Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Controls, Diagnostics, and Instrumentation

Optimization of an Algorithm for the Measurement of Unsteady Flow-Rates in High-Pressure Pipelines and Application of a Newly Designed Flowmeter to Volumetric Pump Analysis

[+] Author and Article Information
A. Ferrari

Energy Department,
Politecnico di Torino,
C.so duca degli Abruzzi, 24,
Torino 10129, Italy
e-mail: alessandro.ferrari@polito.it

P. Pizzo

Energy Department,
Politecnico di Torino,
C.so duca degli Abruzzi, 24,
Torino 10129, Italy

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Controls, Diagnostics and Instrumentation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received October 30, 2014; final manuscript received September 1, 2015; published online October 28, 2015. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 138(3), 031604 (Oct 28, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1599; doi: 10.1115/1.4031541 History: Received October 30, 2014; Revised September 01, 2015

An innovative, efficient, and robust algorithm is presented for the evaluation of the instantaneous flow-rate in high-pressure liquid flow pipelines. This algorithm is based on the pressure time histories measured at two locations. A simple ordinary differential equation has been derived from the mass and momentum conservation laws and has been solved analytically. This equation allows the flow-rate time fluctuations to be evaluated accurately around their mean value, without any need for initial datum on the liquid flow velocity. A measuring device has been designed and realized to evaluate the flow-rate. The proposed flowmeter layout consists of a piece of pipeline endowed with two piezoresistive pressure sensors equipped with miniaturized thermocouples, the pressure sensor conditioners and a central processing unit (CPU), in which the algorithm for the evaluation of the flow-rate has been implemented. A more sophisticated version of the flowmeter algorithm, which includes unsteady friction in the flow-rate evaluation, has also been developed. Different algorithm versions have been assessed and successfully validated through a comparison with numerical flow-rate data predicted using a reliable one-dimensional model of a common rail (CR) fuel injection system. The prototypal flowmeter has been installed at the delivery section of a CR volumetric pump in order to investigate the flow-rate ripple. The flowmeter traces have been compared with the predictions of a previously developed theoretical model for the pump delivered instantaneous flow-rate, in order to further assess the reliability of both the model and the flowmeter as well as to have a better understanding of the cause and effect relationships between the flow-rate time history and the dynamic working of the pump. The effects that the actuation of the fuel metering valve (FMV), which is placed at the CR pump inlet, has on the instantaneous delivered flow-rate have also been analyzed.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Catania, A. E. , Ferrari, A. , and Manno, M. , 2008, “ Development and Application of a Complete Common Rail Injection System Mathematical Model for Layout Hydro-Dynamic Analysis,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 130(6), p. 062809. [CrossRef]
Catania, A. E. , Ferrari, A. , Manno, M. , and Spessa, E. , 2006, “ A Comprehensive Thermodynamic Approach to Acoustic Cavitation Simulation in High-Pressure Injection Systems by a Conservative Homogeneous Two-Phase Barotropic Flow Model,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 128(2), pp. 434–445. [CrossRef]
Beck, M. , Iben, U. , Mittwollen, N. , Iben, H.-K. , and Munz, C.-D. , 2001, “ On Solution of Conservation Equations in Cavitated Hydraulic Pipelines,” Third International Symposium on CFD, Thermal and Chemical Systems With Industrial Applications, July 22–26, Atlanta, GA, pp. 87–98.
Catania, A. E. , and Ferrari, A. , 2011, “ Experimental Analysis, Modeling and Control of Volumetric Radial-Piston Pumps,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 133(8), pp. 1–11. [CrossRef]
ASME, 1971, Fluid Meters, Their Theory and Application, 6th ed., ASME, New York.
Doebelin, E. , 1990, Measurement Systems: Application and Design, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Zimmerman, R. , and Deery, D. , 1977, Turbine Flowmeter Handbook, Flow Technology, Inc., Phoenix, AZ.
Plache, K. O. , 1979, “ Coriolis Flowmeter,” Mechanical Engineering, pp. 36–41.
Micro Motion, 2007, “ Coriolis Flow and Density Management.”
Shercliff, J. A. , 1962, The Theory of Electromagnetic Flow Measurement, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Durst, F. , Ismailov, M. , and Trimis, D. , 1996, “ Measurement of Instantaneous Flow Rates in Periodically Operating Injection Systems,” Exp. Fluids, 20(3), pp. 178–188. [CrossRef]
