Research Papers: Internal Combustion Engines

Postinjection Strategy for the Reduction of the Peak Pressure Rise Rate of Neat n-Butanol Combustion

[+] Author and Article Information
Marko Jeftić

Department of Mechanical, Automotive,
and Materials Engineering,
University of Windsor,
Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
e-mail: jeftic2@uwindsor.ca

Ming Zheng

Department of Mechanical,
Automotive, and Materials Engineering,
University of Windsor,
Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the IC Engine Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received January 29, 2016; final manuscript received January 29, 2016; published online March 30, 2016. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 138(9), 092807 (Mar 30, 2016) (9 pages) Paper No: GTP-16-1047; doi: 10.1115/1.4032765 History: Received January 29, 2016; Revised January 29, 2016

Enhanced premixed combustion of neat butanol in a compression ignition engine can have challenges with regards to the peak pressure rise rate (PRR) and the peak in-cylinder pressure. It was proposed to utilize a butanol postinjection to reduce the peak PRR and the peak in-cylinder pressure while maintaining a constant engine load. Postinjection timing and duration sweeps were carried out with neat n-butanol in a compression ignition engine. The postinjection timing sweep results indicated that the use of an early butanol postinjection reduced the peak PRR and the peak in-cylinder pressure and it was observed that there was an optimal postinjection timing range for the maximum reduction of these parameters. The results also showed that an early postinjection of butanol increased the nitrogen oxide emissions, and a Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis revealed that late postinjections increased the emissions of unburned butanol. The postinjection duration sweep indicated that the peak PRR was significantly reduced by increasing the postinjection duration at constant load conditions. There was also a reduction in the peak in-cylinder pressure. Measurements with a hydrogen mass spectrometer showed that there was an increased presence of hydrogen in the exhaust gas when the postinjection duration was increased but the total yield of hydrogen was relatively low. It was observed that the coefficient of variation for the indicated mean effective pressure was significantly increased and that the indicated thermal efficiency was reduced when the postinjection duration was increased. The results also showed that there were increased nitrogen oxide, carbon monoxide, and total hydrocarbon (THC) emissions for larger postinjections. Although the use of a postinjection resulted in emission and thermal efficiency penalties at medium load conditions, the results demonstrated that the postinjection strategy successfully reduced the peak PRR, and this characteristic can be potentially useful for higher load applications where the peak PRR is of greater concern.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Johnson, T. , 2013, “ Vehicular Emissions in Review,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2013-01-0538.
Johnson, T. , 2010, “ Review of Diesel Emissions and Control,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr., 3(1), pp. 16–29. [CrossRef]
Salvat, O. , Marez, P. , and Belot, G. , 2000, “ Passenger Car Serial Application of a Particulate Filter System on a Common Rail Direct Injection Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2000-01-0473.
Sappok, A. , Wong, V. , Morrow, R. , Zisholtz, E. , Doustar, I. , and Govani, I. , 2011, “ Investigation of Ash Formation, Accumulation, and Distribution in Diesel Particulate Filters Using Lubricant Additive Tracers,” ASME Paper No. ICEF2011-60072.
Castellano, J. , Chaudhari, A. , and Bromham, J. , 2013, “ Adaptive Temperature Control for Diesel Particulate Filter Regeneration,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2013-01-0517.
Akiyoshi, T. , Torisaka, H. , Yokota, H. , Shimizu, T. , Ninomiya, H., and Narita, H., 2011, “ Development of Efficient Urea-SCR Systems for EPA 2010-Compliant Medium Duty Diesel Vehicles,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2011-01-1309.
Prikhodko, V. Y. , Pihl, J. A. , Lewis, S. A., Sr. , and Parks, J. E., II , 2012, “ Effect of Hydrocarbon Emissions From PCCI-Type Combustion on the Performance of Selective Catalytic Reduction Catalysts,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(8), p. 082804. [CrossRef]
Gekas, I. , Vressner, A. , and Johansen, K. , 2009, “ NOx Reduction Potential of V-SCR Catalyst in SCR/DOC/DPF Configuration Targeting Euro VI Limits From High Engine NOx Levels,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2009-01-0626.
Tatur, M. , Koehler, E. , Laermann, M. , Tomazic, D. , Holland, T., Robinson, D., Dowell, J., and Price, K., 2007, “ Lean NOx Trap for Heavy-Duty On-Road Applications—A Feasible Alternative?” SAE Technical Paper No. 2007-01-4179.
Al-Harbi, M. , and Epling, W. S. , 2010, “ Effects of Different Regeneration Timing Protocols on the Performance of a Model NOx Storage/Reduction Catalyst,” Catal. Today, 151(3–4), pp. 347–353. [CrossRef]
Theis, J. , Lupescu, J. , Ura, J. , and McCabe, R. , 2006, “ Lean NOx Trap System Design for Cost Reduction and Performance Improvement,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2006-01-1069.
Flörchinger, P. , and Day, J. , 2002, “ Principles for the Design of Diesel Oxidation Catalysts,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2002-01-1723.
Jacobs, T. J. , and Assanis, D. N. , 2008, “ Characteristic Response of a Production Diesel Oxidation Catalyst Exposed to Lean and Rich PCI Exhaust,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 130(4), p. 042805. [CrossRef]
