Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Fuel-Sensitive Ignition Delay Models for a Local and Global Description of Direct Injection Internal Combustion Engines

[+] Author and Article Information
Kyoung Hyun Kwak

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
e-mail: khkwak@umich.edu

Claus Borgnakke

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
e-mail: claus@umich.edu

Dohoy Jung

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Michigan-Dearborn,
Dearborn, MI 48128
e-mail: dohoy@umich.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received March 12, 2015; final manuscript received March 24, 2015; published online May 12, 2015. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 137(11), 111510 (Nov 01, 2015) (9 pages) Paper No: GTP-15-1091; doi: 10.1115/1.4030293 History: Received March 12, 2015; Revised March 24, 2015; Online May 12, 2015

Models for ignition delay are investigated and fuel-specific properties are included to predict the effects of different fuels on the ignition delay. These models follow the Arrhenius type expression for the ignition delay modified with the oxygen concentration and Cetane number to extend the range of validity. In this investigation, two fuel-sensitive spray ignition delay models are developed: a global model and a local model. The global model is based on the global combustion chamber charge properties including temperature, pressure, and oxygen/fuel content. The local model is developed to account for temporal and spatial variations in properties of separated spray zones such as local temperature, oxidizer, and fuel concentrations obtained by a quasi-dimensional multizone fuel spray model. These variations are integrated in time to predict the ignition delay. Often ignition delay models are recalibrated for a specific fuel but in this study, the global ignition delay model includes the Cetane number to capture ignition delay of various fuels. The local model uses Cetane number and local stoichiometric oxygen to fuel molar ratio. The model is therefore capable of predicting spray ignition delays for a set of fuels with a single calibration. Experimental dataset of spray ignition delay in a constant volume chamber is used for model development and calibration. The models show a good accuracy for the predicted ignition delay of four different fuels: JP8, DF2, n-heptane, and n-dodecane. The investigation revealed that the most accurate form of the models is from a calibration done for each individual fuel with only a slight decrease in accuracy when a single calibration is done for all fuels. The single calibration case is the more desirable outcome as it leads to general models that cover all the fuels. Of the two proposed models, the local model has a slightly better accuracy compared to the global model. Results for both models demonstrate the improvements that can be obtained for the ignition delay model when additional fuel-specific properties are included in the spray ignition model. Other alternative fuels like synthetic oxygenated fuels were included in the investigation. These fuels behave differently such that the Cetane number does not provide the same explanation for the trend in ignition delay. Though of lower accuracy, the new models do improve the predictive capability when compared with existing types of ignition delay models applied to this kind of fuels.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Topics: Fuels , Sprays , Delays , Ignition
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Novella, R., García, A., Pastor, J. M., and Domenech, V., 2011, “The Role of Detailed Chemical Kinetics on CFD Diesel Spray Ignition and Combustion Modelling,” Math. Comput. Modell., 54(7–8), pp. 1706–1719. [CrossRef]
Brakora, J., and Reitz, R., 2013, “A Comprehensive Combustion Model for Biodiesel-Fueled Engine Simulations,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2013-01-1099. [CrossRef]
Ismail, H. M., Ng, H. K., Gan, S., Lucchini, T., and Onorati, A., 2013, “Development of a Reduced Biodiesel Combustion Kinetics Mechanism for CFD Modelling of a Light-Duty Diesel Engine,” Fuel, 106, pp. 388–400. [CrossRef]
Halstead, M. P., Kirsch, L. J., Prothero, A., and Quinn, C. P., 1975, “A Mathematical Model for Hydrocarbon Autoignition at High Pressures,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 346(1647), pp. 515–538. [CrossRef]
