Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Controls, Diagnostics, and Instrumentation

A Study of Bulk Modulus, Entrained Air, and Dynamic Pressure Measurements in Liquids

[+] Author and Article Information
Adam M. Hurst

Kulite® Semiconductor Products, Inc.,
One Willow Tree Road,
Leonia, NJ 07605
e-mail: adamh@kulite.com

Joe VanDeWeert

Kulite® Semiconductor Products, Inc.,
One Willow Tree Road,
Leonia, NJ 07605

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Controls, Diagnostics and Instrumentation Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received March 22, 2016; final manuscript received March 23, 2016; published online April 26, 2016. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 138(10), 101601 (Apr 26, 2016) (9 pages) Paper No: GTP-16-1109; doi: 10.1115/1.4033215 History: Received March 22, 2016; Revised March 23, 2016

Accurate static and dynamic pressure measurements in liquids, such as fuel, oil, and hydraulic fluid, are critical to the control and health monitoring of turbomachinery and aerospace systems. This work presents a theoretical and experimental study of the frequency response of pressure transducers and pressure measurement systems in liquid media. First, we theoretically predict the frequency response of pressure transducers based upon a lumped-parameter model. We then present a liquid-based dynamic pressure calibration test apparatus that validates this model by performing several critical measurements. This system first uses a vibrating liquid column to dynamically calibrate and experimentally determine the frequency response of a test pressure transducer, measurement system or geometry. Second, this calibration system experimentally extracts the bulk modulus of the fluid and the percent of entrained and/or dissolved air by volume. Bulk modulus is determined by measuring the speed of sound within the liquid and through static pressure loading while measuring the deflection of the liquid column. Bulk modulus and the entrained/dissolved gas content within the liquid greatly impact the observed frequency response of a pressure transducer or geometry. Gases, such as air, mixed or dissolved into a fluid can add substantial damping to the dynamic response of the fluid measurement system, which makes measurement of the bulk modulus and entrained and/or dissolved air critical for accurate measurement of the frequency response of a system when operating with a liquid media. All experimental results are compared to theoretical predictions.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Wang, S. , Tomovic, M. , and Liu, H. , 2016, Commercial Aircraft Hydraulic Systems, Elsevier, Shanghai, pp. 53–114.
Parker Hannifin, 2015, “ Engine-Driven Pumps,” Parker Hannifin, Huntsville, AL.
Klette, P. J. , 2010, Fluid Power Systems, American Technical Publishers, Orlando Park, IL.
Mucchi, E. , Dalpiaz, G. , and del Rincòn, A. F. , 2010, “ Elastodynamic Analysis of a Gear Pump. Part I: Pressure Distribution and Gear Eccentricity,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 24(7), pp. 2160–2179. [CrossRef]
Mucchi, E. , Cremonini, G. , Delvecchio, S. , and Dalpiaz, G. , 2013, “ On the Pressure Ripple Measurement in Variable Displacement Vane Pumps,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 135(9), p. 091103. [CrossRef]
Mucchi, E. , Dalpiaz, G. , and Rivola, A. , 2010, “ Elastodynamic Analysis of a Gear Pump. Part II: Meshing Phenomena and Simulation Results,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 24(7), pp. 2180–2197. [CrossRef]
Mohitpour, M. , Botros, K. K. , and Van Hardeveld, T. , 2008, Pipeline Pumping and Compression Systems: A Practical Approach, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
Manring, N. D. , 1998, “ The Discharge Flow Ripple of an Axial-Piston Swash-Plate Type Hydrostatic Pump,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 122(2), pp. 263–268. [CrossRef]
Kim, S. , and Murrenhoff, H. , 2012, “ Measurement of Effective Bulk Modulus for Hydraulic Oil at Low Pressure,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 134(2), p. 021201. [CrossRef]
Karjalainen, J. P. , and Karjalainen, R. , 2014, “ Developed Measuring Methods for Hydraulic Fluid Dynamics and Viscosity at Extreme Pressures and Temperatures,” ASME Paper No. FPMC2014-7853.
Hurst, A. M. , Carter, S. , Firth, D. R. , Szary, A. R. , and VanDeWeert, J. , 2015, “ Real-Time, Advanced Electrical Filtering for Pressure Transducer Frequency Response Correction,” AMSE Paper No. GT2015-42895.
Hurst, A. M. , Goodman, S. , Hilton, J. P. , and VanDeWeert, J. , 2014, “ Miniature Low-Pass Mechanical Filter for Improved Frequency Response With MEMS Microphones and Low-Pressure Transducers,” Sens. Actuators A, 210, pp. 51–58. [CrossRef]
Hurst, A. M. , and Olsen, T. R. , 2014, “ An Experimental Frequency Response Characterization of MEMS Piezoresistive Pressure Transducers,” ASME Paper No. GT2014-27159.
White, F. M. , 2003, Fluid Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA.
Sonntag, R. E. , Borgnakke, C. , Van Wylen, G. J. , and Van Wylen, G. J. , 2003, Fundamentals of Thermodynamics, Wiley, New York.
Wang, S. , 2010, “ The Analysis of Cavitation Problems in the Axial Piston Pump,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 132(7), p. 074502. [CrossRef]
Lamb, H. , 1945, Hydrodynamics, Dover Publications, New York.
Kobayashi, H. , Leger, T. , and Wolff, J. M. , 2000, “ Experimental and Theoretical Frequency Response of Pressure Transducers for High Speed Turbomachinery,” Int. J. Turbo Jet Engines, 17(2), pp. 153–160. [CrossRef]
Ogata, K. , 2010, Modern Control Engineering, Prentice-Hall, Boston, MA.
Kaajakari, V. , 2009, Practical MEMS, Small Gear Publishing, Las Vegas, NV.
ISA, 2002, “ A Guide for the Dynamic Calibration of Pressure Transducers,” Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society (ISA), Research Triangle Park, NC, Standard No. ISA-37.16.02-2002.
Dow Corning, 1998, “ Information About Dow Corning 510, 550 and 710 Fluids,” Dow Corning, Midland, MI, pp. 1–2.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Typical tube and volume cavities construction internal to a pressure transducer for liquid media operation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

IFAS model of theoretical bulk modulus versus pressure for Dow Corning 510 50 cSt fluid with an assumed accepted bulk modulus of 0.75 GPa

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Lumped-parameter model of frequency response of tube-volume cavity geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Piezoelectric-driven vibrating liquid column, dynamic pressure calibration apparatus

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Top view of piezoelectric-driven vibrating liquid column dynamic pressure calibration apparatus

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Validation of flat frequency response of vibrating liquid column test platform

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

(Top plot) Pressure versus time generated by piezoelectric-driven vibrating liquid column. (Bottom plot) Peak-to-peak pressure dynamic pressure as a function of frequency.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Measurement of bulk modulus as well as entrained and dissolved air by static loading of liquid column using piezoelectric actuator

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Bulk modulus versus pressure, comparison of experimental data to theoretical predictions (IFAS model)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of theoretical IFAS model and experimental results from static loading of liquid column

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Transfer function comparing the reference transducers 1 and 2, at the top and the base of the cylinder. Time delay accurately measured.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

(a) Pressure measurements versus time. (b) Strain measurement and resulting displacement of the piezoelectric actuator. (c) Strain measurement and resulting deflection of the piston.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Theoretical and experimental frequency response of sample tube-volume cavity geometry with Dow Corning 510 fluid at various levels of entrained air




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In