0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Assessment of the Indirect Combustion Noise Generated in a Transonic High-Pressure Turbine Stage

[+] Author and Article Information
Dimitrios Papadogiannis, Florent Duchaine

CFD Team,
CERFACS,
42 Avenue Gaspard Coriolis,
Toulouse 31057, France

Gaofeng Wang, Stéphane Moreau

Département de Génie Mécanique,
University of Sherbrooke,
Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada

Laurent Gicquel

CFD Team,
CERFACS,
42 Avenue Gaspard Coriolis,
Toulouse 31057, France
e-mail: laurent.gicquel@cerfacs.fr

Franck Nicoud

CNRS UMR 5149,
Université de Montpellier II,
Place Eugène Bataillon,
Montpellier 34095, France

1Present address: Safran Tech., 1 rue Geneviève Aubé, Magny-les-Hameaux 78772, France.

2Present address: Zhejiang University, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Hangzhou, 310027, China.

Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 20, 2015; final manuscript received August 14, 2015; published online October 21, 2015. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 138(4), 041503 (Oct 21, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: GTP-15-1350; doi: 10.1115/1.4031404 History: Received July 20, 2015; Revised August 14, 2015

Indirect combustion noise, generated by the acceleration and distortion of entropy waves through the turbine stages, has been shown to be the dominant noise source of gas turbines at low-frequencies and to impact the thermoacoustic behavior of the combustor. In the present work, indirect combustion noise generation is evaluated in the realistic, fully 3D transonic high-pressure turbine stage MT1 using large eddy simulations (LESs). An analysis of the basic flow and the different turbine noise generation mechanisms is performed for two configurations: one with a steady inflow and a second with a pulsed inlet, where a plane entropy wave train at a given frequency is injected before propagating across the stage generating indirect noise. The noise is evaluated through the dynamic mode decomposition (DMD) of the flow field. It is compared with the previous 2D simulations of a similar stator/rotor configuration, as well as with the compact theory of Cumpsty and Marble. Results show that the upstream propagating entropy noise is reduced due to the choked turbine nozzle guide vane. Downstream acoustic waves are found to be of similar strength to the 2D case, highlighting the potential impact of indirect combustion noise on the overall noise signature of the engine.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Mesh view of the stator at midspan (a), of the rotor at midspan (b), and at the rotor tip (c)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

SPDMD at the stator inlet (left) and rotor outlet (right)—original DMD modes (deg) and SPDMD selected modes (×)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

DMD pressure spectra of the pulsed case with different number different runtimes—stator (left) and rotor domain (right) at midspan

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

DMD temperature spectra of the pulsed case with different number for different runtimes—stator (left) and rotor domain (right) at midspan

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

DMD 2 kHz mode at midspan—modulus and phase of the temperature (a) and (b) and pressure (c) and (d), respectively

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

DMD spectra of pressure for the stator (left) and rotor (right) domains at midspan—steady inflow case (deg) and pulsed case (×)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

DMD spectra of temperature for the stator (left) and rotor (right) domains at midspan—steady inflow case (deg) and pulsed case (×)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

|∇ρ|/ρ of an instantaneous solution at midspan for the steady inflow (a) and pulsed cases (b) and at an x-normal plane near the rotor for the steady inflow case (c)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparisons of the evaluated transmission coefficients using 3D LES (×), 2D predictions (+ and •) and the compact theory (−)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In