0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Aircraft Engine

A New Approach to the Gray-Box Identification of Wiener Models With the Application of Gas Turbine Engine Modeling

[+] Author and Article Information
Ehsan Mohammadi

Systems Simulation and Control Laboratory,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST),
Tehran 16846-13114, Iran
e-mail: ehs_mohammadi@iust.ac.ir

Morteza Montazeri-Gh

Professor
Systems Simulation and Control Laboratory,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST),
Tehran 16846-13114, Iran
e-mail: montazeri@iust.ac.ir

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Aircraft Engine Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received August 31, 2014; final manuscript received October 31, 2014; published online December 23, 2014. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 137(7), 071202 (Jul 01, 2015) (12 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1521; doi: 10.1115/1.4029170 History: Received August 31, 2014; Revised October 31, 2014; Online December 23, 2014

In this paper, a new approach is presented for the gray-box identification of Wiener models (WM); and to evaluate the performance of the proposed method, it is used to estimate the dynamic behavior of a two-shaft industrial gas turbine (GT). The Wiener models, which have attracted a considerable attention due to their low computational demand and high accuracy, represent modeling techniques based on system identification. These models are composed of a linear dynamic part interconnected with a nonlinear static element, and the unknown parameters of these two parts are generally determined by black-box identification approaches. However, another identification method known as “gray-box identification” can also be employed, which uses the existing information about the static or dynamic behavior of a system to achieve the unknown parameters of the Wiener model. In this study, an innovative approach for improving the Wiener model’s capability of predicting the dynamic behavior of nonlinear systems is presented with the assumption that the static behavior of the examined system is known. In the proposed model called the enhanced Wiener model (EWM), the parameters of the linear dynamic part are allowed to vary with the operating conditions; and thus, this model provides a higher flexibility in estimating the dynamic behavior of the examined system compared to the conventional Wiener models. The EWM consists of a static nonlinear block and a linear dynamic block with varying parameters. Since gas turbine engines are essentially nonlinear in both the steady and transient conditions, the modeling of a gas turbine can be a suitable case for evaluating the effectiveness of the proposed model. In this regard, in order to estimate the parameters of a two-shaft industrial gas turbine, five multi-input single-output (MISO) EWMs with a special structure are employed in which the parameters of the dynamic part of each EWM is determined by an adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). In order to evaluate the performance of the proposed model, the EWM results are compared with the result obtained by common system identification approaches like Wiener, Hammerstein, Wiener–Hammerstein, nonlinear autoregressive exogenous (NARX), and ANFIS models. The simulation results reveal that the proposed EWM not only is more flexible and effective in predicting the dynamic behavior of the examined gas turbine than the block-structured models, but it also outperforms the NARX and ANFIS models in estimating the static behavior of the gas turbine.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Vroemen, B. G., Van Essen, H. A., Van Steenhoven, A. A., and Kok, J. J., 1999, “Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of a Laboratory Gas Turbine Installation,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 121(4), pp. 629–634. [CrossRef]
Montazeri-Gh, M., Nasiri, M., and Jafari, S., 2011, “Real-Time Multi-Rate HIL Simulation Platform for Evaluation of a Jet Engine Fuel Controller,” Simul. Modell. Pract. Theory, 19(3), pp. 996–1006. [CrossRef]
Rowen, W. I., 1983, “Simplified Mathematical Representations of Heavy-Duty Gas Turbines,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 105(4), pp. 865–869. [CrossRef]
Evans, C., and Rees, D., 1998, “Frequency-Domain Identification of Gas Turbine Dynamics,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 6(5), pp. 651–662. [CrossRef]
