Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Turbomachinery

The Semiclosed Recuperated Cycle With Intercooled Compressors

[+] Author and Article Information
Hans E. Wettstein

Swiss Federal Institute of Technology,
Fislisbach 5442, Switzerland
e-mail: hans.e.wettstein@bluewin.ch

Contributed by the Turbomachinery Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 10, 2014; final manuscript received July 20, 2014; published online September 30, 2014. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 137(3), 032601 (Sep 30, 2014) (11 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1362; doi: 10.1115/1.4028383 History: Received July 10, 2014; Revised July 20, 2014

The gas turbine combined cycle (GTCC) is the best currently available choice, if gaps in the renewable electric power supply need being filled with power from fossil fuels. The GTCC manufacturers are in a fierce competition responding to these needs, especially for the best part load efficiency, the fastest load ramp capability and for the lowest low load power parking at an acceptable NOx and CO emission level. But there is an option outperforming the GTCC technology for the above mentioned requirements, which is theoretically known since years but it has not yet been practically developed. It is the semiclosed recuperated cycle (SCRC). Wettstein (2013) has described this recently in “The Air Breathing Semiclosed Recuperated Cycle and Its Super Chargeable Predecessors,” Gas Turbine World 2013, March/April Issue, Vol. 42, No. 2). The SCRC does not require any component technology, which is not yet proven in operating large commercial GTCC or GT plants. But of course the cycle integration is a different one, requiring a specific design of the components. An inherent side feature of the SCRC is the exhaust gas composition, which corresponds to a near-stoichiometric combustion gas. This allows comparing the SCRC with a (CO2−) capture ready GTCC having exhaust gas recirculation. The above mentioned article, the thermodynamic performance analysis of a SCRC with an adiabatic compressor is described. But the cycle becomes even more attractive with an intercooling stage in each of the two compressors. Here, this is quantified with another detailed thermodynamic analysis. Additionally, also an ideal case with isothermal compression is analyzed. The latter is of course unrealistic for a practical realization. But it indicates the potential of using more than one intercooling stage per compressor. The aim of this paper is to quantitatively compare the three variants with adiabatic, intercooled and isothermal compressors. In all three cases the same turbine and recuperator temperature limitations are used while some other cycle data assumptions are adapted to the compressor technology in order to achieve an optimal performance level for each variant. The thermodynamic results have been cross-checked with a breakdown of the exergy losses in the three variants. The final results for base load operation indicate that the intercooled variant could become the best choice.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Wettstein, H. E., 2013, “Recuperated Semi-Closed Cycle Capable of 55–60% Efficiency,” Gas Turbine World, 43(2), pp. 36–44.
Wettstein, H., Wirsum, M., and Schulz, S., 2008, “Gas Turbine System With Exhaust Recycling and Method for Operating of Such System,” Patent Nos. WO2010/049277 A1 and CH01700/08.
Wettstein, H., 2013, “Isothermal or Intercooled Compression,” Turbomachinery International, November/December, pp. 28–29.
Woodbridge, D. E., 1907, “The Hydraulic Compressed-Air Power Plant at the Victoria Mine,” Eng. Min. J., LXXXIII, pp. 125–130.
Turbomachinery Int., 2014, Turbomachinery International Handbook, Business Journals Inc., Norwalk, CT.
De Biasi, V., 2014, Gas Turbine World Handbook, Pequot Publishing Inc., Fairfield, CT.
Wettstein, H. E., 2012, “The Potential of GT Combined Cycles for Ultra High Efficiency,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-68586. [CrossRef]
Rant, Z., 1956, “Exergie, ein Neues Wort für Technische Arbeitsfähigkeit,” Forsch. Geb. Ingenieurwes., 22, pp. 36–37.
El-Masri, M. A., 1985, “On Thermodynamics of Gas-Turbine Cycles: Part 1—Second Law Analysis of Combined Cycles,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 107(4), pp. 880–889. [CrossRef]
Can Gülen, S., and John, J., 2011, “Combined Cycle Off-Design Performance Estimation: A Second-Law Perspective,” ASME Paper GT2011-45940. [CrossRef]
Can Gülen, S., and Driscoll, A. V., 2012, “Simple Parametric Model for Quick Assessment of IGCC Performance,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-68301. [CrossRef]
Grönstedt, T., Irannezhad, M., Lei, X., Thulin, O., and Lundbladh, A., 2013, “First and Second Law Analysis of Future Aircraft Engines,” ASME Paper GT2013-95516. [CrossRef]
CIRCE, 2014, “Easy Exergy Calculator,” Centre of Research for Energy Resources and Consumption, Zaragoza, Spain, http://www.exergoecology.com/excalc
Rolls-Royce, 2014, “Trent 1000,” Rolls-Royce plc, London, http://www.rolls-royce.com/civil/products/largeaircraft/trent_1000/
Kretzschmar, H. J., Stoecker, I., and Jaehne, I., 2011, “FluidMAT for Mathcad—Property Libraries for Calculating Thermodynamic and Transport Properties of Steam, Gas Mixtures, Combustion Gases, and Humid Air,” Department of Technical Thermodynamics, Zittau/Goerlitz University of Applied Sciences, Zittau, Germany.
VDI Richtlinien, 2003, “Thermodynamic Properties of Humid Air and Combustion Gases,” Association of German Engineers (VDI), Düsseldorf, Germany, Standard No. VDI 4670.
Traupel, W., 1977, Thermische Turbomaschinen, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Baehr, H. D., 1996, Thermodynamik, Eine Einführung in die Grundlagen und Ihre Technische Anwendungen, 9th ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Wettstein, H., 2007 “Lecture on Gas Turbine Cycle Analysis Aimed at Application to Catalog Data From Commercially Available Machines,” ASME Paper GT2007-27372. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Variant 2, arrangement in a common pressure vessel, with thermodynamic data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The SCRC scheme. From Ref. [1].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

SCRC process scheme with isothermal compressors

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Recuperator heat exchange for the intercooled variant

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

BREAKDOWN of the fuel lhv use in the GTCC technology. Each column represents a built or operated or commercially offered or predicted GTCC plant [7]. “Phantom 1800 °C” was predicted by the author at 20 October 2010.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Temperature-specific entropy diagram of the intercooled variant SCRC



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In