0
Research Papers: Internal Combustion Engines

Transient “Single-Fuel” RCCI Operation With Customized Pistons in a Light-Duty Multicylinder Engine

[+] Author and Article Information
Christopher W. Gross

Engine Research Center,
University of Wisconsin–Madison,
1500 Engineering Drive,
Madison, WI 53706
e-mail: cwgross@wisc.edu

Rolf D. Reitz

Engine Research Center,
University of Wisconsin–Madison,
1500 Engineering Drive,
Madison, WI 53706
e-mail: reitz@engr.wisc.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the IC Engine Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received June 17, 2016; final manuscript received July 13, 2016; published online September 27, 2016. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 139(3), 032801 (Sep 27, 2016) (11 pages) Paper No: GTP-16-1225; doi: 10.1115/1.4034445 History: Received June 17, 2016; Revised July 13, 2016

Reactivity controlled compression ignition (RCCI) combustion in a light-duty multicylinder engine (MCE) over transient operating conditions using fast response exhaust unburned hydrocarbon (UHC1), nitric oxide (NO), and particulate matter (PM) measurement instruments was investigated. RCCI has demonstrated improvements in efficiency along with low NOx and PM emissions by utilizing in-cylinder fuel blending, generally using two fuels with different reactivity in order to optimize stratification. In the present work, a “single-fuel” approach for RCCI combustion using port-injected gasoline and direct-injected gasoline mixed with a small amount of the cetane improver 2-ethylhexyl nitrate (EHN) was studied with custom designed, compression ratio (CR) of 13.75:1, pistons under transient conditions. The EHN volume percentage in the mixture for the direct-injected fuel was set at 3%. In an experimental investigation, comparisons were made to transient RCCI combustion operation with gasoline/diesel. The experiments were performed over a step load change from 1 to 4 bar brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) at constant 1500 rev/min on a General Motors (GM) Z19DTH 1.9-L diesel engine. The transients were conducted by changing the accelerator pedal command to provide a desired torque output with a DRIVVEN engine control unit (ECU) that replaced the original Bosch ECU. All relevant engine parameters are adjusted accordingly, based on 2D-tables. Previous to the transient engine operation, four steady-state points were used to obtain performance and emission values. Engine calibration at these four points, as well as the interpolation of the intermediate points, allowed for smooth operation during the instantaneous step changes. Differences between the steady-state and transient results indicate the complexity of transient operation and show the need for additional controls to minimize undesirable effects. The steady-state points were calibrated by modifying the fuel injection strategy (actual start of injection (aSOI) timing, port-fuel injection (PFI) fraction, etc.), exhaust gas recirculation (EGR), and rail pressure in order to obtain predefined values for the crank-angle at 50% of total heat release (CA50). Furthermore, emission targets (HC1 < 1500 ppmC3, NO < 10 ppm, filter smoke number (FSN)<0.1 with a maximum pressure rise rate (MPRR) < 10 bar/deg) and noise level targets (<95 dB) for RCCI combustion were maintained during the calibration and mapping. The tests were performed with a closed-loop (CL) calibration by using a next-cycle (NC) controller to adjust the PFI ratio of each cycle in order to reach the steady-state CA50 values in the table. The results show that single-fuel RCCI operation can be achieved, but requires significant alteration of the operating conditions, and NOx emissions were significantly elevated for gasoline/gasoline–EHN operation. While combustion phasing could not be matched, UHC1 emissions were at a similar level as for gasoline/diesel combustion. It is expected that the implementation of different injection strategies and boosted operation, combined with use of higher compression ratio pistons in order to compensate for the lower reactivity direct injection (DI) fuel, could raise the potential for improved performance.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Bessonette, P. W. , Schleyer, C. H. , Duffy, K. P. , Hardy, W. L. , and Liechty, M. P. , 2007, “ Effects of Fuel Property Changes on Heavy-Duty HCCI Combustion,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2007-01-0191.
Kokjohn, S. L. , Hanson, R. M. , Splitter, D. A. , and Reitz, R. D. , 2009, “ Experiments and Modeling of Dual Fuel HCCI and PCCI Combustion Using In-Cylinder Fuel Blending,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2009-01-2647.
