0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Numerical Investigations for Leakage and Windage Heating in Straight-Through Labyrinth Seals

[+] Author and Article Information
Kali Charan Nayak

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science,
Bangalore 560012, India
e-mail: kali_nayak@yahoo.co.in

Pradip Dutta

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Indian Institute of Science,
Bangalore 560012, India

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Structures and Dynamics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received August 26, 2014; final manuscript received August 8, 2015; published online September 18, 2015. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 138(1), 012507 (Sep 18, 2015) (10 pages) Paper No: GTP-14-1515; doi: 10.1115/1.4031343 History: Received August 26, 2014; Revised August 08, 2015

The ability to quantify leakage flow and windage heating for labyrinth seals with honeycomb lands is critical in understanding gas turbine engine system performance and predicting its component life. Variety of labyrinth seal configurations (number of teeth, stepped or straight, honeycomb cell size) are in use in gas turbines, and for each configuration, there are many geometric factors that can impact a seal's leakage and windage characteristics. This paper describes the development of a numerical methodology aimed at studying the effect of honeycomb lands on leakage and windage heating. Specifically, a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model is developed utilizing commercial finite volume-based software incorporating the renormalization group (RNG) k-ε turbulence model with modified Schmidt number. The modified turbulence model is benchmarked and fine-tuned based on several experiments. Using this model, a broad parametric study is conducted by varying honeycomb cell size, pressure ratio (PR), and radial clearance for a four-tooth straight-through labyrinth seal. The results show good agreement with available experimental data. They further indicate that larger honeycomb cells predict higher seal leakage and windage heating at tighter clearances compared to smaller honeycomb cells and smooth lands. However, at open seal clearances larger honeycomb cells have lower leakage compared to smaller honeycomb cells.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Engineering Science Data Unit, 2009, “ Labyrinth Seal Flow,” IHS ESDU, Denver, CO, Document No. ESDU 09004.
Morrison, G. L. , Johnson, M. C. , and Tatterson, G. B. , 1991, “ 3-D Laser Anemometer Measurements in a Labyrinth Seal,” ASME J. Gas Turbines Power, 113(1), pp. 119–125. [CrossRef]
McGreeham, W. F. , and Ko, S. H. , 1989, “ Power Dissipation in Smooth and Honeycomb Labyrinth Seals,” ASME Paper No. 89-GT-220.
Rhode, D. , and Allen, B. , 2001 “ Measurement and Visualization of Leakage Effects of Rounded Teeth Tips and Rub-Grooves on Stepped Labyrinths,” ASME J. Gas Turbines Power, 123(3), pp. 604–611. [CrossRef]
Waschka, W. , Wittig, S. , and Kim, S. , 1992, “ Influence of High Rotational Speeds on Heat Transfer and Discharge Coefficient in Labyrinth Seals,” ASME J. Turbomach., 114(2), pp. 462–468. [CrossRef]
Willenborg, K. , Kim, S. , and Wittig, S. , 2001, “ Effects of Reynolds Number and Pressure Ratio on Leakage Loss and Heat Transfer in a Stepped Labyrinth Seal,” ASME J. Turbomach., 123(4), pp. 815–822. [CrossRef]
Prasad, B. , Sethu Manavalan, V. , and Nanjunda Roa, N. , 1997, “ Computational and Experimental Investigations of Straight Through Labyrinth Seals,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-326.
Wittig, S. , Schelling, U. , Kim, S. , and Jacobsen, K. , 1987, “ Numerical Predictions and Measurements of Discharge Coefficients in Labyrinth Seals,” ASME Paper No. 87-GT-188.
Meyer, C. , and Lowrie, J. , 1975, “ The Leakage Through Straight and Slant Labyrinths and Honeycomb Seals,” ASME J. Gas Turbines Power, 96(4), pp. 495–502. [CrossRef]
Komotori, K. , and Miyake, K. , 1977, “ Leakage Characteristics of Labyrinth Seals With High Rotational Speed,” Tokyo Joint Gas Turbine Congress, Tokyo, May 22–27.
Stocker, H. L. , Cox, D. M. , and Holle, G. F. , 1977, “ Aerodynamic Performance of Conventional and Advanced Design Labyrinth Seals With Solid-Smooth, Abradable and Honeycomb Lands,” NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, Report No. NASA-CR-135307.
Zimmermann, H. , and Wolff, K. H. , 1988, “ Air System Correlations. Part 1: Labyrinth Seals,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-206.
Brownell, J. B. , Millward, J. A. , and Parker, R. J. , 1989, “ Non-Intrusive Investigations Into Life-Size Labyrinth Seal Flow Fields,” ASME J. Gas Turbines Power, 111(2), pp. 335–342. [CrossRef]
Childs, D. , Elrod, D. , and Hale, K. , 1989, “ Annular Honeycomb Seals: Test Results for Leakage and Rotordynamic Coefficients; Comparison to Labyrinth and Smooth Configurations,” ASME J. Tribol., 111(2), pp. 293–301. [CrossRef]
Ha, T. , and Childs, D. , 1992, “ Friction Factor Data for Flat Plate Tests of Smooth and Honeycomb Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 114(4), pp. 722–730. [CrossRef]
Ha, T. W. , Morrison, G. L. , and Childs, D. W. , 1992, “ Friction-Factor Characteristics for Narrow Channels With Honeycomb Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 114(4), pp. 714–721. [CrossRef]
Millward, J. A. , and Edwards, M. F. , 1996, “ Windage Heating of Air Passing Through Labyrinth Seals,” ASME J. Turbomach., 118(2), pp. 414–419. [CrossRef]
Schramm, V. , Wllenborg, K. , Kim, S. , and Wittig, S. , 2002, “ Influence of a Honeycomb Facing on the Flow Through a Stepped Labyrinth Seal,” ASME J. Gas Turbines Power, 124(1), pp. 140–146. [CrossRef]
Dong-Chung, C. , and Rhode, D. , 2003, “ Development of a 2-D CFD Approach for Computing 3-D Honeycomb Labyrinth Seal Leakage,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38238.
Collins, D. , Teixeira, J. , Crudgington, P. , and Ivey, P. , 2006, “ Numerical Modelling of Three Dimensional Honeycomb Labyrinth Seals Employing a Simplified Approach,” ASME Paper No. GT-2006-90850.
Yan, X. , Li, J. , Song, L. M. , and Feng, Z. P. , 2009, “ Investigations on the Discharge and Total Temperature Increase Characteristics of the Labyrinth Seals With Honeycomb and Smooth Lands,” ASME J. Turbomach., 131(4), p. 041009. [CrossRef]
Yan, X. , Li, J. , and Feng, Z. , 2010, “ Effects of Inlet Preswirl and Cell Diameter and Depth on Honeycomb Seal Characteristics,” ASME J. Gas Turbines Power, 132(12), p. 122506. [CrossRef]
Tipton, D. , Scott, T. , and Vogel, R. , 1986, “ Labyrinth Seal Analysis. Volume III: Analytical and Experimental Development of Design Model for Labyrinth Seals,” Allision Gas Turbine Division, General Motors Corporation, Indianapolis, IN, Technical Report No. AFWAL-TR-85-2103.
Denecke, J. , Dullenkopf, K. , Wittig, S. , and Bauer, H. J. , 2005, “ Experimental Investigation of Total Temperature Increase and Swirl Development in Rotating Labyrinth Seals,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-68677.
Denecke, J. , Farber, J. , Dullenkopf, K. , and Bauer, H. J. , 2008, “ Interdependence of Discharge Behavior, Swirl Development and Total Temperature Increase in Rotating Labyrinth Seals,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-51429.
Hodkinson, B. , 1940, “ Estimation of Leakage Through a Labyrinth Gland,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 141(1), pp. 283–288.
Menter, F. R. , 1994, “ Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications,” AIAA J., 32(8), pp. 1598–1605. [CrossRef]
Yakhot, V. , Orszag, S. A. , Thangam, S. , Gatski, T. B. , and Speziale, C. G. ,1992, “ Development of Turbulence Models for Shear Flows by a Double Expansion Technique,” Phys. Fluids A, 4(7), pp. 1510–1520. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the problem of interest

