Research Papers: Nuclear Power

Dry-Cooled Supercritical CO2 Power for Advanced Nuclear Reactors

[+] Author and Article Information
T. M. Conboy

Advanced Nuclear Concepts,
Sandia National Laboratories,
P.O. Box 5800, MS1136,
Albuquerque, NM 87185
e-mail: tmc@creare.com

M. D. Carlson, G. E. Rochau

Advanced Nuclear Concepts,
Sandia National Laboratories,
P.O. Box 5800, MS1136,
Albuquerque, NM 87185

Contributed by the Nuclear Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 9, 2014; final manuscript received July 12, 2014; published online August 18, 2014. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 137(1), 012901 (Aug 18, 2014) (10 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1355; doi: 10.1115/1.4028080 History: Received July 09, 2014; Revised July 12, 2014

Currently, waste heat rejection from electrical power systems accounts for the largest fraction of water withdrawals from the U.S. fresh water table. Siting of nuclear power plants is limited to areas with access to a large natural supply of fresh or sea water. Due to a rise in energy needs and increased concern over environmental impact, dry air cooling systems are poised to play a large role in the future energy economy. In practice, the implementation of dry air-cooled condensing systems at steam plants has proven to be capital-intensive and requires the power cycle to take a significant efficiency penalty. These shortcomings are fundamental to dry-air steam condensation, which must occur at a fixed temperature. Closed-cycle gas turbines are an alternative to the conventional steam Rankine plant that allows for much improved dry heat rejection compatibility. Recent research into advanced nuclear energy systems has identified the supercritical CO2 (s-CO2) Brayton cycle in particular as a viable candidate for many proposed reactor types. The s-CO2 Brayton cycle can maintain superior thermal efficiency over a wide range of ambient temperatures, making these power systems ideally suited for dry air cooling, even in warm climates. For a sodium fast reactor (SFR) operating at 550 °C, thermal efficiency is calculated to be 43% with a 50 °C compressor inlet temperature. This is achieved by raising CO2 compressor inlet pressure in response to rising ambient temperatures. Preliminary design studies have shown that s-CO2 power cycle hardware will be compact and therefore well-matched to near-term and advanced integral small modular reactor (SMR) designs. These advantages also extend to the cooling plant, where it is estimated that dry cooling towers for an SFR-coupled s-CO2 power cycle will be similar in cost and scale to the evaporative cooling tower for a light-water reactor (LWR). The projected benefits of the s-CO2 power cycle coupled to dry air heat rejection may enable the long-awaited rise of next-generation nuclear energy systems, while redrawing the map for siting of small and large nuclear energy systems.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Acharya, S., Bushart, S., and Shi, J., 2013, “NSF/EPRI Collaboration on `Water for Energy'—Advanced Dry Cooling for Power Plants,” National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, Program Solicitation NSF-13-564.
EPRI, 2008, “Application of Dry Cooling in Nuclear Power Plants,” Advanced Cooling Technologies Project Proposal, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
Cizek, N., 2012, “Emerging Ideas,” APRA-E Workshop on No- and Low-Water Power Plant Cooling, APRA-E, Washington, DC, March 28.
Schoene, T. W., 1974, “The HTGR Gas Turbine Plant With Dry Air Cooling,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 26(1), pp. 170–178. [CrossRef]
Forsberg, C. W., Peterson, P. F., and Zhao, H., 2006, “Sustainability and Economics of the Advanced High-Temperature Reactor,” J. Energy Eng., 132(3), pp. 109–115. [CrossRef]
Dostal, V., 2004, “A Supercritical CO2 Carbon Dioxide Cycle for Next Generation Nuclear Reactors,” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Dostal, V., and Kulhanek, M., 2009, “Research on the Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Cycles in the Czech Republic,” Proceedings of the Supercritical CO2 Power Cycle Symposium, Troy, NY, April 29–30.
Dostal, V., and Dostal, J., 2011, “Supercritical CO2 Regeneration Bypass Cycle: Comparison to Traditional Layouts,” Supercritical CO2 Power Cycle Symposium, Boulder, CO, May 24–25.
Moisseytsev, A., and Sienicki, J., 2009, “Investigation of Alternative Layouts for the Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Brayton Cycle for a Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 239(7), pp. 1362–1371. [CrossRef]
