0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Spatial Analysis on Forced Heat Release Response of Turbulent Stratified Flames

[+] Author and Article Information
Zhiyi Han

Department of Engineering,
University of Cambridge,
Trumpington Street,
Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
e-mail: zh253@cam.ac.uk

Saravanan Balusamy, Simone Hochgreb

Department of Engineering,
University of Cambridge,
Trumpington Street,
Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 18, 2014; final manuscript received August 19, 2014; published online December 9, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Song-Charng Kong.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 137(6), 061504 (Jun 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1410; doi: 10.1115/1.4029056 History: Received July 18, 2014; Revised August 19, 2014; Online December 09, 2014

The local equivalence ratio distribution in a flame affects its shape and response under velocity perturbations. The forced heat release response of stratified lean-premixed flames to acoustic velocity fluctuations is investigated via chemiluminescence measurements and spatial Fourier transfer analysis. A laboratory scale burner and its boundary conditions were designed to generate high-amplitude acoustic velocity fluctuations in flames. These flames are subject to inlet radial equivalence ratio distributions created via a split annular fuel delivery system outfitted with a swirling stabilizer. Simultaneous measurements on the oscillations of inlet velocity and heat release rate were carried out via a two-microphone technique and OH* chemiluminescence. The measurements show that, for a given mean total power and equivalence ratio (φg=0.60), the flame responses vary significantly on the equivalence ratio split, forcing frequency, and velocity fluctuation amplitude, with significant nonlinearities with respect to forcing amplitude and stratification ratio (SR). The spatial Fourier transfer analysis shows how the dependence is affected by the underlying changes in the rate of heat release, including the direction and speed of the perturbation within the flame.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Lieuwen, T. C., and Yang, V., 2005, “Combustion Instabilities in Gas Turbine Engines: Operational Experience, Fundamental Mechanisms and Modeling ,” American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA.
Huang, Y., and Yang, V., 2009, “Dynamics and Stability of Lean-Premixed Swirl-Stabilized Combustion,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 35(4), pp. 293–364. [CrossRef]
Candel, S., 2002, “Combustion Dynamics and Control: Progress and Challenges,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 29(1), pp. 1–28. [CrossRef]
Huang, Y., Wang, S., and Yang, V., 2006, “Systematic Analysis of Lean-Premixed Swirl-Stabilized Combustion,” AIAA J., 44(4), pp. 724–740. [CrossRef]
Huang, Y., Sung, H.-G., Hsieh, S.-Y., and Yang, V., 2003, “Large-Eddy Simulation of Combustion Dynamics of Lean-Premixed Swirl-Stabilized Combustor,” J. Propul. Power, 19(5), pp. 782–794. [CrossRef]
Armitage, C., Balachandran, R., Mastorakos, E., and Cant, R., 2006, “Investigation of the Nonlinear Response of Turbulent Premixed Flames to Imposed Inlet Velocity Oscillations,” Combust. Flame, 146(3), pp. 419–436. [CrossRef]
Schuller, T., 2003, “Self-Induced Combustion Oscillations of Laminar Premixed Flames Stabilized on Annular Burners,” Combust. Flame, 135(4), pp. 525–537. [CrossRef]
Bellows, B. D., Neumeier, Y., and Lieuwen, T., 2006, “Forced Response of a Swirling, Premixed Flame to Flow Disturbances,” J. Propul. Power, 22(5), pp. 1075–1084. [CrossRef]
Fleifil, M., and Annaswamy, A., 1996, “Response of a Laminar Premixed Flame to Flow Oscillations: A Kinematic Model and Thermoacoustic Instability Results,” Combust. Flame, 2180(96), pp. 487–510. [CrossRef]
Cho, J. H., and Lieuwen, T., 2005, “Laminar Premixed Flame Response to Equivalence Ratio Oscillations,” Combust. Flame, 140(1–2), pp. 116–129. [CrossRef]
Birbaud, A., Ducruix, S., Durox, D., and Candel, S., 2008, “The Nonlinear Response of Inverted ‘V’ Flames to Equivalence Ratio Nonuniformities,” Combust. Flame, 154(3), pp. 356–367. [CrossRef]
Sengissen, A. X., Poinsot, T. J., Van Kampen, J. F., and Kok, J. B., 2007, “Response of a Swirled Non-Premixed Burner to Fuel Flow Rate Modulation,” Complex Effects in Large Eddy Simulations, Springer, New York, pp. 337–351.
Lieuwen, T., Neumeier, Y., and Zinn, B., 1998, “The Role of Unmixedness and Chemical Kinetics in Driving Combustion Instabilities in Lean Premixed Combustors,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 135(1–6), pp. 193–211. [CrossRef]
Balachandran, R., Ayoola, B., Kaminski, C., Dowling, A., and Mastorakos, E., 2005, “Experimental Investigation of the Nonlinear Response of Turbulent Premixed Flames to Imposed Inlet Velocity Oscillations,” Combust. Flame, 143(1–2), pp. 37–55. [CrossRef]
Kim, K., Lee, J., Quay, B., and Santavicca, D., 2010, “Response of Partially Premixed Flames to Acoustic Velocity and Equivalence Ratio Perturbations,” Combust. Flame, 157(9), pp. 1731–1744. [CrossRef]
Kim, K., Lee, J., Quay, B., and Santavicca, D., 2011, “Experimental Investigation of the Nonlinear Response of Swirl-Stabilized Flames to Equivalence Ratio Oscillations,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 133(2), p. 021502. [CrossRef]
Sattelmayer, T., 2003, “Influence of the Combustor Aerodynamics on Combustion Instabilities From Equivalence Ratio Fluctuations,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 125(1), pp. 11–19. [CrossRef]
Scarinci, T., Freeman, C., and Day, I., 2004, “Passive Control of Combustion Instability in a Low Emissions Aeroderivative Gas Turbine,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53767. [CrossRef]
Barlow, R., Wang, G.-H., Anselmo-Filho, P., Sweeney, M., and Hochgreb, S., 2009, “Application of Raman/Rayleigh/LIF Diagnostics in Turbulent Stratified Flames,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 32(1), pp. 945–953. [CrossRef]
