Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Cycle Innovations

Second Law Analysis of Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Power Plants

[+] Author and Article Information
S. Can Gülen

Engineering Technology Group,
Bechtel Power,
Frederick, MD 21703
e-mail: scgulen@bechtel.com

Contributed by the Cycle Innovations Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received August 19, 2014; final manuscript received September 30, 2014; published online December 2, 2014. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 137(5), 051701 (May 01, 2015) (9 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1493; doi: 10.1115/1.4028741 History: Received August 19, 2014; Revised September 30, 2014; Online December 02, 2014

Integrated solar combined cycle (ISCC) is an operationally simple, clean electric power generation system that is economically more attractive vis-à-vis stand-alone concentrating solar power (CSP) technology. The ISCC can be designed to achieve two primary goals: (1) replace natural gas combustion with solar thermal power at the same output rating to reduce fuel consumption and stack emissions and/or (2) replace supplementary (duct) firing in the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) with “solar firing” to boost power generation on hot days. Optimal ISCC design requires a seamless integration of the solar thermal and fossil-thermal technologies to maximize the solar contribution to the overall system performance at the lowest possible size and cost. The current paper uses the exergy concept of the second law of thermodynamics to distill the quite complex optimization problem to its bare essentials. The goal is to provide the practitioners with physics-based, user-friendly guidelines to understand the key drivers and the interaction among them. Ultimately, such understanding is expected to help direct studies involving heavy use of time consuming system models in a focused manner and evaluate the results critically to arrive at feasible ISCC designs.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Glatzmaier, G., 2011, “Summary Report for Concentrating Solar Power Thermal Storage Workshop,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Report No. NREL/TP-5500-52134.
Turchi, C. S., Ma, Z., and Erbes, M., 2011, “Gas Turbine Solar Parabolic Trough Hybrid Designs,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-45184. [CrossRef]
Cox, J., 2010, “Implications of Intermittency,” Modern Power Systems, 30(1), pp. 22–23.
Armistead, T. F., 2010, “Integrating Solar, Conventional Energy Resources,” Comb. Cycle J., 2Q(2010), pp. 106–111.
Ugolini, D., Zachary, J., and Park, H., 2009, “Options for Hybrid Solar and Conventional Fossil Plants,” Bechtel Technol. J., 2(1), pp. 133–143.
Camporeale, S. M., Fortunato, B., and Saponaro, A., 2011, “Repowering of a Rankine Cycle Power Plant by Means of Concentrating Solar Collectors,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-45736. [CrossRef]
Barigozzi, G., Franchini, G., Perdichizzi, A., and Ravelli, A., 2013, “Simulation of Solarized Combined Cycles: Comparison Between Hybrid GT and ISCC Plants,” ASME Paper No. GT2013-95843. [CrossRef]
Horn, M., Führing, H., and Rheinlander, J., 2004, “Economic Analysis of Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Power Plants: A Sample Case: The Economic Feasibility of an ISCC Power Plant in Egypt,” Energy, 29(5–6), pp. 935–945. [CrossRef]
Kalogirou, S. A., 2009, Solar Energy Engineering: Process and Systems, Academic Press, Burlington, MA.
Pihl, E., and Johnsson, F., 2012, “Concentrating Solar Power Hybrids–Technologies and European Retrofit Potential,” ISES-Europe Solar Conference (Eurosun 2012), Rejika, Croatia, Sept. 17–21.
Petrov, M. P., Salomon Popa, M., and Fransson, T. H., 2012, “Solar Augmentation of Conventional Steam Plants: From System Studies to Reality,” World Renewable Energy Forum (WREF 2012), Denver, CO, May 13–17.
Selig, M., and Mertins, M., 2010, “From Saturated to Superheated Direct Solar Steam Generation—Technical Challenges and Economic Benefits,” 16th SolarPACES Conference (SolarPACES 2010), Perpignan, France, Sept. 21–24.
Kelly, B., Herrmann, U., and Hale, M. J., 2001, “Optimization Studies for Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Systems,” Solar Forum 2001, Washington, DC, Apr. 21–25.
Schenk, H., Hirsch, T., Feldhoff, J. F., and Wittmann, M., 2012, “Energetic Comparison of Linear Fresnel and Parabolic Trough Collector Systems,” ASME Paper No. ES2012-91109. [CrossRef]
