0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Real-Time Aero-elasticity Simulation of Open Rotors With Slender Blades for the Multidisciplinary Design of Rotorcraft

[+] Author and Article Information
Ioannis Goulos

Centre for Propulsion,
School of Engineering,
Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire MK430AL, UK
e-mail: i.goulos@cranfield.ac.uk

Vassilios Pachidis

Centre for Propulsion,
School of Engineering,
Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire MK430AL, UK
e-mail: v.pachidis@cranfield.ac.uk

Contributed by the Structures and Dynamics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 1, 2014; final manuscript received July 2, 2014; published online August 26, 2014. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 137(1), 012503 (Aug 26, 2014) (12 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1319; doi: 10.1115/1.4028180 History: Received July 01, 2014; Revised July 02, 2014

This paper elaborates on the theoretical development of a mathematical approach, targeting the real-time simulation of aero-elasticity for open rotors with slender blades, as employed in the majority of rotorcraft. A Lagrangian approach is formulated for the rapid estimation of natural vibration characteristics of rotor blades with nonuniform structural properties. Modal characteristics obtained from classical vibration analysis methods are utilized as assumed deformation functions. Closed form integral expressions are incorporated, describing the generalized centrifugal forces and moments acting on the blade. The treatment of three-dimensional elastic blade kinematics in the time-domain is thoroughly discussed. In order to ensure robustness and establish applicability in real time, a novel, second-order accurate, finite-difference scheme is utilized for the temporal discretization of elastic blade motion. The developed mathematical approach is coupled with a finite-state induced flow model, an unsteady blade element aerodynamics model, and a dynamic wake distortion model. The combined formulation is implemented in an existing helicopter flight mechanics code. The aero-elastic behavior of a full-scale hingeless helicopter rotor has been investigated. Results are presented in terms of rotor blade resonant frequencies, rotor trim performance, oscillatory structural blade loads, and transient rotor response to control inputs. Extensive comparisons are carried out with wind tunnel (WT) and flight test (FT) measurements found in the open literature as well as with nonreal-time comprehensive analysis methods. It is shown that the proposed approach exhibits good agreement with measured data regarding trim performance and transient rotor response characteristics. Accurate estimation of structural blade loads is demonstrated, in terms of both amplitude and phase, up to the third harmonic component of oscillatory loading. It is shown that the developed model can be utilized for real-time simulation on a modern personal computer. The proposed methodology essentially constitutes an enabling technology for the multidisciplinary design of rotorcraft, when a compromise between simulation fidelity and computational efficiency has to be sought for in the process of model development.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Goulos, I., Pachidis, V., D'Ippolito, R., Stevens, J., and Smith, C., 2012, “An Integrated Approach for the Multidisciplinary Design of Optimum Rotorcraft Operations,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(9), p. 091701. [CrossRef]
Goulos, I., Giannakakis, P., Pachidis, V., and Pilidis, P., 2013, “Mission Performance Simulation of Integrated Helicopter-Engine Systems Using an Aeroelastic Rotor Model,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 135(9), p. 091201. [CrossRef]
CleanSky, 2012, “Clean Sky: Innovation Takes Off,” Clean Sky JTI (Joint Technology Initiative), Brussels, Belgium, http://www.cleansky.eu