Wright, I. G., Pint, B. A., Shingledecker, J. P., and Thimsen, D., 2013, “Materials Considerations for Supercritical CO2 Turbine Cycles,” ASME Paper No. GT2013-94941. [CrossRef]
Dyreby, J., Klein, S., Nellis, G., and Reindl, D., 2013, “Modeling Off-Design and Part-Load Performance of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Power Cycles,” ASME Paper No. GT2013-95824. [CrossRef]
NEI, 2012, “Water Use and Nuclear Power Plants: Fact Sheet,” Nuclear Energy Institute, Washington, DC, available at: http://www.nei.org/CorporateSite/media/filefolder/Backgrounders/Fact-Sheets/Water-Use-and-Nuclear-Power-Plants-Nov-2013.pdf?ext=.pdf
Reyes, J., 2012, “NuScale Plant Safety in Response to Extreme Events,” Nucl. Technol., 178(2), pp. 153–163.
Babcock and Wilcox Co., 2012, “Generation mPower Snapshot,” The Babcock & Wilcox Co., Charlotte, NC, available at: http://www.generationmpower.com/pdf/sp201100.pdf
Szabo, Z., Gregasz, A., and Mezey, Z., 2011, “Water Conservation Type Cooling Systems for Nuclear Power Plants,” 3rd Annual Meeting of Air-Cooled Condensers Users Group, San Francisco, CA, September 19–21.
Mays, G., Belles, R., Blevins, B., Hadley, S., Harrison, T., Jochem, W., Neish, B., Omitaomu, O., and Rose, A., 2012, “Application of Spatial Data Modeling and Geographical Information Systems (GIS) for Identification of Potential Siting Options for Various Electrical Generation Sources,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, Report No. ORNL/TM-2011/157/R1.
Mendelsohn, M., Lowder, T., and Canavan, B., 2012, “Utility-Scale Concentrating Solar Power and Photovoltaics Projects: A Technology and Market Overview,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Technical Report No. NREL/TP-6A20-51137.
SPX, 2012, “Indirect Natural Draft Dry Cooling,” SPX Corp., Overland Park, KS, Report No. A4 Dry-IDCT-12, available at: http://spxcooling.com/pdf/DRY-IDCT-13.pdf
Kutscher, C., Buys, A., and Gladden, C., 2006, “Hybrid Wet/Dry Cooling for Power Plants,” Parabolic Trough Technology Workshop, Incline Village, NV, February 14–16, Paper No. NREL/PR-550-40026.
Waddill, J., 2008, “North Anna Unit 3 Hybrid Cooling,” EPRI Workshop on Advanced Cooling Technologies, Charlotte, NC, July 8–9.
Feher, E., 1967, “The Supercritical Thermodynamic Power Cycle,” 2nd International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC), Miami Beach, FL, August 13–17, Paper No. 4348.
Angelino, G., 1967, “Perspectives on the Liquid Phase Compression Gas Turbine,” ASME J. Eng. Power, 89(2), pp. 229–237. [CrossRef]
Angelino, G., 1968, “Carbon Dioxide Condensation Cycles for Power Production,” ASME Paper No. 68-GT-23. [CrossRef]
Gokhstein, D., 1969, “Use of Carbon Dioxide as a Heat Carrier and Working Fluid in Atomic Power Stations,” Sov. At. Energy, 26(4), pp. 430–432.
U.S. DOE, Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee and the Generation IV International Forum, 2002, “A Technology Roadmap for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems,” available at: https://www.gen-4.org/gif/upload/docs/application/pdf/2013-09/genivroadmap2002.pdf
Wright, S. A., Radel, R. F., Vernon, M. E., Rochau, G. E., and Pickard, P. S., 2010, “Operation and Analysis of a Supercritical CO2 Brayton Cycle,” Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, Technical Report No. SAND2010-0171, available at: http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/2010/100171.pdf
Conboy, T. M., Wright, S., Pasch, J., Fleming, D., Rochau, G., and Fuller, R., 2012, “Performance Characteristics of an Operating Supercritical CO2 Brayton Cycle,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(11), p. 111703. [CrossRef]
Conboy, T. M., Pasch, J., and Fleming, D., 2013, “Control of a Supercritical CO2 Recompression Brayton Cycle Demonstration Loop,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 135(11), p. 111701. [CrossRef]
Turchi, C., Ma, Z., Neises, T., and Wagner, M., 2013, “Thermodynamic Study of Advanced Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Power Cycles for Concentrating Solar Power Systems,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 135(4), p. 041007. [CrossRef]
Iverson, B. D., Conboy, T. M., Pasch, J. J., and Kruizenga, A. M., 2013, “Supercritical CO2 Brayton Cycles for Solar-Thermal Energy,” Appl. Energy, 111, pp. 957–970. [CrossRef]
