0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Industrial & Cogeneration

Robust Optimal Operation of a Gas Turbine Cogeneration Plant Under Uncertain Energy Demands

[+] Author and Article Information
Ryohei Yokoyama

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Osaka Prefecture University,
1-1 Gakuen-cho, Naka-ku,
Sakai, Osaka 599-8531, Japan
e-mail: yokoyama@me.osakafu-u.ac.jp

Masashi Ohkura

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Osaka Prefecture University,
1-1 Gakuen-cho, Naka-ku,
Sakai, Osaka 599-8531, Japan
e-mail: ohkura@me.osakafu-u.ac.jp

Tetsuya Wakui

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Osaka Prefecture University,
1-1 Gakuen-cho, Naka-ku,
Sakai, Osaka 599-8531, Japan
e-mail: wakui@me.osakafu-u.ac.jp

Contributed by the Industrial and Cogeneration Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 12, 2014; final manuscript received July 13, 2014; published online September 4, 2014. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 137(2), 022001 (Sep 04, 2014) (11 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1380; doi: 10.1115/1.4028211 History: Received July 12, 2014; Revised July 13, 2014

Some optimal operation methods based on the mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) have been proposed to operate energy supply plants properly from the viewpoints of economics, energy saving, and CO2 emission reduction. However, most of the methods are effective only under certain energy demands. In operating an energy supply plant actually, it is necessary to determine the operational strategy properly based on predicted energy demands. In this case, realized energy demands may differ from the predicted ones. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the operational strategy so that it is robust against the uncertainty in energy demands. In this paper, an optimization method based on the MILP is proposed to conduct the robust optimal operation of energy supply plants under uncertain energy demands. The uncertainty in energy demands is expressed by their intervals. The operational strategy is determined to minimize the maximum regret in the operational cost under the uncertainty. In addition, a hierarchical relationship among operation modes and on/off states of equipment, energy demands, and energy flow rates of equipment is taken into account. First, a general formulation of a robust optimal operation problem is presented, which is followed by a general solution procedure. Then, in a numerical study, the proposed method is applied to a gas turbine cogeneration plant for district energy supply. Through the study, some features of the robust optimal operation are clarified, and the validity and effectiveness of the proposed method are ascertained.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Ito, K., Yokoyama, R., Akagi, S., and Matsumoto, Y., 1990, “Influence of Fuel Cost on the Operation of a Gas Turbine-Waste Heat Boiler Cogeneration Plant,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 112(1), pp. 122–128. [CrossRef]
Iyer, R. R., and Grossmann, I. E., 1997, “Optimal Multiperiod Operational Planning for Utility Systems,” Comput. Chem. Eng., 21(8), pp. 787–800. [CrossRef]
Yokoyama, R., and Ito, K., 1999, “Optimal Operation of a Cogeneration Plant in Consideration of Equipment Startup/Shutdown Cost,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 121(4), pp. 254–261. [CrossRef]
Sheblé, G. B., and Fahd, G. N., 1994, “Unit Commitment Literature Synopsis,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 9(1), pp. 128–135. [CrossRef]
Van den Bosch, P. P. J., and Honderd, G., 1985, “A Solution of the Unit Commitment Problem Via Decomposition and Dynamic Programming,” IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus Syst., 104(7), pp. 1684–1690. [CrossRef]
Dotzauer, E., 1997, “Algorithms for Short-Term Production-Planning of Cogeneration Plants,” Ph.D. thesis, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Yokoyama, R., 2013, “Optimal Operation of a Gas Turbine Cogeneration Plant in Consideration of Equipment Minimum Up and Down Times,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 135(7), pp. 1–8. [CrossRef]
Verderame, P. M., Elia, J. A., Li, J., and Floudas, C. A., 2010, “Planning and Scheduling Under Uncertainty: A Review Across Multiple Sectors,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49(9), pp. 3993–4017. [CrossRef]
Zeng, Y., Cai, Y. P., Huang, G. H., and Dai, J., 2011, “A Review on Optimization Modeling of Energy Systems Planning and GHG Emission Mitigation Under Uncertainty,” Energies, 4(10), pp. 1624–1656. [CrossRef]
Yokoyama, R., and Ito, K., 1999, “Robust Optimal Design of a Gas Turbine Cogeneration Plant Based on Minimax Regret Criterion,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-128.
Yokoyama, R., and Ito, K., 2001, “Multiobjective Robust Optimal Design of a Gas Turbine Cogeneration Plant Under Uncertain Energy Demands,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0208. [CrossRef]
Yokoyama, R., and Ito, K., 2002, “Optimal Design of Energy Supply Systems Based on Relative Robustness Criterion,” Energy Convers. Manage., 43(4), pp. 499–514. [CrossRef]
Yokoyama, R., Ito, K., and Murata, T., 2004, “Robust Optimal Design in Multistage Expansion of a Gas Turbine Cogeneration Plant Under Uncertain Energy Demands,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 126(4), pp. 823–830. [CrossRef]
Yokoyama, R., Fujiwara, K., Ohkura, M., and Wakui, T., 2014, “A Revised Method for Robust Optimal Design of Energy Supply Systems Based on Minimax Regret Criterion,” Energy Convers. Manage., 84, pp. 196–208. [CrossRef]
Parkinson, A., Sorensen, C., and Pourhassan, N., 1993, “A General Approach for Robust Optimal Design,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 115(1), pp. 74–80. [CrossRef]
Kouvelis, P., and Yu, G., 1997, Robust Discrete Optimization and Its Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
Biegler, L. T., Grossmann, I. E., and Westerberg, A. W., 1997, Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Candler, W., and Townsley, R., 1982, “A Linear Two-Level Programming Problem,” Comput. Oper. Res., 9(1), pp. 59–76. [CrossRef]
Konno, H., 1976, “A Cutting Plane Algorithm for Solving Bilinear Programs,” Math. Program., 11(1), pp. 14–27. [CrossRef]
Yokoyama, R., Hasegawa, Y., and Ito, K., 2002, “A MILP Decomposition Approach to Large Scale Optimization in Structural Design of Energy Supply Systems,” Energy Convers. Manage., 43(6), pp. 771–790. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Basic concept of robust optimal operation based on minimax regret criterion

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Hierarchical relationship among binary operation variables, energy demands, and continuous operation variables

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Configuration of gas turbine cogeneration plant for district energy supply

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Average energy demands

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Convergence characteristics of solution method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Relationship between uncertainty in energy demands and maximum regret in daily operational cost: (a) robust optimal operation and nonoptimal operation A and (b) robust optimal operation and nonoptimal operation B

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

On/off states of main equipment by robust optimal operation: (a) α = 0.05, (b) α = 0.1, and (c) α = 0.15

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Energy demands which give maximum regret in daily operational cost (α = 0.1): (a) largest energy demands and (b) smallest energy demands

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Allocations of energy supplies by robust optimal operation (α = 0.1, smallest energy demands): (a) electricity supply, (b) steam supply, and (c) cold water supply

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

On/off states of main equipment by optimal operation (α = 0.1)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Allocations of energy supplies by optimal operation (α = 0.1, smallest energy demands): (a) electricity supply, (b) steam supply, and (c) cold water supply

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In