0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Numerical Investigations on the Leakage and Rotordynamic Characteristics of Pocket Damper Seals—Part I: Effects of Pressure Ratio, Rotational Speed, and Inlet Preswirl

[+] Author and Article Information
Zhigang Li, Zhenping Feng

Institute of Turbomachinery,
School of Energy & Power Engineering,
Xi'an Jiaotong University,
Xi'an 710049, China

Jun Li

Institute of Turbomachinery,
School of Energy & Power Engineering,
Xi'an Jiaotong University,
Xi'an 710049, China
Collaborative Innovation Center of
Advanced Aero-Engine,
Beijing 100191, China
e-mail: junli@mail.xjtu.edu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Structures and Dynamics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 11, 2014; final manuscript received July 17, 2014; published online September 30, 2014. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 137(3), 032503 (Sep 30, 2014) (15 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1373; doi: 10.1115/1.4028373 History: Received July 11, 2014; Revised July 17, 2014

Effects of pressure ratio, rotational speed and inlet preswirl on the leakage and rotordynamic characteristics of a eight-bladed fully partitioned pocket damper seal (FPDS) were numerically investigated using proposed three-dimensional (3D) transient computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods based on the multifrequency elliptical whirling orbit model. The accuracy and availability of the multifrequency elliptical whirling orbit model and the transient CFD numerical methods were demonstrated with the experimental data of frequency-dependent rotordynamic coefficients of the FPDS at two rotational speeds with high preswirl conditions. The frequency-dependent rotordynamic coefficients of the FPDS at three pressure ratios (three inlet pressures and three outlet pressures), three rotational speeds, three inlet preswirls were computed. The numerical results show that changes in outlet pressure have only weak effects on most rotordynamic coefficients. The direct damping and effective damping slightly increase in magnitude with decreasing outlet pressure at the frequency range of 20–200 Hz. The effect of inlet pressure is most prominent, and increasing inlet pressure for the FPDS results in a significant increase in the magnitudes of all rotordynamic coefficients. The magnitudes of the seal response force and effective damping are proportional to pressure drop through the seal. Increasing rotational speed and increasing inlet preswirl velocity both result in a significant decrease in the effective damping term due to the obvious increase in the magnitude of the destabilizing cross-coupling stiffness with increasing rotational speed or increasing preswirl velocity. The crossover frequency of effective damping significantly increases and the peak magnitude of effective damping decreases with increasing rotational speed or increasing preswirl velocity. The destabilizing cross-coupling stiffness is mainly caused by the circumferential swirl velocity generating from high rotational speed and inlet preswirl. Reducing swirl velocity (such as swirl brake) can greatly enhance the stabilizing capacity of the FPDS.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Lakshminarayana, B., 1996, Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer of Turbomachinery, Wiley, New York, pp. 339–347.
Muszynska, A., 2005, Rotordynamics, CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 214–222.
Childs, D. W., and Vance, J. M., 1997, “Annular Seals and the Rotordynamics of Compressors and Turbines,” 26th Turbomachinery Symposium, Houston, TX, Sept. 14–18, pp. 201–220.
Vance, J. M., 2010, Machinery Vibration and Rotordynamics, Wiley, New York, pp. 271–278.
Chupp, R. E., Hendricks, R. C., Lattime, S. B., and Steinetz, B. M., 2006, “Sealing in Turbomachinery,” J. Propul. Power, 22(2), pp. 313–349. [CrossRef]
Zeidan, F., Perez, R., and Stephenson, E., 1993, “The Use of Honeycomb Seals in Stabilizing Two Centrifugal Compressors,” 22nd Turbomachinery Symposium, Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, Sept. 14–16, pp. 3–15.
Armstrong, J., and Perricone, F., 1996, “Turbine Instabilities Solution Honeycomb Seals,” 25th Turbomachinery Symposium, Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, Sept. 17–19, pp. 47–56.
Vance, J., and Schultz, R., 1993, “A New Damper Seal for Turbomachinery,” 14th Biennial ASME Conference on Vibration and Noise, Albuquerque, NM, Sept. 19–22, pp. 139–148.
Li, Z., Li, J., Feng, Z., Yang, J., Yang, R., and Shi, L., 2011, “Numerical Investigations on the Leakage Flow Characteristics of Pocket Damper Seals,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-45114. [CrossRef]
Li, Z., Li, J., Yan, X., and Feng, Z., 2012, “Numerical Investigations on the Leakage Flow Characteristics of Pocket Damper Labyrinth Seals,” Proc. IMechE Part A: J. Power Energy, 226(7), pp. 932–948. [CrossRef]
Li, J., and Vance, J. M., 1995, “Effects of Clearance and Clearance Ratio on Two and Three Bladed Tamseals,” Turbomachinery Laboratory Research Progress Report, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, Report No. TRC-Seal-4-95.
Richards, R. L., Vance, J. M., and Zeidan, F. Y., 1995, “Using a Damper Seal to Eliminate Subsynchronous Vibrations in Three Back-to-Back Compressors,” 24th Turbomachinery Symposium, Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, Sept. 26–28, pp. 370–376.
Vance, J. M., and Li, J., 1996, “Test Results of a New Damper Seal for Vibration Reduction in Turbomachinery,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 118(4), pp. 843–846. [CrossRef]
Ransom, D. L., 1997, “Identification of Dynamic Force Coefficients of a Labyrinth and Gas Damper Seal Using Impact Load Excitations,” Ph.D. dissertationthesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Laos, H. E., 1999, “Rotordynamic Effect of Pocket Damper Seals,” Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Li, J., Aguilar, R., San Andrés, L, and Vance, J. M., 2000, “Dynamic Force Coefficients of a Multiple Blade, Multiple-Pocket Gas Damper Seal: Test Results and Predictions,” ASME J. Tribol., 122(1), pp. 317–322. [CrossRef]
Gamal, A. M., 2003, “Analytical and Experimental Evaluation of the Leakage and Stiffness Characteristics of High Pressure Pocket Damper Seals,” M.S. thesis, Mechanical Engineering Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Ertas, B. H., 2005, “Rotordynamic Force Coefficients of Pocket Damper Seals,” Ph.D. dissertation, Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Ertas, B. H., and Vance, J. M., 2007, “The Influence of Same-Sign Cross-Coupled Stiffness on Rotordynamics,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 129(1), pp. 24–31. [CrossRef]
Ertas, B. H., Delgado, A., and Vannini, G., 2012 “Rotordynamic Force Coefficients for Three Types of Annular Gas Seals With Inlet Preswirl and High Differentail Pressure Ratio,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(4), p. 042503. [CrossRef]
Ertas, B. H., Gamal, A. M., and Vance, J. M., 2006, “Rotordynamic Force Coefficients of Pocket Damper Seals,” ASME J. Turbomach., 128(4), pp. 725–737. [CrossRef]
Ertas, B. H., and Vance, J. M., 2007, “Rotordynamic Force Coefficients for a New Pocket Damper Seals,” ASME J. Tribol., 129(2), pp. 365–374. [CrossRef]
Gamal, A. M., 2007, “Leakage and Rotordynamic Effects of Pocket Damper Seals and See-Through Labyrinth Seals,” Ph.D. dissertation, Mechanical Engineering Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Armendariz, R. A., 2002, “Rotordynamic Analysis of a Pocket Damper Seal Using Circular Orbits of Large Amplitude,” Ph.D. dissertation, Mechanical Engineering Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Li, J., San Andrés, L., and Vance, J. M., 1999, “A Bulk-Flow Analysis of Multiple-Pocket Gas Damper Seals,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turibines Power, 121(2), pp. 355–362. [CrossRef]
Li, J., Li, Z., and Feng, Z., 2012,“Investigations on the Rotordynamic Coefficients of Pocket Damper Seals Using the Multi-Frequency, One-Dimensional, Whirling Orbit Model and RANS Solutions,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(10), p. 102510. [CrossRef]
Li, Z., Li, J., and Yan, X., 2013, “Multiple Frequencies Elliptical Whirling Orbit Model and Transient RANS Solution Approach to Rotordynamic Coefficients of Annual Gas Seals Prediction,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 135(3), p. 031005. [CrossRef]
AEA Technology GmbH, 2004, CFX-TASCflow User Documentation, AEA Technology, Software Ltd., Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Childs, D. W., 1993, Turbomachinery Rotordynamics: Phenomena, Modeling and Analysis, Wiley, New York, p. 292.
Muszynska, A., and Bently, D. E., 1989, “Anti-Swirl Arrangements Prevent Rotor/Seal Instability,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust. Stress Reliab. Des., 111(2), pp. 156–162. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Geometry of experimental FPDS [20]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Computational model and mesh of the FPDS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Elliptical orbit whirling model for the rotor vibration with a single frequency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Multiple frequencies elliptical whirling orbit of the rotor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Dynamic monitoring data: (a) rotor motion and (b) response force (x excitation)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Rotordynamic coefficients versus vibration frequency with inlet preswirl velocity (u0 = 60 m/s): (a) direct stiffness, (b) direct damping, (c) cross-coupling stiffness, and (d) effective damping

