0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Manufacturing, Materials, and Metallurgy

Characterization of Laser Additive Manufacturing-Fabricated Porous Superalloys for Turbine Components

[+] Author and Article Information
Brandon Ealy

Center for Advanced Turbomachinery
and Energy Research,
University of Central Florida,
Orlando, FL 32816
e-mail: brandonealy@knights.ucf.edu

Luisana Calderon

Center for Advanced Turbomachinery
and Energy Research,
University of Central Florida,
Orlando, FL 32816
e-mail: luisana@knights.ucf.edu

Wenping Wang

Center for Advanced Turbomachinery
and Energy Research,
University of Central Florida,
Orlando, FL 32816
e-mail: Wenping.wang@ucf.edu

Ranier Valentin

CDI Corporation,
Orlando, FL 32826
e-mail: Ranier_v@yahoo.com

Ilya Mingareev

Townes Laser Institute,
CREOL,
University of Central Florida,
Orlando, FL 32816
e-mail: Ilya.mingareev@ucf.edu

Martin Richardson

Townes Laser Institute,
CREOL,
University of Central Florida,
Orlando, FL 32816
e-mail: mcr@creol.ucf.edu

Jay Kapat

Director of Center for Advanced
Turbomachinery and Energy Research,
University of Central Florida,
Orlando, FL 32816
e-mail: Jayanta.Kapat@ucf.edu

Contributed by the Manufacturing Materials and Metallurgy Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received July 21, 2016; final manuscript received November 26, 2016; published online May 9, 2017. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 139(10), 102102 (May 09, 2017) (7 pages) Paper No: GTP-16-1356; doi: 10.1115/1.4035560 History: Received July 21, 2016; Revised November 26, 2016

The limits of gas turbine technology are heavily influenced by materials and manufacturing capabilities. Lately, incremental performance gains responsible for increasing the allowable turbine inlet temperature (TIT) have been made mainly through innovations in cooling technology, specifically convective cooling schemes. Laser additive manufacturing (LAM) is a promising manufacturing technology that uses lasers to selectively melt powders of metal in a layer-by-layer process to directly manufacture components, paving the way to manufacture designs that are not possible with conventional casting methods. This study investigates manufacturing qualities seen in LAM methods and its ability to successfully produce complex features found in turbine blades. A leading edge segment of a turbine blade, containing both internal and external cooling features, along with an engineered-porous structure is fabricated by laser additive manufacturing of superalloy powders. Through a nondestructive approach, the presented geometry is analyzed against the departure of the design by utilizing X-ray computed tomography (CT). Variance distribution between the design and manufactured leading edge segment are carried out for both internal impingement and external transpiration hole diameters. Flow testing is performed in order to characterize the uniformity of porous regions and flow characteristics across the entire article for various pressure ratios (PR). Discharge coefficients of internal impingement arrays and engineered-porous structures are quantified. The analysis yields quantitative data on the build quality of the LAM process, providing insight as to whether or not it is a viable option for direct manufacture of microfeatures in current turbine blade production.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Test article with dimensions, (b) cut plane showing internal features*, (c) internal lattice structure (shown as dark shaded surfaces exposed to fluid)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Preliminary print of inconel test article with inverted build orientation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Plenum assembly with fixture for CD measurements of engineered-porous cavities

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

X-ray CT volume reconstruction with image resolution 200 μm (a) and 100 μm (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Isolated discontinuities (a, b) and anomalies (c, d, and e) observed in 225 kV CT scan

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Relevant linear indication along a single build layer: top down view and view normal to arrows

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Variance distribution along external surface (a) and internal impingement array (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Variance distribution along inside surface of leading edge

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

θ-dependence of part variance (a), comparison of actual and designed part edges (b), and concentricity(c)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Relative surface deviation of entire leading edge segment

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Absolute variance trend for entire part surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Discharge behavior of test article

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Flow behavior across entire test coupon for multiple PR

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In