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Seal leakage predictions at 0.5 mm clearance

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Labyrinth seal leakage comparison for Collins experiment with smooth lands

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Labyrinth seal leakage comparison for Collins experiment with 3.2 mm HCs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Computational model with boundary conditions and (b) periodic 1/2-1-1/2 HC sector grid

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Sensitivity of (a) grid resolution and (b) turbulence model on seal leakage

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Flow field at the tooth tip for different clearances of theseal with HC = 3.2 mm, PR = 1.8. (a) CL = 0.25 mm, (b) CL = 0.5 mm, (c) CL = 1.0 mm and (d) CL = 2.0 mm.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Seal leakage comparison: CFD, analytical correlation, and experiment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Windage heating comparison: CFD, analytical correlation, and experiment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Velocity vectors colored by swirl (Ψ). (a) CL = 0.75mm,Smooth, (b) CL = 0.75 mm, HC = 1.588 mm, and (c) CL = 0.25mm, Smooth.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Variation of bypass flow for different HC sizes at unworn conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Variation of flow parameter with clearance for different HC sizes at PR = 1.8

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Flow field at the tooth tip for different clearances of theseal with HC = 0.8 mm, PR = 1.8. (a) CL = 0.25 mm, (b) CL = 0.5 mm, (c) CL = 1.0 mm, and (d) CL = 2.0 mm.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Variation of flow ratio with clearance for different HC sizes at unworn conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Variation of flow parameter at varied pressure ratio and clearance for (a) smooth land (b) 3.2 mm honeycomb lands

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Variation of windage number with clearance for different HC sizes at PR = 1.8

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Variation of pocket swirl with clearance for different HC sizes at PR = 1.8. Pocket two swirl is taken for comparison.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Velocity vectors colored by air swirl in seal region with 0.25 mm clearance for various HCs. (a) Smooth land, (b) 0.8 mm HCs, (c) 1.6 mm HCs, and (d) 3.2 mm HCs.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Velocity vectors colored by swirl in seal region with 0.5 mm clearance for various HCs. (a) 0.8 mm HCs and (b) 3.2mm HCs.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In