Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Multiphase Flow Large-Eddy Simulation Study of the Fuel Split Effects on Combustion Instabilities in an Ultra-Low-NOx Annular Combustor

[+] Author and Article Information
M. Bauerheim

42 Avenue Gaspard Coriolis,
Toulouse 31057, France;
SNECMA Villaroche,
Reau 77550, France
e-mail: bauerheim@cerfacs.fr

T. Jaravel

42 Avenue Gaspard Coriolis,
Toulouse 31057, France;
SNECMA Villaroche,
Reau 77550, France

L. Esclapez

42 Avenue Gaspard Coriolis,
Toulouse 31057, France;
SNECMA Villaroche,
Reau 77550, France

E. Riber, L. Y. M. Gicquel, B. Cuenot

42 Avenue Gaspard Coriolis,
Toulouse 31057, France

M. Cazalens

Moissy-Cramayel 77550, France;

S. Bourgois, M. Rullaud

SNECMA Villaroche,
Reau 77550, France

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received August 4, 2015; final manuscript received September 24, 2015; published online November 17, 2015. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 138(6), 061503 (Nov 17, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: GTP-15-1392; doi: 10.1115/1.4031871 History: Received August 04, 2015; Revised September 24, 2015

This paper describes the application of a coupled acoustic model/large-eddy simulation approach to assess the effect of fuel split on combustion instabilities in an industrial ultra-low-NOx annular combustor. Multiphase flow LES and an analytical model (analytical tool to analyze and control azimuthal modes in annular chambers (ATACAMAC)) to predict thermoacoustic modes are combined to reveal and compare two mechanisms leading to thermoacoustic instabilities: (1) a gaseous type in the multipoint zone (MPZ) where acoustics generates vortex shedding, which then wrinkle the flame front, and (2) a multiphase flow type in the pilot zone (PZ) where acoustics can modify the liquid fuel transport and the evaporation process leading to gaseous fuel oscillations. The aim of this paper is to investigate these mechanisms by changing the fuel split (from 5% to 20%, mainly affecting the PZ and mechanism 2) to assess which mechanism controls the flame dynamics. First, the eigenmodes of the annular chamber are investigated using an analytical model validated by 3D Helmholtz simulations. Then, multiphase flow LES are forced at the eigenfrequencies of the chamber for three different fuel split values. Key features of the flow and flame dynamics are investigated. Results show that acoustic forcing generates gaseous fuel oscillations in the PZ, which strongly depend on the fuel split parameter. However, the correlation between acoustics and the global (pilot + multipoint) heat release fluctuations highlights no dependency on the fuel split staging. It suggests that vortex shedding in the MPZ, almost not depending on the fuel split, is the main feature controlling the flame dynamics for this engine.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Poinsot, T. , Trouvé, A. , Veynante, D. , Candel, S. , and Esposito, E. , 1987, “ Vortex Driven Acoustically Coupled Combustion Instabilities,” J. Fluid Mech., 177, pp. 265–292. [CrossRef]
Paschereit, C. O. , and Gutmark, E. , 1999, “ Control of Thermoacoustic Instabilities in a Premixed Combustor by Fuel Modulation,” AIAA Paper No. 99-0711.
Lieuwen, T. , and Yang, V. , 2005, “ Combustion Instabilities in Gas Turbine Engines. Operational Experience, Fundamental Mechanisms and Modeling,” Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, Reston, VA.
Krebs, W. , Flohr, P. , Prade, B. , and Hoffmann, S. , 2002, “ Thermoacoustic Stability Chart for High Intense Gas Turbine Combustion Systems,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 174(7), pp. 99–128. [CrossRef]
Noiray, N. , Bothien, M. , and Schuermans, B. , 2011, “ Investigation of Azimuthal Staging Concepts in Annular Gas Turbines,” Combust. Theory Modell., 15(5), pp. 585–606. [CrossRef]
Bauerheim, M. , Parmentier, J. , Salas, P. , Nicoud, F. , and Poinsot, T. , 2014, “ An Analytical Model for Azimuthal Thermoacoustic Modes in an Annular Chamber Fed by an Annular Plenum,” Combust. Flame, 161(5), pp. 1374–1389. [CrossRef]
Pankiewitz, C. , and Sattelmayer, T. , 2003, “ Time Domain Simulation of Combustion Instabilities in Annular Combustors,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 125(3), pp. 677–685. [CrossRef]
