0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Predicting Flashback Limits of a Gas Turbine Model Combustor Based on Velocity and Fuel Concentration for H2–Air Mixtures

[+] Author and Article Information
Matthias Utschick

Lehrstuhl für Thermodynamik,
Technische Universität München,
Garching 85748, Germany
e-mail: utschick@td.mw.tum.de

Daniel Eiringhaus, Christian Köhler, Thomas Sattelmayer

Lehrstuhl für Thermodynamik,
Technische Universität München,
Garching 85748, Germany

Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 1, 2016; final manuscript received August 2, 2016; published online October 18, 2016. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 139(4), 041502 (Oct 18, 2016) (10 pages) Paper No: GTP-16-1299; doi: 10.1115/1.4034646 History: Received July 01, 2016; Revised August 02, 2016

This study investigates the influence of the fuel injection strategy on safety against flashback in a gas turbine model combustor with premixing of H2–air mixtures. The flashback propensity is quantified and the flashback mechanism is identified experimentally. The A2EV swirler concept exhibits a hollow, thick-walled conical structure with four tangential slots. Four fuel injector geometries were tested. One of them injects the fuel orthogonal to the air flow in the slots (jet-in-crossflow injector (JICI)). Three injector types introduce the fuel almost isokinetic to the air flow at the trailing edge of the swirler slots (trailing edge injector (TEI)). Velocity and mixing fields in mixing zone and combustion chamber in isothermal water flow were measured with high-speed particle image velocimetry (PIV) and high-speed laser-induced fluorescence (LIF). The flashback limit was determined under atmospheric pressure for three air mass flows and 673 K preheat temperature for H2–air mixtures. Flashback mechanism and trajectory of the flame tip during flashback were identified with two stereoscopically oriented intensified high-speed cameras observing the OH* radiation. We notice flashback in the core flow due to combustion-induced vortex breakdown (CIVB) and turbulent flame propagation (TFP) near the wall dependent on the injector type. The flashback resistance (FBR) defined as the ratio between a characteristic flow speed and a characteristic flame speed measures the direction of propagation of a turbulent flame in the flow field. Although CIVB cannot be predicted solely based on the FBR, its distribution gives evidence for CIVB-prone states. The fuel should be injected preferably isokinetic to the air flow along the entire trailing edge in order to reduce the RMS fluctuation of velocity and fuel concentration. The characteristic velocity in the entire cross section of the combustion chamber inlet should be at least twice the characteristic flame speed. The position of the stagnation point should be tuned to be located in the combustion chamber by adjusting the axial momentum. Those measures lead to safe operation with highly reactive fuels at high equivalence ratios.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

