multiphase flow. The cavitation model is based on a flash-boiling method with rapid heat transfer between the liquid and vapor phases. In this method, a homogeneous relaxation model is used to describe the rate at which the instantaneous quality, the mass fraction of vapor in a two-phase mixture, will tend towards its equilibrium value. The model is first validated with the nozzle flow case of Winklhofer by comparing the mass flow rate with experimentally measured values at different outlet pressures. The cavitation contour shape is also compared with the experimental observations. Flow in the Engine Combustion Network Spray-A nozzle configuration is simulated. The mesh dependency is also studied in this work followed by validation against discharge coefficient data. Finally, calculations of a five-hole injector, including moving needle effects, are compared to experimental measurements.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

A schematic showing the convective boundedness criterion: U represents upwind cells; D, the donor cells; and A, the acceptor cells

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Geometry of the Winklhofer nozzle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Initial Cartesian mesh of the Winklhofer nozzle simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Cartesian mesh level with AMR. Blue, base mesh level; cyan, first embedding level; yellow, second embedding level; and red, third embedding level.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Velocity and pressure contour of the Winklhofer nozzle simulation at ΔP = 80 bar. Left, velocity contour; and right, pressure contour.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Void fraction comparison with experimental measurements at ΔP = 60 bar. Left, experimental; and right, simulated.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Void fraction comparison with experimental measurements at ΔP = 70 bar. Left, experimental; and right, simulated.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Void fraction comparison with experimental measurements at ΔP = 80 bar. Left, experimental; and right, simulated.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Simulated mass rate comparison with the experimental measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

The geometry of the Spray-A nozzle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

The Spray-A nozzle injection pressure versus time

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

The needle lift versus time for the Spray-A nozzle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Velocity contour of the Spray-A nozzle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Mass flow rate versus time and relative error in the mass flow rate compared to the 7.5 μm resolution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Geometry of the five-hole microSac nozzle. Left, with needle; and right, no needle.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Needle lift of the five-hole microSac nozzle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Cartesian mesh of the five-hole microSac nozzle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Pressure contour of the five-hole microSac nozzle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Velocity contour of the five-hole microSac nozzle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Transient mass flow rate comparison of the five-hole microSac nozzle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Streamlines across the microSac nozzle holes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Steady mass flow rate comparison of the five-hole microSac nozzle

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In