0
Review Article

Review of Ingress in Gas Turbines

[+] Author and Article Information
James A. Scobie

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Bath,
Bath BA2 7AY, UK
e-mail: j.a.scobie@bath.ac.uk

Carl M. Sangan

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Bath,
Bath BA2 7AY, UK
e-mail: c.m.sangan@bath.ac.uk

J. Michael Owen

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Bath,
Bath BA2 7AY, UK
e-mail: j.m.owen@bath.ac.uk

Gary D. Lock

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Bath,
Bath BA2 7AY, UK
e-mail: g.d.lock@bath.ac.uk

Contributed by the Structures and Dynamics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received October 14, 2015; final manuscript received June 2, 2016; published online July 27, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Alexandrina Untaroiu.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 138(12), 120801 (Jul 27, 2016) (16 pages) Paper No: GTP-15-1491; doi: 10.1115/1.4033938 History: Received October 14, 2015; Revised June 02, 2016

This review summarizes research concerned with the ingress of hot mainstream gas through the rim seals of gas turbines. It includes experimental, theoretical, and computational studies conducted by many institutions, and the ingress is classified as externally induced (EI), rotationally induced (RI), and combined ingress (CI). Although EI ingress (which is caused by the circumferential distribution of pressure created by the vanes and blades in the turbine annulus) occurs in all turbines, RI and CI ingress can be important at off-design conditions and for the inner seal of a double-seal geometry. For all three types of ingress, the equations from a simple orifice model are shown to be useful for relating the sealing effectiveness (and therefore the amount of hot gas ingested into the wheel-space of a turbine) to the sealing flow rate. In this paper, experimental data obtained from different research groups have been transformed into a consistent format and reviewed using the orifice model equations. Most of the published results for sealing effectiveness have been made using concentration measurements of a tracer gas (usually CO2) on the surface of the stator, and—for a large number of tests with single and double seals—the measured distributions of effectiveness with sealing flow rate are shown to be consistent with those predicted by the model. Although the flow through the rim seal can be treated as inviscid, the flow inside the wheel-space is controlled by the boundary layers on the rotor and stator. Using boundary-layer theory and the similarity between the transfer of mass and energy, a theoretical model has been developed to relate the adiabatic effectiveness on the rotor to the sealing effectiveness of the rim seal. Concentration measurements on the stator and infrared (IR) measurements on the rotor have confirmed that, even when ingress occurs, the sealing flow will help to protect the rotor from the effect of hot-gas ingestion. Despite the improved understanding of the “ingress problem,” there are still many unanswered questions to be addressed.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Wang, C. Z. , Johnson, B. V. , Mathiyalagan, S. P. , Glahn, J. A. , and Cloud, D. F. , 2012, “ Rim Seal Ingestion in a Turbine Stage From 360-Degree Time-Dependent Numerical Solutions,” ASME J. Turbomach., 136(3), p. 031007. [CrossRef]
Palafox, P. , Ding, Z. , Bailey, J. , Vanduser, T. , Kirtley, K. , Moore, K. , and Chupp, R. , 2013, “ A New 1.5-Stage Turbine Wheelspace Hot Gas Ingestion Rig (HGIR)—Part I: Experimental Test Vehicle, Measurement Capability and Baseline Results,” ASME Paper No. GT2013-96020.
