0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Emissions of a Wet Premixed Flame of Natural Gas and a Mixture With Hydrogen at High Pressure

[+] Author and Article Information
P. Stathopoulos

Chair of Fluid Dynamics
Hermann-Föttinger-Institut,
Technische Universität Berlin,
Müller-Breslau-Str. 8,
Berlin 10623, Germany
e-mail: stathopoulos@tu-berlin.de

P. Kuhn, J. Wendler, T. Tanneberger, S. Terhaar, C. O. Paschereit

Chair of Fluid Dynamics
Hermann-Föttinger-Institut,
Technische Universität Berlin,
Müller-Breslau-Str. 8,
Berlin 10623, Germany

C. Schmalhofer, P. Griebel, M. Aigner

German Aerospace Center (DLR),
Institute of Combustion Technology,
Pfaffenwaldring 38-40,
Stuttgart 70569, Germany

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 13, 2016; final manuscript received August 17, 2016; published online November 2, 2016. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 139(4), 041507 (Nov 02, 2016) (8 pages) Paper No: GTP-16-1332; doi: 10.1115/1.4034687 History: Received July 13, 2016; Revised August 17, 2016

It is generally accepted that combustion of hydrogen and natural gas mixtures will become more prevalent in the near future, to allow for a further penetration of renewables in the European power generation system. The current work aims at the demonstration of the advantages of steam dilution, when highly reactive combustible mixtures are used in a swirl-stabilized combustor. To this end, high-pressure experiments have been conducted with a generic swirl-stabilized combustor featuring axial air injection to increase flashback safety. The experiments have been conducted with two fuel mixtures, at various pressure levels up to 9 bar and at four levels of steam dilution up to 25% steam-to-air mass flow ratio. Natural gas has been used as a reference fuel, whereas a mixture of natural gas and hydrogen (10% hydrogen by mass) represented an upper limit of hydrogen concentration in a natural gas network with hydrogen enrichment. The results of the emissions measurements are presented along with a reactor network model. The latter is applied as a means to qualitatively understand the chemical processes responsible for the observed emissions and their trends with increasing pressure and steam injection.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Melaina, M. , Antonia, O. , and Penev, M. , 2013, “ Blending Hydrogen Into Natural Gas Pipeline Networks: A Review of Key Issues,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Technical Report No. NREL/TP-5600-51995.
Chiesa, P. , Lozza, G. , and Mazzocchi, L. , 2005, “ Using Hydrogen as Gas Turbine Fuel,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 127(1), pp. 73–80. [CrossRef]
Wu, J. , Brown, P. , Diakunchak, I. , Gulati, A. , Lenze, M. , and Koestlin, B. , 2007, “ Advanced Gas Turbine Combustion System Development for High Hydrogen Fuels,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-28337.
Bonaldo, A. , Mats, A. , and Anders, L. , 2014, “ Engine Testing Using Highly Reactive Fuels on Siemens Industrial Gas Turbines,” ASME Paper No. GT2014-26023.
Lam, K.-K. , Geipel, P. , and Larfeldt, J. , 2014, “ Hydrogen Enriched Combustion Testing of Siemens Industrial SGT-400 at Atmospheric Conditions,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 137(2), p. 021502. [CrossRef]
Schefer, R. , Wicksall, D. , and Agrawal, A. , 2002, “ Combustion of Hydrogen-Enriched Methane in a Lean Premixed Swirl-Stabilized Burner,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 29(1), pp. 843–851. [CrossRef]
Mayer, C. , Sangl, J. , Sattelmayer, T. , Lachaux, T. , and Bernero, S. , 2012, “ Study on the Operational Window of a Swirl Stabilized Syngas Burner Under Atmospheric and High Pressure Conditions,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(3), p. 031506. [CrossRef]
Griebel, P. , Boschek, E. , and Jansohn, P. , 2007, “ Lean Blowout Limits and NOx Emissions of Turbulent, Lean Premixed, Hydrogen-Enriched Methane/Air Flames at High Pressure,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 129(2), pp. 404–410. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Q. , Noble, D. R. , Shanbhogue, S. J. , and Lieuwen, T. , 2007, “ Impacts of Hydrogen Addition on Near-Lean Blowout Dynamics in a Swirling Combustor,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-27308.
Beerer, D. , McDonell, V. , Therkelsen, P. , and Cheng, R. K. , 2012, “ Flashback, Blow Out, Emissions, and Turbulent Displacement Flame Speed Measurements in a Hydrogen and Methane Fired Low-Swirl Injector at Elevated Pressures and Temperatures,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-68216.
Lantz, A. , Collin, R. , Aldén, M. , Lindholm, A. , Larfeldt, J. , and Lörstad, D. , 2014, “ Investigation of Hydrogen Enriched Natural Gas Flames in a SGT-700/800 Burner Using OH PLIF and Chemiluminescence Imaging,” ASME Paper No. GT2014-26293.
