Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Chemiluminescence Studies of Coke Oven Gas/O2 Coflow Normal/Inverse Diffusion Flames

[+] Author and Article Information
Xudong Song, Yan Gong, Qinghua Guo, Zhenghua Dai

Key Laboratory of Coal Gasification and Energy
Chemical Engineering of Ministry of Education,
Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Coal Gasification,
East China University of Science and Technology,
Shanghai 200237, China

Guangsuo Yu

Key Laboratory of Coal Gasification and Energy
Chemical Engineering of Ministry of Education,
Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Coal Gasification,
East China University of Science and Technology,
Shanghai 200237, China
e-mail: gsyu@ecust.edu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received June 13, 2014; final manuscript received January 3, 2015; published online February 10, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Kalyan Annamalai.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 137(8), 081505 (Aug 01, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1284; doi: 10.1115/1.4029623 History: Received June 13, 2014; Revised January 03, 2015; Online February 10, 2015

In order to analyze the difference between the inverse diffusion flame (IDF) and normal diffusion flame (NDF) under various conditions, the emission spectra of OH* and CH* chemiluminescence in two dimensions measured by hyperspectral and ultraviolet (UV) cameras are described in this article. The results show that CH* mainly appears in the fuel side near the flame front, while OH* distribution can reflect the reaction region of flame. According to the OH* radial distributions in IDF and NDF, the flame can be divided into three parts: the core area of the flame, the transition region of the flame, and the developed region of flame. The peak intensity of CH* in IDF is higher than that in NDF. Moreover, the length of reaction region in NDF increases with O/C equivalence ratio ([O/C]e) until it reaches a steady value, while in IDF the length decreased with the increase of [O/C]e.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Razzaq, R., Li, C. S., and Zhang, S. J., 2013, “Coke Oven Gas: Availability, Properties, Purification, and Utilization in China,” Fuel, 113, pp. 287–299. [CrossRef]
Yang, Z., Ding, W., Zhang, Y., Lu, X., Zhang, Y., and Shen, P., 2010, “Catalytic Partial Oxidation of Coke Oven Gas to Syngas in an Oxygen Permeation Membrane Reactor Combined With NiO/MgO Catalyst,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 35(12), pp. 6239–6247. [CrossRef]
Mahesh, S., and Mishra, D. P., 2008, “Flame Stability and Emission Characteristics of Turbulent LPG IDF in a Backstep Burner,” Fuel, 87(12), pp. 2614–2619. [CrossRef]
Mikofski, M. A., Williams, T. C., and Shaddix, C. R., 2006, “Flame Height Measurement of Laminar Inverse Diffusion Flames,” Combust. Flame, 146(1–2), pp. 63–72. [CrossRef]
Zhen, H. S., Leung, C. W., and Cheung, C. S., 2009, “Heat Transfer From a Turbulent Swirling Inverse Diffusion Flame to a Flat Surface,” Int. J. Heat Mass Trans., 52(11–12), pp. 2740–2748. [CrossRef]
Kaplan, C. R., and Kailashnath, K., 2001, “Flow Field Effects on Soot Formation in Normal and Inverse Diffusion Flames,” Combust. Flame, 124(1–2), pp. 275–294. [CrossRef]
Demarco, R., Nmira, F., and Consalvi, J. L., 2013, “Influence of Thermal Radiation on Soot Production in Laminar Axisymmetric Diffusion Flames,” J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 120, pp. 52–69. [CrossRef]
Sunderland, P. B., Krishnan, S. S., and Gore, J. P., 2004, “Effects of Oxygen Enhancement and Gravity on Normal and Inverse Laminar Jet Diffusion Flames,” Combust. Flame, 136(1--2), pp. 254–256. [CrossRef]
Takagi, T., Wu, T., and Komiyama, M., 1996, “Preferential Diffusion Effects on the Temperature in Usual and Inverse Diffusion Flames,” Combust. Flame, 106(3), pp. 252–260. [CrossRef]
Javier, B., and Tatiana, G. A., 2010, “Diagnostic Techniques for the Monitoring and Control of Practical Flames,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 36(4), pp. 375–411. [CrossRef]
Gaydon, A. G., and Wolfhard, H. G., 1960, Flames: Their Structure, Radiation and Temperature, Chapman and Hall, London.
Ballester, J., Hernández, R., Sanz, A., Somlarz, A., Barroso, J., and Pina, A., 2009, “Chemiluminescence Monitoring in Premixed Flames of Natural Gas and Its Blends With Hydrogen,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 32(2), pp. 2983–2991. [CrossRef]
Rieker, G. B., Jeffries, J. B., Hanson, R. K., Mathur, T., Gruber, M. R., and Carter, C. D., 2009, “Diode Laser-Based Detection of Combustor Instabilities With Application to a Scramjet Engine,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 32(1), pp. 831–838. [CrossRef]
Li, Z. S., Li, B., Sun, Z. W., and Aldén, M., 2010, “Turbulence and Combustion Interaction: High Resolution Local Flame Front Structure Visualization Using Simultaneous Single-Shot PLIF Imaging of CH, OH, and CH2O in a Piloted Premixed Jet Flame,” Combust. Flame, 157(6), pp. 1087–1096. [CrossRef]
