Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Investigation of Lean Premixed Swirl-Stabilized Hydrogen Burner With Axial Air Injection Using OH-PLIF Imaging

[+] Author and Article Information
Thoralf G. Reichel

Chair of Fluid Dynamics,
Technische Universität Berlin,
Müller-Breslau-Str. 8,
Berlin 10623, Germany
e-mail: thoralf.reichel@tu-berlin.de

Katharina Goeckeler, Oliver Paschereit

Chair of Fluid Dynamics,
Technische Universität Berlin,
Müller-Breslau-Str. 8,
Berlin 10623, Germany

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 13, 2015; final manuscript received July 20, 2015; published online September 18, 2015. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 137(11), 111513 (Sep 18, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: GTP-15-1263; doi: 10.1115/1.4031181 History: Received July 13, 2015; Revised July 20, 2015

In the context of lean premixed combustion, the prevention of upstream flame propagation in the premixing zone, referred to as flashback (FB), is a crucial challenge related to the application of hydrogen as a fuel for gas turbines. The location of flame anchoring and its impact on FB tendencies in a technically premixed, swirl-stabilized hydrogen burner are investigated experimentally at atmospheric pressure conditions using planar laser-induced fluorescence of hydroxyl radicals (OH-PLIF). The inlet conditions are systematically varied with respect to equivalence ratio (ϕ=0.21.0), bulk air velocity u0 = 30–90 m/s, and burner preheat temperature ranging from 300 K to 700 K. The burner is mounted in an atmospheric combustion test rig, firing at a power of up to 220 kW into a 105 mm diameter quartz cylinder, which provides optical access to the flame region. The experiments were performed using an in-house burner design that previously proved to be highly resistant against FB occurrence by applying the axial air injection strategy. Axial air injection constitutes a nonswirling air jet on the central axis of the radial swirl generator. While a high rate of axial air injection yields excellent FB resistance, reduced rates of air injection are utilized to trigger FB, which allowed to investigate the near FB flame behavior. Results show that both, fuel momentum of hydrogen and axial air injection, alter the isothermal flow field as they cause a downstream shift of vortex breakdown and, thus, the axial flame front location. Such a shift is proven beneficial for FB resistance from the recorded FB limits. This effect was quantified by applying an edge detection algorithm to the OH-PLIF images, in order to extract the location of maximum flame front probability xF. By these means, it was revealed that for hydrogen xF is shifted downstream with increasing equivalence ratio due to the added momentum of the fuel flow, superseding any parallel augmentation in the turbulent flame speed. The parameter xF is identified to be governed by J, the momentum ratio between fuel and air flow, over a wide range of inlet conditions. These results contribute to the understanding of the sensitivity of FB to changes in the flow field, stemming from geometry changes or specific fuel properties.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Brand, J. , Sampath, S. , and Shum, F. , 2003, “ Potential Use of Hydrogen in Air Propulsion,” AIAA Paper No. 2003-2879.
Corchero, G. , and Montañés, J. L. , 2005, “ An Approach to the Use of Hydrogen for Commercial Aircraft Engines,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part G, 219(1), pp. 35–44. [CrossRef]
Haglind, F. , and Singh, R. , 2006, “ Design of Aero Gas Turbines Using Hydrogen,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 128(4), pp. 754–764. [CrossRef]
Rao, A. G. , Yin, F. , and van Buijtenen, J. P. , 2014, “ A Hybrid Engine Concept for Multi-Fuel Blended Wing Body,” Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol., 86(6), pp. 483–493. [CrossRef]
Levy, Y. , Sherbaum, V. , and Arfi, P. , 2004, “ Basic Thermodynamics of FLOXCOM, the Low-NOx Gas Turbines Adiabatic Combustor,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 24(11), pp. 1593–1605. [CrossRef]
Döbbeling, K. , and Hellat, J. , 2007, “ 25 Years of BBC/ABB/Alstom Lean Premix Combustion Technologies,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 129(1), pp. 2–12. [CrossRef]
Gupta, A. K. , Lilley, D. G. , and Syred, N. , 1984, Swirl Flows, Abacus Press, Tunbridge Wells, UK.
Schefer, R. , Smith, T. D. , and Marek, J. C. , 2002, “ Evaluation of NASA Lean Premixed Hydrogen Burner,” Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA, Report No. SAND2002-8609.
Reichel, T. G. , Terhaar, S. , and Paschereit, C. O. , 2013, “ Flow Field Manipulation by Axial Air Injection to Achieve Flashback Resistance and Its Impact on Mixing Quality,” AIAA Paper No. 2013-2603.
Fric, T. F. , 1993, “ Effects of Fuel-Air Unmixedness on NO(x) Emissions,” J. Propul. Power, 9(5), pp. 708–713. [CrossRef]
Baumgartner, G. , and Sattelmayer, T. , 2013, “ Experimental Investigation on the Effect of Boundary Layer Fluid Injection on the Flashback Propensity of Premixed Hydrogen-Air Flames,” ASME Paper No. GT2013-94266.