Al-Hamdan, Q. Z., and Ebaid, M. S., 2005, “Modeling and Simulation of a Gas Turbine Engine for Power Generation,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 128(2), pp. 302–311. [CrossRef]
Asgari, H., Venturini, M., Chen, X., and Sainudiin, R., 2014, “Modeling and Simulation of the Transient Behavior of an Industrial Power Plant Gas Turbine,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 136(6), p. 061601. [CrossRef]
Crosa, G., Pittaluga, F., Trucco, A., Beltrami, F., Torelli, A., and Traverso, F., 1998, “Heavy-Duty Gas Turbine Plant Aerothermodynamic Simulation Using Simulink,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 120(3), pp. 550–556. [CrossRef]
Kim, J. H., Song, T. W., Kim, T. S., and Ro, S. T., 2000, “Model Development and Simulation of Transient Behavior of Heavy Duty Gas Turbines,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 123(3), pp. 589–594. [CrossRef]
Camporeale, S. M., Fortunato, B., and Mastrovito, M., 2002, “A Modular Code for Real Time Dynamic Simulation of Gas Turbines in Simulink,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 128(3), pp. 506–517. [CrossRef]
Chacartegui, R., Sánchez, D., Muñoz, A., and Sánchez, T., 2011, “Real Time Simulation of Medium Size Gas Turbines,” Energy Convers. Manage., 52(1), pp. 713–724. [CrossRef]
Prakash, R., Rao, S. V., and Skarvan, C. A., 1990, “Life Enhancement of a Gas Turbine Engine by Temperature Control,” Int. J. Turbo Jet Eng., 7(3–4), pp. 187–206. [CrossRef]
Vittal Rao, S., Moellenhoff, D., and Jaeger, J. A., 1990, “Linear State Variable Dynamic Model and Estimator Design for Allison T406 Gas Turbine,” Int. J. Turbo Jet Eng., 7(3–4), pp. 179–186. [CrossRef]
Breikin, T. V., Arkov, V. Y., and Kulikov, G. G., 2004, “Regularisation Approach for Real-Time Modelling of Aero Gas Turbines,” Control Eng. Pract., 12(4), pp. 401–407. [CrossRef]
Lichtsinder, M., and Levy, Y., 2004, “Jet Engine Model for Control and Real-Time Simulations,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 128(4), pp. 745–753. [CrossRef]
Bershad, N., Celka, P., and Laughlin, S. M., 2001, “Analysis of Stochastic Gradient Identification of Wiener–Hammerstein Systems for Nonlinearities With Hermite Polynomial Expansions,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 49(5), pp. 1060–1072. [CrossRef]
Marmarelis, V. Z., 1993, “Identification of Nonlinear Biological Systems Using Laguerre Expansions of Kernels,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., 21(6), pp. 573–589. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bai, E.-W., Cai, Z., Dudley-Javorosk, S., and Shields, R. K., 2009, “Identification of a Modified Wiener–Hammerstein System and Its Application in Electrically Stimulated Paralyzed Skeletal Muscle Modeling,” Automatica, 45(3), pp. 736–743. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mohammadi, E., Montazeri-Gh, M., and Khalaf, P., 2013, “Metaheuristic Design and Optimization of Fuzzy-Based Gas Turbine Engine Fuel Controller Using Hybrid Invasive Weed Optimization/Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 136(3), p. 031601. [CrossRef]
Narendra, K. S., and Gallman, P. G., 1966, “An Iterative Method for the Identification of Nonlinear Systems Using a Hammerstein Model,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 11(3), pp. 546–550. [CrossRef]
Chang, F., and Luus, R., 1971, “A Noniterative Method for Identification Using Hammerstein Model,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 16(5), pp. 464–468. [CrossRef]
Schetzen, M., 1981, “Nonlinear System Modeling Based on the Wiener Theory,” Proc. IEEE, 69(12), pp. 1557–1573. [CrossRef]
Hunter, W. I., and Korenberg, M. J., 1986, “The Identification of Nonlinear Biological Systems: Wiener and Hammerstein Cascade Models,” Biol. Cybern., 55(2–3), pp. 135–144. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Haber, R., 1988, “Parametric Identification of Nonlinear Dynamic Systems Based on Nonlinear Crosscorrelation Functions,” Control Theory Appl., 135(6), pp. 405–420. [CrossRef]
Chen, C. H., and Fassois, S. D., 1992, “Maximum Likelihood Identification of Stochastic Weiner–Hammerstein-Type Non-Linear Systems,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 6(2), pp. 135–153. [CrossRef]
Wigren, T., 1993, “Recursive Prediction Error Identification Using the Nonlinear Wiener Model,” Automatica, 29(4), pp. 1011–1025. [CrossRef]
Kalafatis, A., Arifin, N., Wang, L., and Cluett, W. R., 1995, “A New Approach to the Identification of pH Processes Based on the Wiener Model,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 50(23), pp. 3693–3701. [CrossRef]