Kothnur, P. S., Tsurikov, M. S., Clemens, N. T., Donbar, J. M., and Carter, C. D., 2002, “Planar Imaging of CH/OH and Velocity in Turbulent Non-Premixed Jet Flames,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 29(2), pp. 1921–1927. [CrossRef]
Lacoste, D. A., Moeck, J. P., Durox, D., Laux, C. O., and Schuller, T., 2013, “Effect of Nanosecond Repetitively Pulsed Discharges on the Dynamics of a Swirl-Stabilized Lean Premixed Flame,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 135(10), p. 101501. [CrossRef]
Lauer, M., Zellhuber, M., Sattelmayer, T., Aul, C. J., and Lee, E., 2011, “Determination of the Heat Release Distribution in Turbulent Flames by a Model Based Correction of OH* Chemiluminescence,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 133(12), p. 121501. [CrossRef]
Marchese, A. J., Dryer, F. L., Nayagam, V., and Colantonio, R. O., 1996, “Hydroxyl Radical Chemiluminescence Imaging and the Structure of Microgravity Droplet Flames,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 26(1), pp. 1219–1226. [CrossRef]
Kojima, J., Ikeda, Y., and Nakajima, T., 2005, “Basic Aspects of OH(A), CH(A), and C2(d) Chemiluminescence in the Reaction Zone of Laminar Methane-Air Premixed Flames,” Combust. Flame, 140(1–2), pp. 34–45. [CrossRef]
Fu, J., Tang, C. L., Jin, W., Thi, L. D., Huang, Z. H., and Zhang, Y., 2013, “Study on Laminar Flame Speed and Flame Structure of Syngas With Varied Compositions Using OH-PLIF and Spectrograph,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 38(3), pp.1636–1643. [CrossRef]
Zhang, T., Guo, Q. H., Song, X. D., Zhou, Z. J., and Yu, G. S., 2013, “The Chemiluminescence and Structure Properties of Normal/Inverse Diffusion Flames,” J. Spectrosc., 2013, p. 304717. [CrossRef]
Beér, J. M., and Chigier, N. A., 1972, Combustion Aerodynamics, Applied Science Publishers, London.
Zhang, T., Guo, Q. H., Lang, Q. F., Dai, Z. H., and Yu, G. S., 2012, “Distribution Characteristics of OH*, CH*, and C2* Luminescence in CH4/O2 Co-Flow Diffusion Flames,” Energy Fuel, 26(9), pp. 5503–5508. [CrossRef]
Carl, S. A., Van Poppel, M., and Peeters, J., 2003, “Identification of the CH + O2 → OH(A) + CO Reaction as the Source of OH(A-X) Chemiluminescence in C2H2/O/H/O2 Atomic Flames and Determination of Its Absolute Rate Constant Over the Range T=296 to 511 K,” J. Phys. Chem. A, 107(50), pp. 11001–11007. [CrossRef]
Smith, G. P., Park, C., and Luque, J., 2005, “A Note on Chemiluminescence in Low-Pressure Hydrogen and Methane–Nitrous Oxide Flames,” Combust. Flame, 140(4), pp. 385–389. [CrossRef]
Tamura, M., Berg, P. A., Harrington, J. E., Luque, J., Jeffries, J. B., Smith, G. P., and Crosley, D. R., 1998, “Collisional Quenching of CH(A), OH(A), and NO(A) in Low Pressure Hydrocarbon Flames,” Combust. Flame, 114(3–4), pp. 502–514. [CrossRef]
Tripathi, M. M., Krishnan, S. R., Srinivasan, K. K., Yueh, F. Y., and Singh, J. P., 2012, “Chemiluminescence-Based Multivariate Sensing of Local Equivalence Ratios in Premixed Atmospheric Methane-Air Flames,” Fuel, 93, pp. 684–691. [CrossRef]
Tamir, A., 1994, Impinging-Stream Reactors: Fundamentals and Applications, Elsevier, Amsterdam.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The schematic diagram of the spectroscopic diagnostic system for jet diffusion flame

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

OH* distribution of IDF for condition 11 ((a) OH* 2D profile and (b) OH* radial distribution)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of OH* two-dimensional distribution of IDF with different [O/C]e

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The change of OH* maximum emission intensity with [O/C]e for different conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

OH* distribution of NDF for condition 11 ((a) OH* 2D profile and (b) OH* radial distribution)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison of OH* two-dimensional distribution of NDF with different [O/C]e

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

CH* distribution of NDF for condition 11 ((a) CH* 2D profile and (b) CH* radial distribution)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Comparison of CH* and OH* radial distributions of NDF for condition 11

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

CH* distribution of IDF for condition 11 ((a) CH* 2D profile and (b) CH* radial distribution)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of CH* two-dimensional distribution of NDF (a, b, c) and IDF (d, e, f) with different [O/C]e

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

The dimension of different part of flame at different conditions ((I) vCOG = 0.5 L/min NDF, (II) vCOG = 1.0 L/min NDF, (III) vCOG = 1.5 L/min NDF, (IV) vCOG = 0.5 L/min IDF, (V) vCOG = 1.0 L/min IDF, and (VI) vCOG = 1.5 L/min IDF) ((a) the whole reaction region of the flame; (b) the care area of flame; and (c) the full development region of flame)



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In