0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

The Three-Dimensional Structure of Swirl-Stabilized Flames in a Lean Premixed Multinozzle Can Combustor

[+] Author and Article Information
Janith Samarasinghe

Turbulent Combustion Lab,
The Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: rjs5309@psu.edu

Stephen J. Peluso

Turbulent Combustion Lab,
The Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: sjp249@psu.edu

Bryan D. Quay

Turbulent Combustion Lab,
The Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: bdq100@psu.edu

Domenic A. Santavicca

Turbulent Combustion Lab,
The Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802
e-mail: das8@psu.edu

Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 2, 2015; final manuscript received August 19, 2015; published online September 22, 2015. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 138(3), 031502 (Sep 22, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: GTP-15-1230; doi: 10.1115/1.4031439 History: Received July 02, 2015; Revised August 19, 2015

Flame structure can have a significant effect on a combustor's static stability (resistance to blowoff) and dynamic stability (combustion instability) and therefore is an important aspect of the combustion process that must be taken into account in the design of gas turbine combustors. While the relationship between flame structure and flame stability has been studied extensively in single-nozzle combustors, relatively few studies have been conducted in multinozzle combustor configurations typical of actual gas turbine combustion systems. In this paper, a chemiluminescence-based tomographic reconstruction technique is used to obtain three-dimensional images of the flame structure in a laboratory-scale five-nozzle can combustor. Analysis of the 3D images reveals features of the complex, three-dimensional structure of this multinozzle flame. Effects of interacting swirling flows, flame–flame interactions, and flame–wall interactions on the flame structure are also discussed.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Key fluid dynamic features of an annular swirl flow: (A) outer recirculation zone, (B) inner recirculation zone, (C) reactant jet, (D) inner shear layer, (E) outer shear layer, and (F) centerbody wake. Modified from Ref. [5].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Schematics of V- and M-flames and (b) V- and M-flames observed in the multinozzle combustor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Enlarged view of vertical slice through the center of the multinozzle combustor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Angle of the interaction region in the direction of swirl

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Two-dimensional horizontal and vertical slices of the reconstructed three-dimensional multinozzle flame image

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Pseudo color scale used for all chemiluminescence images

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Projection images of unforced multinozzle flame obtained from different viewing angles around the combustor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic of multi-angle imaging setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematics and photographs of the multinozzle combustor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Horizontal slices at incremental axial distances from the dump plate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison between horizontal chemiluminescence image slices of the multinozzle flame and LDV data from a nine-nozzle LDI combustor [24]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Isolating the middle flame and division into vertical two-dimensional slices around the circumference

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Plots of (a) flame root angle and (b) chemiluminescence intensity of vertical slices around the circumference of the middle flame as a function of rotation angle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Isolating a single outer flame and division into vertical two-dimensional slices around the circumference

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

(a) Dimensions used to calculate confinement ratio and (b) variation of confinement ratio (Cr) with rotation angle (θrot)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

(a) Flame brush of a vertical flame slice, (b) calculation of extent of mean flame position and, (c) flame brush with mean flame position overlaid

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Two-dimensional vertical slices of the outer half of an outer flame with mean flame position overlaid

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Plots of (a) flame root angle and (b) chemiluminescence intensity of vertical slices around the circumference of a single outer flame as a function of rotation angle

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In