Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Full-Parameter Approach for the Intake Port Design of a Four-Valve Direct-Injection Gasoline Engine

[+] Author and Article Information
Lei Cui

State Key Laboratory of Engines,
Tianjin University,
Weijin Road 92,
Tianjin City 300072, China
e-mail: cuilei@tju.edu.cn

Tianyou Wang

State Key Laboratory of Engines,
Tianjin University,
Weijin Road 92,
Tianjin City 300072, China
e-mail: wangtianyou@tju.edu.cn

Zhen Lu

State Key Laboratory of Engines,
Tianjin University,
Weijin Road 92,
Nankai District,
Tianjin City 300072, China
e-mail: luzhen@tju.edu.cn

Ming Jia

School of Energy and Power Engineering,
Dalian University of Technology,
Dalian City 116024, China
e-mail: jm2020jm@gmail.com

Yanzhe Sun

State Key Laboratory of Engines,
Tianjin University,
Weijin Road 92,
Tianjin City 300072, China
e-mail: sunyanzhe@tju.edu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received November 25, 2014; final manuscript received January 19, 2015; published online February 18, 2015. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 137(9), 091502 (Sep 01, 2015) (11 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1637; doi: 10.1115/1.4029686 History: Received November 25, 2014; Revised January 19, 2015; Online February 18, 2015

The design of the intake port plays a critical role in the development of modern internal combustion (IC) engines. The traditional method of the intake port design is a time-consuming process including a huge amount of tests and the production of core box. Compared with the traditional methods, parametric approach attracts increasing attentions by virtue of its high-efficiency, traceability, and flexibility. Based on a tangential port model created by a three-dimensional (3D) computer aided design (cad) software, a new tangential port can be quickly generated with different sets of structure parameters, then computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was employed to explore the influence of structure parameters on the intake port performance. The results show that the flow capacity and the large-scale vortex intensity change regularly with the variations of structure parameters. Finally, the parametric approach was employed to design the intake port of a production four-valve direct-injection (DI) gasoline engine, and the good applicability this approach is well illustrated.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Endres, H., Neuβer, H. J., and Wurms, R., 1992, “Influence of Swirl and Tumble on Economy and Emissions of Multi Valve SI Engines,” SAE Technical Paper No. 920516. [CrossRef]
Adomeit, P., Jakob, M., Pischinger, S., Brunn, A., and Ewald, J., 2011, “Effect of Intake Port Design on the Flow Field Stability of a Gasoline DI Engine,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2011-01-1284. [CrossRef]
Witze, P. O., Martin, J. K., and Borgnakke, C., 1983, “Measurements and Predictions of the Precombustion Fluid Motion and Combustion Rates in a Spark Ignition Engine,” SAE Technical Paper No. 831697. [CrossRef]
Omori, S., Iwachido, K., Motomochi, M., and Hirako, O., 1991, “Effect of Intake Port Flow Pattern on the In-Cylinder Tumbling Air Flow in Multi-Valve SI Engines,” SAE Technical Paper No. 910477. [CrossRef]
Mandloi, P., and Verma, G., 2009, “Design Optimization of an In-Cylinder Engine Intake Port,” NAFEMS World Congress 2009, Crete, June 16–19.
Gale, N. F., 1990, “Diesel Engine Cylinder Head Design: The Compromises and the Techniques,” SAE Technical Paper No. 900133. [CrossRef]
Widener, S. K., 1995, “Parametric Design of Helical Intake Ports,” SAE Technical Paper No. 950818. [CrossRef]
Takenaka, Y., Nakajima, H., and Mehri, D., 2000, “Application of Automatic Geometry Creation and Mesh Generation Technique for Port,” Seoul 2000 FISITA WORLD Automotive Congress, Seoul, June 12–15.
Affes, H., Trigui, N., Smith, D., and Griaznov, V., 1998, “Shape Optimization of IC Engine Ports and Chambers,” SAE Technical Paper No. 980127. [CrossRef]
Kawaguchi, A., Aiba, T., Takada, N., and Ona, K., 2009, “A Robustness-Focused Shape Optimization Method for Intake Ports,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2009-01-1777. [CrossRef]
Cantore, G., Fontanesi, S., Gagliardi, V., and Malaguti, S., 2005, “Effects of Relative Port Orientation on the In-Cylinder Flow Patterns in a Small Unit Displacement HSDI Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2005-32-0093. [CrossRef]
Blaxill, H., Downing, J., Seabrook, J., and Fry, M., 1999, “A Parametric Approach to Spark-Ignition Engine Inlet-Port Design,” SAE Technical Paper No. 1999-01-0555. [CrossRef]
Bates, M. C., and Heikal, M. R., 2002, “A Knowledge-Based Model for Multi-Valve Diesel Engine Inlet Port Design,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2002-01-1747. [CrossRef]
Lu, Z., Wang, T. Y., Li, X. C., Li, L. T., and Zhang, G. Y., 2013, “Parametric Design of the Tangential Intake Port in Diesel Engines,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part D, 227(3), pp. 409–421. [CrossRef]
Adomeit, P., Hopp, M., Schmidt, A., Lang, O., and Schmitt, P., 2005, “CAE-Based Port Development and Flow Design for SI Engines,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2005-01-0243. [CrossRef]
Star-CD Version 4.20 Methodology, 2013, CD Adapco, Melville, NY.
Horváth, A., and Horváth, Z., 2003, “Application of CFD Numerical Simulation for Intake Port Shape Design of a Diesel Engine,” J. Comput. Appl. Mech., 4(2), pp. 129–146.
Partington, G. D., 1980, “Analysis of Steady Flow Tests on Inlet and Exhaust Ports,” Ricardo Consulting Engineers, Shoreham-by-Sea, UK, Report No. DP 80: 1123.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Major structure parameters of the tangential port template

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Comparison between the two models (a) parametric intake port and (b) original intake port

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Flow distributions of scheme 2 at two different valve lifts (a) 7 mm and (b) 8 mm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Influence of parameter Av (scheme 1 as the reference)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison between the experiment and the simulation (a) flow coefficient and (b) tumble intensity

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Flow coefficient and tumble intensity of scheme 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Volume mesh of the calculation model (a) computational grid of the experimental comparison and (b) computational grid of the parametric analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Velocity contours of schemes 1 and 4 (at 8.5 mm valve lift) (a) Av = 60 deg and (b) Av = 90 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Influence of parameter Ab (scheme 5 as the reference)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Flow distributions of schemes 5 and 7 (a) Ab = 60 deg and (b) Ab = 90 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Influence of parameter Ar (scheme 2 as the reference)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Actual outlet flow area

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Influence of parameter Ac (scheme 2 as the reference)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Flow distributions of schemes 2, 11–13 at 7 mm valve lift (a) Ac = 37.5 deg, (b) Ac = 4.25 deg, (c) Ac = 47.5 deg, and (d) Ac = 52.5 deg



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In