Burmberger, S. , and Sattelmayer, T. , 2011, “ Optimization of the Aerodynamic Flame Stabilization for Fuel Flexible Gas Turbine Premix Burners,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 133(10), p. 101501. [CrossRef]
Reichel, T. , Terhaar, S. , and Paschereit, C. O. , 2014, “ Increasing Flashback Resistance in Lean Premixed Swirl-Stabilized Hydrogen Combustion by Axial Air Injection,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 137(7), p. 071503. [CrossRef]
Mayer, C. , Sangl, J. , Sattelmayer, T. , Lachaux, T. , and Bernero, S. , 2012, “ Study on the Operational Window of a Swirl Stabilized Syngas Burner Under Atmospheric and High Pressure Conditions,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(3), p. 031506. [CrossRef]
Sangl, J. , Mayer, C. , and Sattelmayer, T. , 2010, “ Dynamic Adaptation of Aerodynamic Flame Stabilization of a Premix Swirl Burner to Fuel Reactivity Using Fuel Momentum,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 133(7), p. 071501.
Terhaar, S. , Reichel, T. G. , Schrödinger, C. , Rukes, L. , Paschereit, C. O. , and Oberleithner, K. , 2015, “ Vortex Breakdown Types and Global Modes in Swirling Combustor Flows With Axial Injection,” J. Propul. Power, 31(1), pp. 219–229. [CrossRef]
Schefer, R. , Wicksall, D. , and Agrawal, A. , 2002, “ Combustion of Hydrogen-Enriched Methane in a Lean Premixed Swirl-Stabilized Burner,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 29(1), pp. 843–851. [CrossRef]
Lantz, A. , Collin, R. , Aldén, M. , Lindholm, A. , Larfeldt, J. , and Lörstad, D. , 2014, “ Investigation of Hydrogen Enriched Natural Gas Flames in a SGT-700/800 Burner Using OH PLIF and Chemiluminescence Imaging,” ASME Paper No. GT2014-26293.
Sadanandan, R. , Lückerath, R. , Meier, W. , and Wahl, C. , 2011, “ Flame Characteristics and Emissions in Flameless Combustion Under Gas Turbine Relevant Conditions,” J. Propul. Power, 27(5), pp. 970–980. [CrossRef]
Emadi, M. , Karkow, D. , Salameh, T. , Gohil, A. , and Ratner, A. , 2012, “ Flame Structure Changes Resulting From Hydrogen-Enrichment and Pressurization for Low-Swirl Premixed Methane–Air Flames,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37(13), pp. 10397–10404. [CrossRef]
Göckeler, K. , Krüger, O. , and Paschereit, C. O. , 2015, “ Laminar Burning Velocities and Emissions of Hydrogen–Methane–Air–Steam Mixtures,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 137(3), p. 031503. [CrossRef]
Strakey, P. A. , Woodruff, S. D. , Williams, T. C. , and Schefer, R. W. , 2008, “ OH-Planar Fluorescence Measurements of Pressurized, Hydrogen Premixed Flames in the SimVal Combustor,” AIAA J., 46(7), pp. 1604–1613. [CrossRef]
Tuncer, O. , Acharya, S. , and Uhm, J. , 2009, “ Dynamics, NOx and Flashback Characteristics of Confined Premixed Hydrogen-Enriched Methane Flames,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 34(1), pp. 496–506. [CrossRef]
Tanneberger, T. , Reichel, T. G. , Krüger, O. , Terhaar, S. , and Paschereit, C. O. , 2015, “ Numerical Investigation of the Flow Field and Mixing in a Swirl-Stabilized Burner With a Non-Swirling Axial Jet,” ASME Paper No. GT2015-43382.
Terhaar, S. , Krüger, O. , and Paschereit, C. O. , 2015, “ Flow Field and Flame Dynamics of Swirling Methane and Hydrogen Flames at Dry and Steam Diluted Conditions,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 137(4), p. 041503. [CrossRef]
Lacarelle, A. , and Paschereit, C. O. , 2012, “ Increasing the Passive Scalar Mixing Quality of Jets in Crossflow With Fluidics Actuators,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(2), p. 021503. [CrossRef]
Göckeler, K. , Göke, S. , Schimek, S. , and Paschereit, C. O. , 2010, “ Enhanced Recirculation in the Cold Flow Field of a Swirl-Stabilized Burner for Ultra Wet Combustion,” International Conference Jets, Wakes Separated Flows (ICJWSF-2010), Cincinnati, OH, Sept. 27–30.
Eckbreth, A. C. , 1996, Laser Diagnostics for Combustion Temperature and Species, Vol. 3, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Boxx, I. , Slabaugh, C. , Kutne, P. , Lucht, R. , and Meier, W. , 2014, “ 3 kHz PIV/OH-PLIF Measurements in a Gas Turbine Combustor at Elevated Pressure,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 35(3), pp. 3793–3802. [CrossRef]
Donbar, J. M. , Driscoll, J. F. , and Carter, C. D. , 2000, “ Reaction Zone Structure in Turbulent Nonpremixed Jet Flames—From CH-OH PLIF Images,” Combust. Flame, 122(1–2), pp. 1–19. [CrossRef]
Sadanandan, R. , Stöhr, M. , and Meier, W. , 2008, “ Simultaneous OH-PLIF and PIV Measurements in a Gas Turbine Model Combustor,” Appl. Phys. B, 90(3–4), pp. 609–618. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Stability limits (from Ref. [13]) for χ = 12.5% and χ = 7.5%; both configurations operated at ϕ = 1 without FB (symbol × , ϕ > 1 not tested). Hence, only the lower stability limits are displayed.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Bulk outlet velocity u0(ϕ), top, and momentum ratio J, bottom, at constant air mass flow m˙air with respect to varied equivalence ratio ϕ and ratio of inlet air to fuel temperature (Tin/Tfuel) for hydrogen, left, and methane, right

