Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Low-Emission, Liquid Fuel Combustion System for Conventional and Alternative Fuels Developed by the Scaling Analysis

[+] Author and Article Information
Yonas Niguse

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Alabama,
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
e-mail: ygniguse@crimson.ua.edu

Ajay Agrawal

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Alabama,
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
e-mail: AAgrawal@eng.ua.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 14, 2015; final manuscript received August 27, 2015; published online October 13, 2015. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 138(4), 041502 (Oct 13, 2015) (11 pages) Paper No: GTP-15-1307; doi: 10.1115/1.4031475 History: Received July 14, 2015; Revised August 27, 2015

The objective of this study is to develop a theoretical basis for scalability considerations and design of a large-scale combustor utilizing flow blurring (FB) atomization. FB atomization is a recently discovered twin-fluid atomization concept, reported to produce fine spray of liquids with wide range of viscosities. Previously, we have developed and investigated a small-scale swirl-stabilized combustor of 7-kWth capacity. Spray measurements have shown that the FB injector's atomization capability is superior when compared to other techniques, such as air blast atomization. However, despite these favorable results, scalability of the FB injector and associated combustor design has never been explored for large capacity; for example, for gas turbine applications. In this study, a number of dimensionless scaling parameters that affect the processes of atomization, fuel–air mixing, and combustion are analyzed, and scaling criteria for the different components of the combustion system are selected. Constant velocity criterion is used to scale key geometric components of the system. Scaling of the nonlinear dimensions and complex geometries, such as swirler vanes and internal parts of the injector is undertaken through phenomenological analysis of the flow processes associated with the scaled component. A scaled-up 60-kWth capacity combustor with FB injector is developed and investigated for combustion performance using diesel and vegetable oil (VO) (soybean oil) as fuels. Results show that the scaled-up injector's performance is comparable to the smaller scale system in terms of flame quality, emission levels, and static flame stability. Visual flame images at different atomizing air-to-liquid ratio by mass (ALR) show mainly blue flames, especially for ALR > 2.8. Emission measurements show a general trend of lower CO and NOx levels at higher ALRs, replicating the performance of the small-scale combustion system. Flame liftoff height at different ALRs is similar for both scales. The scaled-up combustor with FB injector preformed robustly with uncompromised stability for the range of firing rates (FRs) above 50% of the design capacity. Experimental results corroborate with the scaling methodology developed in this research.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Lefebvre, A. H. , 1989, Atomization and Sprays, Hemisphere, New York.
Kreith, F. , 2000, Fluid Mechanics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Lefebvre, A. H. , Wang, X. F. , and Martin, C. A. , 1988, “ Spray Characteristics of Aerated-Liquid Pressure Atomizers,” J. Propul. Power, 4(4), pp. 293–298. [CrossRef]
Sovani, S. D. , Sojka, P. E. , and Lefebvre, A. H. , 2001, “ Effervescent Atomization,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 27(4), pp. 483–521. [CrossRef]
Gañán-Calvo, A. M. , 2005, “ Enhanced Liquid Atomization: From Flow-Focusing to Flow-Blurring,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 86(21), p. 214101. [CrossRef]
Simmons, B. M. , Kolhe, P. S. , Taylor, R. P. , and Agrawal, A. K. , 2010, “ Glycerol Combustion Using Flow-Blurring Atomization,” Technical Meeting of the Central States Section of the Combustion Institute, Champaign, IL, Mar. 21–23.
Simmons, B. M. , and Agrawal, A. K. , 2011, “ Drop Size and Velocity Measurements in Bio-Oil Sprays Produced by the Flow-Blurring Injector,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-46832.
Panchasara, H. V. , Sequera, D. E. , Schreiber, W. C. , and Agrawal, A. K. , 2009, “ Emissions Reductions in Diesel and Kerosene Flames Using a Novel Fuel Injector,” J. Propul. Power, 25(4), pp. 984–987. [CrossRef]
