0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Hybrid RANS-LES Modeling of the Aerothermal Field in an Annular Hot Streak Generator for the Study of Combustor–Turbine Interaction

[+] Author and Article Information
A. Andreini

Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Florence,
via S. Marta 3,
Florence 50139, Italy
e-mail: antonio.andreini@htc.de.unifi.it

T. Bacci

Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Florence,
via S. Marta 3,
Florence 50139, Italy
e-mail: tommaso.bacci@htc.de.unifi.it

M. Insinna

Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Florence,
via S. Marta 3,
Florence 50139, Italy
e-mail: massimiliano.insinna@unifi.it

L. Mazzei

Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Florence,
via S. Marta 3,
Florence 50139, Italy
e-mail: lorenzo.mazzei@htc.de.unifi.i

S. Salvadori

Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Florence,
via S. Marta 3,
Florence 50139, Italy
e-mail: simone.salvadori@unifi.it

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received June 30, 2016; final manuscript received July 7, 2016; published online September 20, 2016. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 139(2), 021508 (Sep 20, 2016) (12 pages) Paper No: GTP-16-1293; doi: 10.1115/1.4034358 History: Received June 30, 2016; Revised July 07, 2016

The adoption of lean-burn technology in modern aero-engines influences the already critical aerothermal conditions at turbine entry, where the absence of dilution holes preserves the swirl component generated by burners and prevents any control on pattern factor. The associated uncertainty and lack of confidence entail the application of wide safety margins in turbine cooling design, with a detrimental effect on engine efficiency. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can provide a deeper understanding of the physical phenomena involved in combustor–turbine interaction, especially with hybrid Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) large eddy simulation (LES) models, such as scale adaptive simulation (SAS), which are proving to overcome the well-known limitations of the RANS approach and be a viable approach to capture the complex flow physics. This paper describes the numerical investigation on a test rig representative of a lean-burn, effusion cooled, annular combustor developed in the EU Project Full Aerothermal Combustor-Turbine interactiOns Research (FACTOR) with the aim of studying combustor–turbine interaction. Results obtained with RANS and SAS were critically compared to experimental data and analyzed to better understand the flow physics, as well as to assess the improvements related to the use of hybrid RANS-LES models. Significant discrepancies are highlighted for RANS in predicting the recirculating region, which has slight influence on the velocity field at the combustor outlet, but affects dramatically mixing and the resulting temperature distribution. The accuracy of the results achieved suggests the exploitation of SAS model with a view to the future inclusion of the nozzle guide vanes in the test rig.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Cha, C. M. , Ireland, P. T. , Denman, P. , and Savarianandam, V. , 2012, “ Turbulence Levels are High at the Combustor-Turbine Interface,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-69130.
Cha, C. M. , Hong, S. , Ireland, P. T. , Denman, P. , and Savarianandam, V. , 2012, “ Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Combustor-Turbine Interaction Using an Isothermal, Nonreacting Tracer,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(8), p. 081501. [CrossRef]
Giller, L. , and Schiffer, H. P. , 2012, “ Interactions Between the Combustor Swirl and the High Pressure Stator of a Turbine,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-69157.
Pyliouras, S. , Schiffer, H. P. , Janke, E. , and Willer, L. , 2012, “ Effects of Non-Uniform Combustor Exit Flow on Turbine Aerodynamics,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-69327.
Salvadori, S. , Ottanelli, L. , Jonsson, M. , Ott, P. , and Martelli, F. , 2012, “ Investigation of High-Pressure Turbine Endwall Film-Cooling Performance Under Realistic Inlet Conditions,” J. Propul. Power, 28(4), pp. 799–810. [CrossRef]
