0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Combustion, Fuels, and Emissions

Experimental and Computational Analysis of the Swirling Flow Generated by an Axial Counter-Rotating Swirler in a Rectangular Model Chamber Using Water Test Rig

[+] Author and Article Information
Foad Vashahi

Graduate School of Chonbuk National University,
Fluid Engineering Laboratory,
Jeonju 54896, South Korea
e-mail: Foadvashahi@outlook.com

Sangho Lee

Graduate School of Chonbuk National University,
Fluid Engineering Laboratory,
Jeonju 54896, South Korea
e-mail: Leesh_235@naver.com

Jeekeun Lee

Division of Mechanical System Engineering
of Chonbuk National University,
Jeonju 54896, South Korea
e-mail: Leejk@jbnu.ac.kr

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received June 14, 2015; final manuscript received December 20, 2016; published online March 15, 2017. Editor: David Wisler.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 139(8), 081501 (Mar 15, 2017) (12 pages) Paper No: GTP-15-1204; doi: 10.1115/1.4035734 History: Received June 14, 2015; Revised December 20, 2016

This paper reports the particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurement of swirling flow in a confined rectangular-shaped model combustion chamber. Water is used as the working fluid, and the average profiles of axial, radial, and magnitudes of velocity are given. Flow behavior is investigated and a rebound angle term is defined to investigate the direct effects of the noncircular chamber shape. Flow behavior near the walls is discussed in detail, as are other important swirling flow features such as the appearance of corner and central toroidal recirculation zones. Additionally, experimental data are compared with simulation results. Analyses were performed via commercial software STAR-CCM+ version 9.0. The large eddy simulation (LES) dynamic Smagorinsky subgrid scale, realizable k–ε model, and k–ω shear-stress transport (SST) detached eddy version were used as simulation tools. Three different test filters of 1.0, 2.2, and 3.0 were applied to the LES to identify improvements in accuracy. The overall best turbulence model is compared to the experimental result and reliability of such model is evaluated. The ability of such model was profound within the upstream and to some extent unreliable in downstream.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Archer, S. S. , Gupta, A. K. , and Kitagawa, K. , 2006, “ Spectroscopic Examination and Analysis of Unconfined Swirling Flames,” J. Korean Phys. Soc., 49(1), pp. 298–304.
Merkle, K. , Haessler, H. , Büchner, H. , and Zarzalis, N. , 2003, “ Effect of Co- and Counter-Swirl on the Isothermal Flow- and Mixture-Field of an Airblast Atomizer Nozzle,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 24(4), pp. 529–537. [CrossRef]
Schiestel, R. , 2010, “ Notes on the Problems Posed by the Study of Complex Flows,” Modeling and Simulation of Turbulent Flows, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 423–455.
Hadef, R. , and Lenze, B. , 2008, “ Effects of Co- and Counter-Swirl on the Droplet Characteristics in a Spray Flame,” Chem. Eng. Process., 47(12), pp. 2209–2217. [CrossRef]
Wang, P. , Bai, X. S. , Wessman, M. , and Klingmann, J. , 2004, “ Large Eddy Simulation and Experimental Studies of a Confined Turbulent Swirling Flow,” Phys. Fluids, 16(9), pp. 3306–3324. [CrossRef]
Wang, S. , Yang, V. , Hsiao, G. , Hsieh, S.-Y. , and Mongia, H. C. , 2007, “ Large-Eddy Simulations of Gas-Turbine Swirl Injector Flow Dynamics,” J. Fluid Mech., 583, pp. 99–122. [CrossRef]
Matsuzaki, K. , Haramoto, Y. , Munekata, M. , and Ohba, H. , 2001, “ A Study on Swirling Flows in a Rectangular Channel (LDV Measurement, Flow Visualization and Large Eddy Simulation),”J. Therm. Sci., 10(3), pp. 205–210. [CrossRef]
Palm, R. , Grundmann, S. , Weismüller, M. , Šarić, S. , Jakirlić, S. , and Tropea, C. , 2006, “ Experimental Characterization and Modelling of Inflow Conditions for a Gas Turbine Swirl Combustor,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 27(5), pp. 924–936. [CrossRef]
Roux, S. , Lartigue, G. , Poinsot, T. , Meier, U. , and Bérat, C. , 2005, “ Studies of Mean and Unsteady Flow in a Swirled Combustor Using Experiments, Acoustic Analysis, and Large Eddy Simulations,” Combust. Flame, 141(1–2), pp. 40–54. [CrossRef]
Gupta, A. K. , Lilley, D. J. , and Syred, N. , 1984, Swirl Flows, Abacus Press, Tunbridge Wells, UK.
Shamami, K. K. , and Birouk, M. , 2008, “ Assessment of the Performances of RANS Models for Simulating Swirling Flows in a Can-Combustor,” Open Aerosp. Eng. J., 1(1), pp. 8–27. [CrossRef]
Yang, Y. , and Kær, S. K. , 2012, “ Large-Eddy Simulations of the Non-Reactive Flow in the Sydney Swirl Burner,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 36, pp. 47–57. [CrossRef]
Menter, F. R. , Kuntz, M. , and Langtry, R. , 2003, Ten Years of Industrial Experience With the SST Turbulence Model, Begell House, Danbury, CT.
Wessam Estefanos, S. T. , and San-mou, Jeng , 2015, “ A Study of the Mean and Dynamic Behavior of the Swirling Flow Generated by a Counter Rotating Radial-Radial Swirler Using a Water Test Rig,” ASME Paper No. GT2015-43464.
TSI Corporation, “ INSIGHT 4G User Manual,” TSI Corporation, Shoreview, MN.
Mellor, A. M. , 1990, Design of Modern Turbine Combustors, Academic, New York.
Pope, S. B. , 2000, Turbulent Flows, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Davis, P. L. , Rinehimer, A. T. , and Uddin, M. , 2012, “ A Comparison of RANS-Based Turbulence Modeling for Flow Over a Wall-Mounted Square Cylinder,” N C Motorsports and Automotive Research Center, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Science, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, p. 8.
Wilcox, D. C. , 2006, Turbulence Modeling for CFD, DCW Industries, La Canada, CA.
CD-Adapco, 2014, “ STAR-CCM+ Version 9.0 Help Manual,” Cd-Adapco, New York.
Liang, H. , and Maxworthy, T. , 2005, “ An Experimental Investigation of Swirling Jets,” J. Fluid Mech., 525, pp. 115–159. [CrossRef]
Lucca-Negro, O. , and O'Doherty, T. , 2001, “ Vortex Breakdown: A Review,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 27(4), pp. 431–481. [CrossRef]
Sulabh, D. , James, D. , and Hukam, M. , 2008, “ Instantaneous Flow Structures in a Reacting Gas Turbine Combustor,” AIAA Paper No. 2008-4683.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the water test setup for analysis of the swirling flow in a model rectangular chamber. 1. Water tank, 2. water pump, 3. main/drain valve, 4. pressure sensor, 5. swirler set, 6. Nd: YAG laser, 7. power supply, 8. synchronizer, 9. CCD camera, 10. image processor, 11. pressure monitor, and 12. DAQ computer.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