Ismailov, M. , Ishima, T. , Obokata, T. , Tsukagoshi, M. , and Kobayashi, K. , 1999, “ Visualization and Measurements of Sub-Millisecond Transient Spray Dynamics Applicable to Direct Injection Gasoline Engine—Part 3: Measurements of Instantaneous and Integrated Flow Rates in High-Pressure Injection System Using LDA-Based Meter,” JSME Int. J., Ser. B, 42(1), p. 39. [CrossRef]
General Motors, 1985, “ Method and Apparatus for Measuring Fluid Flows,” German patent application EP0141546A2.
Sakai, I. , Kushida, S. , Machida, N. , and Ikeda, M. , 2006, “ Method and Apparatus for Measuring Flow Rate of Fluids,” U.S. patent application US2006243065A1.
Kulite, 2007, “ Innovative Piezoresistive Transducers.”
Catania, A. E. , Ferrari, A. , Manno, M. , and Spessa, E. , 2008, “ Experimental Investigation of Dynamics Effects on Multiple-Injection Common Rail System Performance,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 130(3), p. 032806. [CrossRef]
Catania, A. E. , and Ferrari, A. , 2009, “ Advanced Mathematical Modeling of Electronic Unit-Injector Systems for Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Application,” SAE Paper No. 2008-01-1195.
Catania, A. E. , and Ferrari, A. , 2012, “ Development and Performance Assessment of the New-Generation CF Fuel Injection System for Diesel Passenger Cars,” Appl. Energy, 91(1), pp. 483–495. [CrossRef]
Catania, A. E. , and Ferrari, A. , 2009, “ Development and Assessment of a New Operating Principle for the Measurement of Unsteady Flow Rates in High-Pressure Pipelines,” Flow Meas. Instrum., 20(6), pp. 230–240. [CrossRef]
Batchelor, G. K. , 2000, An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Winning, H. K. , and Coole, T. , 2013, “ Explicit Friction Factor Accuracy and Computational Efficiency for Turbulent Flow in Pipes,” Flow, Turbul. Combust., 90(1), pp. 1–27. [CrossRef]
Zielke, W. , 1968, “ Frequency-Dependent Friction in Transient Pipe Flow,” ASME J. Basic Eng., 90(1), pp. 109–115. [CrossRef]
Kagawa, T. , Lee, I . Y. , Kitagawa, A. , and Taakenaka, T. , 1983, “ High Speed and Accurate Computing Method of Frequency-Dependent Friction in Laminar Pipe Flow for Characteristics Methods,” Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., Ser. B, 49(447), pp. 2638–2644. [CrossRef]
Ferrari, A. , 2010, “ Modelling Approaches to Acoustic Cavitation in Transmission Pipelines,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 53(19–20), pp. 4193–4203. [CrossRef]
Ferrari, A. , Paolicelli, F. , and Pizzo, P. , 2014, “ Common Feeding Injection System Equipped With Reduced-Leakage Solenoid Injectors for EURO 6 Diesel Engines Applications,” SAE Paper No. 2014-01-2735.
Catania, A. E. , Ferrari, A. , and Spessa, E. , 2008, “ Temperature Variations in the Simulation of High-Pressure Injection-Systems Transient Flows Under Cavitation,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 51(7–8), pp. 2090–2107. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

CR layout used for the flowmeter validation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Flowmeter validation results (double injection, pnom = 1200 bar, DT = 700 μs)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Flowmeter validation results (single injection, pnom = 400 bar, ET = 1000 μs)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effect of unsteady friction on the flow-rate (single injection, pnom = 1200 bar, ET = 400 μs)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effect of unsteady friction on the flow-rate (double injection, pnom = 800 bar, DT = 1000 μs)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Impact of the pressure transducer inaccuracy on the differential pressure measurement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Application of the flowmeter to a high-pressure volumetric pump

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Pump flow-rate ripple: flowmeter versus model results (pnom = 1000 bar, n = 1000 rpm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Pump flow-rate ripple: flowmeter versus model results (pnom = 1400 bar, n = 1500 rpm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Flowmeter results at n = 2000 rpm, 〈G〉  = 15.5 g/s, and pnom = 1200 bar

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Flowmeter results at n = 1500 rpm, 〈G〉  = 13.8 g/s, and pnom = 1600 bar

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Lump parameter model of the pump-pipe-rail-system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Regulation strategy of the CR pump delivered flow-rate (pnom = 1000 bar, n = 1000 rpm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Regulation strategy of the CR pump delivered flow-rate (pnom = 600 bar, n = 1000 rpm)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In