0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Stabilizing a 46 MW Multistage Utility Steam Turbine Using Integral Squeeze Film Bearing Support Dampers

[+] Author and Article Information
Bugra Ertas

Mechanical Systems Organization,
GE Global Research Center,
Niskayuna, NY 12309

Vaclav Cerny

Head of Operational Analysis,
Doosan Skoda Power,
Pizen 30614, Czech Republic

Jongsoo Kim

Engineering and Research,
Waukesha Bearings Corporation,
Pewaukee, WI 53072

Vaclav Polreich

Measurement and Diagnostics,
Doosan Skoda Power,
Pizen 30614, Czech Republic

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Structures and Dynamics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 9, 2014; final manuscript received August 20, 2014; published online December 2, 2014. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 137(5), 052506 (May 01, 2015) (11 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1349; doi: 10.1115/1.4028715 History: Received July 09, 2014; Revised August 20, 2014; Online December 02, 2014

A 46 MW 5500 rpm multistage single casing utility steam turbine experienced strong subsynchronous rotordynamic vibration of the first rotor mode; preventing full load operation of the unit. The root cause of the vibration stemmed from steam whirl forces generated at secondary sealing locations in combination with a flexible rotor-bearing system. Several attempts were made to eliminate the subsynchronous vibration by modifying bearing geometry and clearances, which came short of enabling full load operation. The following paper presents experimental tests and analytical results focused on stabilizing a 46 MW 6230 kg utility steam turbine experiencing subsynchronous rotordynamic instability. The paper advances an integral squeeze film damper (ISFD) solution, which was implemented to resolve the subsynchronous vibration and allow full load and full speed operation of the machine. The present work addresses the bearing-damper analysis, rotordynamic analysis, and experimental validation through waterfall plots, and synchronous vibration data of the steam turbine rotor. Analytical and experimental results show that using ISFD improved the stability margin by a factor of 12 eliminating the subsynchronous instability and significantly reducing critical speed amplification factors. Additionally, by using ISFD the analysis showed significant reduction in interstage clearance closures during critical speed transitions in comparison to the hard mounted tilting pad bearing configuration.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Magge, N., 1975, “Philosophy, Design, and Evaluation of Soft-Mounted Engine Rotor Systems,” J. Aircr., 12(4), pp. 318–324. [CrossRef]
Vance, J., and Royal, A., 1975, “High-Speed Rotor Dynamics—An Assessment of Current Technology for Small Turboshaft Engines,” J. Aircr., 12(4), pp. 295–305. [CrossRef]
Memmott, E. A., 1992, “Stability of Centrifugal Compressors by Applications of Tilt Pad Seals, Damper Bearings, and Shunt Holes,” IMechE 5th International Conference on Vibrations in Rotating Machinery, Bath, UK, Sept. 7–10, pp. 99–106.
Memmott, E. A., 2010, “Application of Squeeze-Film Dampers to Centrifugal Compressors,” 28th Machinery Dynamics Seminar (CMVA2010), Ville, QC, Canada, Oct. 27–29, Paper No. CMVA2010-15, pp. 115–129.
Zeidan, F. Y., Andres, L. S., and Vance, J. M., 1996, “Design and Application of Squeeze Film Dampers in Rotating Machinery,” 25th Turbomachinery Symposium, Houston, TX, Sept. 17–19, pp. 169–188.
Leader, M. E., Whalen, J. K., and Grey, G. G., 1995, “The Design and Application of a Squeeze Film Damper Bearing to a Flexible Steam Turbine Rotor,” 24th Turbomachinery Symposium, College Station, TX, pp. 49–58.
Edney, S. L., and Nicholas, J. C., 1999, “Retrofitting a Large Steam Turbine With a Mechanically Centered Squeeze Film Damper,” 27th Turbomachinery Symposium, Houston, TX, pp. 29–40.
Kuzdzal, M. J., and Hustak, J. F., 1996, “Squeeze Film Damper Bearing Experimental vs. Analytical Results for Various Damper Configurations,” 25th Turbomachinery Symposium, College Station, TX, pp. 57–70.
Kanki, H., Kaenko, Y., Kurosawa, M., and Yamamoto, T., 1998, “Prevention of Low-Frequency Vibration of High-Capacity Steam Turbine Units by Squeeze Film Damper,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 120(2), pp. 391–396. [CrossRef]
Locke, S. R., and Faller, W., 1999, “Recycle Gas Compressor Designed for High Unbalance Tolerance and Stability,” 32nd Turbomachinery Symposium, Houston, TX, pp. 137–144.
De Santiago, O., Andrés, L. S., and Oliveras, J., 1999, “Imbalance Response of a Rotor Supported on Open-Ends, Integral Squeeze Film Dampers,” ASME J. Gas Turbines Power, 121(4), pp. 718–724. [CrossRef]
De Santiago, O., and Andrés, L. S., 1999, “Imbalance Response and Damping Force Coefficients of a Rotor Supported on End Sealed Integral Squeeze Film Dampers,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-203. [CrossRef]