Werschnik, H. , Krichbaum, A. , and Schiffer, H.-P. , 2015, “ The Influence of Combustor Swirl on Turbine Stator Endwall Heat Transfer and Film Cooling Effectiveness in a 1.5-Stage Axial Turbine,” ISABE, ISABE Paper No. 2015-20184.
Insinna, M. , Griffini, D. , Salvadori, S. , and Martelli, F. , 2014, “ Conjugate Heat Transfer Analysis of a Film Cooled High-Pressure Turbine Vane Under Realistic Combustor Exit Flow Conditions,” ASME Paper No. GT2014-25280.
Griffini, D. , Insinna, M. , Salvadori, S. , and Martelli, F. , 2015, “ Clocking Effects of Inlet Non-Uniformities in a Fully Cooled High-Pressure Vane: A Conjugate Heat Transfer Analysis,” ASME J. Turbomach., 138(2), p. 021006. [CrossRef]
Boudier, G. , Gicquel, L. Y. M. , Poinsot, T. , Bissieres, D. , and Berat, C. , 2007, “ Comparison of LES, RANS and Experiments in an Aeronautical Gas Turbine Combustion Chamber,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 31(2), pp. 3075–3082. [CrossRef]
Gicquel, L. Y. M. , Staffelbach, G. , and Poinsot, T. , 2012, “ Large Eddy Simulations of Gaseous Flames in Gas Turbine Combustion Chambers,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 38(6), pp. 782–817. [CrossRef]
Spalart, P. R. , Jou, W.-H. , Strelets, M. , and Allmaras, S. R. , 1997, “ Comments on the Feasibility of LES for Wings, and on a Hybrid RANS/LES Approach,” 1st AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES.
Menter, F. R. , and Egorov, Y. , 2006, “ Re-Visiting the Turbulent Scale Equation,” IUTAM Symposium on One Hundred Years of Boundary Layer Research, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Menter, F. R. , and Egorov, Y. , 2004, “ A Scale-Adaptive Simulation Model Using Two-Equation Models,” AIAA Paper No. 2005-1095.
Menter, F. R. , and Egorov, Y. , 2010, “ The Scale-Adaptive Simulation Method for Unsteady Turbulent Flow Predictions. Part 2: Application to Complex Flows,” Flow Turbul. Combust., 85(1), pp. 113–138. [CrossRef]
Widenhorn, A. , Noll, B. , and Aigner, M. , 2009, “ Numerical Study of a No-Reacting Turbulent Flow in a Gas Turbine Model Combustor,” AIAA Paper No. 2009-647.
Mazzei, L. , Andreini, A. , Facchini, B. , and Turrini, F. , 2015, “ Impact of Swirl Flow on Combustor Liner Heat Transfer and Cooling: A Numerical Investigation With Hybrid Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes-Large Eddy Simulation Models,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 138(5), p. 051504. [CrossRef]
Andreini, A. , Facchini, B. , Insinna, M. , Mazzei, L. , and Salvadori, S. , 2015, “ Hybrid RANS-LES Modeling of a Hot Streak Generator Oriented to the Study of Combustor-Turbine Interaction,” ASME Paper No. GT2015-42402.
Andreini, A. , Caciolli, G. , Facchini, B. , Picchi, A. , and Turrini, F. , 2014, “ Experimental Investigation of the Flow Field and the Heat Transfer on a Scaled Cooled Combustor Liner With Realistic Swirling Flow Generated by a Lean-Burn Injection System,” ASME J. Turbomach., 137(3), p. 031012. [CrossRef]
Wurm, B. , Schulz, A. , Bauer, H.-J. , and Gerendas, M. , 2012, “ Impact of Swirl Flow on the Cooling Performance of an Effusion Cooled Combustor Liner,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(12), p. 121503. [CrossRef]
Koupper, C. , Bonneau, G. , Caciolli, G. , Facchini, B. , Tarchi, L. , Gicquel, L. , and Duchaine, F. , 2014, “ Development of an Engine Representative Combustor Simulator Dedicated to Hot Streak Generation,” ASME J. Turbomach., 136(11), p. 111017. [CrossRef]
Bacci, T. , Caciolli, G. , Facchini, B. , Tarchi, L. , Koupper, C. , and Champion, J.-L. , 2015, “ Flowfield and Temperature Profiles Measurements on a Combustor Simulator Dedicated to Hot Streaks Generation,” ASME Paper No. GT2015-42217.
Lilley, D. G. , 1977, “ Swirl Flows in Combustion: A Review,” AIAA J., 15(8), pp. 1063–1078. [CrossRef]
Koupper, C. , Bonneau, G. , Gicquel, L. , and Duchaine, F. , 2016, “ Large Eddy Simulations of the Combustor Turbine Interface: Study of the Potential and Clocking Effects,” ASME Paper No. GT2016-56443.
