Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Turbomachinery

Impact of Piping Impedance and Acoustic Characteristics on Centrifugal Compressor Surge and Operating Range

[+] Author and Article Information
Klaus Brun

Southwest Research Institute,
Machinery Program,
6220 Culebra Road,
San Antonio, TX 78238
e-mail: klaus.brun@swri.org

Marybeth G. Nored

Apache, Inc.,
Gas Monetization Department,
2000 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 100,
Houston, TX 77056
e-mail: marybeth.nored@apachecorp.com

Rainer Kurz

Solar Turbines, Inc.,
Systems Analysis,
9330 Skypark Court,
San Diego, CA 92123
e-mail: kurx_rainer_x@solarturbines.com

Contributed by the Turbomachinery Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 14, 2014; final manuscript received August 5, 2014; published online October 7, 2014. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 137(3), 032603 (Oct 07, 2014) (9 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1393; doi: 10.1115/1.4028464 History: Received July 14, 2014; Revised August 05, 2014

The performance of a centrifugal compressor is usually defined by its head versus flow map, limited by the surge and stall regions. This map is critical to assess the operating range of a compressor for both steady state and transient system scenarios. However, the compressor map does not provide a complete picture on how the compressor will respond to rapid transient inputs and how its surge behavior is affected by these events. Specifically, the response of the compressor to rapid transient events such as single or multiple (periodic) pressure pulses, is also a function of the compressor's upstream and downstream piping system's acoustic response and impedance characteristics. This unique response phenomenon was first described in the 1970 s and came to be known as the “compressor dynamic response (CDR) theory.” CDR theory explains how pulsations are amplified or reduced by a compression system's acoustic response characteristic superimposed on the compressor head-flow map. Although the CDR theory explained the impact of the nearby piping system on the compressor surge and pulsation amplification, it provided only limited usefulness as a quantitative analysis tool, mainly due to the lack of computational numerical tools available at the time. To fully analyze pulsating flows in complex centrifugal compressor suction and discharge header piping systems, the principles of the CDR theory should be implemented in a dynamic flow model to quantify the magnitude of the amplifications of pressure pulses near the surge region. When designing centrifugal compressor stations within a transmission piping system, it is critically important to have a full understanding of the impact of the station's piping system on compressor dynamic behavior. For example, if a compressor system's piping impedance amplifies the suction side pulsations, the compressor's operating range will be severely limited and will produce unacceptable discharge piping vibrations. Whereas it is usually desirable to limit the downstream volume between the compressor discharge and the check valve to reduce the potential for transient surge events, a small discharge volume results in high piping impedance. This will amplify pressure pulsations passing through the compressor. The small downstream volume provides limited ability for any transient peak (such as a pressure pulse) passing through the compressor to be absorbed quickly, and an amplified discharge pressure spike will be the result. Also, if any periodic pressure excitation from upstream vortex shedding or any other continuously varying flow disturbance couples with a pipe resonance length, the result can be high fluctuations of the compressor operating point on its speed line, effectively resulting in a reduced operating range and higher than expected surge margin (surge line moves to the right). Both acoustic resonance and system impedance are functions of pipe friction, pipe and header interface connections, valve/elbow locations, pipe diameter, and valve coefficients, i.e., the entire piping system connected to the compressor. Thus, a careful acoustic and impedance design review of a compressor station design should be performed to avoid impacting the operating range of the machine. This paper describes the methodology of such a design review using modern pulsation analysis software. Examples and parametric studies are presented that demonstrate the impact of system impedance and piping acoustics on the dynamic operating response of the compressor in a typical compressor station. Some recommendations to reduce the risk of pulsation amplification and unsteady operation are also provided.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Aust, N., 1988, “Ein Verfahren zur digitalen Simulation instationaerer Vorgaenge in Verdichteranlagen,” Doctoral dissertation, Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Morini, M., Pinelli, M., and Venturini, M., 2006, “Development of a One-Dimensional Modular Dynamic Model for the Simulation of Surge in Compression Systems,” ASME J. Turbomach., 129(3), pp. 437–447. [CrossRef]
