0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Transient Amplitude Amplification of Mistuned Blisks

[+] Author and Article Information
Marius Bonhage

Institute of Dynamics and Vibration Research,
Leibniz Universität Hannover,
Hanover 30163, Germany
e-mail: bonhage@ids.uni-hannover.de

Linus Pohle

Institute of Dynamics
and Vibration Research,
Leibniz Universität Hannover,
Hanover 30163, Germany

Lars Panning-von Scheidt

Institute of Dynamics and Vibration Research,
Leibniz Universität Hannover,
Hanover 30163, Germany

Jörg Wallaschek

Professor
Institute of Dynamics and Vibration Research,
Leibniz Universität Hannover,
Hanover 30163, Germany

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Structures and Dynamics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received January 22, 2015; final manuscript received March 19, 2015; published online May 12, 2015. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 137(11), 112502 (Nov 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: GTP-15-1024; doi: 10.1115/1.4030278 History: Received January 22, 2015; Revised March 19, 2015; Online May 12, 2015

This article discusses the problem of exceeding amplitudes of mistuned structures caused by accelerated traveling waves type excitation, i.e., traveling waves with time variant frequencies. These waves cause resonance passages of, e.g., rotating structures. To calculate the resonance passage a semi-analytical solution is proposed. Thus, high accuracy is guaranteed. The topic of exceeding amplitudes is initially approached by studying a discrete lumped mass model with detuned parameters. It can be shown that under certain circumstances the maximum amplitude of the transient resonance passage is even higher than the maximum amplitude of the steady-state solution. To investigate this phenomenon on a real bladed disk, the number of degrees of freedom of the blisk is reduced using component mode synthesis (CMS). By applying the semi-analytical solution to the reduced model, the envelopes of the vibration during resonance passage can be calculated. Processing extensive parametric studies it can be pointed out under which circumstances the probability rises that higher maximum amplitudes occur during resonance passage compared to steady-state conditions.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Lewis, F. M., 1932, “Vibration During Acceleration Through a Critical Speed,” Trans. ASME, 54(3), pp. 253–261.
Pöschl, T., 1933, “Das Anlaufen eines einfachen Schwingers,” Arch. Appl. Mech., 4(1), pp. 98–102. [CrossRef]
Weidenhammer, F., 1958, “Das Anlaufen eines ungedämpften Schwingers mit Massenkrafterregung,” J. Appl. Math. Mech./Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 38(7–8), pp. 304–307. [CrossRef]
Goloskokov, E. G., and Filippov, A., 1971, Instationäre Schwingungen mechanischer Systeme, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin.
Wauer, J., 1981, “Anlaufen einfacher Schwingungssysteme mit verteilten Parametern unter Kraft- und Massenkrafterregung,” J. Appl. Math. Mech./Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 61(1), pp. 60–61. [CrossRef]
Landa, P. S., 2001, Regular and Chaotic Oscillations, Springer, Berlin.
Markert, R., and Seidler, M., 2001, “Analytically Based Estimation of the Maximum Amplitude During Passage Through Resonance,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 38(10–13), pp. 1975–1992. [CrossRef]
Whitehead, D. S., 1966, “Effect of Mistuning on the Vibration of Turbo Machine Blades Induced by Wakes,” J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 8(1), pp. 15–21. [CrossRef]
Ewins, D. J., 1969, “The Effects of Detuning Upon the Forced Vibrations of Bladed Disks,” J. Sound Vib., 9(1), pp. 65–79. [CrossRef]
Wagner, J., 1967, “Coupling of Turbomachine Blade Vibrations Through the Rotor,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 89(4), pp. 502–512. [CrossRef]
Dye, R. C., and Henry, T. A., 1969, “Vibration Amplitudes of Compressor Blades Resulting From Scatter in Blade Natural Frequencies,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 91(3), pp. 182–188. [CrossRef]
Griffin, J. H., and Hoosac, T. M., 1984, “Model Development and Statistical Investigation of Turbine Blade Mistuning,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 106(2), pp. 204–210. [CrossRef]
Craig, R. R., and Bampton, M. C. C., 1968, “Coupling of Substructures for Dynamic Analyses,” AIAA J., 6(7), pp. 1313–1319. [CrossRef]