De Santiago, O., and Andrés, L. S., 2000, “Dynamic Response of a Rotor-Integral Squeeze Film Damper to Couple Imbalances,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-0388. [CrossRef]
Andrés, L. S., and De Santiago, O., 2003, “Imbalance Response of a Rotor Supported on Flexure Pivot Tilting Pad Journal Bearings in Series With Integral Squeeze Film Dampers,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 125(4), pp. 1026–1032. [CrossRef]
Agnew, J., and Childs, D., 2012, “Rotordynamic Characteristics of a Flexure Pivot Pad Bearing With an Active and Locked Integral Squeeze Film Damper,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-68564. [CrossRef]
Hibner, D. H., 1975, “Dynamic Response of Viscous-Damped Multi-Shaft Jet Engines,” J. Aircr., 12(4), pp. 305–312. [CrossRef]
Gunter, E. J., 1977, “Design of Nonlinear Squeeze Film Dampers for Aircraft Engines,” J. Lubr. Technol., 99(1), pp. 57–64. [CrossRef]
Taylor, D. L., and Fehr, V. S., 1982, “Analysis and Design of Segmented Dampers for Rotor Dynamic Control,” J. Lubr. Technol., 104(1), pp. 84–90. [CrossRef]
Delgado, A., Cantanzaro, M., Mitanitonna, N., and Gerbet, M., 2011, “Identification of Force Coefficients in a 5-Pad Tilting Pad Bearing With an Integral Squeeze Film Damper,” 10th EDF/Pprime Poitiers Workshop, Poitiers, France, Oct. 6–7.
Della Pietra, L., and Adiletta, G., 2002, “The Squeeze Film Damper Over Four Decades of Investigations. Part I: Characteristics and Operating Features,” Shock Vib. Dig., 34(1), pp. 3–26.
Pietra, L. D., and Adiletta, G., 2002, “The Squeeze Film Damper Over Four Decades of Investigations. Part II: Rotordynamic Analyses With Rigid and Flexible Rotors,” Shock Vib. Dig., 34(2), pp. 97–126.
Gunter, E. J., 1978, “Optimum Bearing Support Damping for Unbalance Response and Stability of Rotating Equipment,” ASME J. Eng. Power, 100(1), pp. 89–94. [CrossRef]
Alford, J., 1965, “Protecting Turbomachinery From Self-Excited Rotor Whirl,” ASME J. Eng. Power, 87(4), pp. 333–343. [CrossRef]
Childs, D., and Vance, J. M., 1997, “Annular Gas Seals and Rotordynamics of Compressors and Turbines,” 26th Turbomachinery Symposium, Houston, TX, pp. 201–220.
Edney, S. L., and Lucas, G. M., 2000, “Designing High Performance Steam Turbines With Rotordynamics as a Prime Consideration,” 29th Turbomachinery Symposium, Houston, TX, pp. 205–223.
Bachschmid, N., Pennacchi, P., and Vania, A., 2007, “Some Results in Steam Whirl Analysis,” 12th IFToMM World Congress, Bensancon, France, June 18–21, pp. 201–220.
Hirano, T., Takashi, S., Sakakida, H., Uchida, T., Tsutsui, M., and Ikeda, K., 2008, “Evaluation of Rotordynamic Stability of a Steam Turbine Due to Labyrinth Seal Forces,” J. Power Energy Syst., 2(3), pp. 945–955. [CrossRef]
Dimarogonas, A., and Gomez-Mancilla, J. C., 1994, “Flow-Excited Turbine Rotor Instability,” Int. J. Rotating Mach., 1(1), pp. 37–51. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Past applications of SFD in multistage steam turbines. (a) Ball-socket TPJ bearing with O-ring SFD [6], (b) ball-socket TPJ bearing with an arc centering spring and O-ring SFD [7], and (c) rocker-back TPJ bearing with “pin” bearing support centering spring and SFD [9].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

46 MW multistage utility steam turbine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Turbine power versus rotor vibration at the bearings

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Waterfall spectrum 0-peak: five pad LOP bearings

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Damping mechanism: conventional SFD versus ISFD

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

NDE four pad LBP ISFD TPJ bearing: 200 mm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

DE four pad LBP ISFD TPJ bearing: 220 mm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Synchronously reduced bearing and damper coefficients

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Rotordynamic models

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Damped eigenvalue frequency map

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

First mode log dec using ISFD: damper optimization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Effective seal damping and stiffness at 5500 rpm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

First mode damped eigenvalue: five pad LOP TPJ

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

First mode damped eigenvalue: four pad LBP ISFD

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Field vibration measurements: synchronous response

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Predicted synchronous vibration response

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Rotor midspan vibration and deflected rotor shapes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Waterfall spectrum 0-peak: four pad LBP ISFD bearings

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In