Goulos, I., 2012, “Simulation Framework Development for the Multidisciplinary Optimization of Rotorcraft,” Ph.D. thesis, School of Engineering, Cranfield University, Bedfordshire, UK.
Goulos, I., Hempert, F., Sethi, V., Pachidis, V., d'Ippolito, R., and d'Auria, M., 2013, “Rotorcraft Engine Cycle Optimization at Mission Level,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 135(9), p. 091202. [CrossRef]
Johnson, W., 2013, Rotorcraft Aeromechanics, 1st ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Johnson, W., 2011, “Milestones in Rotorcraft Aeromechanics,” NASA Ames Research Center, Mountain View, CA, Report No. TP-2011-215971.
Yeo, H., and Johnson, W., 2008, “Prediction of Rotor Structural Loads With Comprehensive Analysis,” J. Am. Helicopter Soc., 53(2), pp. 193–209. [CrossRef]
Piziali, R. A., and DuWaldt, F. A., 1962, “A Method for Computing Rotary Wing Airload Distribution in Forward Flight,” Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, Ithica, NY, TCREC Technical Report No. 62-44.
Piziali, R., and DuWaldt, F., 1963, “Computed Induced Velocity, Induced Drag, and Angle of Attack Distributions for a Two-Bladed Rotor,” 19th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Washington, DC, May 1–3.
Piziali, R., Daughaday, H., and DuWaldt, F., 1963, “Rotor Airloads,” CAL/TRECOM Symposium on Dynamic Load Problems Associated With Helicopters and V/STOL Aircraft, Buffalo, NY, June 26–28.
Piziali, R., 1966, “A Method for Predicting the Aerodynamic Loads and Dynamic Response of Rotor Blades,” U.S. Army Aviation Materiel Laboratories, Fort Eustis, VA, USAAVLABS Technical Report No. 65-74.
Piziali, R., 1966, “Method for the Solution of the Aeroelastic Response Problem for Rotating Wings,” J. Sound Vib., 4(3), pp. 445–489. [CrossRef]
Yeo, H., and Johnson, W., 2005, “Assessment of Comprehensive Analysis Calculation of Airloads on Helicopter Rotors,” J. Aircraft, 42(5), pp. 1218–1228. [CrossRef]
Yeo, H., and Johnson, W., 2005, “Comparison of Rotor Structural Loads Calculated Using Comprehensive Analysis,” 31st European Rotorcraft Forum, Florence, Italy, September 13-15.
Johnson, W., 1994, “Technology Drivers in the Development of CAMRAD II,” American Helicopter Society Aeromechanics Specialist Conference, San Fransisco, CA, January 19–21.
Johnson, W., 1998, “Rotorcraft Aerodynamics Models for a Comprehensive Analysis,” 54th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Washington, DC, May 20–22.
Johnson, W., 1995, “General Free Wake Geometry Calculation for Wings and Rotors,” 51st Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Fort Worth, TX, May 9–11.
Johnson, W., 1998, “Rotorcraft Dynamics Models for a Comprehensive Analysis,” 54th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Washington, DC, May 20–22.
Bir, G., Chopra, I., and Nguyen, K., 1990, “Development of UMARC (University of Maryland Advanced Rotorcraft Code),” 46th Annual National Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Washington, DC, May 21–23.
Johnson, W., 1988, “CAMRAD/JA, A Comprehensive Analytical Model of Rotorcraft Aerodynamics and Dynamics, Vol. I: Theory Manual,” Johnson Aeronautics, Palo Alto, CA.
Johnson, W., 1988, “A Comprehensive Analytical Model of Rotorcraft Aerodynamics and Dynamics, Vol. II: User Manual,” Johnson Aeronautics, Palo Alto, CA.
Bhagwat, M. J., and Leishman, J. G., 2001, “Stability, Consistency and Convergence of Time-Marching Free-Vortex Rotor Wake Algorithms,” J. Am. Helicopter Soc., 46(1), pp. 59–71. [CrossRef]
Bisplinghoff, R. L., Ashley, H., and Halfman, R. L., 1996, Aeroelasticity, Dover Publications, Mineola, NY.
Bramwell, A. R. S., Done, G., and Balmford, D., 2001, Bramwell's Helicopter Dynamics, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK.
Padfield, G. D., 2007, Helicopter Flight Dynamics, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.
Peters, D. A., Boyd, D. D., and He, C. J., 1989, “Finite-State Induced-Flow Model for Rotors in Hover and Forward Flight,” J. Am. Helicopter Soc., 34(4), pp. 5–17. [CrossRef]