Barringer, M. , Coward, A. , Clark, K. , Thole, K. A. , Schmitz, J. , Wagner, J. , Alvin, M. A. , Burke, P. , and Dennis, R. , 2014, “ The Design of a Steady Aero Thermal Research Turbine (START) for Studying Secondary Flow Leakages and Airfoil Heat Transfer,” ASME Paper No. GT2014-25570.
Childs, P. R. N. , 2011, Rotating Flow, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK.
Johnson, B. V. , Mack, G. J. , Paolillo, R. E. , and Daniels, W. A. , 1994, “ Turbine Rim Seal Gas Path Flow Ingestion Mechanisms,” AIAA Paper No. 94-2703.
Owen, J. M. , and Rogers, R. H. , 1989, Flow and Heat Transfer in Rotating-Disc Systems: Rotor-Stator Systems, Vol. 1, Research Studies Press, Taunton, UK.
Owen, J. M. , 2011, “ Prediction of Ingestion Through Turbine Rim Seals: Part 1, Rotationally-Induced Ingress,” ASME J. Turbomach., 133(3), p. 031005. [CrossRef]
Owen, J. M. , 2011, “ Prediction of Ingestion Through Turbine Rim Seals: Part 2, Externally-Induced and Combined Ingress,” ASME J. Turbomach., 133(3), p. 031006. [CrossRef]
Sangan, C. M. , Pountney, O. J. , Zhou, K. , Wilson, M. , Owen, J. M. , and Lock, G. D. , 2013, “ Experimental Measurements of Ingestion Through Turbine Rim Seals—Part 1: Externally-Induced Ingress,” ASME J. Turbomach., 135(2), p. 021012. [CrossRef]
Sangan, C. M. , Pountney, O. J. , Zhou, K. , Wilson, M. , Owen, J. M. , and Lock, G. D. , 2013, “ Experimental Measurements of Ingestion Through Turbine Rim Seals—Part 2: Rotationally-Induced Ingress,” ASME J. Turbomach., 135(2), p. 021013. [CrossRef]
Zhou, K. , Wood, S. N. , and Owen, J. M. , 2013, “ Statistical and Theoretical Models of Ingestion Through Turbine Rim Seals,” ASME J. Turbomach., 135(2), p. 021014. [CrossRef]
Hamabe, K. , and Ishida, K. , 1992, “ Rim Seal Experiments and Analysis of a Rotor-Stator System With Nonaxisymmetric Main Flow,” ASME Paper No. 92-GT-160.
Chew, J. W. , Green, T. , and Turner, A. B. , 1994, “ Rim Sealing of Rotor-Stator Wheelspaces in the Presence of External Flow,” ASME Paper No. 94-GT-126.
Scanlon, T. , Wilkes, J. , Bohn, D. , and Gentilhomme, O. , 2004, “ A Simple Method of Estimating Ingestion of Annulus Gas Into a Turbine Rotor Stator Cavity in the Presence of External Pressure Gradients,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53097.
Johnson, B. V. , Jakoby, R. , Bohn, D. E. , and Cunat, D. , 2006, “ A Method for Estimating the Influence of Time-Dependent Vane and Blade Pressure Fields on Turbine Rim Seal Ingestion,” ASME J. Turbomach., 131(2), p. 021005.
Johnson, B. V. , Wang, C. Z. , and Roy, R. P. , 2008, “ A Rim Seal Orifice Model With Two Cd's and Effects of Swirl in Seals,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-50650.
Balasubramanian, J. , Pathak, P. S. , Thiagarajan, J. K. , Singh, P. , Roy, R. P. , and Mirzamoghadam, A. V. , 2015, “ Experimental Study of Ingestion in the Rotor–Stator Disk Cavity of a Subscale Axial Turbine Stage,” ASME J. Turbomach., 137(9), p. 091010. [CrossRef]
Bayley, F. J. , and Owen, J. M. , 1970, “ Fluid Dynamics of a Shrouded Disk System With a Radial Outflow of Coolant,” ASME J. Eng. Power, 92(3), pp. 335–341. [CrossRef]
Graber, D. J. , Daniels, W. A. , and Johnson, B. V. , 1987, “ Disc Pumping Test, Final Report,” Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, Report No. AFWAL-TR-87-2050.
Daniels, W. A. , Johnson, B. V. , Graber, D. J. , and Martin, R. J. , 1992, “ Rim Seal Experiments and Analysis for Turbine Applications,” ASME J. Turbomach., 114(2), pp. 426–432. [CrossRef]
