Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Turbomachinery

Rotor Blade Heat Transfer of High Pressure Turbine Stage Under Inlet Hot-Streak and Swirl

[+] Author and Article Information
A. Rahim

Department of Engineering Science,
University of Oxford,
Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK

L. He

Department of Engineering Science,
University of Oxford,
Oxford OX1 3PJ, UK
e-mail: Li.He@eng.ox.ac.uk

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Turbomachinery Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received August 4, 2014; final manuscript received September 23, 2014; published online December 9, 2014. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 137(6), 062601 (Jun 01, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1460; doi: 10.1115/1.4028740 History: Received August 04, 2014; Revised September 23, 2014; Online December 09, 2014

A key consideration in high pressure (HP) turbine designs is the heat load experienced by rotor blades. Impact of turbine inlet nonuniformity of combined temperature and velocity traverses, typical for a lean-burn combustor exit, has rarely been studied. For general turbine aerothermal designs, it is also of interest to understand how the behavior of lean-burn combustor traverses (with both hot-streak and swirl) might contrast with those for a rich-burn combustor (largely hot-streak only). In the present work, a computational study has been carried out on the aerothermal performance of a HP turbine stage under nonuniform temperature and velocity inlet profiles. The analyses are primarily conducted for two combined hot-streak and swirl inlets, with opposite swirl directions. In addition, comparisons are made against a hot-streak only case and a uniform inlet. The effects of three nozzle guide vane (NGV) shape configurations are investigated: straight, compound lean (CL) and reverse CL (RCL). The present results reveal a qualitative change in the roles played by heat transfer coefficient (HTC) and fluid driving (“adiabatic wall”) temperature, Taw. It has been shown that the blade heat load for a uniform inlet is dominated by HTC, whilst a hot-streak only case is largely influenced by Taw. However, in contrast to the hot-streak only case, a combined hot-streak and swirl case shows a role reversal with the HTC being a dominant factor. Additionally, it is seen that the swirling flow redistributes radially the hot fluid within the NGV passage considerably, leading to a much ‘flatter’ rotor inlet temperature profile compared to its hot-streak only counterpart. Furthermore, the rotor heat transfer characteristics for the combined traverses are shown to be strongly dependent on the NGV shaping and the inlet swirl direction, indicating a potential for further design space exploration. The present findings underline the need to clearly define relevant combustor exit temperature and velocity profiles when designing and optimizing NGVs for HP turbine aerothermal performance.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Khanal, B., He, L., Northall, J., and Adami, P., 2013, “Analysis of Radial Migration of Hot-Streak in Swirling Flow Through HP Turbine Stage,” ASME J. Turbomach., 135(4), p. 041005. [CrossRef]
Butler, T. L., Sharma, O. P., Jopslyn, H. D., and Dring, R. P., 1989, “Redistribution of Inlet Temperature Distortion in an Axial Flow Turbine Stage,” J. Propul. Power, 5(1), pp. 64–71. [CrossRef]
Dorney, D. J., Davis, R. L., Edwards, D. E., and Madavan, N. K., 1992, “Unsteady Analysis of Hot-Streak Migration in a Turbine Stage,” J. Propul. Power, 8(2), pp. 520–529. [CrossRef]
Chana, K. S., and Jones, T. V., 2002, “An Investigation on Turbine Tip and Shroud Heat Transfer,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38469. [CrossRef]
Salvadori, S., Montomoli, F., Martelli, F., Chana, K., Qureshi, I., and Povey, T., 2012, “Analysis on the Effect of a Nonuniform Inlet Profile on Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow in Turbine Stages,” ASME J. Turbomach., 134(1), p. 011012. [CrossRef]
He, L., Menshikova, V., and Haller, B. R., 2007, “Effect of Hot-Streak Counts on Turbine Blade Heat Load and Forcing,” J. Propul. Power, 23(6), pp. 1235–1241. [CrossRef]
Shang, T., and Epstein, A. H., 1997, “Analysis of Hot-Streak Effects on Turbine Rotor Heat Load,” ASME J. Turbomach., 119(2), pp. 544–553. [CrossRef]
Ong, J., and Miller, R. J., 2008, “Hot-Streak and Vane Coolant Migration in a Downstream Rotor,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-50971. [CrossRef]
Rahim, A., Khanal, B., He, L., and Romero, E., 2014, “Effect of Nozzle Guide Vane Lean Under Influence of Inlet Temperature Traverse,” ASME J. Turbomach., 136(7), p. 071002. [CrossRef]
Harrison, S., 1992, “The Influence of Blade Lean on Turbine Losses,” ASME J. Turbomach., 114(1), pp. 184–190. [CrossRef]
Denton, J., and Xu, L., 1999, “The Exploitation of Three-Dimensional Flow in Turbomachinery Design,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C, 213(2), pp. 125–137. [CrossRef]
Sharma, O., Kopper, F., Stetson, G., Magge, S., Price, F., and Ni, R., 2003, “A Perspective on the Use of Physical and Numerical Experiments in the Advancement of Design Technology for Axial Flow Turbines,” XVI International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines (ISABE), Cleveland, OH, Aug. 31-Sept. 5, Paper No. 2003–1035.
Bagshaw, D., Ingram, G., Gregory-Smith, D. G., and Stokes, M., 2005, “An Experimental Study of Reverse Compound Lean in a Linear Turbine Cascade,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A, 219(6), pp. 443–449. [CrossRef]
Rosic, B., and Xu, L., 2012, “Blade Lean and Shroud Leakage Flows in Low Aspect Ratio Turbines,” ASME J. Turbomach., 134(3), p. 031003. [CrossRef]
Qureshi, I., Beretta, A., Chana, K, S., and Povey, T., 2011, “Effect of Aggressive Inlet Swirl on Heat Transfer and Aerodynamics in an Unshrouded Transonic HP Turbine,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-46038. [CrossRef]
Shahpar, S., and Caloni, S., 2012, “Aerodynamic Optimisation of High Pressure Turbines for Lean-Burn Combustion System,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-69228. [CrossRef]
Munk, M., and Prim, R. C., 1947, “On the Multiplicity of Steady Gas Flows Having the Same Streamwise Pattern,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U.S.A., 33(5), pp. 137–141. [CrossRef]
Khanal, B., He, L., Northall, J. D., and Adami, P., 2012, “Unsteady Aero Thermal Behaviour of HP Turbine Stage Under Combustor Hot Streak and Swirl,” 13th International Symposium on Unsteady Aerodynamics Aero-Elasticity and Aero-Acoustics of Turbomachines ( ISUAAAT13), Tokyo, Japan, Sept. 10–14.
Moinier, P., Muller, J., and Giles, M., 2002, “Edge-Based Multigrid and Preconditioning for Hybrid Grids,” AIAA J., 40(2), pp. 1954–1960. [CrossRef]
Takahashi, R. K., Ni, R. H., Sharma, O. P., and Staubach, J. B., 1996, “Effects of Hot-Streak Indexing on a 1-1/2 Stage Turbine,” AIAA Paper No. 96-2796. [CrossRef]
He, L., and Oldfield, M. L. G., 2011, “Unsteady Conjugate Heat Transfer Modeling,” ASME J. Turbomach., 133(3), p. 031022. [CrossRef]
Jameson, A., 1991, “Time-Dependent Calculations Using Multi-Grid, With Applications to Unsteady Flows Past Airfoil and Wings,” AIAA Paper No. 91-1596. [CrossRef]
He, L., 1992, “Method of Simulating Unsteady Turbomachinery Flows With Multiple Perturbations,” AIAA J., 30(11), pp. 2730–2735. [CrossRef]
He, L., 2010, “Fourier Methods for Turbomachinery Applications,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 46(8), pp. 329–341. [CrossRef]
Chana, K. S., Hurrion, J. R., and Jones, T. V., 2003, “The Design, Development and Testing of a Non-Uniform Inlet Temperature Generator for the QinetiQ Transient Turbine Research Facility,” ASME Paper No. GT2002-30554. [CrossRef]
Khanal, B., and He, L., 2011, “Influence of Hot-Streak Profile on Integrated Heat Load and Stage Performance,” Rolls Royce, London, Technical Report April-HS.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Reduction in computational cost through use of a single-passage domain with the phase-shift condition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Computational meshes for different vane configurations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Combined hot-streak and swirl profiles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Mesh dependency check for distributions of isentropic Mach number (left) and Nusselt number (right) at 10%, 50%, and 90% radial height