Peters, D. A., and He, C. J., 1991, “Correlation of Measured Induced Velocities With a Finite-State Wake Model,” J. Am. Helicopter Soc., 36(3), pp. 59–70. [CrossRef]
Leishman, J. G., and Beddoes, T. S., 1989, “A Semi-Empirical Model for Dynamic Stall,” J. Am. Helicopter Soc., 34(3), pp. 3–17. [CrossRef]
Zhao, J., Prasad, J. V. R., and Peters, D. A., 2004, “Rotor Dynamic Wake Distortion Model for Helicopter Maneuvering Flight,” J. Am. Helicopter Soc., 49(4), pp. 414–424. [CrossRef]
Peters, D. A., and HaQuang, N., 1988, “Dynamic Inflow for Practical Applications,” J. Am. Helicopter Soc., 33(4), pp. 64–68. [CrossRef]
Staley, J. A., 1976, “Validation of Rotorcraft Flight Simulation Program Through Correlation With Flight Data for Soft-in-Plane Hingeless Rotor,” U.S. Army Air Mobility Research and Development Lab, Fort Eustis, VA, USAAMRDL Technical Report No. 75-50.
Padfield, G. D., Basset, P. M., Dequin, A. M., von Grunhagen, W., Haddon, D., Haverdings, H., Kampa, K., and McCallum, A. T., 1996, “Predicting Rotorcraft Flying Qualities Through Simulation Modelling. A Review of Key Results From Garteur AG06,” 22nd European Rotorcraft Forum, Brighton, UK, September 17–19.
AGARD, 1991, “Rotorcraft System Identification,” Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development, Neuilly sur Seine, France, AGARD Lecture Series No. 178.
Peterson, R. L., Maier, T., Langer, H. J., and Tränapp, N., 1994, “Correlation of Wind Tunnel and Flight Test Results of a Full-Scale Hingeless Rotor,” American Helicopter Society Aeromechanics Specialist Conference, San Fransisco, CA, January 19–21.
Theodore, C., 2000, “Helicopter Flight Dynamics Simulation With Refined Aerodynamic Modeling,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Krothapalli, K. R., Prasad, J. V. R., and Peters, D. A., 2001, “Helicopter Rotor Dynamic Inflow Modeling for Maneuvering Flight,” J. Am. Helicopter Soc., 46(2), pp. 129–139. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Reference systems used for the description of elastic blade kinematics: (a) global nonrotating reference system O and (b) rotating and blade element reference frames (Ai and b, respectively)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Resonance chart calculated for the rotor blades of the Bo 105 helicopter—comparison with Boeing–Vertol Y-71 calculations [32]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Normalized mode shapes for the hingeless rotor blades of the Bo 105 helicopter: (a) flap modes, (b) lag modes, and (c) torsion modes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Trim performance predictions for the Bo 105 helicopter—comparison with FT data [33] and free-wake/FEA simulation [36]: (a) rotor power required, (b) collective pitch angle θ0, (c) longitudinal cyclic pitch angle θ1s, and (d) lateral cyclic pitch angle θ1c

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Oscillatory structural blade loads for μ = 0.306/0.313— comparison with FTs, WT experiments, and CAMRAD/JA simulations from Ref. [35]: (a) flap bending moment for r/R = 0.144, (b) chord bending moment for r/R = 0.144, and (c) torsional moment for r/R = 0.40

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Oscillatory structural blade loads for μ = 0.306/0.313—comparison with FTs, WT experiments and CAMRAD/JA simulations from Ref. [35]: (a) flap bending moment for r/R = 0.57, (b) chord bending moment for r/R = 0.45 (FT) – r/R = 0.57 (WT), and (c) torsional moment for r/R = 0.57

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Transient rotor response to control perturbations from trim, δθ0=δθ1c=δθ1s=1 deg,θ·=45 deg/s,μ=0.189—comparison with equivalent time-delays identified in Ref. [34]: (a) thrust coefficient Ct, (b) longitudinal flapping angle β1c, and (c) lateral flapping angle β1s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Effect of number of flow-states and F/L/T mode shapes on the computational time ratio for a personal computer with a 2.3 GHz CPU and 4 GB of RAM

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In