Research Papers: Internal Combustion Engines

A Numerical Simulation of Analysis of Backfiring Phenomena in a Hydrogen-Fueled Spark Ignition Engine

[+] Author and Article Information
K. A. Subramanian

Engines and Unconventional Fuels Laboratory,
Centre for Energy Studies,
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi,
Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110016, India
e-mail: subra@ces.iitd.ac.in

B. L. Salvi

Engines and Unconventional Fuels Laboratory,
Centre for Energy Studies,
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi,
Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110016, India
e-mail: salvibl@yahoo.in

Contributed by the IC Engine Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received February 11, 2016; final manuscript received February 25, 2016; published online April 26, 2016. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 138(10), 102811 (Apr 26, 2016) (10 pages) Paper No: GTP-16-1067; doi: 10.1115/1.4033182 History: Received February 11, 2016; Revised February 25, 2016

Hydrogen utilization in spark ignition (SI) engines could reduce urban pollution including particulate matter as well as greenhouse gas emission. However, backfiring, which is an undesirable combustion process of intake charge in hydrogen-fueled SI engine with manifold-based injection, is one of the major technical issues in view of safety of engine operation. Backfiring occurs generally during suction stroke as the hydrogen–air charge interacts with residual gas, resulting in flame growth and propagation toward upstream of engine's intake manifold, resulting in stalling of engine operation and high risk of safety. This work is aimed at analysis of backfiring in a hydrogen-fueled SI engine. The results indicate that backfiring is mainly function of residual gas temperature, start of hydrogen injection timing, and equivalence ratio. Any hot-spot present in the cylinder would act as ignition source resulting in more chances of backfiring. In addition to this, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was carried out in order to assess flow characteristics of hydrogen and air during suction stroke in intake manifold. Furthermore, numerical analysis of intake charge velocity, flame speed (deflagration), and flame propagation (backfiring) toward upstream of intake manifold was also carried out. Some notable points of backfiring control strategy including exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) and retarded (late) hydrogen injection timing are emerged from this study for minimizing chance of backfiring. This study results are useful for development of dedicated SI engine for hydrogen fuel in the aspects of elimination of backfiring.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Salvi, B. L. , Subramanian, K. A. , and Panwar, N. L. , 2013, “ Alternative Fuels for Transportation Vehicles: A Technical Review,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 25, pp. 404–419. [CrossRef]
White, C. M. , Steeper, R. R. , and Lutz, A. E. , 2006, “ The Hydrogen-Fueled Internal Combustion Engine: A Technical Review,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 31(10), pp. 1292–1305. [CrossRef]
Huynh, T. C. , Kang, J. K. , Noh, K. C. , Lee, J. T. , and Caton, J. A. , 2008, “ Controlling Backfire for a Hydrogen Fueled Engine Using External Mixture Injection,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 130(6), p. 062804. [CrossRef]
Mariani, A. , Morrone, B. , and Unich, A. , 2012, “ Numerical Evaluation of Internal Combustion Spark Ignition Engines Performance Fuelled With Hydrogen-Natural Gas Blends,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37(3), pp. 2644–2654. [CrossRef]
Verhelst, S. , and Wallner, T. , 2009, “ Hydrogen-Fueled Internal Combustion Engines,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 35(6), pp. 490–527. [CrossRef]
Verhelst, S. , Demuynck, J. , Sierens, R. , and Huyskens, P. , 2010, “ Impact of Variable Valve Timing on Power, Emissions and Backfire of a Bi-Fuel Hydrogen/Gasoline Engine,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 35(9), pp. 4399–4408. [CrossRef]
Das, L. M. , 1986, “ Studies on Timed Manifold Injection in Hydrogen Operated Spark Ignition Engine: Performance, Combustion and Exhaust Emission Characteristics,” Ph.D. thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India.
Das, L. M. , 2002, “ Hydrogen Engine: Research and Development (R&D) Programmes in Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Delhi,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 27(9), pp. 953–965. [CrossRef]
Sierens, R. , and Verhelst, S. , 2003, “ Influence of the Injection Parameters on the Efficiency and Power Output of a Hydrogen Fueled Engine,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 95(3), pp. 444–449. [CrossRef]
Liu, X. , Liu, F. , Zhou, L. , Sun, B. , and Schock, H. J. , 2008, “ Backfire Prediction in a Manifold Injection Hydrogen Internal Combustion Engine,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 33(14), pp. 3847–3855. [CrossRef]
Verhelst, S. , and Sierens, R. , 2001, “ Hydrogen Engine-Specific Properties,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 26(9), pp. 987–990. [CrossRef]
Saravanan, N. , and Nagarajan, G. , 2007, “ An Experimental Investigation on Optimized Manifold Injection in a Direct-Injection Diesel Engine With Various Hydrogen Flow Rates,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part D, 221(12), pp. 1575–1584. [CrossRef]
Kahramana, E. , Ozcanlıb, S. C. , and Ozerdemb, B. , 2007, “ An Experimental Study on Performance and Emission Characteristics of a Hydrogen Fuelled Spark Ignition Engine,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 32(12), pp. 2066–2072. [CrossRef]
Sarkar, S. , 2009, Fuels and Combustion, 3rd ed., Universities Press (India), Hyderabad, India.
Gregory, F. D. , 1997, Safety Standard for Hydrogen and Hydrogen Systems, NASA Office of Safety and Mission Assurance, Washington DC, p. A-16.
Gas Research Institute, 2002, “GRI Mech 3.0,” Berkeley University, Berkeley, CA, accessed Jan. 12, 2015, http://combustion.berkeley.edu/gri-mech/releases.html
Turn, S. R. , 2012, An Introduction to Combustion: Concept and Applications, McGraw-Hill, Singapore.
ANSYS, 2011, ansys fluent Tutorial Guide, Release 14.0, ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
Heywood, J. B. , 1988, Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Fox, J. W. , Cheng, W. K. , and Heywood, J. B. , 1993, “ A Model for Predicting Residual Gas Fraction in Spark-Ignition Engines,” SAE Paper No. 931025.
Kuznetsov, M. , Kobelt, S. , Grune, J. , and Jordan, T. , 2012, “ Flammability Limits and Laminar Flame Speed of Hydrogen-Air Mixtures at Sub-Atmospheric Pressures,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37(22), pp. 17580–17588. [CrossRef]
Das, L. M. , 1990, “ Hydrogen Engines: A View of the Past and a Look Into the Future,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 15(6), pp. 425–443. [CrossRef]
Salimi, F. , Shamekhi, A. H. , and Pourkhesalian, A. M. , 2009, “ Effects of Spark Advance, A/F Ratio and Valve Timing on Emission and Performance Characteristics of Hydrogen Internal Combustion Engine,” SAE International Paper No. 2009-01-1424.
Pulkrabek, W. W. , 2013, Engineering Fundamentals of the Internal Combustion Engines, Pearson Education, Essex, UK.
Lewis, B. , and von Elbe, G. , 1961, Combustion, Flames and Explosions of Gases, 2nd ed., Academic Press, New York.
Fieweger, K. , Blumenthal, R. , and Adomeit, G. , 1997, “ Self-Ignition of SI Engine Model Fuels: A Shock Tube Investigation at High Pressure,” Combust. Flame, 109(4), pp. 599–619. [CrossRef]
Kurdyumov, V. , Fernandez-Tarrazo, E. , Truffaut, J. M. , Quinard, J. , Wangher, A. , and Searby, G. , 2007, “ Experimental and Numerical Study of Premixed Flame Flashback,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 31(1), pp. 1275–1282. [CrossRef]
De, A. , and Acharya, S. , 2012, “ Dynamics of Upstream Flame Propagation in a Hydrogen-Enriched Premixed Flame,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37(22), pp. 17294–17309. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Photographic view of engine cylinder with manifolds and (b) intake manifold geometry with meshing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Valve timing diagram with backfiring period