Irretier, H., 1983, “Spectral Analysis of Mistuned Bladed Disk Assemblies by Component Mode Synthesis,” ASME 9th Conference on Mechanical Vibration and Noise, Dearborn, MI, Sept. 11–14, pp. 115–125.
Bladh, J. R., 2001, “Efficient Predictions of the Vibratory Response of Mistuned Bladed Disks by Reduced Order Modeling,” Ph.D. thesis, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Bladh, R., Castanier, M. P., and Pierre, C., 2001, “Component-Mode-Based Reduced Order Modeling Techniques for Mistuned Bladed Disks, Part I: Theoretical Models,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 123(1), pp. 89–99. [CrossRef]
Hohl, A., Siewert, C., Panning, L., and Wallaschek, J., 2009, “A Substructure Based Reduced Order Model for Mistuned Bladed Disks,” ASME Paper No. DETC2009-87459. [CrossRef]
Yang, M. T., and Griffin, J. H., 2001, “A Reduced-Order Model of Mistuning Using a Subset of Nominal System Modes,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 123(4), pp. 893–900. [CrossRef]
Feiner, D. M., and Griffin, J. H., 2002, “A Fundamental Model of Mistuning for a Single Family of Modes,” ASME J. Turbomach., 124(4), pp. 597–605. [CrossRef]
Feiner, D. M., and Griffin, J. H., 2004, “Mistuning Identification of Bladed Disks Using a Fundamental Mistuning Model—Part I: Theory,” ASME J. Turbomach., 126(1), pp. 150–158. [CrossRef]
Ayers, J. P., Feiner, D. M., and Griffin, J. H., 2006, “A Reduced-Order Model for Transient Analysis of Bladed Disk Forced Response,” ASME J. Turbomach., 128(3), pp. 466–473. [CrossRef]
Kaneko, Y., 2013, “Study on Transient Vibration of Mistuned Bladed Disk Passing Through Resonance,” ASME Paper No. GT2013-94052. [CrossRef]
Siewert, C., and Stüer, H., 2014, “Transient Forced Response Analysis of Mistuned Steam Turbines Blades During Start-Up and Coast-Down,” ASME Paper No. GT2014-25654. [CrossRef]
Panning, L., 2005, “Auslegung von Reibelementen zur Schwingungsdämpfung von Turbinenschaufeln,” Ph.D. thesis, Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Abramovich, M., and Stegun, I. A., 1965, Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Graphs and Mathematical Tables), National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics, Washington, DC.
Gautschi, W., 1970, “Efficient Computation of the Complex Error Function,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 7(1), pp. 187–198. [CrossRef]
Gautschi, W., 1969, “Algorithm 363: Complex Error Function [S15],” Commun. ACM, 12(11), pp. 634–638. [CrossRef]
Poppe, G., and Wijers, C. M. J., 1990, “More Efficient Computation of the Complex Error Function,” ACM Trans. Math. Software, 16(1), pp. 38–46. [CrossRef]
Thomas, D. L., 1979, “Dynamics of Rotationally Periodic Structures,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 14(1), pp. 81–102. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Lumped mass model to study accelerated traveling wave-like excitation on mistuned structures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Comparison of the maximum steady-state solution and the maximum amplitude of the resonance passage of a stiffness mistuned model and (b) comparison between the transient and steady-state amplitudes at δmis=0.1,ɛ=0.5 Hz/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Influence of the sweep rate on the transient maximum amplitude and (b) comparison between the transient and steady-state amplitudes at δmis=0.02,ε=0.5 Hz/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) Finite element model of the studied blisk and (b) detail of nodal diameter diagram, position of the force application and monitoring point

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

(a) Probability of the occurrence of TAMS, EO = 1, second bending; (b) amplification band; (c) example of TAMS occurrence at EO = 1 and σ2=10-3, different sweep velocities compared to the steady-state solution; (d) TAMS curve of maximum amplitude versus sweep rate of the transient solution; and (e) mistuning factors

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Cumulative density curve of σ=2×10-5 at EO = 1 from Fig. 5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

(a) Probability of occurrence of TAMS, EO = 10, first bending; (b) amplification band; (c) example of TAMS occurrence at EO = 10 and σ2=2×10-5: different sweep velocities compared to the steady-state solution (d) TAMS curve of maximum amplitude versus sweep rate of the transient solution, and (e) mistuning factors

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Cumulative density curve of σ=2×10-5 at EO = 10 from Fig. 7

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In