0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Near-Field Characteristics of a Rectangular Jet and Its Effect on the Liftoff of Turbulent Methane Flame

[+] Author and Article Information
Mohsen Akbarzadeh

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Manitoba,
Winnipeg,
Manitoba R3T 5V6, Canada
e-mail: Mohsen.Akbarzadeh@umanitoba.ca

Madjid Birouk

Professor
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Manitoba,
Winnipeg,
Manitoba R3T 5V6, Canada
e-mail: Madjid.Birouk@umanitoba.ca

Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received September 12, 2014; final manuscript received November 17, 2014; published online January 28, 2015. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 137(8), 081502 (Aug 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1547; doi: 10.1115/1.4029371 History: Received September 12, 2014; Revised November 17, 2014; Online January 28, 2015

Understanding the stability of turbulent flames is a key for the design of efficient combustion systems. The present paper reports an experimental study on the effect of the internal geometry of a rectangular orifice on the characteristics/stability of a turbulent methane flame. Three rectangular nozzles with different orifice lengths having an identical exit aspect ratio (AR) of 2 were used. The co-airflow strength was also varied to evaluate its effect on the jet flow emerging from the rectangular nozzle. The experimental data revealed that the jet initial conditions affect both the flow characteristics and the liftoff of turbulent diffusion methane flame. That is, increasing the orifice length of the rectangular nozzle resulted in delaying the occurrence of the axis-switching phenomenon, reducing the length of the jet potential core, and accelerating the liftoff transition of the attached flame. The co-airflow was found to reduce the velocity strain rate in the shear layer, displace the occurrence of axis-switching farther downstream of the jet, and delay flame detachment. The results revealed also that there is a clear interplay between the flame liftoff and the jet near-field molecular mixing and flow characteristics. That is, a rectangular jet which spreads faster and generates higher near-field velocity strain and turbulence intensity causes flame detachment at a lower fuel jet velocity. Based on this, a correlation was found between the flame liftoff velocity, the fuel molecular thermal diffusivity, the stoichiometric laminar flame speed, and the fuel jet strain rate at the nozzle exit. This relationship was shown to successfully predict the liftoff velocity of methane flame as well as other common gaseous hydrocarbons and hydrogen flames.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Nathan, G. J., Mi, J., Alwahabi, Z. T., Newbold, G. J. R., and Nobes, D. S., 2006, “Impacts of a Jet’s Exit Flow Pattern on Mixing and Combustion Performance,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 32(5–6), pp. 496–538. [CrossRef]
Iyogun, C. O., and Birouk, M., 2009, “Effect of Sudden Expansion on Entrainment and Spreading Rates of a Jet Issuing From Asymmetric Nozzles,” Flow, Turbul. Combust., 82(3), pp. 287–315. [CrossRef]
Quinn, W. R., 1992, “Turbulent Free Jet Flows Issuing From Sharp-Edged Rectangular Slots: The Influence of Slot Aspect Ratio,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 5(2), pp. 203–215. [CrossRef]
Iyogun, C. O., and Birouk, M., 2008, “Effect of Fuel Nozzle Geometry on the Stability of a Turbulent Jet Methane Flame,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 180(12), pp. 2186–2209. [CrossRef]
Akbarzadeh, M., 2014, “An Experimental Study on the Liftoff of a Co-Flowing Non-Premixed Turbulent Methane Flame: Effect of the Fuel Nozzle Geometry,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Feikema, D., Chen, R., and Driscoll, J., 1990, “Enhancement of Flame Blowout Limits by the Use of Swirl,” Combust. Flame, 80(2), pp. 183–195. [CrossRef]
Gutmark, E. J., and Grinstein, F. F., 1999, “Flow Control With Noncircular Jets,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 31, pp. 239–272. [CrossRef]
Grandmaison, E., Pollard, A., and Ng, S., 1991, “Scalar Mixing in a Free, Turbulent Rectangular Jet,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 34(10), pp. 2653–2662. [CrossRef]
Sfeir, A., 1976, “The Velocity and Temperature Fields of Rectangular Jets,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 19(11), pp. 1289–1297. [CrossRef]
Tsuchiya, Y., and Horikoshi, C., 1986, “On the Spread of Rectangular Jets,” Exp. Fluids, 4(4), pp. 197–204. [CrossRef]
Lozanova, M., and Stankov, P., 1998, “Experimental Investigation on the Similarity of a 3D Rectangular Turbulent Jet,” Exp. Fluids, 24(5–6), pp. 470–478. [CrossRef]
Krothapalli, A., Baganoff, D., and Karamcheti, K., 1981, “On the Mixing of a Rectangular Jet,” J. Fluid Mech., 107, pp. 201–220. [CrossRef]