Splitter, D. A. , Hanson, R. M. , Kokjohn, S. L. , and Reitz, R. D. , 2010, “ Improving Engine Performance by Optimizing Fuel Reactivity With a Dual Fuel PCCI Strategy,” THIESEL 2010 Conference on Thermo and Fluid Dynamic Processes in Diesel Engines, Valencia, Spain, Sept. 14–17.
Inagaki, K. , Fuyuto, T. , Nishikawa, K. , Nakakita, K. , and Sakata, I. , 2006, “ Dual-Fuel PCI Combustion Controlled by In-Cylinder Stratification of Ignitability,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2006-01-0028.
Kokjohn, S. , Hanson, R. , Splitter, D. , Kaddatz, J. , and Reitz, R. , 2011, “ Fuel Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI) Combustion in Light- and Heavy-Duty Engines,” SAE Int. J. Engines, 4(1), pp. 360–374. [CrossRef]
Hanson, R. M. , Kokjohn, S. L. , Splitter, D. A. , and Reitz, R. D. , 2010, “ An Experimental Investigation of Fuel Reactivity Controlled PCCI Combustion in a Heavy-Duty Engine,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2010-01-0864.
Kokjohn, S. L. , 2012, “ Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI.
Reitz, R. D. , Kokjohn, S. L. , Hanson, R. M. , and Splitter, D. A. , 2010, “ Engine Combustion Control Via Fuel Reactivity Stratification,” U.S. Patent Application P100054.
Splitter, D. A. , Kokjohn, S. L. , Rein, K. , Hanson, R. M. , Sanders, S. , and Reitz, R. D. , 2010, “ An Optical Investigation of Ignition Processes in Fuel Reactivity Controlled PCCI Combustion,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2010-01-0345.
Splitter, D. A. , Wissink, M. L. , DelVescovo, D. , and Reitz, R. D. , 2013, “ RCCI Engine Operation Towards 60% Thermal Efficiency,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2013-01-0279.
Splitter, D. A. , Wissink, M. L. , Hendricks, T. L. , Ghandi, J. B. , and Reitz, R. D. , 2012, “ Comparison of RCCI, HCCI, and CDC Operation From Low to Full Load,” THIESEL Conference on Thermo and Fluid Dynamic Processes in Diesel Engines, Valencia, Spain, Sept. 14–17.
Dempsey, A. B. , Walker, N. R. , Gingrich, E. , and Reitz, R. D. , 2014, “ Comparison of Low Temperature Combustion Strategies for Advanced Compression Ignition Engines With a Focus on Controllability,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 186(2), pp. 210–241. [CrossRef]
Splitter, D. A. , Hanson, R. M. , Kokjohn, S. L. , and Reitz, R. D. , 2011, “ Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI) Heavy Duty Engine Operation at Mid and High Loads With Conventional and Alternative Fuels,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2011-01-0363.
Curran, S. , Hanson, R. , and Wagner, R. , 2012, “ Effect of E85 on RCCI Performance and Emissions on a Multi-Cylinder Light-Duty Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2012-01-0376.
Hanson, R. , Curran, S. , Wagner, R. , and Reitz, R. , 2013, “ Effects of Biofuel Blends on RCCI Combustion in a Light-Duty, Multi-Cylinder Diesel Engine,” SAE Int. J. Engines, 6(1), pp. 488–503. [CrossRef]
Hanson, R. M. , 2014, “ Experimental Investigation of Transient RCCI Combustion in a Light Duty Diesel Engine,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI.
Dempsey, A. B. , 2013, “ Dual-Fuel Reacitivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI) With Alternative Fuels,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI.
Splitter, D. A. , Reitz, R. D. , and Hanson, R. M. , 2010, “ High Efficiency, Low Emissions RCCI Combustion by Use of a Fuel Additive,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr., 3(2), pp. 742–756. [CrossRef]
Hanson, R. M. , Kokjohn, S. L. , Splitter, D. A. , and Reitz, R. D. , 2011, “ Fuel Effects on Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI) Combustion at Low Load,” SAE Int. J. Engines, 4(1), pp. 394–411. [CrossRef]
Kaddatz, J. R. , Andrie, M. , Kokjohn, S. L. , and Reitz, R. D. , 2012, “ Light-Duty Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition Combustion Using a Cetane Improver,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2012-01-1110.
Dempsey, A. , 2015, “ Characterization of Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI) Using Premixed Gasoline and Direct-Injected Gasoline With a Cetane Improver on a Multi-Cylinder Engine,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2015-01-0855.
Glewen, W. , 2012, “ Experimental Investigation of Transient Operation and Low Temperature Combustion in a Light-Duty Diesel Engine,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI.
Williams, D. R. , 2008, “ Transient Effect of Speed and Load on Low Temperature Diesel Combustion,” MS thesis, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI.