Bacci, T. , Facchini, B. , Picchi, A. , Tarchi, L. , Koupper, C. , and Bonneau, G. , 2015, “ Turbulence Field Measurements at the Exit of an Engine Representative Combustor Simulator Dedicated to Hot Streaks Generation,” ASME Paper No. GT2015-42218.
Koupper, C. , Bonneau, G. , Bacci, T. , Facchini, B. , Tarchi, L. , Gicquel, L. , and Duchaine, F. , 2015, “ Experimental and Numerical Calculation of Turbulent Timescales at the Exit of an Engine Representative Combustor Simulator,” ASME Paper No. GT2015-42278.
Charonko, J. J. , and Vlachos, P. P. , 2013, “ Estimation of Uncertainty Bounds for Individual Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements From Cross-Correlation Peak Ratio,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 24(6), p. 065301. [CrossRef]
Menter, F. R. , and Egorov, Y. , 2010, “ The Scale-Adaptive Simulation Method for Unsteady Turbulent Flow Predictions. Part 1: Theory and Model Description,” Flow Turbul. Combust., 85(1), pp. 113–138. [CrossRef]
Menter, F. R. , 2012, “ Best Practice: Scale-Resolving Simulations in ANSYS CFD,” ANSYS Germany, Darmstadt, Germany.
ANSYS, 2015, “ Fluent Theory Guide,” Release 16.0, ANSYS, Canonsburg, PA.
Mendez, S. , and Nicoud, F. , 2008, “ Adiabatic Homogeneous Model for Flow Around a Multiperforated Plate,” AIAA J., 46(10), pp. 2623–2633. [CrossRef]
Pope, S. B. , 2004, “ Ten Questions Concerning the Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flows,” New J. Phys., 6, pp. 1–24. [CrossRef]
Povey, T. , and Qureshi, I. , 2009, “ Developments in Hot-Streak Simulators for Turbine Testing,” ASME J. Turbomach., 131(3), p. 031009. [CrossRef]
Widenhorn, A. , Noll, B. , and Aigner, M. , 2009, “ Numerical Characterization of the Reacting Flow in a Swirled Gasturbine Model Combustor,” High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering’08, Springer, Berlin, pp. 365–380.
Puggelli, S. , Bertini, D. , Mazzei, L. , and Andreini, A. , 2016, “ Assessment of Scale Resolved CFD Methods for the Investigation of Lean Burn Spray Flames,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (accepted).

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

View of the test rig and detail of swirlers and multiperforated liners

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Experimental setup for the PIV measurements on the combustor simulator

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Five-hole probe positions and definition of velocity angles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Computational domain with periodicity conditions (single sector case, 1S)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Computational domain (three-sector case, 3S)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Details of the computational grids

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Time-averaged contours of Pope's criterion (SAS at DP, 1S case). Areas with M > 0.2 are blanked.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Comparison of velocity field at the meridional plane (isoT case)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparison of axial velocity field at the meridional plane (isoT case)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of axial velocity profiles at the meridional plane (isoT case)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Contours of swirl angle on plane 40 (DP case)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Profiles of swirl angle on plane 40 at three different nondimensional radial positions (DP case)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Contours of pitch angle on plane 40 (DP case)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Profiles of pitch angle on plane 40 at three different nondimensional radial positions (DP case)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Contours of nondimensional temperature at plane 40t (DP case)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Contours of relative temperature differences between CFD and experiments at plane 40t

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Radial profiles of tangentially averaged nondimensional temperature at plane 40t

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In