0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Amplitude-Dependent Flow Field and Flame Response to Axial and Tangential Velocity Fluctuations

[+] Author and Article Information
Sebastian Schimek

Hermann-Föttinger-Institut,
Technische Universität Berlin,
Müller-Breslau-Str. 8,
Berlin 10623, Germany
e-mail: Schimek@tu-berlin.de

Bernhard Ćosić, Jonas P. Moeck, Steffen Terhaar, Christian Oliver Paschereit

Hermann-Föttinger-Institut,
Technische Universität Berlin,
Müller-Breslau-Str. 8,
Berlin 10623, Germany

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received September 3, 2014; final manuscript received October 9, 2014; published online January 28, 2015. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 137(8), 081501 (Aug 01, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1525; doi: 10.1115/1.4029368 History: Received September 03, 2014; Revised October 09, 2014; Online January 28, 2015

The current paper investigates the nonlinear interaction of the flow field and the unsteady heat release rate and the role of swirl fluctuations. The test rig consists of a generic swirl-stabilized combustor fed with natural gas and equipped with a high-amplitude forcing device. The influence of the phase between axial and azimuthal velocity oscillations is assessed on the basis of the amplitude and phase relations between the velocity fluctuations at the inlet and the outlet of the burner. These relations are determined in the experiment with the multimicrophone-method and a two component laser Doppler velocimeter (LDV). Particle image velocimetry (PIV) and OH*-chemiluminescence measurements are conducted to study the interaction between the flow field and the flame. For several frequency regimes, characteristic properties of the forced flow field and flame are identified, and a strong amplitude dependence is observed. It is found that the convective time delay between the swirl generator and the flame has an important influence on swirl-number oscillations and the flame dynamics in the low-frequency regime. For mid and high frequencies, significant changes in the mean flow field and the mean flame position are identified for high forcing amplitudes. These affect the interaction between coherent structures and the flame and are suggested to be responsible for the saturation in the flame response at high forcing amplitudes.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Lieuwen, T. C., and Yang, V., eds., 2005, Combustion Instabilities in Gas Turbine Engines (Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, Vol. 210), American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, pp. 445–480.
Dowling, A. P., and Stow, S. R., 2003, “Acoustic Analysis of Gas Turbine Combustors,” J. Propul. Power, 19(5), pp. 751–764. [CrossRef]
Paschereit, C. O., Schuermans, B., Bellucci, V., and Flohr, P., 2005, “Implementation of Instability Prediction in Design: ALSTOM Approaches,” Combustion Instabilities in Gas Turbine Engines (Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, Vol. 210), T. C.Lieuwen and V.Yang, eds., American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, pp. 445–480.
Dowling, A. P., 1997, “Nonlinear Self-Excited Oscillations of a Ducted Flame,” J. Fluid Mech., 346(9), pp. 271–290. [CrossRef]
Bellows, B. B., Bobba, M. K., Forte, A., Seitzmann, J. M., and Lieuwen, T., 2007, “Flame Transfer Function Saturation Mechanisms in a Swirl-Stabilized Combustor,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 31(2), pp. 3181–3188. [CrossRef]
Balachandran, R., Ayoola, B. O., Kaminski, C. F., Dowling, A. P., and Mastorakos, E., 2005, “Experimental Investigation of the Nonlinear Response of Turbulent Premixed Flames to Imposed Inlet Velocity Oscillations,” Combust. Flame, 143(1–2), pp. 37–55. [CrossRef]
Noiray, N., Durox, D., Schuller, T., and Candel, S., 2008, “A Unified Framework for Nonlinear Combustion Instability Analysis Based on the Flame Describing Function,” J. Fluid Mech., 615(11), pp. 139–167. [CrossRef]
Schuermans, B., Bellucci, V., Guethe, F., Meili, F., Flohr, P., and Paschereit, C. O., 2004, “A Detailed Analysis of Thermoacoustic Interaction Mechanisms in a Turbulent Premixed Flame,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53831. [CrossRef]
Culick, F., Ratner, A., Isella, G., Matveev, K., Palm, S. P., Pun, W., Seywert, C., and Swenson, G., 2001, “Nonuniformities of Mixture Ratio as a Mechanism of Combustion Instabilities in Lean Pre-Mixed Combustors,” Jet Propulsion Center, California Institute of Technology, AGTSR Subcontract No. 98-01-SR063.
Schuermans, B., Polifke, W., Paschereit, C. O., and van der Linden, J. H., 2000, “Prediction of Acoustic Pressure Spectra in Combustion Systems Using Swirl Stabilized Gas Turbine Burners,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-0105. [CrossRef]
Lieuwen, T. C., Torres, H., Johnson, C., and Zinn, B. T., 2001, “A Mechanism of Combustion Instability in Lean Premixed Gas Turbine Combustors,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 123(1), pp. 182–189. [CrossRef]
Thumuluru, S. K., and Lieuwen, T., 2009, “Characterisation of Acoustically Forced Swirl Flame Dynamics,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 32(2), pp. 2893–2900. [CrossRef]
Schimek, S., Moeck, J. P., and Paschereit, C. O., 2011, “An Experimental Investigation of the Nonlinear Response of an Atmospheric Swirl-Stabilized Premixed Flame,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 133(10), p. 101502. [CrossRef]
Palies, P., Schuller, T., Durox, D., and Candel, S., 2011, “Modeling of Premixed Swirling Flames Transfer Functions,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 33(2), pp. 2967–2974. [CrossRef]
Poinsot, T. J., Trouvé, A. C., Veynante, D. P., Candel, S. M., and Esposito, E. J., 1987, “Vortex-Driven Acoustically Coupled Combustion Instabilities,” J. Fluid Mech., 177(4), pp. 265–292. [CrossRef]
Armitage, C. A., Balachandran, R., Mastorakos, E., and Cant, R. S., 2006, “Investigation of the Nonlinear Response of Turbulent Premixed Flames to Imposed Inlet Velocity Oscillations,” Combust. Flame, 146(3), pp. 419–436. [CrossRef]
Oberleithner, K., Schimek, S., and Paschereit, C. O., 2012, “On the Impact of Shear Flow Instabilities on Global Heat Release Rate Fluctuations: Linear Stability Analysis of an Isothermal and a Reacting Swirling Jet,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-69774. [CrossRef]
Palies, P., Durox, D., Schuller, T., and Candel, S., 2010, “The Combined Dynamics of Swirler and Turbulent Premixed Swirling Flames,” Combust. Flame, 157(9), pp. 1698–1717. [CrossRef]
Leuckel, W., 1967, “Swirl Intensities, Swirl Types and Energy Losses of Different Swirl Generating Devices,” International Flame Research Foundation, Ijmuiden, The Netherlands, Technical Report No. G02/a/16.
Schneider, C., 2004, “Über die Charakterisierung von Turbulenzstrukturen in verdrallten Strömungen,” Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.
Paschereit, C. O., Schuermans, B., Polifke, W., and Mattson, O., 2002, “Measurement of Transfer Matrices and Source Terms of Premixed Flames,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 124(2), pp. 239–247. [CrossRef]
Güthe, F., and Schuermans, B., 2007, “Phase-Locking in Post-Processing for Pulsating Flames,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 18(9), pp. 3036–3042. [CrossRef]
Jaffe, S., Larjo, J., and Henberg, R., 1991, “Abel Inversion Using the Fast Fourier Transform,” 10th International Symposium on Plasma Chemistry, Bochum, Germany, Aug. 4–9.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Acoustic energy balance and supercritical instability