Kim, H. , Arghode, V. , and Gupta, A. , 2009, “ Flame Characteristics of Hydrogen-Enriched Methane–Air Premixed Swirling Flames,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 34(2), pp. 1063–1073. [CrossRef]
Sangl, J. , Mayer, C. , and Sattelmayer, T. , 2011, “ Dynamic Adaptation of Aerodynamic Flame Stabilization of a Premix Swirl Burner to Fuel Reactivity Using Fuel Momentum,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 133(7), p. 071501. [CrossRef]
Reichel, T. G. , Terhaar, S. , and Paschereit, O. , 2014, “ Increasing Flashback Resistance in Lean Premixed Swirl-Stabilized Hydrogen Combustion by Axial Air Injection,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 137(7), p. 071503. [CrossRef]
Reichel, T. G. , Goeckeler, K. , and Paschereit, O. , 2015, “ Investigation of Lean Premixed Swirl-Stabilized Hydrogen Burner With Axial Air Injection Using OH-PLIF Imaging,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 137(11), p. 111513. [CrossRef]
Kuhn, P. , Terhaar, S. , Reichel, T. , and Paschereit, C. O. , 2015, “ Design and Assessment of a Fuel-Flexible Low Emission Combustor for Dry and Steam-Diluted Conditions,” ASME Paper No. GT2015-43375.
Fleck, J. M. , Griebel, P. , Steinberg, A. M. , Stöhr, M. , Aigner, M. , and Ciani, A. , 2010, “ Experimental Investigation of a Generic, Fuel Flexible Reheat Combustor at Gas Turbine Relevant Operating Conditions,” ASME Paper No. GT2010-22722.
Göckeler, K. , 2015, “ Influence of Steam Dilution and Hydrogen Enrichment on Laminar Premixed Methane Flames,” Ph.D. thesis, TU Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Albin, E. , Nawroth, H. , Göke, S. , D'Angelo, Y. , and Paschereit, C. O. , 2013, “ Experimental Investigation of Burning Velocities of Ultra-Wet Methane–Air–Steam Mixtures,” Fuel Process. Technol., 107, pp. 27–35. [CrossRef]
Göckeler, K. , Krüger, O. , and Oliver Paschereit, C. , 2014, “ Laminar Burning Velocities and Emissions of Hydrogen–Methane–Air–Steam Mixtures,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 137(3), p. 041505. [CrossRef]
Boushaki, T. , Dhuè, Y. , Selle, L. , Ferret, B. , and Poinsot, T. , 2012, “ Effects of Hydrogen and Steam Addition on Laminar Burning Velocity of Methane–Air Premixed Flame: Experimental and Numerical Analysis,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37(11), pp. 9412–9422. [CrossRef]
Correa, S. M. , 1993, “ A Review of NOx Formation Under Gas-Turbine Combustion Conditions,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 87(1–6), pp. 329–362. [CrossRef]
Göke, S. , Schimek, S. , Terhaar, S. , Göckeler, K. , Krüger, O. , Fleck, J. , Griebel, P. , and Paschereit, C. O. , 2014, “ Influence of Pressure and Steam Dilution on NOx and CO Emissions in a Premixed Natural Gas Flame,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 136(9), p. 091508. [CrossRef]
Bhargava, A. , Kendrick, D. W. , Colket, M. B. , Sowa, W. A. , Casleton, K. H. , and Maloney, D. J. , 2000, “ Pressure Effect on NOx and CO Emissions in Industrial Gas Turbines,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-0097.
Lefebvre, A. H. , 1983, Gas Turbine Combustion, Hemisphere Publishing, New York.
Goodwin, D. , 2003, “ An Open Source, Extensible Software Suite for CVD Process Simulation,” Chemical Vapor Deposition XVI and EUROCVD 14, Paris, France, Apr. 27–May 2, pp. 155–162.
Beer, J. , and Lee, K. , 1965, “ The Effect of the Residence Time Distribution on the Performance and Efficiency of Combustors,” Symp. (Int.) Combust., 10(1), pp. 1187–1202. [CrossRef]
Michaud, M. , Westmoreland, P. , and Feitelberg, A. , 1992, “ Chemical Mechanisms of NOx Formation for Gas Turbine Conditions,” Symp. (Int.) Combust., 24(1), pp. 879–887. [CrossRef]
Göke, S. , Terhaar, S. , Schimek, S. , Göckeler, K. , and Paschereit, C. O. , 2011, “ Combustion of Natural Gas, Hydrogen and Bio-Fuels at Ultra-Wet Conditions,” ASME Paper No. GT2011-45696.
Smith, G. P. , Golden, D. M. , Frenklach, M. , Moriarty, N. W. , Eiteneer, B. , Goldenberg, M. , Bowman, C. T. , Hanson, R. K. , Song, S., Jr. , Gardiner, W. C. , Lissianski, V. V. , and Qin, Z. , 2000, “ GRI 3.0,” Gas Research Institute (GRI), Chicago, IL.
Curran, H. J. , 2004, “ Detailed Chemical Kinetic Modeling; Is There Life After Gri-Mech 3.0?,” Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Fuel Chem., 49(1), pp. 263–264.
Leckner, B. , 1972, “ Spectral and Total Emissivity of Water Vapor and Carbon Dioxide,” Combust. Flame, 19(1), pp. 33–48. [CrossRef]
Ronney, P. , 2003, “ Gas Radiation: Emissivities, Absorptivities, Planck Mean Absorption Coefficients and Net Emission From H2O and CO2 Radiation According to the Hottel/Leckner Model,” University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Stathopoulos, P. , Terhaar, S. , and Paschereit, C. , 2014, “ The Ultra-Wet Cycle for High Efficiency, Low Emission Gas Turbines,” 7th International Gas Turbine Conference (ETN: IGTC-14), Brussels, Belgium, Oct. 14–15, Paper No. 38.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Combustion system as used in the atmospheric experiments