Sanchez, F. P. , Bandivadekar, A. , and German, J. , 2012, “ Estimated Cost of Emission Reduction Technologies for Light-Duty Vehicles,” The International Council on Clean Transportation, Washington, DC.
Hountalas, D. , Kouremenos, D. , Binder, K. , Schwarz, V. , and Mavropoulos, G. C. , 2003, “ Effect of Injection Pressure on the Performance and Exhaust Emissions of a Heavy Duty DI Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2003-01-0340.
Engelmayer, M. , Wimmer, A. , Taucher, G. , Hirschl, G. , and Kammerdiener, T. , 2015, “ Impact of Very High Injection Pressure on Soot Emissions of Medium Speed Large Diesel Engines,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 137(10), p. 101509. [CrossRef]
Kreso, A. , Johnson, J. , Gratz, L. , Bagley, S. , and Leddy, D. G. , 1998, “ A Study of the Effects of Exhaust Gas Recirculation on Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Emissions,” SAE Technical Paper No. 981422.
Zheng, M. , Reader, G. T. , and Hawey, J. G. , 2004, “ Diesel Engine Exhaust Gas Recirculation—A Review on Advanced and Novel Concepts,” Energy Convers. Manage., 45(6), pp. 883–900. [CrossRef]
de Ojeda, W. , Zoldak, P. , Espinosa, R. , and Kumar, R. , 2008, “ Development of a Fuel Injection Strategy for Diesel LTC,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2008-01-0057.
Subramanian, S. N. , and Ciatti, S. , 2011, “ Low Cetane Fuels in Compression Ignition Engine to Achieve LTC,” ASME Paper No. ICEF2011-60014.
Kohketsu, S. , Mori, K. , Sakai, K. , and Hakozaki, T. , 1997, “ EGR Technologies for a Turbocharged and Intercooled Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper No. 970340.
Alriksson, M. , and Denbratt, I. , 2006, “ Low Temperature Combustion in a Heavy Duty Diesel Engine Using High Levels of EGR,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2006-01-0075.
Asad, U. , and Zheng, M. , 2008, “ EGR Oxidation and Catalytic Fuel Reforming for Diesel Engines,” ASME Paper No. ICES2008-1684 87-97.
Tsurutani, K. , Takei, Y. , Fujimoto, Y. , Matsudaira, J. , and Kumamoto, M. , 1995, “ The Effects of Fuel Properties and Oxygenates on Diesel Exhaust Emissions,” SAE Technical Paper No. 952349.
Zannis, T. , Hountalas, D. , and Kouremenos, D. , 2004, “ Experimental Investigation to Specify the Effect of Oxygenated Additive Content and Type on DI Diesel Engine Performance and Emissions,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2004-01-0097.
Tan, P. Q. , Hu, Z. Y. , and Lou, D. M. , 2009, “ Regulated and Unregulated Emissions From a Light-Duty Diesel Engine With Different Sulfur Content Fuels,” Fuel, 88(6), pp. 1086–1091. [CrossRef]
Zheng, M. , Li, T. , and Han, X. , 2015, “ Direct Injection of Neat n-Butanol for Enabling Clean Low Temperature Combustion in a Modern Diesel Engine,” Fuel, 142, pp. 28–37. [CrossRef]
Liu, H. , Li, S. , Zheng, Z. , Xu, J., and Yao, M., 2013, “ Effects of n-Butanol, 2-Butanol, and Methyl Octynoate Addition to Diesel Fuel on Combustion and Emissions Over a Wide Range of Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) Rates,” Appl. Energy, 112, pp. 246–256. [CrossRef]
Yanai, T. , Han, X. , Reader, G. T. , Zheng, M., and Tjong, J., 2014, “ Preliminary Investigation of Direct Injection Neat n-Butanol in a Diesel Engine,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 137(1), p. 012205. [CrossRef]
Chen, Z. , Liu, J. , Wu, Z. , and Lee, C. , 2013, “ Effects of Port Fuel Injection (PFI) of n-Butanol and EGR on Combustion and Emissions of a Direct Injection Diesel Engine,” Energy Convers. Manage., 76, pp. 725–731. [CrossRef]
Heywood, J. B. , 1988, Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, McGraw-Hill, Singapore, pp. 508–514.
Jeftić, M. , Tjong, J. , Reader, G. T. , Wang, M. , and Zheng, M., 2015, “ Combustion and Exhaust Gas Speciation Analysis of Diesel and Butanol Post Injection,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2015-01-0803.
Jeftić, M. , and Zheng, M. , 2015, “ A Study of the Effect of Post Injection on Combustion and Emissions With Premixing Enhanced Fueling Strategies,” Appl. Energy, 157, pp. 861–870. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the engine experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Effect of postinjection timing on PRR and pMAX

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Impact of early postinjections on the HRR

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Impact of delayed postinjections on the HRR

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effect of post-timing on THC, CO, and H2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effect of postinjection timing on hydrocarbon speciation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Effect of postinjection timing on indicated efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Impact of post-timing on NOx and smoke emissions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Effect of postinjection duration on PRR, pMAX, and COVIMEP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Impact of postinjection duration on in-cylinder pressure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Impact of postinjection duration on HRR

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Impact of postinjection duration on bulk gas temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Effect of postinjection duration on indicated efficiency and IMEP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Impact of postinjection duration on NOx and smoke

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Effect of postinjection duration on THC, CO, and hydrogen

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Effect of postinjection duration on hydrocarbon speciation




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In