0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Design, Modeling, and Performance Testing of a Weak Coupling Combined Radial–Axial Magnetic Bearing

[+] Author and Article Information
Bangcheng Han

Science and Technology on Inertial Laboratory,
Beihang University,
Shining Building 403, Xueyuan Road,
Beijing 100191, China
e-mail: hanbangcheng@buaa.edu.cn

Qinjie Xu

Science and Technology on Inertial Laboratory,
Beihang University,
Shining Building 403, Xueyuan Road,
Beijing 100191, China
e-mail: 18813155982@163.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Structures and Dynamics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received December 12, 2014; final manuscript received March 2, 2015; published online May 6, 2015. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 137(10), 102503 (Oct 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1664; doi: 10.1115/1.4030265 History: Received December 12, 2014; Revised March 02, 2015; Online May 06, 2015

Most combined radial–axial magnetic bearing (CRAMB) is usually composed of a radial magnetic bearing (RMB) unit and an axial magnetic bearing (AMB) unit. The coupling problems in different degrees of freedom (DOF) will make it difficult to design the controller and influence dynamic characteristics of the magnetic bearing system (MBS). In this paper, the coupling stiffness models of a CRAMB between the RMB unit and the AMB unit affected by radial-displacement and axial-displacement are presented using equivalent magnetic circuit method. The CRAMB and the testing system are designed and fabricated. The coupling stiffness model is verified by the experimental results. The weak coupling characteristics between the radial-direction and axial-direction is beneficial to design the controller and dynamic stability control for the CRAMB system.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Configuration of the CRAMB

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic diagram of the displaced rotor in z-axis and equivalent bias magnetic circuit. (a) Schematic diagram of the displaced rotor in z-axis and (b) equivalent bias magnetic circuit.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Equivalent network magnetic circuit of the control fluxes and bias magnetic fluxes in the axial air gaps of the AMB unit

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic diagram of the displaced rotor in z-axis and equivalent bias magnetic circuit. (a) Schematic diagram of the displaced rotor in z-axis and (b) equivalent bias magnetic circuit.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Equivalent magnetic circuit of the control fluxes in the x-axial radial air gaps of the RMB unit (rotor is not displaced in y-axis)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The CRAMB and its key parts. (a) View from the RMB unit showing the CRAMB stator and (b) view from the AMB unit showing the CRAMB stator.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The magnetically suspended motor with the CRAMB and its high-speed rotor for testing the coupling performances of the CRAMB. (a) The magnetically suspended motor with the CRAMB and (b) the high-speed rotor showing the CRAMB rotor.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Bearing force versus control current for the AMB unit and the RMB unit with no rotor deflected in axial and radial directions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The force–current factor kiz of the AMB unit affected only by x-displacement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

The force–current factor kiz of the AMB unit affected by x-displacement and y-displacement simultaneously

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Magnetic reluctance affected by x-displacement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Measured and analyzed results for bearing force of the AMB unit versus z-displacement without rotor displacement in radial direction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

The force–displacement factor kz of the AMB unit affected only by x-displacement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

The force–displacement factor kz of the AMB unit affected by x-displacement and y-displacement simultaneously

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

The force–current factor kix of the RMB unit affected only by z-displacement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Magnetic reluctance affected by z-displacement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Measured and analyzed results for bearing force of the RMB unit versus x-displacement without rotor displacement in z-axis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

The force–displacement factor kx of the RMB unit affected only by z-displacement

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In