Boutayeb, M., and Darouach, M., 1995, “Recursive Identification Method for MISO Wiener–Hammerstein Model,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 40(2), pp. 287–291. [CrossRef]
Pearson, R. K., and Pottmann, M., 2000, “Gray-Box Identification of Block-Oriented Nonlinear Models,” J. Process Control, 10(4), pp. 301–315. [CrossRef]
Crama, P., and Schoukens, J., 2001, “Initial Estimates of Wiener and Hammerstein Systems Using Multisine Excitation,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 50(6), pp. 1791–1795. [CrossRef]
Voros, J., 2007, “An Iterative Method for Wiener–Hammerstein Systems Parameter Identification,” J. Elec. Eng., 58(2), pp. 114–117. http://iris.elf.stuba.sk/cgi-bin/jeeec?act=abs&no=2_107&ttl=9
Ase, H., Katayama, T., and Tanaka, H., 2009, “A State-Space Approach to Identification of Wiener-Hammerstein Benchmark Model,” 15th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Saint-Malo, France, July 6–8, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1092–1097. [CrossRef]
Paduart, J., Lauwers, L., Pintelon, R., and Schoukens, J., 2012, “Identification of a Wiener–Hammerstein System Using the Polynomial Nonlinear State Space Approach,” Control Eng. Pract., 20(11), pp. 1133–1139. [CrossRef]
Celka, P., Bershad, N. J., and Vesin, J., 2001, “Stochastic Gradient Identification of Polynomial Wiener Systems: Analysis and Application,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 49(2), pp. 301–313. [CrossRef]
Bai, E. W., 2002, “A Blind Approach to the Hammerstein–Wiener Model Identification,” Automatica, 38(6), pp. 967–979. [CrossRef]
Schroder, D., Hintz, C., and Rau, M., 2001, “Intelligent Modeling, Observation, and Control for Nonlinear Systems,” IEEE Trans. Mechatron., 6(2), pp. 122–131. [CrossRef]
Jurado, F., and Carpio, J., 2003, “Modeling Micro-Turbines on the Distribution System Using Narx Structures,” Latin Am. Trans., IEEE (Revista IEEE America Latina), 1(1), pp. 34–39. [CrossRef]
Ruano, A. E., Fleming, P. J., Teixeira, C., Rodrı́Guez-Vázquez, K., and Fonseca, C. M., 2003, “Nonlinear Identification of Aircraft Gas-Turbine Dynamics,” Neurocomputing, 55(3–4), pp. 551–579. [CrossRef]
Basso, M., Giarre, L., Groppi, S., and Zappa, G., 2005, “Narx Models of an Industrial Power Plant Gas Turbine,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 13(4), pp. 599–604. [CrossRef]
Bettocchi, R., Pinelli, M., Spina, P. R., and Venturini, M., 2006, “Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnostics of Gas Turbines—Part I: Neural Network Approach,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 129(3), pp. 711–719. [CrossRef]
Fast, M., Assadi, M., and De, S., 2009, “Development and Multi-utility of an ANN Model for an Industrial Gas Turbine,” Appl. Energy, 86(1), pp. 9–17. [CrossRef]
Nikpey, H., Assadi, M., and Breuhaus, P., 2013, “Development of an Optimized Artificial Neural Network Model for Combined Heat and Power Micro Gas Turbines,” Appl. Energy, 108, pp. 137–148. [CrossRef]
Bettocchi, R., Pinelli, M., Spina, P. R., and Venturini, M., 2006, “Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnostics of Gas Turbines—Part II: Neuro-Fuzzy Approach,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 129(3), pp. 720–729. [CrossRef]
Shabanian, M., and Montazeri, M., 2011, “A Neuro-Fuzzy Online Fault Detection and Diagnosis Algorithm for Nonlinear and Dynamic Systems,” Int. J. Control, Autom., Syst., 9(4), pp. 665–670. [CrossRef]
Li, H.-X., and Chen, C. L. P., 2000, “The Equivalence Between Fuzzy Logic Systems and Feedforward Neural Networks,” IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 11(2), pp. 356–365. [CrossRef]
Jang, J.-S. R., 1993, “ANFIS: Adaptive-Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybern., 23(3), pp. 665–685. [CrossRef]
Billings, S. A., and Fakhouri, S. Y., 1982, “Identifications of Systems Containing Linear Dynamics and Static Nonlinear Elements,” Automatica, 18(1), pp. 15–26. [CrossRef]
G. G.Kulikov, and Thompson, H. A., 2004, Dynamic Modelling of Gas Turbines: Identification, Simulation, Condition Monitoring and Optimal Control, Springer-Verlag, Ltd., London.
Aguirre, L. A., Coelho, M. C. S., and Correa, M. V., 2005, “On the Interpretation and Practice of Dynamical Differences Between Hammerstein and Wiener Models,” IEE Proc.-Control Theory Appl., 152(4), pp. 349–356. [CrossRef]
Mehrabian, A. R., and Lucas, C., 2006, “A Novel Numerical Optimization Algorithm Inspired from Weed Colonization,” Ecol. Inf., 1(4), pp. 355–366. [CrossRef]
