Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Turbomachinery

A Comparison of Modeling Techniques for Polydispersed Droplet Spectra in Steam Turbines

[+] Author and Article Information
Fiona R. Hughes

Hopkinson Laboratory,
Department of Engineering,
University of Cambridge,
Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
e-mail: frh25@cam.ac.uk

Jörg Starzmann

Hopkinson Laboratory,
Department of Engineering,
University of Cambridge,
Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
e-mail: js2145@cam.ac.uk

Alexander J. White

Hopkinson Laboratory,
Department of Engineering,
University of Cambridge,
Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
e-mail: ajw36@cam.ac.uk

John B. Young

Hopkinson Laboratory,
Department of Engineering,
University of Cambridge,
Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
e-mail: jby@cam.ac.uk

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Turbomachinery Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 17, 2015; final manuscript received August 13, 2015; published online October 21, 2015. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 138(4), 042603 (Oct 21, 2015) (9 pages) Paper No: GTP-15-1344; doi: 10.1115/1.4031389 History: Received July 17, 2015; Revised August 13, 2015

Within steam turbine flows, condensation phenomena give rise to complex droplet spectra that can span more than two orders of magnitude in size. To predict the behavior of the two-phase flow and the resulting losses, the interactions between the vapor phase and droplets of all sizes must be accurately calculated. The estimation of thermodynamic losses and droplet deposition rates, in particular, depends on the size range and shape of the droplet spectrum. These calculations become computationally burdensome when a large number of droplet groups are present, and it is therefore advantageous to capture the complete droplet spectrum in a compressed form. This paper compares several methods for reducing the complexity of the droplet spectrum: a single representative droplet size (equivalent monodispersion), the moment method (including various growth rate approximations), the quadrature method of moments (QMOM), and spectrum pruning. In spectrum pruning, droplet groups are individually nucleated, but their number is subsequently reduced by combining groups together in a manner that preserves droplet number, wetness fraction, and the shape of the initial spectrum. The various techniques are compared within a Lagrangian framework by tracking the two-phase behavior along predefined pressure–time trajectories. Primary and secondary nucleation, droplet evaporation, and a representative turbomachinery case are modeled. The calculations are compared in terms of speed, accuracy, and robustness. It is shown that both the moment methods and spectrum pruning provide an appreciable improvement in accuracy over the use of an “equivalent” monodispersion without compromising calculation speed. Although all the examined methods are adequate for primary nucleation and droplet growth calculations, spectrum pruning and the QMOM are most accurate over the range of conditions considered.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Chandler, K. , White, A. , and Young, J. , 2014, “ Non-Equilibrium Wet-Steam Calculations of Unsteady Low-Pressure Turbine Flows,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A, 228(2), pp. 143–153. [CrossRef]
Young, J. B. , 1992, “ Two-Dimensional, Nonequilibrium, Wet-Steam Calculations for Nozzles and Turbine Cascades,” ASME J. Turbomach., 114(3), pp. 569–579. [CrossRef]
Yeoh, C. , and Young, J. , 1982, “ Non-Equilibrium Streamline Curvature Throughflow Calculations in Wet Steam Turbines,” ASME J. Eng. Power, 104(2), pp. 489–496. [CrossRef]
Bakhtar, F. , and Mohsin, R. , 2014, “ A Study of the Throughflow of Nucleating Steam in a Turbine Stage by a Time-Marching Method,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C, 228(5), pp. 932–949. [CrossRef]
Wróblewski, W. , Dykas, S. , and Gepert, A. , 2009, “ Steam Condensing Flow Modeling in Turbine Channels,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 35(6), pp. 498–506. [CrossRef]
White, A. J. , Young, J. B. , and Walters, P. T. , 1996, “ Experimental Validation of Condensing Flow Theory for a Stationary Cascade of Steam Turbine Blades,” Proc. R. Soc. A, 354(1704), pp. 59–88.
White, A. J. , and Young, J. B. , 1993, “ Time-Marching Method for the Prediction of Two-Dimensional, Unsteady Flows of Condensing Steam,” ASME J. Propul. Power, 9(4), pp. 579–587. [CrossRef]
Young, J. B. , 1982, “ The Spontaneous Condensation of Steam in Supersonic Nozzles,” Physicochem. Hydrodyn., 3, pp. 57–82.
McDonald, J. E. , 1962, “ Homogeneous Nucleation of Vapour Condensation. I—Thermodynamic Aspects,” Am. J. Phys., 30(12), pp. 870–877. [CrossRef]
McDonald, J. E. , 1963, “ Homogeneous Nucleation of Vapour Condensation. II—Kinetic Aspects,” Am. J. Phys., 31(1), pp. 31–41. [CrossRef]
Bakhtar, F. , Young, J. B. , White, A. J. , and Simpson, D. A. , 2005, “ Classical Nucleation Theory and Its Application to Condensing Steam Flow Calculations,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C, 219(12), pp. 1315–1333. [CrossRef]
Kantrowitz, A. , 1951, “ Nucleation in Very Rapid Vapour Expansions,” J. Chem. Phys., 19(9), pp. 1097–1100. [CrossRef]
White, A. J. , and Hounslow, M. J. , 2000, “ Modelling Droplet Size Distributions in Polydispersed Wet-Steam Flows,” Int. J. Heat Mass Trans., 43(11), pp. 1873–1884. [CrossRef]
White, A. J. , 2003, “ A Comparison of Modelling Methods for Polydispersed Wet-Steam Flow,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 57(6), pp. 819–834. [CrossRef]
Hulbert, H. M. , and Katz, S. , 1964, “ Some Problems in Particle Technology: A Statistical Mechanical Formulation,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 19(8), pp. 555–574. [CrossRef]
Gerber, A. G. , and Mousavi, A. , 2006, “ Application of Quadrature Method of Moments to the Polydispersed Droplet Spectrum in Transonic Steam Flows With Primary and Secondary Nucleation,” Appl. Math. Modell., 31(8), pp. 1518–1533. [CrossRef]
Gordon, R. G. , 1968, “ Error Bounds in Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics,” J. Math. Phys., 9(5), pp. 655–663. [CrossRef]
Marchisio, D. , Vigil, R. , and Fox, R. , 2003, “ Quadrature Method of Moments for Aggregation-Breakage Processes,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 258(2), pp. 322–334. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Starzmann, J. , Kaluza, P. , Casey, M. , and Sieverding, F. , “ On Kinematic Relaxation and Deposition of Water Droplets in the Last Stages of Low Pressure Steam Turbines,” ASME J. Turbomach., 136(7), p. 071001.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Normalized Wilson point pressure (top), Sauter diameter (centre), and droplet number (bottom) as functions of expansion rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The droplet number density functions resulting from primary nucleation at p˙ = 4000 s−1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The droplet number density functions resulting from secondary nucleation at p˙ = 8000 s−1 with droplet clusters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Specific droplet number as a function of time for secondary nucleation followed by evaporation; no droplet clusters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Sauter mean diameter as a function of time for secondary nucleation followed by evaporation; no droplet clusters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Pressure and expansion rate versus time for an idealized expansion in an LP turbine stage

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Specific droplet number as a function of time near the Wilson point of idealized expansion in an LP turbine




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In