Curran, S. , Prikhodko, V. , Cho, K. , Sluder, C. S. , Parks, J. , Wagner, R. , Kokjohn, S. , and Reitz, R. , 2010, “ In-Cylinder Fuel Blending of Gasoline/Diesel for Improved Efficiency and Lowest Possible Emissions on a Multi-Cylinder Light-Duty Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2010-01-2206.
Cambustion Ltd., 2001, “ fNOx400 Fast Response Nitric Oxide Measurement System,” Cambustion Ltd., Cambridge, UK.
Schurov, S. , Collings, N. , Hands, T. , and Peckham, M. E. A. , 1998, “ Fast Response NO/HC Measurements in the Cylinder and Exhaust Port of a DI Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper No. 980788.
Lapuerta, M. , Martos, F. J. , and Cardenas, M. D. , 2005, “ Determination of Light Extinction Efficiency of Diesel Soot From Smoke Opacity Measurements,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 16(10), pp. 2048–2055. [CrossRef]
AVL, 2001, “ Smoke Measurement,” AVL LIST GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Prikhodko, V. , Curran, S. , Barone, T. , and Lewis, S. E. A. , 2010, “ Emissions Characteristics of a Diesel Engine Operating With In-Cylinder Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Blending,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr., 3(2), pp. 946–955. [CrossRef]
Splitter, D. A. , Wissink, M. , Kokjohn, S. L. , and Reitz, R. , 2012, “ Effect of Compression Ratio and Piston Geometry on RCCI Load Limits and Efficiency,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2012-01-0383.
Hanson, R. , Curran, S. , Wagner, R. , Kokjohn, S. , Splitter, D. , and Reitz, R. , 2012, “ Piston Bowl Optimization for RCCI Combustion in a Light-Duty Multi-Cylinder Engine,” SAE Int. J. Engines, 5(2), pp. 286–299. [CrossRef]
Dempsey, A. , Curran, S. , Wagner, R. , and Kokjohn, S. , 2012, “ Effect of Piston Bowl Geometry on Dual-Fuel Reactivity Controlled Compression (RCCI) in a Light-Duty Engine Operated With Gasoline/Diesel and Methanol/Diesel,” SAE Int. J. Engines, 6(1), pp. 78–100. [CrossRef]
Babbage Science and Technology Blog, 2013, “  Difference Engine: Born Again,” The Economist, London.
Hitomi, M. , Nakai, E. , Terazawa, Y. , Takamatsu, H. , and Shimo, D. , 2013, “ Development of a New Generation Clean Diesel Engine (2.2L) Which Achieves Both Driving Pleasure and Environmental Performance—Realization of a Concept for Ultra-Low Compression Ratio of 14.0,” JSME, epub.
Dempsey, A. , Walker, N. R. , and Reitz, R. , 2013, “ Effect of Cetane Improvers on Gasoline, Ethanol, and Methanol Reacitivity and the Implications for RCCI Combustion,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 6(1), pp. 170–187. [CrossRef]
Babbit, G. R. , 1999, “ Transient Engine Test System for Hardware-in-the-Loop Powertrain Development,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI.
Feist, M. , 2001, “ Implementation of a Transient Hydrostatic Engine Dynamometer,” MS thesis, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI.
Lahti, J. L. , and Moskwa, J. J. , 2002, “ A Transient Hydrostatic Dynamometer for Testing Single-Cylinder Prototypes of Multi-Cylinder Engines,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2002-01-0616.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Modified GM 1.9 L intake manifold and port-fuel injection system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic of the test engine laboratory

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Rail pressure (bar) for the download (solid) and upload (dashed) cases; 95% confidence interval is illustrated by the shaded area

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Intake manifold temperature ( °C) for the download (solid) and upload (dashed) cases; 95% confidence interval is illustrated by the shaded area

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Intake manifold pressure (bar) for the download (solid) and upload (dashed) cases; 95% confidence interval is illustrated by the shaded area

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Air system response for the download (solid) and upload (dashed) cases; 95% confidence interval is illustrated by the shaded area

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

BMEP (bar) for the download (solid) and upload (dashed) cases; 95% confidence interval is illustrated by the shaded area

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Fueling commands for the download (solid) and upload (dashed) cases; 95% confidence interval is illustrated by the shaded area

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Combustion performance for the download (solid) and upload (dashed) cases; 95% confidence interval is illustrated by the shaded area

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Emissions performance for the download (solid) and upload (dashed) cases; 95% confidence interval is illustrated by the shaded area

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In