0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Turbomachinery

Effect of Temperature on Microparticle Rebound Characteristics at Constant Impact Velocity—Part II

[+] Author and Article Information
J. M. Delimont

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Virginia Tech,
Blacksburg, VA 24061
e-mail: jacob.delimont@swri.org

M. K. Murdock

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Virginia Tech,
Blacksburg, VA 24061
e-mail: murdockm@vt.edu

W. F. Ng

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Virginia Tech,
Blacksburg, VA 24061
e-mail: wng@vt.edu

S. V. Ekkad

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Virginia Tech,
Blacksburg, VA 24061
e-mail: sekkad@vt.edu

Contributed by the Turbomachinery Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received January 21, 2015; final manuscript received March 12, 2015; published online May 12, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Klaus Brun.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 137(11), 112604 (Nov 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: GTP-15-1022; doi: 10.1115/1.4030313 History: Received January 21, 2015; Revised March 12, 2015; Online May 12, 2015

When gas turbine engines operate in environments where the intake air has some concentration of particles, the engine will experience degradation. Very few studies of such microparticles approaching their melting temperatures are available in open literature. The coefficient of restitution (COR), a measure of the particles' impact characteristics, was measured in this study of microparticles using a particle tracking technique. Part II of this study presents data taken using the Virginia Tech Aerothermal Rig and Arizona road dust (ARD) of 20–40 μm size range. Data were taken at temperatures up to and including 1323 K, where significant deposition of the sand particles was observed. The velocity at which the particles impact the surface was held at a constant 70 m/s for all of the temperature cases. The target on which the particles impacted was made of a nickel alloy, Hastelloy X. The particle angle of impact was also varied between 30 deg and 80 deg. Deposition of particles was observed as some particles approach their glass transition point and became molten. Other particles, which do not become molten due to different particle composition, rebounded and maintained a relatively high COR. Images were taken using a microscope to examine the particle deposition that occurs at various angles. A rebound ratio was formulated to give a measure of the number of particles which deposited on the surface. The results show an increase in deposition as the temperature approaches the melting temperature of sand.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Goldsmith, W., 2002, Impact: The Theory and Physical Behaviour of Colliding Solids, Dover Publications, Mineola, NY.
Tabakoff, W., Grant, G., and Ball, R., 1974, “An Experimental Investigation of Certain Aerodynamic Effects on Erosion,” AIAA Paper No. 74-639. [CrossRef]
Li, X., Dunn, P. F., and Brach, R. M., 2000, “Experimental and Numerical Studies of Microsphere Oblique Impact With Planar Surfaces,” Aerosol Sci. Technol., 31(5), pp. 583–594. [CrossRef]
Sommerfeld, M., and Huber, N., 1999, “Experimental Analysis and Modelling of Particle-Wall Collisions,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 25(6–7), pp. 1457–1489. [CrossRef]
Mok, C. H., and Duffy, J., 1964, “The Behaviour of Metals at Elevated Temperatures Under Impact With a Bouncing Ball,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 6(2), pp. 161–175. [CrossRef]
Brenner, S. S., Wriedt, H. A., and Oriani, R. A., 1981, “Impact Adhesion of Iron at Elevated Temperatures,” Wear, 68(2), pp. 169–190. [CrossRef]
Tabakoff, W., 1991, “Measurements of Particles Rebound Characteristics on Materials Used in Gas Turbines,” J. Propul. Power, 7(5), pp. 805–813. [CrossRef]
Tabakoff, W., Hamed, A., and Murugan, D. M., 1996, “Effect of Target Materials on the Particle Restitution Characteristics for Turbomachinery Application,” J. Propul. Power, 12(2), pp. 260–266. [CrossRef]
Wakeman, T., and Tabakoff, W., 1979, “Erosion Behavior in a Simulated Jet Engine Environment,” J. Aircr., 16(12), pp. 828–833. [CrossRef]
Hamad, A., and Tabakoff, W., 1994, “Experimental and Numerical Simulation of the Effects of Ingested Particles in Gas Turbine Engines,” Erosion, Corrosion and Foreign Object Damage Effects in Gas Turbines, Propulsion and Energetics Panel (PEP) Symposium, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Apr. 25–28, AGARD-CP-558, Paper No. 11.
Reagle, C., Delimont, J., Ng, W., Ekkad, S., and Rajendran, V., 2013, “Measuring the Coefficient of Restitution of High Speed Microparticle Impacts Using a PTV and CFD Hybrid Technique,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 24(10), p. 105303. [CrossRef]
Reagle, C. J., Delimont, J., Ng, W. F., and Ekkad, S. V., 2013, “Study of Microparticle Rebound Characteristics Under High Temperature Conditions,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 136(1), p. 011501. [CrossRef]
Walsh, W. S., Thole, K. A., and Joe, C., 2006, “Effects of Sand Ingestion on the Blockage of Film-Cooling Holes,” ASME Paper No. GT2014-25687. [CrossRef]
Crosby, J. M., Lewis, S., Bons, J. P., Ai, W., and Fletcher, T. H., 2008, “Effects of Temperature and Particle Size on Deposition in Land Based Turbines,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 130(5), p. 051503. [CrossRef]
Delimont, J. M., Murdock, M. K., Ng, W. F., and Ekkad, S. V., 2014, “Effect of Temperature on Microparticle Rebound Characteristics at a Constant Impact Velocity,” ASME Paper No. GT2014-25687. [CrossRef]
Nealy, D., Mihelc, M., Hylton, L., and Gladden, H., 1984, “Measurements of Heat Transfer Distribution Over the Surfaces of Highly Loaded Turbine Nozzle Guide Vanes,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 106(1), pp. 149–158. [CrossRef]
Hylton, L., Nirmalan, V., Sultanian, B., and Kaufman, R., 1988, “The Effects of Leading Edge and Downstream Film Cooling on Turbine Vane Heat Transfer,” NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, NASA Report No. CR-182133. http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890004383.pdf
Hinkley, D. V., 1969, “On the Ratio of Two Correlated Normal Random Variables,” Biometrika, 56(3), pp. 635–639. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

VT Aerothermal Rig

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Diagram of incoming and rebounding particle trajectories

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Example of sand ingestion in desert conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic of instrumentation setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Plot of total COR versus angle of impact

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Plot of tangential COR versus angle of impact

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Plot of COR versus temperature for different impact angles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Averaged rebound ratio of angles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Image of sand deposition at 1323 K at 60 deg angle of attack and 200× optical magnification

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Deposition per mm2 at several angles and at various temperatures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Image taken sand particles prior to testing at 200× optical magnification

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Comparison of amorphous and crystalline particle COR trends at near melting temperatures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Hypothesized nonhomogeneous sand particle impact behavior

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Plot of normal COR versus angle of impact

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Related

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In