Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

A Refined Model for Knock Onset Prediction in Spark Ignition Engines Fueled With Mixtures of Gasoline and Propane

[+] Author and Article Information
Emiliano Pipitone

Department of Chemical, Management,
Computer Science and Mechanical Engineering,
University of Palermo,
Viale delle Scienze,
edificio 8,
Palermo 90128, Italy
e-mail: emiliano.pipitone@unipa.it

Stefano Beccari

Department of Chemical, Management,
Computer Science and Mechanical Engineering,
University of Palermo,
Viale delle Scienze,
edificio 8,
Palermo 90128, Italy
e-mail: stefano.beccari@unipa.it

Giuseppe Genchi

Department of Chemical, Management,
Computer Science and Mechanical Engineering,
University of Palermo,
Viale delle Scienze,
edificio 8,
Palermo 90128, Italy
e-mail: giuseppe.genchi@unipa.it

Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received November 11, 2014; final manuscript received March 4, 2015; published online May 12, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Song-Charng Kong.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 137(11), 111501 (Nov 01, 2015) (9 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1615; doi: 10.1115/1.4030262 History: Received November 11, 2014; Revised March 04, 2015; Online May 12, 2015

In the last decade, gaseous fuels, such as liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and natural gas (NG), widely spread in many countries, thanks to their prerogative of low cost and reduced environmental impact. Hence, bi-fuel engines, which allow to run either with gasoline or with gas (LPG or NG), became very popular. Moreover, as experimentally demonstrated by the authors in the previous works, these engines may also be fueled by a mixture of gasoline and gas, which, due to the high knock resistance of gas, allow to use stoichiometric mixtures also at full load, thus drastically improving engine efficiency and pollutant emissions with respect to pure gasoline operation without noticeable power loss. This third operation mode, called double fuel combustion, can be easily introduced in series production engine, since a simple electronic control unit (ECU) programing is required. The introduction into series production would require the availability of proper models for thermodynamic simulations, nowadays widely adopted to reduce research and development efforts and costs. To this purpose, the authors developed a quite original knock onset prediction model for knock-safe performances optimization of engines fueled by propane, gasoline, and their mixtures. The ignition delay model has been properly modified to account for the negative temperature coefficient (NTC) behavior exhibited by many hydrocarbon fuels such as gasoline and propane. The model parameters have been tuned by means of a considerable amount of light knocking in-cylinder pressure cycles acquired on a modified cooperative fuel research (CFR) engine, fueled by gasoline–propane mixtures. The adoption of many different compression ratios (CRs), inlet mixture temperatures, spark advances (SAs), and fuel mixture compositions allowed to use a very differentiated set of pressure and temperature curve, which gives the calibrated model a general validity for using different kinds of engines, i.e., naturally aspirated or supercharged. As a result, the model features a maximum knock onset prediction error around four crank angle degrees (CAD) and a mean absolute error always lower than 1 CAD, which is a negligible quantity from an engine control standpoint.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Pipitone, E., and Beccari, S., 2010, “Performances and Emissions Improvement of an S.I. Engine Fuelled by LPG/Gasoline Mixtures,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2010-01-0615 [CrossRef].
Pipitone, E., and Beccari, S., 2009, “Performances Improvement of a S.I. CNG Bi-Fuel Engine by Means of Double-Fuel Injection,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2009-24-0058 [CrossRef].
Obiols, J., Soleri, D., Dioc, N., and Moreau, M., 2011, “Potential of Concomitant Injection of CNG and Gasoline on a 1.6L Gasoline Direct Injection Turbocharged Engine,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2011-01-1995 [CrossRef].