Sazhina, E. M., Sazhin, S. S., Heikal, M. R., and Marooney, C. J., 1999, “The Shell Autoignition Model: Applications to Gasoline and Diesel Fuels,” Fuel, 78(4), pp. 389–401. [CrossRef]
Hamosfakidis, V., and Reitz, R. D., 2003, “Optimization of a Hydrocarbon Fuel Ignition Model for Two Single Component Surrogates of Diesel Fuel,” Combust. Flame, 132(3), pp. 433–450. [CrossRef]
Watson, N., Pilley, A. D., and Marzouk, M. A., 1980, “Combustion Correlation for Diesel Engine Simulation,” SAE Technical Paper No. 800029. [CrossRef]
Hiroyasu, H., and Arai, M., 1980, “Fuel Spray Penetration and Spray Angle of Diesel Engines,” Trans. JSAE, 21, pp. 5–11.
Hiroyasu, H., Toshikazu, K., and Arai, M., 1983, “Development and Use of a Spray Combustion Modeling to Predict Diesel Engine Efficiency and Pollutant Emissions,” Bull. JSME, 26(214), pp. 569–575. [CrossRef]
Assanis, D. N., Filipi, Z. S., Fiveland, S. B., and Syrimis, M., 2003, “A Predictive Ignition Delay Correlation Under Steady-State and Transient Operation of a Direct Injection Diesel Engine,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 125(2), pp. 450–457. [CrossRef]
Zheng, M., Mulenga, M. C., Reader, G. T., Wang, M., Ting, D. S.-K., and Tjong, J., 2008, “Biodiesel Engine Performance and Emissions in Low Temperature Combustion,” Fuel, 87(6), pp. 714–722. [CrossRef]
Maroteaux, F., and Saad, C., 2013, “Diesel Engine Combustion Modeling for Hardware in the Loop Applications: Effects of Ignition Delay Time Model,” Energy, 57, pp. 641–652. [CrossRef]
Jung, D., 2001, “A Multi-Zone Direct-Injection Diesel Spray Combustion Model for Cycle Simulation Studies of Large-Bore Engine Performance and Emissions,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Zhou, P., Zhou, S., and Clelland, D., 2006, “A Modified Quasi-Dimensional Multi-Zone Combustion Model for Direct Injection Diesels,” Int. J. Engine Res., 7(4), pp. 335–345. [CrossRef]
Rakopoulos, C. D., Antonopoulos, K. A., Rakopoulos, D. C., and Hountalas, D. T., 2008, “Multi-Zone Modeling of Combustion and Emissions Formation in DI Diesel Engine Operating on Ethanol–Diesel Fuel Blends,” Energy Convers. Manage., 49(4), pp. 625–643. [CrossRef]
Hountalas, D. T., Lamaris, V. T., Pariotis, E. G., and Ofner, H., 2008, “Parametric Study Based on a Phenomenological Model to Investigate the Effect of Post Fuel Injection on HDDI Diesel Engine Performance and Emissions: Model Validation Using Experimental Data,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2008-01-0641. [CrossRef]
Wolfer, H. H., 1938, “Ignition Lag in Diesel Engines,” VDI-Forschungsh., 392, p. 621–436.047; translated by Royal Aircraft Establishment, Aug. 1959, Farnborough Library No. 358, UDC 621-436.047.
Kavtaradze, R. Z., Zeilinger, K., and Zitzler, G., 2005, “Ignition Delay in a Diesel Engine Utilizing Different Fuels,” High Temp., 43(6), pp. 951–960. [CrossRef]
Aligrot, C., Champoussin, J. C., Guerrassi, N., and Claus, G., 1994, “Prediction of Self-Ignition Delay of Different Liquid Diesel Fuels,” Third International Symposium on Diagnostics and Modeling of Combustion in Internal Combustion Engines (COMODIA 94), Japan, July 11–14, pp. 331–336. [CrossRef]
Hardenberg, H. O., and Hase, F. W., 1979, “An Empirical Formula for Computing the Pressure Rise Delay of a Fuel From Its Cetane Number and From the Relevant Parameters of Direct-Injection Diesel Engines,” SAE Technical Paper No. 790493. [CrossRef]
He, X., Donovan, M. T., Zigler, B. T., Palmer, T. R., Walton, S. M., Wooldridge, M. S., and Atreya, A., 2005, “An Experimental and Modeling Study of Iso-Octane Ignition Delay Times Under Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition Conditions,” Combust. Flame, 142(3), pp. 266–275. [CrossRef]
Walton, S. M., He, X., Zigler, B. T., Wooldridge, M. S., and Atreya, A., 2007, “An Experimental Investigation of Iso-Octane Ignition Phenomena,” Combust. Flame, 150(3), pp. 246–262. [CrossRef]
Tsuboi, T., and Wagner, H. G., 1975, “Homogeneous Thermal Oxidation of Methane in Reflected Shock Waves,” Symp. (Int.) Combust., 15(1), pp. 883–890. [CrossRef]
Colket, M. B., III, and Spadaccini, L. J., 2001, “Scramjet Fuels Autoignition Study,” J. Propul. Power, 17(2), pp. 315–323. [CrossRef]
SNL Engine Combustion Department, 2012, “Diesel Spray Combustion,” Engine Combustion Network, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA, http://www.sandia.gov/ecn/dieselSprayCombustion.php