Simmons, B. M. , and Agrawal, A. K. , 2010, “ Spray Characteristics of a Flow-Blurring Atomizer,” Atomization Sprays, 20(9), pp. 821–835. [CrossRef]
Simmons, B. M. , and Agrawal, A. K. , 2012, “ Flow Blurring Atomization for Low-Emission Combustion Of Liquid Biofuels,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 184(5), pp. 660–675. [CrossRef]
Simmons, B. M. , Panchasara, H. V. , and Agrawal, A. K. , 2009, “ A Comparison of Air-Blast and Flow-Blurring Injectors Using Phase Doppler Particle Analyzer Technique,” ASME Paper No. GT2009-60239.
Bohon, M. D. , Metzger, B. A. , Linak, W. P. , King, C. J. , and Roberts, W. L. , 2011, “ Glycerol Combustion and Emissions,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 33(2), pp. 2717–2724. [CrossRef]
Kenny, R. J. , Moser, M. D. , Hulka, J. , and Jones, G. , 2006, “ Cold Flow Testing for Liquid Propellant Rocket Injector Scaling and Throttling,” AIAA Paper No. 2006-4705.
Jiang, X. , Siamas, G. A. , Jagus, K. , and Karayiannis, T. G. , 2010, “ Physical Modelling and Advanced Simulations of Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Jet Flows in Atomization and Sprays,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 36(2), pp. 131–167. [CrossRef]
Rosner, D. E. , 2012, Transport Processes in Chemically Reacting Flow Systems, Courier Dover, Mineola, NY.
Baukal, C. E. , 2004, Industrial Burner's Handbook, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p. 195.
Kumar, S. , Paul, P. J. , and Mukunda, H. S. , 2005, “ Investigations of the Scaling Criteria for a Mild Combustion Burner,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 30(2), pp. 2613–2621. [CrossRef]
Weber, R. , 1996, “ Scaling Characteristics of Aerodynamics, Heat Transfer, and Pollutant Emissions in Industrial Flames,” Symp. (Int.) Combust., 26(2), pp. 3343–3354. [CrossRef]
Jiang, L. , Agrawal, A. K. , and Taylor, R. P. , 2014, “ High Speed Visualization and PIV Measurements in the Near Field of Spray Produced by Flow-Blurring Atomization,” ASME Paper No. GT2014-27199.
Shepard, T. G. , (2011), “ Bubble Size Effect on Effervescent Atomization,” Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Simmons, B. M. , 2011, “ Atomization and Combustion of Liquid Biofuels,” Doctoral dissertation, Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
Gupta, A. K. , Lilley, D. G. , and Syred, N. , 1984. Swirl Flows, Abacus Press, Tunbridge Wells, UK.
Syred, N. , and Beer, J. M. , 1974, “ Combustion in Swirling Flows: A Review,” Combust. Flame, 23(2), pp. 143–201. [CrossRef]
Jiang, L. , Agrawal, A. K. , and Taylor, R. P. , 2014, “ Clean Combustion of Different Liquid Fuels Using a Novel Injector,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 57, pp. 275–284. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic diagram of scaled-up parts of the burner and the injector

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Geometrical representation of swirler

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Photographs of the small (left) and scaled-up (right) inlet swirlers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Schematic diagram of experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic representation of atomization, mixing, and combustion processes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic of the swirl stabilized dual-fuel burner setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic illustration of flow-blurring atomization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Flame photographs of diesel combustion for different ALR (HRR: 54 kW, dimensions in cm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Plots of experimental flame and calculated and lift heights for diesel and different ALR

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Radial profiles of (a) CO and (b) NOx emissions for diesel for different ALRs, for the small-scale and large-scale systems

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Radial profiles of CO (a) and NOx (b) for diesel combustion at ALR of 2.8 for heat release rates of 45 and 54 kW

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Flame photographs of VO combustion for different ALR (HRR: 54 kW, dimensions in cm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Plots of experimental and calculated flame liftoff heights for VO and different ALR

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Radial profiles of (a) CO and (b) NOx emissions for VO for different ALRs, for the small-scale and large-scale systems




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In