Momeni Movahed, M., Basirat Tabrizi, H., and Mirsalim, M., 2014, “Experimental Investigation of the Concomitant Injection of Gasoline and CNG in a Turbocharged Spark Ignition Engine,” Energy Convers. Manage., 80, pp. 126–136. [CrossRef]
Veiga, M., Mansano, R., Silva, R., and Gomes, C., 2010, “Injection System for Tri-Fuel Engines With Control of Power by Simultaneous Use of CNG and Ethanol or Gasoline,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2010-36-0195 [CrossRef].
Linvengood, J. C., and Wu, P. C., 1955, “Correlation of Autoignition Phenomenon in Internal Combustion Engines and Rapid Compression Machines,” Symp. (Int.) Combust., 5(1), pp. 347–356 [CrossRef].
Boehman, A. L., and Le Corre, O., 2008, “Combustion of Syngas in Internal Combustion Engines,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 180(6), pp. 1193–1206. [CrossRef]
Douaud, A. M., and Eyzat, P., 1978, “Four-Octane-Number Method for Predicting the Anti-Knock Behaviour of Fuels and Engines,” SAE Technical Paper No. 780080 [CrossRef].
Lämmle, C., 2005, “Numerical and Experimental Study of Flame Propagation and Knock in a Compressed Natural Gas Engine,” Ph.D. thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich.
Wayne, W., Clark, N., and Atkinson, C., 1998, “Numerical Prediction of Knock in a Bi-Fuel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper No. 982533 [CrossRef].
Pipitone, E., and Beccari, S., 2009, “Calibration of a Knock Prediction Model for the Combustion of Gasoline-Natural Gas Mixtures,” ASME Paper No. ICEF2009-14057. [CrossRef]
Moses, E., Yarin, A. L., and Bar-Yoseph, P., 1995, “On Knocking Prediction in Spark Ignition Engines,” Combust. Flame, 101(3), pp. 239–261. [CrossRef]
Westbrook, C. K., and Pitz, W. J., 1990, “Modeling of Knock in Spark-Ignition Engines,” International Symposium on Diagnostics and Modeling of Combustion in Internal Combustion Engines (COMODIA 90), Kyoto, Japan, Sept. 3–5, OSTI Paper No. 6755324.
Prince, J. C., and Williams, F. A., 2012, “Short Chemical-Kinetic Mechanisms for Low-Temperature Ignition of Propane and Ethane,” Combust. Flame, 159(7), pp. 2336–2344. [CrossRef]
Fisher, E. M., Pitz, W. J., Curran, H. J., and Westbrook, C. K., 2000, “Detailed Chemical Kinetic Mechanisms for Combustion of Oxygenated Fuels,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 28(2), pp. 1579–1586. [CrossRef]
Kukkadapu, G., Kumar, K., Sung, C.-J., Mehl, M., and Pitz, W. J., 2012, “Experimental and Surrogate Modeling Study of Gasoline Ignition in a Rapid Compression Machine,” Combust. Flame, 159(10), pp. 3066–3078. [CrossRef]
Gallagher, S. M., Curran, H. J., Metcalfe, W. K., Healy, D., Simmie, J. M., and Bourque, G., 2008, “A Rapid Compression Machine Study of the Oxidation of Propane in the Negative Temperature Coefficient Regime,” Combust. Flame, 153(1–2), pp. 316–333. [CrossRef]
Radu, B., Martin, G., Chiriac, R., and Apostolescu, N., 2005, “On the Knock Characteristics of LPG in a Spark Ignition Engine,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2005-01-3773 [CrossRef].
Heywood, J. B., 1988, Internal Combustion Engines Fundamentals (Automotive Technology Series), McGraw-Hill, New York.
Ramos, J. I., 1999, Internal Combustion Engine Modeling, Butterworth-Heinemann, New York.
Fieweger, K., Blumenthal, R., and Adomeit, G., 1997, “Self-Ignition of S.I. Engine Model Fuels: A Shock Tube Investigation at High Pressure,” Combust. Flame, 109(4), pp. 599–619. [CrossRef]
Mehl, M., Pitz, W. J., Westbrook, C. K., and Curran, H. J., 2011, “Kinetic Modeling of Gasoline Surrogate Components and Mixtures Under Engine Conditions,” Proc. Combus. Inst., 33(1), pp. 193–200. [CrossRef]
ASTM, 2011, “Standard Test Method for Motor Octane Number of Spark Ignition Engine Fuel,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, Standard No. D2700.
Pipitone, E., and Genchi, G., 2014, “Experimental Determination of LPG-Gasoline Mixtures Knock Resistance,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 136(12), p. 121502. [CrossRef]
Fairchild Semiconductor, 2002, “HGTP14N40F3VL/HGT1S14N40F3VLS,” Data sheet rev. B1, Fairchild Semiconductor Corp., Mountain Top, PA, available at: http://pdf.datasheetcatalog.com/datasheet/fairchild/HGTP14N40F3VL.pdf
Brunt Michael, F. J., and Pond Christopher, R., 1997, “Evaluation of Techniques for Absolute Cylinder Pressure Correction,” SAE Paper No. 970036 [CrossRef].