Anselmo-Filho, P., Hochgreb, S., Barlow, R., and Cant, R., 2009, “Experimental Measurements of Geometric Properties of Turbulent Stratified Flames,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 32(2), pp. 1763–1770. [CrossRef]
Giezendanner, R., Keck, O., Weigand, P., Meier, W., Meier, U., Stricker, W., and Aigner, M., 2003, “Periodic Combustion Instabilities in a Swirl Burner Studied by Phase-Locked Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 175(4), pp. 721–741. [CrossRef]
Pasquier, N., Lecordier, B., Trinite, M., and Cessou, A., 2007, “An Experimental Investigation of Flame Propagation Through a Turbulent Stratified Mixture,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 31(1), pp. 1567–1574. [CrossRef]
Nogenmyr, K., Petersson, P., and Bai, X., 2007, “Large Eddy Simulation and Experiments of Stratified Lean Premixed Methane/Air Turbulent Flames,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 31(1), pp. 1467–1475. [CrossRef]
Haworth, D., Blint, R., Cuenot, B., and Poinsot, T., 2000, “Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Propane–Air Combustion With Nonhomogeneous Reactants,” Combust. Flame, 121(3), pp. 395–417. [CrossRef]
Robin, V., Mura, A., and Champion, M., 2008, “Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Stratified Turbulent V-Shaped Flames,” Combust. Flame, 153(1), pp. 288–315. [CrossRef]
Marzouk, Y., Ghoniem, A., and Najm, H., 2000, “Dynamic Response of Strained Premixed Flames to Equivalence Ratio Gradients,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 28(2), pp. 1859–1866. [CrossRef]
Galizzi, C., and Escudié, D., 2010, “Experimental Analysis of an Oblique Turbulent Flame Front Propagating in a Stratified Flow,” Combust. Flame, 157(12), pp. 2277–2285. [CrossRef]
Kang, T., and Kyritsis, D., 2009, “Phenomenology of Methane Flame Propagation Into Compositionally Stratified, Gradually Richer Mixtures,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 32(1), pp. 979–985. [CrossRef]
Truffin, K., and Poinsot, T., 2005, “Comparison and Extension of Methods for Acoustic Identification of Burners,” Combust. Flame, 142(4), pp. 388–400. [CrossRef]
Sweeney, M. S., Hochgreb, S., Dunn, M. J., and Barlow, R. S., 2012, “The Structure of Turbulent Stratified and Premixed Methane/Air Flames I: Non-Swirling Flows,” Combust. Flame, 159(9), pp. 2896–2911. [CrossRef]
Sweeney, M. S., Hochgreb, S., Dunn, M. J., and Barlow, R. S., 2012, “The Structure of Turbulent Stratified and Premixed Methane/Air Flames II: Swirling Flows,” Combust. Flame, 159(9), pp. 2912–2929. [CrossRef]
Kim, K., and Hochgreb, S., 2011, “The Nonlinear Heat Release Response of Stratified Lean-Premixed Flames to Acoustic Velocity Oscillations,” Combust. Flame, 158(12), pp. 2482–2499. [CrossRef]
Han, Z., and Hochgreb, S., 2013, “The Forced Heat Release Response of Stratified Flames to Acoustic Velocity Fluctuations,” European Combustion Meeting 2013, Lund, Sweden, June 26–28.
Kim, K. T., Lee, J. G., Quay, B. D., and Santavicca, D. A., 2011, “Reconstruction of Heat Release Response of Partially Premixed Flames,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 183(2), pp. 122–137. [CrossRef]
Hurle, I., Price, R., Sugden, T., and Thomas, A., 1968, “Sound Emission From Open Turbulent Premixed Flames,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 303(1475), pp. 409–427. [CrossRef]
Lee, J., and Santavicca, D., 2003, “Experimental Diagnostics for the Study of Combustion Instabilities in Lean Premixed Combustors,” J. Propul. Power, 19(5), pp. 735–750. [CrossRef]
Hardalupas, Y., and Selbach, A., 2002, “Imposed Oscillations and Non-Premixed Flames,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 28(1), pp. 75–104. [CrossRef]
Higgins, B., McQuay, M., Lacas, F., and Candel, S., 2001, “An Experimental Study on the Effect of Pressure and Strain Rate on CH Chemiluminescence of Premixed Fuel-Lean Methane/Air Flames,” Fuel, 80(11), pp. 1583–1591. [CrossRef]
Higgins, B., McQuay, M., and Lacas, F., 2001, “Systematic Measurements of OH Chemiluminescence for Fuel-Lean, High-Pressure, Premixed, Laminar Flames,” Fuel, 80(1), pp. 67–74. [CrossRef]
Guethe, F., Guyot, D., Singla, G., Noiray, N., and Schuermans, B., 2012, “Chemiluminescence as Diagnostic Tool in the Development of Gas Turbines,” Appl. Phys. B, 107(3), pp. 619–636. [CrossRef]
Bobusch, B. C., Ćosić, B., Moeck, J. P., and Paschereit, C. O., 2013, “Optical Measurement of Local and Global Transfer Functions for Equivalence Ratio Fluctuations in a Turbulent Swirl Flame,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 136(2), p. 021506. [CrossRef]
Dasch, C. J., 1992, “One-Dimensional Tomography: A Comparison of Abel, Onion-Peeling, and Filtered Backprojection Methods,” Appl. Opt., 31(8), pp. 1146–1152. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lieuwen, T., 2005, “Nonlinear Kinematic Response of Premixed Flames to Harmonic Velocity Disturbances,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 30(2), pp. 1725–1732. [CrossRef]
Kim, K. T., Lee, J. G., Lee, H. J., Quay, B. D., and Santavicca, D. A., 2010, “Characterization of Forced Flame Response of Swirl-Stabilized Turbulent Lean-Premixed Flames in a Gas Turbine Combustor,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 132(4), p. 041502. [CrossRef]
Palies, P., Durox, D., Schuller, T., and Candel, S., 2011, “Nonlinear Combustion Instability Analysis Based on the Flame Describing Function Applied to Turbulent Premixed Swirling Flames,” Combust. Flame, 158(10), pp. 1980–1991. [CrossRef]
Palies, P., Durox, D., Schuller, T., and Candel, S., 2010, “Swirling Flame Instability Analysis Based on the Flame Describing Function Methodology,” ASME Paper No. GT2010-22294. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the stratified swirl burner. Dimensions in millimeters, not to scale. Centerbody diameter Dc = 6.35 mm, inner tube diameter Di = 155 mm, outer tube Do = 26.64 mm, and quartz tube Dqt = 94.00 mm. Area ratio of inner channel to outer channel, Ai/Ao = 0.512.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