Abe, T. , Kikuchi, J. , and Takeuchi, H. , 1979, “ An Investigation of Turbine Disk Cooling (Experimental Investigation and Observation of Hot Gas Flow Into a Wheel Space),” 13th International Congress on Combustion Engines (CIMAC), Vienna, Austria, May 7–10, Paper No. GT30.
Phadke, U. P. , and Owen, J. M. , 1988, “ Aerodynamic Aspects of the Sealing of Gas-Turbine Rotor-Stator Systems—Part 2: The Performance of Seals in a Quasiaxisymmetric External Flow,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 9(2), pp. 106–112. [CrossRef]
Phadke, U. P. , and Owen, J. M. , 1988, “ Aerodynamic Aspects of the Sealing of Gas-Turbine Rotor-Stator Systems—Part 3: The Effect of Nonaxisymmetric External Flow on Seal Performance,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 9(2), pp. 113–117. [CrossRef]
Dadkhah, S. , Turner, A. B. , and Chew, J. W. , 1992, “ Performance of Radial Clearance Rim Seals in Upstream and Downstream Rotor-Stator Wheelspaces,” ASME J. Turbomach., 114(2), pp. 439–445. [CrossRef]
Green, T. , and Turner, A. B. , 1994, “ Ingestion Into the Upstream Wheelspace of an Axial Turbine Stage,” ASME J. Turbomach., 116(2), pp. 327–332. [CrossRef]
Hills, N. J. , Green, T. , Turner, A. B. , and Chew, J. W. , 1997, “ Aerodynamics of Turbine Rim-Seal Ingestion,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-268.
Hills, N. J. , Chew, J. W. , and Turner, A. B. , 2002, “ Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Turbine Rim Seal Ingestion,” ASME J. Turbomach., 124(2), pp. 306–315. [CrossRef]
Gentilhomme, O. , Hills, N. J. , Turner, A. B. , and Chew, J. W. , 2002, “ Measurement and Analysis of Ingestion Through a Rim Seal,” ASME J. Turbomach., 125(3), pp. 505–512. [CrossRef]
Bayley, F. J. , and Childs, P. R. N. , 1997, “ Prediction of Ingress Rates to Turbine and Compressor Wheelspaces,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 18(2), pp. 218–228. [CrossRef]
Bohn, D. E. , Johann, E. , and Kruger, U. , 1995, “ Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Aerodynamic Aspects of Hot Gas Ingestion in Rotor-Stator Systems With Superimposed Cooling Mass Flow,” ASME Paper No. 95-GT-143.
Bohn, D. E. , Rudzinski, B. , Sürken, N. , and Gärtner, W. , 1999, “ Influence of Rim Seal Geometry on Hot Gas Ingestion Into the Upstream Cavity of an Axial Turbine Stage,” ASME Paper No. 99-GT-248.
Bohn, D. , Rudzinski, B. , Sürken, N. , and Gärtner, W. , 2000, “ Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Influence of Rotor Blades on Hot Gas Ingestion Into the Upstream Cavity of an Axial Turbine Stage,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-0284.
Bohn, D. E. , and Wolff, M. , 2003, “ Improved Formulation to Determine Minimum Sealing Flow—Cw, Min—for Different Sealing Configurations,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38465.
Bohn, D. E. , Decker, A. , Hongwei, M. , and Wolff, M. , 2003, “ Influence of Sealing Air Mass Flow on the Velocity Distribution in and Inside the Rim Seal of the Upstream Cavity of a 1.5-Stage Turbine,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38459.
Jakoby, R. , Zierer, T. , Lindblad, K. , Larsson, J. , deVito, L. , Bohn, D. E. , Funcke, J. , and Decker, A. , 2004, “ Numerical Simulation of the Unsteady Flow Field in an Axial Gas Turbine Rim Seal Configuration,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53829.
Owen, J. M. , and Rogers, R. H. , 1995, Flow and Heat Transfer in Rotating Disc Systems: Rotating Cavities, Vol. 2, Research Studies Press, Taunton, UK.
Bohn, D. E. , Decker, A. , Ohlendorf, N. , and Jakoby, R. , 2006, “ Influence of an Axial and Radial Rim Seal Geometry on Hot Gas Ingestion Into the Upstream Cavity of a 1.5-Stage Turbine,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90453.
