Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Oil and Gas Applications

Testing and Modeling of an Acoustic Instability in Pilot-Operated Pressure Relief Valves

[+] Author and Article Information
Timothy C. Allison

Mechanical Engineering Division,
Southwest Research Institute,
San Antonio, TX 78238
e-mail: tim.allison@swri.org

Klaus Brun

Mechanical Engineering Division,
Southwest Research Institute,
San Antonio, TX 78238
e-mail: klaus.brun@swri.org

Contributed by the Oil and Gas Applications Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 13, 2015; final manuscript received September 8, 2015; published online November 3, 2015. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 138(5), 052401 (Nov 03, 2015) (6 pages) Paper No: GTP-15-1279; doi: 10.1115/1.4031623 History: Received July 13, 2015; Revised September 08, 2015

Pressure relief valves (PRVs) are included as an essential element of many compressor piping systems in order to prevent overpressurization and also to minimize the loss of process gas during relief events. Failure of the valve to operate properly can result in excessive quantities of vented gas and/or catastrophic failure of the piping system. Several mechanisms for chatter and instability have been previously identified for spring-loaded relief valves, but pilot-operated relief valves are widely considered to be stable. In this paper, pilot-operated PRVs are shown to be susceptible to a dynamic instability under certain conditions where valve dynamics couple with upstream piping acoustics. This self-exciting instability can cause severe oscillations of the valve piston, damaging the valve seat, preventing resealing, and possibly causing damage to attached piping. Two case studies are presented, which show damaging unstable oscillations in a field installation and a blowdown rig, and a methodology is presented for modeling the instability by coupling a valve dynamic model with a 1D transient fluid dynamics simulation code. Modeling results are compared with measured stable and unstable operation in a blowdown rig to show that the modeling approach accurately predicts the observed behaviors.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Hellemans, M. , 2009, The Safety Relief Valve Handbook: Design and Use of Process Safety Valves to ASME and International Code and Standards, 1st ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK.
Scully, W. A. , 1981, “ Safety-Relief-Valve Malfunctions: Symptoms, Causes, and Cures,” Chemical Engineering, Access Intelligence, New York, pp. 111–114.
API, 2011, “ Sizing, Selection, and Installation of Pressure-Relieving Devices in Refineries,” American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, Report No. API RP 520.
Föllmer, B. , 1980, “ Influence of Pressure Surges on the Functioning of Safety Valves,” 3rd International Conference on Pressure Surges, Canterbury, UK, Mar. 25–27, pp. 429–444.
Frommann, O. , and Friedel, L. , 1998, “ Analysis of Safety Relief Valve Chatter Induced by Pressure Waves in Gas Flow,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 11(4), pp. 279–290. [CrossRef]
MacLeod, G. , 1985, “ Safety Valve Dynamic Instability: An Analysis of Chatter,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 107(2), pp. 172–177. [CrossRef]
Baldwin, R. M. , and Simmons, H. R. , 1984, “ Flow-Induced Vibration in Safety Relief Valves: Design and Troubleshooting Methods,” ASME Paper No. 84-PVP-8.
Baldwin, R. M. , and Simmons, H. R. , 1986, “ Flow-Induced Vibration in Safety Relief Valves,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 108(3), pp. 267–272. [CrossRef]
Johnston, D. N. , Edge, K. A. , and Brunelli, M. , 2002, “ Impedance and Stability Characteristics of a Relief Valve,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part I, 216(5), pp. 371–382.
Brun, K. , Deffenbaugh, D. M. , and Bowles, E. B., Jr ., 2007, “ Development of a Transient Fluid Dynamics Solver for Compression System Pulsation Analysis,” Gas Machinery Conference, Dallas, TX, Oct. 1–3.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Pilot-operated PRV schematic [1]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Stop bolt damage from PRV failure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Blowdown test rig layout

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Test rig riser acoustic mode at 74.6 Hz

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Piston position and pressures at instability onset

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Piston position spectrogram during instability

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Riser top pressure spectrogram during instability

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Dome force versus lift

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Normalized effective force area versus lift

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Measured inlet force versus lift

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Inputs list and analysis flow for fluid–structure interaction analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Simulated piston position and inlet pressure at instability onset

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Frequency spectra of simulated piston position and inlet pressure




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In