0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Aircraft Engine

Aerodynamic Design of Separate-Jet Exhausts for Future Civil Aero-engines—Part I: Parametric Geometry Definition and Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach

[+] Author and Article Information
Ioannis Goulos

Propulsion Engineering Centre,
Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire, MK430AL, UK
e-mail: i.goulos@cranfield.ac.uk

Tomasz Stankowski

Propulsion Engineering Centre,
Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire, MK430AL, UK
e-mail: t.stankowski@cranfield.ac.uk

John Otter

Propulsion Engineering Centre,
Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire, MK430AL, UK
e-mail: j.j.otter@cranfield.ac.uk

David MacManus

Propulsion Engineering Centre,
Cranfield University,
Bedfordshire, MK430AL, UK
e-mail: D.G.Macmanus@cranfield.ac.uk

Nicholas Grech

Installation Aerodynamics,
Rolls-Royce plc,
Trent Hall 2.2, SinA-17,
Derby DE24 8BJ, UK
e-mail: Nicholas.Grech@Rolls-Royce.com

Christopher Sheaf

Installation Aerodynamics,
Rolls-Royce plc,
Trent Hall 2.2, SinA-17,
Derby DE24 8BJ, UK
e-mail: Christopher.Sheaf@Rolls-Royce.com

Contributed by the Aircraft Engine Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received November 22, 2015; final manuscript received December 18, 2015; published online March 15, 2016. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 138(8), 081201 (Mar 15, 2016) (14 pages) Paper No: GTP-15-1538; doi: 10.1115/1.4032649 History: Received November 22, 2015; Revised December 18, 2015

This paper presents the development of an integrated approach which targets the aerodynamic design of separate-jet exhaust systems for future gas-turbine aero-engines. The proposed framework comprises a series of fundamental modeling theories which are applicable to engine performance simulation, parametric geometry definition, viscous/compressible flow solution, and design space exploration (DSE). A mathematical method has been developed based on class-shape transformation (CST) functions for the geometric design of axisymmetric engines with separate-jet exhausts. Design is carried out based on a set of standard nozzle design parameters along with the flow capacities established from zero-dimensional (0D) cycle analysis. The developed approach has been coupled with an automatic mesh generation and a Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) flow-field solution method, thus forming a complete aerodynamic design tool for separate-jet exhaust systems. The employed aerodynamic method has initially been validated against experimental measurements conducted on a small-scale turbine powered simulator (TPS) nacelle. The developed tool has been subsequently coupled with a comprehensive DSE method based on Latin-hypercube sampling. The overall framework has been deployed to investigate the design space of two civil aero-engines with separate-jet exhausts, representative of current and future architectures, respectively. The inter-relationship between the exhaust systems' thrust and discharge coefficients has been thoroughly quantified. The dominant design variables that affect the aerodynamic performance of both investigated exhaust systems have been determined. A comparative evaluation has been carried out between the optimum exhaust design subdomains established for each engine. The proposed method enables the aerodynamic design of separate-jet exhaust systems for a designated engine cycle, using only a limited set of intuitive design variables. Furthermore, it enables the quantification and correlation of the aerodynamic behavior of separate-jet exhaust systems for designated civil aero-engine architectures. Therefore, it constitutes an enabling technology toward the identification of the fundamental aerodynamic mechanisms that govern the exhaust system performance for a user-specified engine cycle.

Copyright © 2016 by Rolls-Royce plc
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Notional axisymmetric housing geometry for a very-high bypass ratio (VHBR) turbofan engine with separate-jet exhausts

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Upper-level overview of the developed software architecture

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Individual terms comprising Bernstein's polynomial for n = 8

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Employed parameters for the parametric geometry representation of an exhaust system: (a) duct geometry and (b) nozzle geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Employed CFD domain and BCs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Mesh generation and topology definition: (a) overall view of derived computational mesh and (b) mesh close-up

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Graphical illustration of force accounting for the computation of gross propulsive force FGexhaust

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Engine model used for the grid sensitivity analysis: (a) model geometry, (b) computational mesh, Ncell≈4.76×105, and (c) Mach number contours at midcruise conditions, M∞=0.85, Alt.=13106.4m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of predicted nozzle performance parameters with experimental data reported in Ref. [34]: (a) normalized bypass nozzle mass flow m˙bypass/m˙bypassref, gross propulsive force FG

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Grid sensitivity analysis for the described engine model: (a) bypass nozzle discharge coefficient CDBypass, (b) core nozzle discharge coefficient CDCore, and (c) overall exhaust velocity coefficient CVOverall

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Mach number contours for the baseline exhaust system designs at DP midcruise conditions: (a) design representative of future engine architectures (E1) and (b) design representative of current engine architectures (E2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

2D axisymmetric geometries of investigated engine architectures: (a) design representative of future engine architectures (E1) and (b) design representative of current engine architectures (E2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Model validation: (a) Mach number contours for FPR = 1.6, M∞=0.17, (b) isentropic Mach number Misen on the bypass and core nozzle inner walls—comparison with experimental data from Ref. [34]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Design space definition: (a) bypass duct outer line position ybpout=Rbpout/Lductin, (b) ybpin=Rbpin/Lductin, (c) nozzle CP to exit area ratio Aratio=ACP/Aexit and length ratio κlenin=LinNozzle/h2, (d) outer line slope at the CP θCPout, (e) CP inner/outer curvature radius ratio κCPin/out=RcurveCP,in/out/h2, (f) core cowl length lcrcowl=Lcrcowl/Rfan, (g) zone 3 vent exit position lz3exit=Lz3exit/Lcrcowl, (h) zone 3 exit Mach no. Mz3exit, and (i) core cowl angle θcrcowl and outer line angle θnozzleout

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Linear correlation estimation between design variables and performance metrics: (a) future E1 engine and (b) current E2 engine

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Exhaust design improvement for the E1 future engine architecture: (a) baseline exhaust nozzle and (b) improved exhaust nozzle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Correlation of performance metrics for the current E2engine: (a) CDBypass and CVOverall, (b) CDBypass and FN, and (c) CVOverall and FN

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Correlation of performance metrics for the future E1engine: (a) CDBypass and CVOverall, (b) CDBypass and FN, and (c) CVOverall and FN

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Related

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In