0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Ceramics

Foreign Object Damage in an Oxide/Oxide Ceramic Matrix Composite Under Prescribed Tensile Loading

[+] Author and Article Information
Nesredin Kedir, David Faucett, Luis Sanchez

Naval Air Systems Command,
Patuxent River, MD 20670

Sung R. Choi

Naval Air Systems Command,
Patuxent River, MD 20670
e-mail: sung.choi1@navy.mil

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Ceramics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 6, 2016; final manuscript received July 12, 2016; published online September 20, 2016. Editor: David Wisler. This material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 139(2), 021301 (Sep 20, 2016) (8 pages) Paper No: GTP-16-1314; doi: 10.1115/1.4034360 History: Received July 06, 2016; Revised July 12, 2016

Foreign object damage (FOD) behavior of an N720/alumina oxide/oxide ceramic matrix composite (CMC) was characterized at ambient temperature by using spherical projectiles impacted at velocities ranging from 100 to 350 m/s. The CMC targets were subject to ballistic impact at a normal incidence angle while being loaded under different levels of tensile loading in order to simulate conditions of rotating aeroengine airfoils. The impact damage of frontal and back surfaces was assessed with respect to impact velocity and load factor. Subsequent postimpact residual strength was also estimated to determine quantitatively the severity of impact damage. Impact force was predicted based on the principles of energy conservation.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Choi, S. R. , Wright, J. M. , Faucett, C. D. , and Ayre, M. , 2014, “ Phenomena of Foreign Object Damage by Spherical Projectiles in EB-PVD Thermal Barrier Coatings of Turbine Airfoils,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 136(10), p. 102603. [CrossRef]
Choi, S. R. , 2008, “ Foreign Object Damage Phenomenon by Steel Ball Projectiles in a SiC/SiC Ceramic Matrix Composite at Ambient and Elevated Temperatures,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 91(9), pp. 2963–2968. [CrossRef]
Choi, S. R. , Alexander, D. J. , and Kowalik, R. W. , 2009, “ Foreign Object Damage in an Oxide/Oxide Composite at Ambient Temperature,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 131(2), p. 021301. [CrossRef]
Corman, G. G. , and Luthra, K. L. , 2005, “ Silicon Melt Infiltrated Ceramic Composites (HiPerComp),” Handbook of Ceramic Composites, N. P. Bansal , ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, pp. 99–115.
Ogi, K. , Okabe, T. , Takahashi, M. , Yashiro, S. , and Yoshimura, A. , 2010, “ Experimental Characterization of High-Speed Impact Damage Behavior in a Three-Dimensionally Woven SiC/SiC Composite,” Composites, Part A, 41(4), pp. 489–498. [CrossRef]
Verrilli, M. J. , Foster, S. , and Subit, J. , 2010, “ Impact Behavior of a SiC/SiC Composite at an Elevated Temperature,” Seventh Conference on High Temperature CMCs (HTCMC7), Bayreuth, Germany, pp. 519–530.
Yashiro, S. , Ogi, K. , and Oshita, M. , 2012, “ High-Velocity Impact Damage Behavior of Plain-Woven SiC/SiC Composites After Thermal Loading,” Composites, Part B, 43(3), pp. 1353–1362. [CrossRef]
Herb, V. , Martin, E. , and Couégnat, G. , 2012, “ Damage Analysis of Thin 3D-Woven SiC/SiC Composite Under Low Velocity Impact Loading,” Composites, Part A, 43(2), pp. 247–253. [CrossRef]
Morscher, G. N. , Baker, C. , Ramasamy, S. , Choi, S. , and Faucett, C. , 2012, “ Use of Electrical Resistivity and Acoustic Emission to Assess Impact Damage States in Two SiC-Based CMCs,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-69167.
Morscher, G. N. , Baker, C. , Gyekenyesi, A. , Faucett, C. , and Choi, S. , 2013, “ Damage Detection and Tensile Performance of Various SiC/SiC Composites Impacted at High Speed Projectiles,” ASME Paper No. GT2013-95638.
Yao, L. Y. , Feng, Z. Y. , and Cheng, Q. Y. , 2009, “ Low Velocity Impact Damage Evaluation of 2D C/SiC Composite Material,” Adv. Mater. Res., 79–82, pp. 1835–1838. [CrossRef]
Phillips, D. C. , Park, N. , and Lee, R. J. , 1990, “ The Impact Behavior of High Performance Ceramic Matrix Composites,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 37(1–3), pp. 249–265. [CrossRef]
Boccaccini, R. , Atiq, S. , Boccaccini, D. N. , Dlouhy, I. , and Kaya, C. , 2005, “ Fracture Behavior of Mullite Fiber Reinforced Mullite Matrix Composites Under Quasi-Static and Ballistic Impact Loading,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 65(2), pp. 325–333. [CrossRef]
Abdi, F. , Morscher, G. , Troha, W. , and Choi, S. , 2012, “ Multi-Scale Analysis of Foreign Object Damage (FOD) in Ceramic Matrix Composites (CMCs) Using and Adaptive Meshing and Damage Evolution Technique,” 36th Annual Conference on Composites, Materials, and Structures, Cape Canaveral, FL, Jan. 23–26.
Xue, Y. , Abdi, F. , and Morscher, G. N. , 2013, “ Non-Destructive Ceramic Matrix Composite Impact Modeling Validation,” ASME Paper No. GT2013-94728.
Abdi, F. , Xue, Y. , Morscher, G. N. , and Choi, S. , 2015, “ Quantification of Foreign Object Damage (FOD) and Electrical Resistivity for CMCs and Tensile Residual Strength Prediction,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 137(5), p. 052503. [CrossRef]
Baker, C. R. , Maillet, E. , Morscher, G. N. , Gyekenyesi, A. L. , Choi, S. R. , and Abdi, F. , 2014, “ High Velocity Impact Damage Assessment in SiC/SiC Composites,” ASME Paper No. GT2014-26955.
Choi, S. R. , Faucett, D. C. , and Alexander, D. A. , 2014, “ Foreign Object Damage by Spherical Steel Projectiles in an N720/Alumina Oxide/Oxide Ceramic Matrix Composite,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 97(12), pp. 3926–3934. [CrossRef]
Choi, S. R. , 2015, “ Foreign Object Damage in Ceramic Matrix Composites,” Ceramic Matrix Composites—Materials, Modeling & Technology, N. P. Bansal , and J. Lamon , eds., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, Chap. 14.
Choi, S. R. , Pereira, J. M. , Janosik, L. A. , and Bhatt, R. T. , 2004, “ Foreign Object Damage in Flexure Bars of Two Gas-Turbine Grade Silicon Nitrides,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 379(1–2), pp. 411–419. [CrossRef]
Faucett, D. C. , Kedir, N. , and Choi, S. R. , 2015, “ Foreign Object Damage in an Oxide/Oxide CMC Subjected to Tensile Preloading,” ASME Paper No. GT2015-44048.
Simon, R. A. , 2005, “ Progress in Processing and Performance of Porous-Matrix Oxide/Oxide Composites,” Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol., 2(2), pp. 141–149. [CrossRef]
Zok, F. , 2006, “ Developments in Oxide Fiber Composites,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 89(11), pp. 3309–3324. [CrossRef]
ASTM C1275, 2015, “ Test Method for Monotonic Tensile Behavior of Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Advanced Ceramics With Solid Rectangular Cross-Section Test Specimens at Ambient Temperature,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
Yoshida, H. , Chaudhri, M. N. , Fukudome, T. , and Tsuruzono, S. , 2005, “ Impact Fracture Behavior of Turbine-Grade Silicon Nitride Ceramic Under Tensile Stress at Elevated Temperatures,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-68182.
Bhadeshia, H. K. D. H. , 2012, “ Steel for Bearings,” Prog. Mater. Sci., 57(2), pp. 268–435. [CrossRef]
Choi, S. R. , 2008, “ Foreign Object Damage Behavior in a Silicon Nitride Ceramic by Spherical Projectiles of Steels and Brass,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 497(1–2), pp. 160–167. [CrossRef]
Cosgriff, M. , Bhatt, R. , Choi, S. R. , and Fox, D. S. , 2005, “ Thermographic Characterization of Impact Damage in SiC/SiC Composite Materials,” Proc. SPIE, 5767, pp. 363–372.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Examples of FOD in hot-section hardware in aeroengines: (a) micro FOD in TBCs by a miniature particle, probably by a molten metallic droplet; (b) intermediate FOD probably by a pointed particle causing deformation and compaction of TBCs/substrate; and (c) significant FOD by big metallic objects [1]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Typical microstructure of an N720/alumina oxide/oxide CMC used in the current work