Kutscher, C., Burkholder, F., and Stynes, K., 2010, “Generation of a Parabolic Trough Collector Efficiency Curve From Separate Measurements of Outdoor Optical Efficiency and Indoor Receiver Heat Loss,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Report No. NREL/CP-5500-49304.
CSP Today, 2013, “CSP Solar Tower Report: Cost, Performance and Key Trends,” FC Business Intelligence Ltd., London.
CSP Today, 2012, “CSP Parabolic Trough Report: Cost, Performance and Key Trends,” FC Business Intelligence Ltd., London.
Thermoflow, “GT PRO, GT MASTER,” Version 23.0, Thermoflow, Inc., Southborough, MA.
Bohtz, C., Gokarn, S., and Conte, E., 2013, “Integrated Solar Combined Cycles (ISCC) to Meet Renewable Targets and Reduce CO2 Emissions,” PowerGen Europe, Vienna, Austria, June 4–6.
Ojo, C. O., Pont, D., Conte, E., and Carroni, R., 2012, “Performance Evaluation of an Integrated Solar Combined Cycle,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-68134. [CrossRef]
Gas Turbine World, 2013, Gas Turbine World 2013 GTW Handbook, Vol. 30, Pequot Publishing, Inc., Fairfield, CT.
Gülen, S. C., 2013, “What Is the Worth of 1 Btu/kWh of Heat Rate?” Power, 157(6), pp. 61–63.
Mehos, M. S., Finch, N. S., Ho, C. K., Turchi, C. S., and Wagner, M. J., 2012, “Probabilistic Analysis of Power Tower Designs and Technology Improvement Opportunities to Meet Sunshine Goals,” SolarPaces 2012, Marrakech, Morocco, Sept. 11–14.
Peter, M., 2012, “Integrated Solar Combined Cycle: A Hybrid Energy System Case Study,” I-NEST Nuclear Hybrid Energy Systems Workshop, Salt Lake City, UT, Apr. 3–4.
Dersch, J., Geyer, M., Herrmann, U., Jones, S. A., Kelly, B., Kistner, R., Ortmanns, W., Pitz-Paal, R., and Price, H., 2004, “Trough Integration into Power Plants—A Study on the Performance and Economy of Integrated Solar Combined Cycle Systems,” Energy, 29(5–6), pp. 947–959. [CrossRef]
Hinkley, J., Curtin, B., Hayward, J., Wonhas, A., Boyd, R., Grima, C., Tadros, A., Hall, R., Naicker, K., and Mikhail, A., 2011, “Concentrating Solar Power—Drivers and Opportunities for Cost-Competitive Electricity,” Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Clayton, Australia, http://www.csiro.au
Glatzmaier, G., 2011, “Developing a Cost Model and Methodology to Estimate Capital Costs for Thermal Energy Storage,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Boulder, CO, Report No. NREL/TP-5500-53066.
Spelling, J., Jöcker, M., and Martin, A., 2011, “Thermal Modeling of a Solar Steam Turbine With a Focus on Start-Up Time Reduction,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(1), p. 013001. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic description of a generic ISCC with a GTCC and CSP plant comprising a solar field and solar steam generator

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Solar collector thermal efficiency for three major CSP technologies as a function of Trec, CR, and DNI

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Conceptual HRSG section layout (HP, IP, or LP) for external heat addition via additional steam generation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

External GTCC bottoming cycle heat addition via additional HP steam generation with feed water take-off from A in Fig. 3 (1 in. of Hg ∼ 34 mbar)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Impact of switching feed water take-off location from A to C in Fig. 3 (100 pps ∼ 45 kg/s, to convert from °F to °C, subtract 32 and divide by 1.8)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Key performance-cost trade-off drivers for ISCC based on HP steam generation in a CRS-based solar plant

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Exergy loss in the HRSG, ST, and condenser as a fraction of GT exhaust gas exergy at the HRSG inlet. The dashed-line curves are for the large-sized bottoming cycle.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

HRSG heat release diagram (the inset shows the decrease in main and reheat steam temperatures)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Conceptual HRSG-ST layout for external heat addition via reheat superheating

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Impact of HRSG steam level on additional ST power output via external heat addition. (The plots can be used for generic 3PRH GTCC bottoming cycle studies using the fractional information on x- and y-axes.)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Impact of HRSG steam level on GTCC net (thermal) efficiency output via external heat addition (constant GT heat consumption)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In