Randolph Andrew, L., 1990, “Methods of Processing Cylinder Pressure Transducer Signals to Maximize Data Accuracy,” SAE Paper No. 900170 [CrossRef].
Pipitone, E., and Beccari, A., 2010, “Determination of TDC in Internal Combustion Engines by a Newly Developed Thermodynamic Approach,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 30(14), pp. 1914–1926. [CrossRef]
Pipitone, E., 2008, “A Comparison Between Combustion Phase Indicators for Optimal Spark Timing,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 130(5), p. 052808. [CrossRef]
Nelder, J. A., and Mead, R., 1964, “A Simplex Method for Function Minimization,” Comput. J., 7(4), pp. 308–313. [CrossRef]
Cadman, P., Thomas, G. O., and Butler, P., 2000, “The Auto-Ignition of Propane at Intermediate Temperatures and High Pressures,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2, pp. 5411–5419. [CrossRef]
Genchi, G., Pipitone, E., Beccari, S., and Piacentino, A., 2013, “Knock Resistance Increase Through the Addition of Natural Gas or LPG to Gasoline: An Experimental Study,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2013-24-0100 [CrossRef].
API, 1988, “Alcohols and Ethers,” 2nd ed., American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, Publication No. 4261.
Nikolaou, N., Papadopoulos, C. E., Gaglias, I. A., and Pitarakis, K. G., 2004, “A New Non-Linear Calculation Method of Isomerisation Gasoline Research Octane Number Based on Gas Chromatographic Data,” Fuel, 83(4–5), pp. 517–523. [CrossRef]
Anderson, J. E., Kramer, U., Mueller, S. A., and Wallington, T. J., 2010, “Octane Numbers of Ethanol- and Methanol-Gasoline Blends Estimated From Molar Concentrations,” Energy Fuels, 24(12), pp. 6576–6585. [CrossRef]
Lanje, A. S., and Deshmukh, M. J., 2012, “Performance and Emission Characteristics of SI Engine Using LPG-Ethanol: A Review,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng., 2(10), pp. 146–152 http://www.ijetae.com/files/Volume2Issue10/IJETAE_1012_26.pdf.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Typical auto-ignition delay measurement, carried out on a rapid compression machine using gasoline surrogate [16]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

ID diagram obtained from RCM [16] (Gasoline surrogate, 20 bar, three different values of the equivalence ratio ϕ)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison between measured ignition delay [16] and model adopted in the present paper

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Experimental system layout

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Fuel supply systems: carburettor, LPG injector, and gasoline injectors

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Power spectrum of the raw pressure signal (propane mass fraction 40%, SA = 35 CAD BTDC, TMIX = 80 °C)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Raw and filtered pressure with ϑKO,exp evaluation (propane mass fraction 40%, SA = 35 CAD BTDC, TMIX = 80 °C)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Surface of the minimum εMA as a function of the model constants B and n (gasoline, TNTC = 720 K)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Contour map of the minimum εMA as a function of the model constants B and n (gasoline, TNTC = 720 K)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Model parameter A as function of the propane mass fraction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Fuel mixture MON as function of the propane mass fraction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Model parameter A as function of the mixture MON (propane mass fraction is also reported)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Comparison between estimated and experimental KOCAs for gasoline (operative conditions reported in Table 3, first column)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Comparison between estimated and experimental KOCAs for propane (operative conditions reported in Table 3, last column)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Comparison between estimated and experimental knock onset for double fuel operation (operative conditions reported in Table 3, from 20% to 80% of propane mass fraction)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In