CH* and OH* chemiluminescence emission intensity versus input power for uniformly premixed and stratified combustion. Lines for SR = 1.0 and 0.5 overlap. Dashed lines show the operating points for velocities of 5 and 10 m/s, respectively.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Time-averaged OH* chemiluminescence images (top half of each figure) and Abel-deconvoluted, radius-weighted OH* chemiluminescence images (bottom), for different SR = 1.0, 0.5, and 2.0. The color scales are self-normalized. Inlet conditions: SR = 1.0, 0.5, and 2.0, U = 5 and 10 m/s, φg=0.60, TI = 20 ± 2 °C, PI = 1 ± 0.02 bar. (a) SR = 1.0, U = 5, (b) SR = 0.5, U = 5, (c) SR = 2.0, U = 5, (d) SR = 1.0, U = 10, (e) SR = 0.5, U = 10, and (f) SR = 2.0, U = 10.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Flame transfer function of premixed and stratified flame: gain (a) and phase difference in multiples of π (b). SR = 1.0, 0.5, and 2.0, U = 5 and 10 m/s, φg=0.60, Ti = 20 ± 2 °C, and pi = 1 ± 0.02 bar.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Normalized heat release response as a function of forcing amplitude at forcing frequencies of 60, 160, and 380 Hz. SR = 1.0 (top), 0.5 (middle), and 2.0 (bottom), φg=0.60, Ti = 20 ± 2 °C, pi = 1 ± 0.02 bar. (a) U = 5 m/s and (b) U = 10 m/s.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

High speed image FFT of OH* chemiluminescence. Each image set contains the magnitude (top) the FFT intensities, normalized to the overall FFT peak, and the phase (bottom), in multiples of π. Columns (a)–(c) obtained for 5 m/s, column (d) for 10 m/s. Inlet conditions: φg=0.60, Ti = 20 ± 2 °C, and pi = 1 ± 0.02 bar.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In