Nicoud, F. , Benoit, L. , Sensiau, C. , and Poinsot, T. , 2007, “ Acoustic Modes in Combustors With Complex Impedances and Multidimensional Active Flames,” AIAA J., 45(2), pp. 426–441. [CrossRef]
Wolf, P. , Staffelbach, G. , Gicquel, L. , Muller, J. , and Poinsot, T. , 2012, “ Acoustic and Large Eddy Simulation Studies of Azimuthal Modes in Annular Combustion Chambers,” Combust. Flame, 159(11), pp. 3398–3413. [CrossRef]
Bauerheim, M. , Staffelbach, G. , Worth, N. , Dawson, J. , Gicquel, L. , and Poinsot, T. , 2015, “ Sensitivity of LES-Based Harmonic Flame Response Model for Turbulent Swirled Flames and Impact on the Stability of Azimuthal Modes,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 35(3), pp. 3355–3363. [CrossRef]
Lieuwen, T. , and Zinn, B. T. , 1998, “ The Role of Equivalence Ratio Oscillations in Driving Combustion Instabilities in Low NOx Gas Turbines,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 27(2), pp. 1809–1816. [CrossRef]
Lovett, J. , 1995, “ Multi-Stage Fuel Nozzle for Reducing Combustion Instabilities in Low NOx Gas Turbines,” U.S. Patent No. 5,408,830, Apr. 25.
Poinsot, T. , and Veynante, D. , 2011, Theoretical and Numerical Combustion, 3rd ed.
Lacaze, G. , Richardson, E. , and Poinsot, T. J. , 2009, “ Large Eddy Simulation of Spark Ignition in a Turbulent Methane Jet,” Combust. Flame, 156(6), pp. 1993–2009. [CrossRef]
Colin, O. , Ducros, F. , Veynante, D. , and Poinsot, T. , 2000, “ A Thickened Flame Model for Large Eddy Simulations of Turbulent Premixed Combustion,” Phys. Fluids, 12(7), pp. 1843–1863. [CrossRef]
Nicoud, F. , and Poinsot, T. , 1999, “ DNS of a Channel Flow With Variable Properties,” International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena.
Poinsot, T. , and Lele, S. , 1992, “ Boundary Conditions for Direct Simulations of Compressible Viscous Flows,” J. Comput. Phys., 101(1), pp. 104–129. [CrossRef]
Jaegle, F. , 2009, “ LES of Two-Phase Flow in Aero-Engines,” Ph.D. thesis, Université de Toulouse-Ecole doctorale MEGeP, CERFACS-CFD Team, Toulouse.
Becker, J. , and Hassa, C. , 2002, “ Breakup and Atomization of a Kerosene Jet in Crossflow at Elevated Pressure,” Atomization Sprays, 12(1–3), pp. 49–68. [CrossRef]
Lavedrine, J. , 2008, “ Simulations aux grandes échelles de l’écoulement diphasique dans des modèles d'injecteur de moteurs aéronautiques,” Ph.D. thesis, INP Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Bertier, N. , Dupoirieux, F. , Matuszewski, L. , and Guin, C. , 2008, “ Simulation numérique d'une chambre de combustion multipoint,” 2nd Colloque INCA, Rouen, France, Oct. 23–24.
Boileau, M. , Staffelbach, G. , Cuenot, B. , Poinsot, T. , and Bérat, C. , 2008, “ LES of an Ignition Sequence in a Gas Turbine Engine,” Combust. Flame, 154(1–2), pp. 2–22. [CrossRef]
Sanjosé, M. , Lederlin, T. , Gicquel, L. , Cuenot, B. , Pitsch, H. , García-Rosa, N. , Lecourt, R. , and Poinsot, T. , 2008, “ LES of Two-Phase Reacting Flows,” Summer Program 2008, CTR, ed., pp. 251–263.
Bauerheim, M. , Jaravel, T. , Esclapez, L. , Riber, R. , Gicquel, L. , Cuenot, B. , Bourgois, S. , Rullaux, M. , and Cazalens, M. , 2015, “ Multiphase Flow LES Study of the Fuel Split Effects on Combustion Instabilities in an Ultra Low-NOx Annular Combustor,” ASME Paper No. GT2015-44139.
Charlette, F. , Veynante, D. , and Meneveau, C. , 2002, “ A Power-Law Wrinkling Model for LES of Premixed Turbulent Combustion: Part I—Non-Dynamic Formulation and Initial Tests,” Combust. Flame, 131(1–2), pp. 159–180. [CrossRef]
Blimbaum, J. , Zanchetta, M. , Akin, T. , Acharya, V. , O'Connor, J. , Noble, D. , and Lieuwen, T. , 2012, “ Transverse to Longitudinal Acoustic Coupling Processes in Annular Combustion Chambers,” Int. J. Spray Combust. Dyn., 4(4), pp. 275–298. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Tools developed at CERFACS for combustion instabilities: low-order models (ATACAMAC), Helmholtz simulations (AVSP), and large eddy simulations (AVBP)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Block diagram showing mechanisms 1 (vortex shedding ω̂) and 2 (fuel oscillations φ̂), leading to heat release oscillations q̂