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Test rig overview with measurement devices

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Burner, swirl generator with annular duct, and area jump to silica glass combustion chamber; flame angle (FA) and center of mass (COM) are indicated

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Burner, cut through the movable block swirl generator

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Acoustic burner describing function, gain, and phase of the transfer function relating axial velocity fluctuations at the swirler inlet to axial velocity fluctuations at the combustion chamber inlet. Symbols indicate the forcing level in terms of the normalized acoustic velocity amplitude (|u'|/u¯) at the combustion chamber inlet.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Acoustic burner describing function, gain, and phase of the transfer function relating axial velocity fluctuations at the swirler inlet to azimuthal velocity fluctuations at the combustion chamber inlet. Symbols indicate the forcing level in terms of the normalized acoustic velocity amplitude (|u'|/u¯) at the combustion chamber inlet.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Flame describing function for various forcing amplitudes. Symbols indicate the forcing level in terms of the normalized acoustic velocity amplitude (|u'|/u¯) at the combustion chamber inlet.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Two columns corresponding to u'/u¯ = 0.22 (left) and 0.33 (right) at 53 Hz. Each row corresponds to one of eight equidistant phases of the forcing period. Each individual picture shows the OH* image of the flame and the corresponding phase-averaged flow field.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Amplitude-dependent flame response at 53 Hz

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Axial displacement of the COM of the OH*-chemiluminescence images versus acoustic displacement in the annular jet; straight line indicates equal acoustic and com displacements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Two columns corresponding to |u'|/u¯ = 0.19 (left) and 0.77 (right) at 123 Hz. Each row corresponds to one of eight equidistant phases of the forcing period. Each individual picture shows the OH* image of the flame and the corresponding phase-averaged flow field.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Amplitude-dependent flame response at 123 Hz

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Two columns corresponding to |u'|/u¯ = 0.12 (left) and 0.75 (right) at 254 Hz. Each row corresponds to one of eight equidistant phases of the forcing period. Each individual picture shows the OH* image of the flame and the corresponding phase-averaged flow field.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Amplitude-dependent flame response at 254 Hz

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

FA at various forcing amplitudes at 254 Hz (black) and for various other forcing frequencies (gray)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Average over the oscillation cycle of the transverse moment of inertia of the phase-averaged OH* chemiluminescence distribution plotted against the acoustic displacement. Axial expansion of the flame increases with increasing forcing amplitude.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Two columns corresponding to |u'|/u¯ = 0.07 (left) and 0.37 (right) at 400 Hz. Each row corresponds to one of eight equidistant phases of the forcing period. Each individual picture shows the OH* image of the flame and the corresponding phase-averaged flow field.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Amplitude-dependent flame response at 400 Hz

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Left: OH* image averaged over all phases; right: fluctuating part of OH* image at an arbitrary phase illustrating the convective length scale

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In