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Combustor with optical access integrated in the HBK-S

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Fuel temperature for 100% NG at p = 4 bar (higher values) and the mixture of 90% NG and 10% by mass hydrogen at p = 5 bar (lower values) and steam contents (• — Ω = 0, ▪ - - Ω = 0.1, and ♦ ⋯Ω=0.2 (Ω = 0.25 for the mix))

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Normalized OH*-chemiluminescence images for 100% natural gas at constant equivalence ratio of ϕ=0.8

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Normalized OH*-chemiluminescence images for 90% natural gas and 10% hydrogen by mass at constant equivalence ratio of ϕ=0.85. Left column from Ref. [16]. (The top right image (9 bar and Ω = 0) represents a 95% natural gas and 5% hydrogen by mass flame.)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Axial flame position as a function of steam dilution and pressure for both fuel mixtures: natural gas (• — p = 1 bar, p = 4 bar, and p = 9 bar) and fuel mixture (• - - p = 1 bar, p = 5 bar, and p = 9 bar)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Radial flame position as a function of steam dilution and pressure for both mixtures: natural gas (• — p = 1 bar, p = 4 bar, and p = 9 bar) and fuel mixture (• - - p = 1 bar, p = 5 bar, and p = 9 bar)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

NOx emissions for 100% natural gas at various pressure levels (• — p = 1 bar, p = 4 bar, and p = 9 bar) and steam contents (• — Ω = 0, ▪ - - Ω = 0.1, and ♦ ⋯Ω=0.2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

NOx emissions for 90% natural gas and 10% hydrogen by mass at various pressure levels (by Ω = 0 and p = 9 bar 95% natural gas and 5% hydrogen by mass) (• — P = 1 bar, P = 5 bar, and P = 9 bar) and steam contents (• — Ω = 0, ▪ - - Ω=0.1, and ♦ ⋯Ω=0.25)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

CO emissions for 100% natural gas at various pressure levels (• — p = 1 bar, p = 4 bar, and p = 9 bar) and steam contents (• — Ω = 0, ▪ - - Ω=0.1, and ♦ ⋯Ω=0.2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

CO emissions for 90% natural gas and 10% hydrogen by mass at various pressure levels (by Ω = 0 and p = 9 bar 95% natural gas and 5% hydrogen by mass) (• — p = 1 bar, p = 5 bar, and p = 9 bar) and steam contents (• — Ω = 0, ▪ - - Ω=0.1, and ♦ ⋯Ω=0.25)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Schematic of the reactor network model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Measured and simulated NOx emissions for natural gas (top) and H2-enriched natural gas (bottom) for various pressures (• — p = 1 bar, p = 4 bar (top) and p = 5 bar (bottom), and p = 9 bar) and steam contents (• — Ω = 0, ▪ - - Ω=0.1, and ♦ ⋯Ω=0.2 (top) and Ω = 0.25 (bottom))

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Contributions of the NOx formation pathways in the H2-enriched natural gas flame at 1 bar (left) and 9 bar (right) with steam contents Ω = 0 (top) and Ω = 0.25 (bottom)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In