0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics

Cooling Injection Effect on a Transonic Squealer Tip—Part II: Analysis of Aerothermal Interaction Physics

[+] Author and Article Information
H. Ma

University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong
University Joint Institute,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: haitengma@gmail.com

Q. Zhang

Department of Mechanical Engineering and
Aeronautics,
School of Engineering and Mathematical
Sciences,
City, University of London,
Northampton Square,
London EC1V 0HB, UK
e-mail: Qiang.Zhang@city.ac.uk

L. He

Department of Engineering Science,
University of Oxford,
Oxford OX2 0ES, UK
e-mail: Li.He@eng.ox.ac.uk

Z. Wang

University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong
University Joint Institute,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: wangzhaoguang1991@hotmail.com

L. Wang

University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong
University Joint Institute,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: lipo.wang@sjtu.edu.cn

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Structures and Dynamics Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 14, 2016; final manuscript received August 24, 2016; published online January 10, 2017. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 139(5), 052507 (Jan 10, 2017) (9 pages) Paper No: GTP-16-1339; doi: 10.1115/1.4035200 History: Received July 14, 2016; Revised August 24, 2016

A basic attribute for turbine blade film cooling is that coolant injected should be largely passively convected by the local base flow. However, the effective working of the conventional wisdom may be compromised when the cooling injection strongly interacts with the base flow. Rotor blade tip of a transonic high-pressure (HP) turbine is one of such challenging regions for which basic understanding of the relevant aerothermal behavior as a basis for effective heat transfer/cooling design is lacking. The need to increase our understanding and predictability for high-speed transonic blade tip has been underlined by some recent findings that tip heat transfer characteristics in a transonic flow are qualitatively different from those at a low speed. Although there have been extensive studies previously on squealer blade tip cooling, there have been no published experimental studies under a transonic flow condition. The present study investigates the effect of cooling injection on a transonic squealer tip through a closely combined experimental and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) effort. The experimental and computational results as presented in Part I have consistently revealed some distinctive aerothermal signatures of the strong coolant-base flow interactions. In this paper, as Part II, detailed analyses using the validated CFD solutions are conducted to identify, analyze, and understand the causal links between the aerothermal signatures and the driving flow structures and physical mechanisms. It is shown that the interactions between the coolant injection and the base over-tip leakage (OTL) flow in the squealer tip region are much stronger in the frontal subsonic region than the rear transonic region. The dominant vortical flow structure is a counter-rotating vortex pair (CRVP) associated with each discrete cooling injection. High HTC stripes on the cavity floor are directly linked to the impingement heat transfer augmentation associated with one leg of the CRVP, which is considerably enhanced by the near-floor fluid movement driven by the overall pressure gradient along the camber line (CAM). The strength of the coolant-base flow interaction as signified by the augmented values of the HTC stripes is seen to correlate to the interplay and balance between the OTL flow and the CRVP structure. As such, for the frontal subsonic part of the cavity, there is a prevailing spanwise inward flow initiated by the CRVP, which has profoundly changed the local base flow, leading to high HTC stripes on the cavity floor. On the other hand, for the rear high speed part, the high inertia of the OTL flow dominates; thus, the vortical flow disturbances associated with the CRVP are largely passively convected, leaving clear signatures on the top surface of the suction surface rim. A further interesting side effect of the strong interaction in the frontal subsonic region is that there is considerable net heat flux reduction (NHFR) in an area seemingly unreachable by the injected coolant. The present results have confirmed that this is due to the large reduction in the local HTC as a consequence of the upstream propagated impact of the strong coolant-base flow interactions.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Computational domain and mesh employed in the present study

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Contours of the relative difference in HTC between the results from two meshes for the cooled case (five cooling holes near the PS side)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Nondimensional radially averaged OTL mass flux distribution on the suction side edge of the squealer tip for the cooled case (five cooling holes near the PS side)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison of HTC (W/(m2-K))

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Percentage differences in HTC (all relative to the uncooled case)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Cooling parameters (case with nine holes near SS)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

OTL flow streamlines for uncooled and cooled cases

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Nondimensional radially averaged OTL mass flux distribution on the suction side edge of squealer tip

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Injection vortical flow structure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Streamlines of OTL flow (colored by radial velocity) and the injected coolant (blue) (black line indicates the OTL flow path)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Contours of radial velocity on the cut plane of the rim surface (A–A) and contours of Mach number on two cut planes normal to the camber line (B–B and C–C)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Contour of nondimensional total temperature on plane T2 and contour of HTC on tip surfaces, with streamlines of OTL flow colored by Mach number (the high HTC regions on the cavity floor are marked by two arrows)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

HTC, vorticity, and temperature variations along two curved surface cuts on the cavity floor and on the SS rim

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

HTC with relative casing movement (CFD) (W/(m2-K))

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In