Moisseytsev, A., and Sienicki, J., 2008, “Transient Accident Analysis of a Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Brayton Cycle Energy Converter Coupled to an Autonomous Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 238(8), pp. 2094–2105. [CrossRef]
Baccaglini, G., Ball, S., Burchell, T., Corwin, B., Fewell, T., LaBar, M., MacDonald, P., Rittenhouse, P., Shaber, E., Southworth, F., and Vollman, R., 2003, “Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR): Survey of Materials Research and Development Needs to Support Early Deployment,” Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID, Report No. INEEL/EXT-03-00141, available at: http://www.inl.gov/technicalpublications/Documents/2559926.pdf
Hejzlar, P., Todreas, N. E., Shwageraus, E., Nikiforova, A., Petroski, R., and Driscoll, M. J., 2009, “Comparison of Fast Reactor Concepts With Various Coolants,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 239(12), pp. 2672–2691. [CrossRef]
Johnson, G. A., McDowell, M. W., O'Connor, G. M., Sonwane, C. G., and Subbaraman, G., 2012, “Supercritical CO2 Cycle Development at Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-70105. [CrossRef]
Pope, M., “Thermal-Hydraulic Design of a 2400 MWth Supercritical CO2-Cooled Fast Reactor,” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Parma, E. J., Wright, S. A., Vernon, M. E., Rochau, G. E., Suo-Anttila, A. J. Al Rashdan, A, and Tsvetkov, P. V. 2011, “Supercritical CO2 Direct Cycle Gas Fast Reactor (SC-GFR) Concept,” Proceedings of the Supercritical CO2 Power Cycle Symposium, Boulder, CO, May 24–25.
Yoon, H. J., Ahn, Y. H., Lee, J. I., and Addad, Y., 2012, “Potential Advantages of Coupling Supercritical CO2 Brayton Cycle to Water Cooled Small and Medium Size Reactor,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 245, pp. 223–232. [CrossRef]
Perez-Pichel, G. D., Linares, J. I., Herranz, L. E., and Moratilla, B. Y., 2012, “Thermal Analysis of Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles: Assessment of Their Suitability to the Forthcoming Sodium Fast Reactors,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 250, pp. 23–34. [CrossRef]
Eoh, J. H., No, H. C., Lee, Y. B., and Kim, S. O., 2013, “Potential Sodium-CO2 Interaction of a Supercritical CO2 Power Conversion Option Coupled With an SFR: Basic Nature and Design Issues,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 259, pp. 88–101. [CrossRef]
GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy, 2009, “PRISM Technical Brief," GE-Hitachi, Wilmington, NC, available at: http://www.uxc.com/smr/Library%5CDesign%20Specific/PRISM/Other%20Documents/Technical%20Brief.pdf
Nellis, G., and Klein, S. A., 2009, Heat Transfer, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Lennon, S., 2011, “Advances in Dry Cooling Deployed at South African Power Stations,” Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI) 2011 Summer Seminar, San Diego, CA, August 1–2.
Fortescue, P., 1971, “Tomorrow's Plant: Gas Turbines, Nuclear Power, Dry Cooling,” Power Eng., 75(8), pp. 45–47.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Selected results from ORNL study on power plant siting [16]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Coal plant in desert using natural draft dry cooling [18]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison of S-CO2 power cycle to steam Rankine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

S-CO2 power cycle efficiency at 550 °C with increasing compressor inlet conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

CO2 equation of state, with lines of constant density

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Cycle efficiency compared to maximum pressure, for various low-side pressures at 30 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Cycle efficiency compared to maximum pressure, for various low-side pressures at 50 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Comparison of s-CO2 power cycle operating conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Heat transfer profiles of the CO2 (red) and air (blue) streams in a CO2-to-air dry cooler; Tmin = 50 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Heat transfer profiles of the steam (red) and air (blue) streams in a steam-to-air dry cooler; Tmin = 50 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Heat transfer profiles of the steam (red) and air (blue) streams in a steam-to-air dry cooler; Tmin = 55 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison of heat rejection plants for various nuclear systems for a fixed thermal load




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In