0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Hole-Pattern Seals Performance Evaluation Using Computational Fluid Dynamics and Design of Experiment Techniques

[+] Author and Article Information
Alexandrina Untaroiu

Mechanical and Aerospace
Engineering Department,
University of Virginia,
Rotating Machinery and Controls
(ROMAC) Laboratory,
122 Engineer's Way,
Charlottesville, VA 22904-4746
e-mail: au6d@virginia.edu

Cheng Liu

Beijing Institute of Technology,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Beijing 100081, China

Patrick J. Migliorini, Houston G. Wood

Mechanical and Aerospace
Engineering Department,
University of Virginia,
Rotating Machinery and Controls
(ROMAC) Laboratory,
122 Engineer's Way,
Charlottesville, VA 22904-4746

Costin D. Untaroiu

School of Biomedical Engineering
and Sciences,
Virginia Polytechnic Institute
and State University,
Blacksburg, VA 24060

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Structures and Dynamics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received February 27, 2014; final manuscript received March 10, 2014; published online May 9, 2014. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 136(10), 102501 (May 09, 2014) (7 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1129; doi: 10.1115/1.4027217 History: Received February 27, 2014; Revised March 10, 2014

A main goal of noncontacting mechanical seals is to provide minimal leakage during operation. This may be achieved by specifying a small clearance between the mating faces that is just enough to avoid rubbing contact while allowing some tolerable leakage. The amount of leakage flow is reduced through the acceleration and deceleration of the fluid through a tortuous path, so the sealing performance depends on the geometric characteristics of the leakage path. This study focuses on annular hole-pattern seals, which are noncontacting mechanical seals commonly used in high pressure compressors. A design of experiments (DOE) approach is used to investigate the effects of various geometric variables on the leakage rate of a hole-pattern seal during normal operating conditions. The design space, defined by the ranges of hole diameter, hole depth, axial space between holes and number of holes in circumferential direction, is discretized using the simple random sampling method. Then, steady-state computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are performed at each design point to evaluate seal performance. To better understand the sensitivity of the hole-pattern seal leakage rate with respect to design variables selected, response surfaces are built through its values at design points using quadratic polynomial fitting. The results show that the optimal solution had a better leakage control ability over the base model design. It is believed that the results of this study will assist in improving the design of annular hole-pattern seals.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Fluid domain of the hole-pattern seal-base model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Hole-pattern seal parameterization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Extreme condition for D2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Simplified hole-pattern seal axial view

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Extreme position of rows of holes in unfolded view

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Unstructured mesh grid for a sector of the seal

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

CFD model and boundary conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The design flow for gas seal design of experiment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Design matrix generating flow by constrained simple random sampling

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Distribution of sampling points

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Spearman coefficient bar chart

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Response surface: leakage versus D1 versus D2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Response surface: leakage versus NC versus S1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Response surface: leakage versus DE1 versus DE2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Quadratic polynomial fitting results for β versus leakage

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In