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Seal leakage flow rate versus pressure ratio: (a) with decreasing outlet pressure and (b) with increasing inlet pressure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Rotordynamic coefficients versus vibration frequency at different pressure ratios (decreasing outlet pressure): (a) direct stiffness, (b) direct damping, (c) cross-coupling stiffness, and (d) effective damping

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Rotordynamic coefficients versus vibration frequency at different pressure ratios (increasing inlet pressure): (a) direct stiffness, (b) direct damping, (c) cross-coupling stiffness, and (d) effective damping

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Seal leakage flow rate versus rotational speed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Rotordynamic coefficients versus vibration frequency at different rotational speeds without inlet preswirl: (a) direct stiffness, (b) direct damping, (c) cross-coupling stiffness, and (d) effective damping

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Rotordynamic coefficients versus vibration frequency at different rotational speeds with inlet preswirl: (a) direct stiffness, (b) direct damping, (c) cross-coupling stiffness, and (d) effective damping

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Static pressure contours on the cross section through the middle of cavity 3 and phasor diagram of the response force at different rotational speeds (u0 = 0 m/s x excitation, T=0.1 s): (a) 0 rpm, (b) 7000 rpm, and (c) 15,000 rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Seal leakage flow rate versus inlet preswirl velocity

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Rotordynamic coefficients versus vibration frequency at different preswirl velocities (0 rpm): (a) direct stiffness, (b) direct damping, (c) cross-coupling stiffness, and (d) effective damping

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Rotordynamic coefficients versus vibration frequency at different preswirl velocities (7000 rpm): (a) direct stiffness, (b) direct damping, (c) cross-coupling stiffness, and (d) effective damping

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Rotordynamic coefficients versus vibration frequency at different preswirl velocities (15,000 rpm): (a) direct stiffness, (b) direct damping, (c) cross-coupling stiffness, and (d) effective damping

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Static pressure contours on the cross section through the middle of cavity 3 and phasor diagram of the response force at different inlet preswirl velocities (n = 7000 rpm, x excitation, T = 0.1 s): (a) u0 = 0 m/s, (b) u0 = 30 m/s, and (c) u0 = 60 m/s

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In