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Configuration and setup of tensile test specimen in FOD testing under tensile preload for an N720/alumina oxide/oxide CMC. The impact site was at x = y = z = 0. The FPR represents a tensile preload applied during impact experiments. The “V” indicates the impact velocity.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Impact damage morphology generated in impact sites (front sides) and back sides as a function of impact velocity and load factor (α) in an N720/alumina CMC subjected to impact by 1.59 steel ball projectiles. The direction of applied preloads is shown as a double arrow in the right above.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Example of stress–strain curves of impacted specimens with no tensile preload, determined in postimpact strength testing for an N720/alumina CMC impacted by 1.59 mm steel ball projectiles. The AsR denotes the as-received test specimen.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Results of postimpact strength as a function of impact velocity at different levels of load factor (α) for an N720/alumina CMC impacted by 1.59 mm steel ball projectiles. The solid lines represent the best fit. The AsR denotes the as-received strength of the material.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Postimpact strength as a function of load factor (α) at different levels of impact velocity for an N720/alumina CMC impacted by 1.59 mm steel ball projectiles. The solid lines represent the best fit. The AsR denotes the as-received strength of the material. The offset from “zero” at α = 70% was made for clarity of plotting.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Schematic showing an impact event in the tensile-grip support used in this work: (a) overall; (b) idealized impact event of an oxide/oxide CMC target by a spherical steel ball projectile. The L and δ represent, respectively, unsupport (span) length and target deflection by impact. The py denotes the contact yield stress, d and z are damage sizes, D is the projectile diameter, and F and V are impact force and velocity, respectively.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

SEM image of an indent made on an N720/alumina CMC by a 1.59 mm steel ball projectile with an indent force of 980 N

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Indent size as a function of indent force determined in an N720/alumina CMC indented by 1.59 mm steel ball projectiles. The inset describes the indent diameter (di) and depth (zi). The solid lines represent the best fit.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Contact area as a function of indent force determined in an N720/alumina CMC indented by 1.59 mm steel ball projectiles. The solid lines represent the best-fit regression line. The inverse of the slope corresponds to the value of contact yield stress, py.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Predicted impact force as a function of impact velocity for the tensile-grip support in an N720/alumina CMC impacted by 1.59 mm steel ball projectiles. The impact-force prediction for full support was made for comparison. The “e” represents coefficient of restitution.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Predicted impact damage size (d) as a function of impact velocity for tensile-grip support in an N720/alumina CMC impacted by 1.59 mm steel ball projectiles. The solid line represents the prediction. The full-support prediction and experimental data were also included for comparison.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In