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic of burner model, indicating different volume flow pathways through swirl generator or axial injection

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Experimental setup for OH-PLIF measurements in atmospheric combustion test rig

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Isothermal flow field in the absence (χ = 0%, left column) and presence of a medium (χ = 7.5%, center column) and high (χ = 12.5%, right column) amount of axial air injection. Additionally, the effect of injected fuel is presented at J = 3 (center row) and J = 6 (bottom row); (Re = 40,000, S = 0.9, and u0 = const.); solid lines indicating u/u0 = 0.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Extraction method for axial location of maximum flame front probability xF from a series of OH PLIF snapshots (Tin = 450 K, u0 = 70 m/s, and ϕ=0.3)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Mean OH signal probability (top row) and instant OH-PLIF images (bottom row) in the presence of high axial air injection (χ = 12.5%) recorded at Tin = 453 K and u0 = 70 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Mean OH signal probability (top row) and instant OH-PLIF images (bottom row) in the presence of medium axial air injection (χ = 7.5%) recorded at Tin = 453 K and u0 = 70 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Location of maximum flame front likelihood xF over equivalence ratio ϕ for varied air preheat temperatures Tin for methane (left, χ = 12.5%) and hydrogen (center, χ = 12.5% and right χ = 7.5%); all points recorded at a constant bulk air velocity u0 = 70 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Location of maximum flame front likelihood xF over bulk air velocity u0 for varied air preheat temperatures Tin for hydrogen at χ = 12.5% for ϕ=0.4 (left) and ϕ=0.6 (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Measured (symbols) and modeled (lines) fuel temperature as a function of air preheat temperature Tin and equivalence ratio at constant u0 = 70 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

xF over J with varied Tin and ϕ for hydrogen at χ = 7.5% (solid), χ = 12.5% (dotted), and methane at χ = 12.5% (dashed line)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Location of maximum flame front likelihood xF over Reynolds number, varying Tin (circle color) and ϕ=0.2−1.0 (circle diameter) yields different levels of momentum ratio J, recorded for hydrogen at χ = 12.5%




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In