Akbarzadeh, M., Birouk, M., and Sarh, B., 2012, “Numerical Simulation of a Turbulent Free Jet Issuing From a Rectangular Nozzle,” Comput. Therm. Sci., 4(1), pp. 1–22. [CrossRef]
Quinn, W. R., 1995, “Turbulent Mixing in a Free Jet Issuing From a Low Aspect Ratio Contoured Rectangular Nozzle,” Aeronaut. J., 99(988), pp. 337–342.
Gollahalli, S. R., Khanna, T., and Prabhu, N., 1992, “Diffusion Flames of Gas Jets Issued From Circular and Elliptic Nozzles,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 86(1–6), pp. 267–288. [CrossRef]
Akbarzadeh, M., and Birouk, M., 2014, “Liftoff of a Co-Flowing Non-Premixed Turbulent Methane Flame: Effect of the Fuel Nozzle Orifice Geometry,” Flow, Turbul. Combust., 92(4), pp. 903–929. [CrossRef]
Iyogun, C. O., 2009, “Effect of Nozzle Geometry on the Stability of a Turbulent Jet Flame With and Without Swirling Co-Flow,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Manitoba.
Akbarzadeh, M., and Birouk, M., 2013, “Liftoff of a Co-Flowing Non-Premixed Turbulent Methane Flame: Effect of the Internal Geometrical Parameters of a Circular Fuel Nozzle,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 185(10), pp. 1–23. [CrossRef]
Abramovich, G., 1982, “On the Deformation of the Rectangular Turbulent Jet Cross-Section,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 25(12), pp. 1885–1894. [CrossRef]
Everest, D., Feikema, D., and Driscoll, J., 1996, “Images of the Strained Flammable Layer Used to Study the Liftoff of Turbulent Jet Flames,” Symp. Combust., 26(1), pp. 129–136. [CrossRef]
Chung, S. H., and Lee, B. J., 1991, “On the Characteristics of Laminar Lifted Flames in a Nonpremixed Jet,” Combust. Flame, 86(1–2), pp. 62–72. [CrossRef]
Lewis, B., and Von Elbe, G., 2012, Combustion, Flames and Explosions of Gases, Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
Lee, B. J., and Chung, S. H., 1997, “Stabilization of Lifted Tribrachial Flames in a Laminar Nonpremixed Jet,” Combust. Flame, 109(1–2), pp. 163–172. [CrossRef]
Lee, B., Cha, M., and Chung, S., 1997, “Characteristics of Laminar Lifted Flames in a Partially Premixed Jet,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 127(1–6), pp. 55–70. [CrossRef]
Savas, O., and Gollahalli, S. R., 1986, “Flow Structure in Near-Nozzle Region of Gas Jet Flames,” AIAA J., 24(7), pp. 1137–1140. [CrossRef]
Cessou, A., Maurey, C., and Stepowski, D., 2004, “Parametric and Statistical Investigation of the Behavior of a Lifted Flame Over a Turbulent Free-Jet Structure,” Combust. Flame, 137(4), pp. 458–477. [CrossRef]
Takahashi, F., and Schmoll, W. J., 1991, “Lifting Criteria of Jet Diffusion Flames,” Symp. Combust., 23(1), pp. 677–683. [CrossRef]
Gollahalli, S. R., Savaş, Ö., Huang, R. F., and Azara, J. L. R., 1988, “Structure of Attached and Lifted Gas Jet Flames in Hysteresis Region,” Symp. Combust., 21(1), pp. 1463–1471. [CrossRef]
Mastorakos, E., 2009, “Ignition of Turbulent Non-Premixed Flames,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 35(1), pp. 57–97. [CrossRef]
Undapalli, S., 2008, “Large Eddy Simulation of Premixed and Non-Premixed Combustion in a Stagnation Point Reverse Flow Combustor,” Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
Akbarzadeh, M., and Birouk, M., 2014, “On the Hysteresis Phenomenon of Turbulent Lifted Diffusion Methane Flame,” Flow, Turbul. Combust. (epub). [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of (a) the experimental burner setup and (b) the burner and the fuel nozzle geometry (Dcoh = 21.7 mm is the hydraulic diameter of the co-airflow annulus)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Initial velocity profiles (U/Ujet, u/Ujet, and v/Ujet) along the major axis of the rectangular jet (x/De ∼ 0.25 and Uco ∼ 0.2 m/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Initial velocity profiles (U/Ujet and u/Ujet) along the minor axis of the rectangular jet (x/De ∼ 0.25 and Uco ∼ 0.2 m/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Lateral (y1/2/De) and spanwise (z1/2/De) spread of rectangular jet for a weak co-airflow (Uco ∼ 0.2 m/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Lateral (y1/2/De) and spanwise (z1/2/De) spread of rectangular jet for a relatively strong co-airflow (Uco ∼ 0.9 m/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Contours of the streamwise turbulence intensity u/Ujet (in the major plane) showing the jet’s core potential length xp/De (Uco ∼ 0.6 m/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Flame liftoff velocity Ul versus Uco

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Initial velocity profiles (U/Ujet) along the major axis of rectangular jet with L/De = 1 for different co-airflow strengths (Uco ∼ 0.2 and 0.9 m/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Large-scale structures at the interface between the central jet and surrounding co-airflow (L/De = 5.6)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In