Roy, R. P. , Feng, J. , Narzary, D. , Saurabh, P. , and Paolillo, R. E. , 2004, “ Experiments on Gas Ingestion Through Axial-Flow Turbine Rim Seals,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53394.
Roy, R. P. , Zhou, D. W. , Ganesan, S. , Wang, C. Z. , Paolillo, R. E. , and Johnson, B. V. , 2007, “ The Flow Field and Main Gas Ingestion in a Rotor-Stator Cavity,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-27671.
Zhou, D. W. , Roy, R. P. , Wang, C. Z. , and Glahn, J. A. , 2011, “ Main Gas Ingestion in a Turbine Stage for Three Rim Cavity Configurations,” ASME J. Turbomach., 133(3), p. 031023. [CrossRef]
Balasubramanian, J. , Junnarkar, N. , Zhou, D. W. , Roy, R. P. , Kim, Y. W. , and Moon, H. K. , 2011, “ Experiments on Aft-Disk Cavity Ingestion in a Model 1.5-Stage Axial-Flow Turbine,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-45895.
Mirzamoghadam, A. V. , Kanjiyani, S. , Riahi, A. , Vishnumolakala, R. , and Gundeti, L. , 2015, “ Unsteady 360 Computational Fluid Dynamics Validation of a Turbine Stage Mainstream/Disk Cavity Interaction,” ASME J. Turbomach., 137(1), p. 011008. [CrossRef]
Cao, C. , Chew, J. W. , Millington, P. R. , and Hogg, S. I. , 2004, “ Interaction of Rim Seal and Annulus Flows in an Axial Flow Turbine,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 126(4), pp. 786–793. [CrossRef]
Boudet, J. , Autef, V. N. D. , Chew, J. W. , Hills, N. J. , and Gentilhomme, O. P. , 2005, “ Numerical Simulation of Rim Seal Flows in Axial Turbines,” Aeronaut. J., 109(1098), pp. 373–383.
O'Mahoney, T. S. D. , Hills, N. J. , Chew, J. W. , and Scanlon, T. , 2011, “ Large-Eddy Simulation of Rim Seal Ingestion,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C, 225(12), pp. 2881–2891. [CrossRef]
Sangan, C. M. , Pountney, O. J. , Scobie, J. A. , Wilson, M. , Owen, J. M. , and Lock, G. D. , 2013, “ Experimental Measurements of Ingestion Through Turbine Rim Seals—Part 3: Single and Double Seals,” ASME J. Turbomach., 135(5), p. 051011. [CrossRef]
Sangan, C. M. , Lalwani, Y. , Owen, J. M. , and Lock, G. D. , 2014, “ Fluid Dynamics of a Gas Turbine Wheel-Space With Ingestion,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A, 228(5), pp. 508–524. [CrossRef]
Owen, J. M. , Wu, K. , Scobie, J. A. , Sangan, C. M. , Cho, G. , and Lock, G. D. , 2014, “ Use of Pressure Measurements to Determine Effectiveness of Turbine Rim Seals,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 137(3), p. 032510. [CrossRef]
Cho, G. , Sangan, C. M. , Owen, J. M. , and Lock, G. D. , 2016, “ Effect of Ingress on Turbine Discs,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 138(4), p. 042502. [CrossRef]
Mear, L. I. , Owen, J. M. , and Lock, G. D. , 2016, “ Theoretical Model to Determine Effect of Ingress on Turbine Disks,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 138(3), p. 032502. [CrossRef]
Wilson, M. , and Lock, G. D. , 2015, “ A Summary of Computations of Ingestion at the University of Bath,” International Gas Turbine Congress (IGTC 2015), Tokyo, Japan, Nov. 11–15, Paper No. IGTC2015-0077.
Khilnani, V. I. , and Bhavnani, S. H. , 2001, “ Sealing of Gas Turbine Disk Cavities Operating in the Presence of Mainstream External Flow,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 25(3–4), pp. 163–173. [CrossRef]
Scobie, J. A. , Sangan, C. M. , Owen, J. M. , Wilson, M. , and Lock, G. D. , 2014, “ Experimental Measurements of Hot Gas Ingestion Through Turbine Rim Seals at Off-Design Conditions,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A, 228(5), pp. 491–507. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Typical high-pressure gas-turbine stage and (b) detail of rim seal