Jaw, L. C., and Mattingly, J. D., 2009, Aircraft Engine Controls: Design, System Analysis, and Health Monitoring (AIAA Education Series), American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA.
Delio, G. J., 1952, “Evaluation of Three Methods for Determining Dynamic Characteristics of a Turbojet Engine,” National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics Collection, Cleveland, OH, Technical Report No. 2634.
Siemens, 2005, “SGT-600 Industrial Gas Turbine,” Siemens Industrial Turbomachinery, Inc., Duisburg, Germany.
Massucco, S., Pitto, A., and Silvestro, F., 2011, “A Gas Turbine Model for Studies on Distributed Generation Penetration Into Distribution Networks,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 26(3), pp. 992–999. [CrossRef]
Strand, T., 2006, “Industrial Gas Turbine Control,” Siemens Power Generation, Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany, available at: www.energy.kth.se/courses/4a1626/ahpt2006/gtcontrol.pdf
Nelles, O., and Isermann, R., 1995, “Identification of Nonlinear Dynamic Systems Classical Methods Versus Radial Basis Function Networks,” American Control Conference (ACC), Seattle, WA, June 21–23, pp. 3786–3790. [CrossRef]
Nelles, O., 2001, Nonlinear System Identification: From Classical Approaches to Neural Networks and Fuzzy Models, Springer, New York.
Deflorian, M., and Zaglauer, S., 2011, “Design of Experiments for Nonlinear Dynamic System Identification,” 18th IFAC World Congress, Milano, Aug. 28–Sept. 2, pp. 13179–13184. [CrossRef]
Rodriquez, K., 1999, “Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms in Non-Linear System Identification,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Pizzileo, B., Li, K., Irwin, G. W., and Zhao, W., 2012, “Improved Structure Optimization for Fuzzy-Neural Networks,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 20(6), pp. 1076–1089. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

A typical ANFIS architecture with multi-inputs and one output

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Block diagrams of the block-structured models: (a) Hammerstein model, (b) Wiener model, and (c) Wiener–Hammerstein model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The schematic of the EWM training

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The overall configuration of the enhanced Wiener model for the two-shaft gas turbine modeling

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Schematic representation of the two-shaft gas turbine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Schematic of the gas turbine control circuit

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Load variations in train mode (QAPRBS signal)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

NGG variations in train mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Fuel flow variations in train mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

EGT variations in train mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Output power variations in train mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

CPR variations in train mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

CAMF variations in train mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

NPT variations in train mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Variation of the “τ” in the EWM versus the WM for estimation of the NGG (training data)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Variation of the “τ” in the EWM versus the WM for estimation of the EGT (training data)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Variation of the “τ” in the EWM versus the WM for estimation of the CAMF (training data)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Drop in the PC index when the examined models subjected to the untrained data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Load variations in test mode (QAPRBS signal)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Fuel flow variations in test mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

NPT variations in test mode

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

NGG variations in test mode (the selected region)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

EGT variations in test mode (the selected region)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

The percentage of error in estimation of the static behavior of the (a) CAMF, (b) NGG, (c) CPR, (d) EGT, and (e) OP

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In