EERE Information Center, 2010, “ Fuel Cell Technologies Program,” U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, Technical Report No. 1-877-337-3463.
Lieuwen, T. , McDonell, V. , Santavicca, D. , and Sattelmayer, T. , 2008, “ Burner Development and Operability Issues Associated With Steady Flowing Syngas Fired Combustors,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 180(6), pp. 1169–1192. [CrossRef]
Lewis, B. , and von Elbe, G. , 1943, “ Stability and Structure of Burner Flames,” J. Chem. Phys., 11(2), pp. 75–97. [CrossRef]
Putnam, A. A. , and Jensen, R. A. , 1949, “ Application of Dimensionless Numbers to Flash-Back and Other Combustion Phenomena,” Third Symposium on Combustion, Flame and Explosion Phenomena, pp. 89–98.
Eichler, C. , Baumgartner, G. , and Sattelmayer, T. , 2012, “ Experimental Investigation of Turbulent Boundary Layer Flashback Limits for Premixed Hydrogen–Air Flames Confined in Ducts,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(1), p. 011502. [CrossRef]
Eichler, C. , and Sattelmayer, T. , 2012, “ Premixed Flame Flashback in Wall Boundary Layers Studied by Long-Distance Micro-PIV,” Exp. Fluids, 52(2), pp. 347–360. [CrossRef]
Eichler, C. , 2011, “ Flame Flashback in Wall Boundary Layers of Premixed Combustion Systems,” Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
Baumgartner, G. , 2014, “ Flame Flashback in Premixed Hydrogen–Air Combustion Systems,” Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
Baumgartner, G. , Böck, L. , and Sattelmayer, T. , 2015, “ Experimental Investigation of the Transition Mechanism From Stable Flame to Flashback in a Generic Premixed Combustion System With High-Speed Micro-PIV and Micro-PLIF Combined With Chemiluminescence Imaging,” ASME Paper No. GT2015-42605.
Fritz, J. , 2003, “ Flammenrückschlag durch verbrennungsinduziertes Wirbelaufplatzen,” Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
Kröner, M. , 2003, “ Einfluss lokaler Löschvorgänge auf den Flammenrückschlag durch verbrennungsinduziertes Wirbelaufplatzen,” Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
Konle, M. , 2010, “ Verbrennungsinduziertes Wirbelaufplatzen in moderat turbulenten Drallströmungen,” Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
Konle, M. , and Sattelmayer, T. , 2009, “ Prediction of CIVB Driven Flame Flashback for CH4–H2–Air Mixtures and Moderate Turbulence,” 22nd International Colloquium on the Dynamics of Explosions and Reactive Systems, Luikov Heat and Mass Transfer Institute, Minsk, Belarus, July 27–31.
Ashurst, W. T. , 1996, “ Flame Propagation Along a Vortex: The Baroclinic Push,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 112(1), pp. 175–185. [CrossRef]
Burmberger, S. , 2008, “ Optimierung der aerodynamischen Flammenstabilisierung für brennstoffflexible, vorgemischte Gasturbinenbrenner,” Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
Burmberger, S. , and Sattelmayer, T. , 2011, “ Optimization of the Aerodynamic Flame Stabilization for Fuel Flexible Gas Turbine Premix Burners,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 133(10), p. 101501. [CrossRef]
Sangl, J. , 2011, “ Erhöhung der Brennstoffflexibilität von Vormischbrennern durch Beeinflussung der Wirbeldynamik,” Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
Sangl, J. , Mayer, C. , and Sattelmayer, T. , 2011, “ Dynamic Adaptation of Aerodynamic Flame Stabilization of a Premix Swirl Burner to Fuel Reactivity Using Fuel Momentum,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 133(7), p. 071501. [CrossRef]
Mayer, C. , 2012, “ Konzept zur vorgemischten Verbrennung wasserstoffhaltiger Brennstoffe in Gasturbinen,” Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
Mayer, C. , Sangl, J. , Sattelmayer, T. , Lachaux, T. , and Bernero, S. , 2012, “ Study on the Operational Window of a Swirl Stabilized Syngas Burner Under Atmospheric and High Pressure Conditions,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(3), p. 031506. [CrossRef]
Sattelmayer, T. , Mayer, C. , and Sangl, J. , 2014, “ Interaction of Flame Flashback Mechanisms in Premixed Hydrogen–Air Swirl Flames,” ASME Paper No. GT2014-25553.
Marosky, A. , Seidel, V. , Bless, S. , and Sattelmayer, T. , 2012, “ Impact of Cooling Air Injection on the Primary Combustion Zone of a Swirl Burner,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-68898.
Fritz, Y. , Kröner, M. , and Sattelmayer, T. , 2004, “ Flashback in a Swirl Burner With Cylindrical Premixing Zone,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 126(2), pp. 276–283. [CrossRef]
Kröner, M. , Fritz, Y. , and Sattelmayer, T. , 2003, “ Flashback Limits for Combustion Induced Vortex Breakdown in a Swirl Burner,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 125(3), pp. 693–700. [CrossRef]
Peters, N. , 2006, Turbulent Combustion, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Pope, S. B. , 2005, Turbulent Flows, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Virginia Tech, 2012, “ Prana 2.0b,” Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, accessed Mar. 16, 2016, sourceforge.net/projects/qi-tools/
LaVision, 2011, “ Product Manual for Davis 8.0: LIF in Liquid Fluids,” LaVision GmbH, Göttingen, Germany.
Marosky, A. , 2014, “ Einfluss der Kühllufteindüsung auf das Betriebsverhalten von Drallbrennern,” Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
Peters, N. , 1994, “ Turbulente Brenngeschwindigkeit,” RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany, Technical Report No. Pe 241/9-2.
Otsu, N. , 1979, “ A Threshold Selection Method From Gray-Level Histograms,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 9(1), pp. 62–66. [CrossRef]
Dribinski, V. , Ossadtchi, A. , Mandelshtam, V. A. , and Reisler, H. , 2002, “ Reconstruction of Abel-Transformable Images: The Gaussian Basis-Set Expansion Abel Transform Method,” Rev. Sci. Instrum., 73(7), pp. 2634–2642. [CrossRef]
Chterev, I. , Sundararajan, G. , Seitzman, J. M. , and Lieuwen, T. , 2015, “ Precession Effects on the Relationship Between Time-Averaged and Instantaneous Swirl Flow and Flame Characteristics,” ASME Paper No. GT2015-42768.
Wang, Q. , McDonell, V. , Steinthorsson, E. , Mansour, A. , and Hollon, B. , 2009, “ Correlating Flashback Tendencies for Premixed Injection of Hydrogen and Methane Mixtures at Elevated Temperature and Pressure,” ASME Paper No. GT2009-59500.
Seidel, V. , 2014, “ Numerische und experimentelle Untersuchungen der Aerodynamik und Verbrennungsstabilität eines Vormischbrenners,” Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
Reichel, T. G. , Terhaar, S. , and Paschereit, C. O. , 2014, “ Increasing Flashback Resistance in Lean Premixed Swirl-Stabilized Hydrogen Combustion by Axial Air Injection,” ASME Paper No. GT2014-27002.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

A2EV combustor concept

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

A2EV swirler and gas injectors

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Stereoscopic camera setup for FB path recordings in the mixing tube

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Normalized mean axial velocity u¯z/ub as well as OH* radiation for m˙a=100 g/s and varied fuel mass flow m˙f and injector type

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Normalized mean axial velocity along the burner axis (left side) and normalized mean tangential velocity in LS2 (right) for m˙a=100 g/s at λ = 2 and λFB

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Characteristic velocity (u¯z−u′z,RMS)/ub and OH* radiation for m˙a=100 g/s and varied fuel mass flow m˙f and injector type

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Normalized hydrogen mole fraction Xf/Xf,0 and OH* radiation for m˙a=100 g/s and varied fuel mass flow m˙f and injector type

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

FB limit at atmospheric pressure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Flashback trajectories in z–x plane at three air mass flows m˙a=60, 80, and 100 g/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Flashback event with Inj. A

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Stereoscopic OH* recordings with Inj. A corresponding to Fig. 10

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Flashback event with Inj. D

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Stereoscopic OH* recordings with Inj. D corresponding to Fig. 12

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Characteristic velocity ratio ξl,Δpf and OH* radiation for m˙a=100 g/s and varied fuel mass flow m˙f and injector type

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Flame–flow field interaction for swirl stabilized flame

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In