Shapiro, L., 1996, Performance Formulas for Centrifugal Compressors, Solar Turbines Publication, San Diego, CA.
Kurz, R., McKee, R., and Brun, K., 2006, “Pulsations in Centrifugal Compressor Installations,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90700 [CrossRef].
Sparks, C. R., 1983, “On the Transient Interaction of Centrifugal Compressors and Their Piping Systems,” Paper No. ASME 83-GT-236.
Abdel-Hamid, A. N., 1985, “Dynamic Response of a Centrifugal Blower to Periodic Flow Fluctuations,” Paper No. ASME 85-GT-195.
Baldwin, R. M., and Simmons, H. R., 1989, “Flow-Induced Vibration in Safety Relief Valves: Design and Troubleshooting Methods,” ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, June 17–21, Paper No. 84-PVP-8 [CrossRef].
Bar, L. C., 1979, “The Unsteady Response of an Axial Flow Turbomachinery Rotor to Inlet Flow Distortions,” M.S. thesis, Department of Aerospace Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.
Blodgett, L. E., 1992, “Theoretical and Practical Design of Pulsation Damping Systems,” Flow Meas. Instrum., 3(3), pp. 203–208. [CrossRef]
Durke, R. G., and McKee, R. J., 1986, “Identification of Pulsation Induced Orifice Metering Errors Including Gage Line Shift,” Measuring and Metering of Unsteady Flows, Winter Annual Meeting of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Anaheim, CA, Dec. 7–12, ASME, New York.
Fletcher, C. A. J., 1991, Computational Techniques for Fluid Dynamics, Volume I, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Henderson, R. E., 1972, “The Unsteady Attenuation of an Axial Flow Turbomachine to an Upstream Disturbance,” Ph.D. thesis, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ingard, U., and Singhla, V. K., 1974, “Sound in Turbulent Pipe Flow,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 55(3), pp. 535–538. [CrossRef]
Iwasaki, M., Ikeya, N., Marutani, Y., and Kitazawa, T., 1994, “Comparison of Turbocharger Performance Between Steady Flow and Pulsating Flow on Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 940839 [CrossRef].
Kinsler, L. E., Frey, A. R., Coppens, A. B., and Sanders, J. V., 2000, Fundamentals of Acoustics, Wiley, New York.
Meyer, W., 1988, “Untersuchungen zum Einfluss von Einlaufdrallstoerungen auf das stationaere Betriebsverhalten von Turbostrahltriebwerken,” Doctoral dissertation, Universität der Bundeswehr Muenchen, Munich, Germany.
Smalley, A. J., Jungbauer, D. E., and Harris, R. E., 1995, “Reciprocating Compressor Reliability Issues: Pulsation Control, Installation, and Monitoring for Enhanced Reliability and Performance,” Proceedings of the 4th Process Plant Reliability Conference, Houston, TX, Nov. 14–17.
Szymko, S., Martinez-Botas, R. F., and Pullen, K. R., 2005, “Experimental Evaluation of Turbocharger Turbine Performance Under Pulsating Flow Conditions,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-68878. [CrossRef]
Wachter, J., and Loehle, M., 1985, “Identifikation des dynamischen Uebertragungsverhaltens eines dreistufigen Radialverdichters bei saug- und druckseitiger Durchsatzvariation,” VDI Bericht572(2), pp. 365–379.
Yocum, A. M., and Henderson, R. E., 1980, “The Effects of Some Design Parameters of an Isolated Rotor on Inlet Flow Distortions,” ASME J. Eng. Power, 102(1), pp. 178–186. [CrossRef]
Brun, K., and Kurz, R., 2010, “Analysis of the Effects of Pulsations on the Operational Stability of Centrifugal Compressors in Mixed Reciprocating and Centrifugal Compressor Stations,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 132(7), p. 072402. [CrossRef]
Brun, K., Deffenbaugh, D. M., and Bowles, E. B., Jr., 2007, “Development of a Transient Fluid Dynamics Solver for Compression System Pulsation Analysis,” Gas Machinery Conference, Dallas, TX, Oct. 1–3.
Brun, K., and Nored, M., 2008, Application Guidelines for Surge Control System, Gas Machinery Research Council Publication, Dallas, TX.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Pulsation transmission in centrifugal compressors [5]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Centrifugal compressor inlet velocity versus time

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Pulsation dampening in a typical pipeline [4]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Typical pipeline compressor map and startup sequence

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Graphical user interface for solver

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Arrangement drawing of simulated compressor pipe system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Compressor discharge mass-flow for case 6 (10% excitation high impedance case)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Surge margin versus excitation frequency for case 6 (10% excitation and high impedance)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Compressor pressure ratio comparison for high versus low impedance (cases 4 and 6)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Compressor peak-to-peak pressure ratio versus discharge piping impedance



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In