(a) Schematic of the rectangular shape chamber and dual axial counter rotating swirler and (b) domain characteristics and flow areas of interest

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Histogram of cell and wall y+ distribution in the entire region of total 4.7 × 106 cells

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Radial distribution of normalized average radial velocity of experimental data at different axial distances

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Radial distribution of normalized average axial velocity of experimental data at different axial distances

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Instantaneous velocity vectors on the center of the swirler: (a) the zero axial velocity iso-line, (b) overlaid by contour of negative axial velocity and streamlines and (c) averaged velocity vectors overlaid by contour of negative axial velocity and streamlines

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Instantaneous velocity vector plots on the center of the swirler with overlaid contour of negative axial velocity and partial streamlines at several phases: (a), (b) N shape reversed flow, and (c), (d) inverse N shape reversed flow

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Radial distribution of the normalized average velocity magnitude of the experimental data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Measurements of the rebound angle in a rectangular model combustor on the central plane. Averaged velocity vectors of experimental data with isoline of zero axial velocity.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of the radial distribution of normalized average axial velocity profiles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of the radial distribution of normalized average radial velocity profiles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Cumulative frequency analysis of different turbulence models performance: (a) overall performance within certain range and (b) overall performance in certain areas

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

(a), (b) comparison of instantaneous velocity streamlines colored by negative axial velocity and (c), (d) comparison of averaged streamlines colored by averaged negative axial velocity

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Isosurface of the negative average axial velocity region colored by pressure

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In