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Stage nonadiabatic efficacy as illustrated in h–s diagram

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Hot-streak isosurface (T0 = 495 K), with and without swirl through NGV passage (viewed from upstream)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Absolute total temperatures at vane exit for straight vane (hot-streak case and two combined cases with different swirl directions)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Absolute total temperature at vane exit (hot-streak and positive swirl)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Absolute total temperature at vane exit (hot-streak and negative swirl)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Tip heat flux, HTC and Taw for straight and CL vanes (uniform inflow)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Tip heat flux, HTC and Taw for straight and CL vanes (hot-streak only)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Heat flux, HTC and Taw on rotor pressure surface for different vane shapes (hot-streak and positive swirl)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

δHTC and δTaw plots on rotor pressure surface (hot-streak and positive swirl)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Heat flux, HTC, and Taw for different vane shapes (hot-streak and negative swirl)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Tip heat flux, HTC, and Taw for three vane cases (hot-streak and positive swirl)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Tip circumferential averaged heat flux for three NGV shapes (hot-streak and positive swirl)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

δHTC and δTaw plots for three NGV shapes (hot-streak and positive swirl)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Tip heat flux, HTC, and Taw for three NGV shapes (hot-streak and negative swirl)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Tip circumferential averaged heat flux for three NGV shapes (hot-streak and negative swirl)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In