Ciezki, H. K., and Adomeit, G., 1993, “Shock-Tube Investigation of Self-Ignition of n-Heptane–Air Mixtures Under Engine Relevant Conditions,” Combust. Flame, 93(4), pp. 421–433. [CrossRef]
Kwak, K. H., Jung, D., and Borgnakke, C., 2014, “Enhanced Spray and Evaporation Model With Multi-Fuel Mixtures for Direct Injection Internal Combustion Engines,” Int. J. Engine Res., 15(4), pp. 488–503. [CrossRef]
Pickett, L. M., and Siebers, D. L., 2003, “Fuel Effects on Soot Processes of Fuel Jets at DI Diesel Conditions,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2003-01-3080. [CrossRef]
Pickett, L. M., and Hoogterp, L., 2008, “Fundamental Spray and Combustion Measurements of JP-8 at Diesel Conditions,” SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh., 1(1), pp. 108–118. [CrossRef]
ASTM, 2010, “Standard Test Method for Cetane Number of Diesel Fuel Oil,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, Standard No. D613-10a.
ASTM, 2013, “Standard Test Method for Determination of Ignition Delay and Derived Cetane Number (DCN) of Diesel Fuel Oils by Combustion in a Constant Volume Chamber,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, Standard No. D6890-07a.
Penyazkov, O. G., Sevrouk, K. L., Tangirala, V., and Joshi, N., 2009, “Autoignitions of Diesel Fuel/Air Mixtures Behind Reflected Shock Waves,” 4th European Combustion Meeting, Vienna, Apr. 14–17. http://www.combustion.org.uk/ECM_2009/P810232.pdf
Dean, A. J., Penyazkov, O. G., Sevruk, K. L., and Varatharajan, B., 2007, “Autoignition of Surrogate Fuels at Elevated Temperatures and Pressures,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 31(2), pp. 2481–2488. [CrossRef]
Livengood, J. C., and Wu, P. C., 1955, “Correlation of Autoignition Phenomena in Internal Combustion Engines and Rapid Compression Machines,” Symp. (Int.) Combust., 5(1), pp. 347–356. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Comparison of n-heptane ignition of spray in constant volume chamber versus shock tube ignition. Spray ignition delay data are obtained from ECN database [25], and shock tube data are obtained from Ciezki and Adomeit [26]. Presented data are scaled to 50 atm with pressure exponent −1.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Comparison of activation temperatures: (a) JP8, (b) DF2, (c) n-heptane, and (d) n-dodecane

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Monotonic behavior of pre-exponential parameter Ag when θg is 3171 K and its curve fitting model R2= 0.9829

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic representation of multizone spray concept

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effect of different values of concentration exponents

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Regression of pre-exponent parameter Az versus Cetane number for local ignition delay model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Prediction result of fuel-sensitive spray ignition delay model using global information

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Prediction result of fuel-sensitive spray ignition delay model using local spray information

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Prediction result of calibrated Wolfer’s ignition delay model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Prediction result of Aligrot’s ignition delay model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Prediction result of calibrated Rakopoulos’ ignition delay model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Prediction result of calibrated Zheng’s ignition delay model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Result of global ignition delay correlation with T70, CN80, GE80, and BM88

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Result by local ignition delay with T70, CN80, GE80, and BM88

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Prediction result of Wolfer’s ignition delay with T70, CN80, GE80, and BM88

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Prediction result of Aligrot’s ignition delay model with T70, CN80, GE80, and BM88

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Prediction result of calibrated Rakopoulos’ ignition delay model with T70, CN80, GE80, and BM88

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Prediction result of calibrated Zheng’s ignition delay model with T70, CN80, GE80, and BM88




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In