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Hydrogen-fueled SI engine: (a) backfiring phenomenon in the intake manifold and (b) pressure raised during backfire in intake manifold at WOT [6]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

A typical intake manifold geometry for numerical analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Variation in intake manifold pressure with respect to crank angle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Indicative diagram of backfiring zone during gas exchange process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Instantaneous in-cylinder mass and valves lifting profile with respect to crank angle during gas exchange process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

In-cylinder mixture temperature with respect to crank angle during suction stroke

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Hydrogen–air charge flow field and hot-spot temperature gradient profile in intake manifold: (a) 5 deg CA bTDC, (b) 10 deg CA aTDC, (c) 20 deg CA aTDC, and (d) 25 deg CA aTDC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Explosion limits of a stoichiometric H2–O2 mixture (modified source figure from Ref. [25])

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Propagation of backfiring with different velocity of reactant

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

(a) Early stage of backfiring and (b) backfiring propagation in the intake manifold containing hydrogen–air charge

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Laminar burning velocity with respect to equivalence ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Laminar burning velocity and inlet charge velocity with respect to crank angle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

The Rankine–Hugoniot curve for q = q1 with origin at A(P1, v1)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Effect of EGR on laminar burning velocity with respect to equivalence ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Variation in start of gas injection with respect to brake torque and engine speed for backfire-free operation




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In