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Variation of static pressure in a turbine annulus

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Typical rim seal configurations: (a) axial-clearance, (b) radial-clearance, (c) double radial-clearance, and (d) engine-representative double-clearance seal

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Operating capabilities of selected ingestion test facilities

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Simplified flow structure for system with superposed sealing flow and ingress. (Side plots show radial velocity and concentration profiles within the boundary layers.)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Orifice ring—Owen [7]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Axial-clearance seal experimental data of Graber et al. [19] without vanes and blades fitted using Eqs. (3.7) and (3.9); open symbols—εc, shaded symbols Φi,RImin,RI (CF = 0.005, Reϕ = 5.1 × 106, Gc = 0.0048)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Radial-clearance seal experimental data of Graber et al. [19] without vanes and blades fitted using Eqs. (3.7) and (3.9); open symbols—εc, shaded symbols Φi,RImin,RI (CF = 0.01, Reϕ = 2.6 × 106)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Axial-clearance seal experimental data conducted under RI conditions from Sangan et al. [10], fitted using Eqs. (3.7) and (3.9); open symbols—εc, shaded symbols Φi,RImin,RI (CF = 0, Gc = 0.0105)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Radial-clearance seal experimental data conducted under RI conditions from Sangan et al. [10], fitted using Eqs. (3.7) and (3.9); open symbols—εc, shaded symbols Φi,RImin,RI (CF = 0, Gc = 0.0105)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Experimental data from Green and Turner [25], each condition fitted using Eq. (3.12) (Reϕ = 1.5 × 106, Gc = 0.01)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Experimental data from Gentilhomme et al. [28] fitted using Eq. (3.12) (Gc = 0.013)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Effect of rotor blades on ingestion for (a) configuration 1 (Gc = 0.015) and (b) configuration 2 (Gc = 0.005), Bohn et al. [32]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Variation of Cw,min with Cp,max½, from Bohn and Wolf [33]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Contours of (a) static pressure and (b) hot gas (hg) concentration in the wheel-space at Φ0 = 0.015 from 360 deg CFD simulation, Jakoby et al. [35] (Reϕ = 2.4 × 106, CF = 0.46, Gc = 0.03)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Diagrammatic representation of wheel-space static pressure distribution, from Childs [4]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Radial distribution of effectiveness for an axial-clearance and radial-clearance seal, Bohn et al. [37] (Reϕ = 2.4 × 106, CF = 0.46, Gc = 0.03)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Experimental data of Johnson et al. [16] fitted using Eqs. (3.12) and (3.13); open symbols—εc, shaded symbols Φi,EImin,EI (Reϕ = 5.9 × 105, Gc = 0.046)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Radial distribution of effectiveness for three radial-clearance seal geometries at Φ0 = 0.011, Zhou et al. [40] (Reϕ = 5.9 × 105, CF = 0.78, Gc = 0.046)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Experimental data of Balasubramanian et al. [17] fitted using Eqs. (3.12) and (3.13); open symbols—εc, shaded symbols Φi,EImin,EI (Gc = 0.046)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Comparison between theoretical effectiveness curves (Eqs. (3.12) and (3.13)) and experimental data for axial-clearance seal, Sangan et al. [9]; open symbols—εc, shaded symbols Φi,EImin,EI (CF = 0.54, Gc = 0.0105)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Radial distribution of effectiveness for three seal geometries tested at a consistent sealant flow rate, Sangan et al. [46] (Reϕ = 8.2 × 105, CF = 0.54, Gc = 0.0105)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Radial distribution of swirl ratio for three seal geometries tested at a consistent sealant flow rate, Sangan et al. [47] (Reϕ = 8.2 × 105, CF = 0.54, Gc = 0.0105)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

Radial distribution of pressure coefficient for three seal geometries tested at a consistent sealant flow rate, symbols denote measurements, lines denote Eq. (5.2), Sangan et al. [47] (Reϕ = 8.2 × 105, CF = 0.54, Gc = 0.0105)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 25

Variation of pressure and concentration effectiveness with sealant flow rate for radial-clearance seal (symbols denote data; line is theoretical curve), Owen et al. [48] (CF = 0.54, Gc = 0.0105)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 26

Variation of effectiveness with nondimensional sealing flow rate showing thermal buffering effect on rotor, Cho et al. [49] (Reϕ = 8.2 × 105, CF = 0.54, Gc = 0.0105)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 27

Experimental data from Phadke and Owen [23] fitted using Eq. (3.16) (Gc = 0.01)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 28

Experimental data from Khilnani and Bhavnani [51] fitted using Eq. (3.16) (Gc = 0.01)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 29

Experimental data from Scobie et al. [53] fitted using Eq. (3.16) (Reϕ = 5.3 × 105, Gc = 0.0105)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 30

Experimental data from Scobie et al. [53] replotted in the style of Bohn and Wolff [33] (Reϕ = 5.3 × 105, Gc = 0.0105)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In