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The ultra-low-NOx annular configuration LEMCOTEC with N = 19 identical sectors. Network model for ATACAMAC (C0—left) and a complete configuration with detailed swirlers for LES (C2—right).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Single sector of the industrial ultra-low-NOx configuration LEMCOTEC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

ATACAMAC results of the first three azimuthal modes of the LEMCOTEC configuration with N = 19 burners and passive flames: normalized frequency (top), pressure plots over the azimuthal direction (middle), and pressure fields in annular cavities (bottom)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Stability maps obtained by ATACAMAC for the first and second azimuthal modesofthe annular engine versus varying FTFu amplitudes (nu = 0.25–1.0) and phase lags (Δϕu=0 –2π)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Mesh around the swirler, PZ and MPZ. Details of the swirler and injection system have been blanked.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Instantaneous flame nature (premixed or nonpremixed), for the case α = 10%, identified using the fuel mass fraction field and isocontours of heat release (thin lines) and the stoichiometric lines (φ=1, large lines)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Isocontours of heat release colored by temperature (top), isocontour of fuel mass fraction (rich, middle), and (lean + reach, bottom) to visualize the flame shape as well as the pilot (middle) and multipoint (bottom) flames versus the fuel split parameter: 5% (left), 10% (middle), and 20% (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Q-criterion (left) and gaseous fuel oscillations (RMS values, right) in the longitudinal cut plane. Both the multipoint and pilot mean flames (isocontour of the mean heat release) are superimposed in solid black lines.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Normalized relative pressure P′̃=p′/p′max and fuel mass fraction Ykero′̃=Ykero′/p′max oscillations in the PZ for the case at α = 10% and forcing frequencies f = 1.0 (left) and f = 1.84 (right). A filter at the forcing frequency is applied to remove hydrodynamic and turbulent oscillations.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Normalized relative pressure P′̃ and fuel mass fractions Ykero′̃ oscillations for the case at f = 1.84 and fuel splits α = 5% (left), α = 10% (middle), and α = 20% (right). Normalized phase-lags Δϕ/2π between fuel and pressure oscillations are extracted.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Phase lags associated with the pilot gaseous fuel oscillations (Δϕ, left), and the global flame dynamics (pilot + multipoint, ΔϕQ, right) for cases forced at f = 1.0 and 1.84 and fuel split α = 5%, 10%, and 20%




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In