0
Research Papers: Gas Turbines: Turbomachinery

Flowfield and Performance Analysis of a Three-Dimensional TBCC Exhaust Nozzle

[+] Author and Article Information
Baocheng Xu

Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of
Aerospace Power System,
College of Energy and Power Engineering,
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and
Astronautics (NUAA),
Nanjing 210016, Jiangsu, China
e-mail: alvin_xubc@163.com

Jinglei Xu

Professor
Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of
Aerospace Power System,
College of Energy and Power Engineering,
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and
Astronautics (NUAA),
Nanjing 210016, Jiangsu, China
e-mail: xujl@nuaa.edu.cn

Xiao Wang

Shenyang Aircraft Design and Research Institute,
Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC),
Shenyang 110035, Liaoning, China
e-mail: alenwx@126.com

Wei Zhu

Shenyang Aircraft Design and Research Institute,
Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC),
Shenyang 110035, Liaoning, China
e-mail: zwwder@163.com

Yanfeng Niu

Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of
Aerospace Power System,
College of Energy and Power Engineering,
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and
Astronautics (NUAA),
Nanjing 210016, Jiangsu, China
e-mail: yanfengniu@163.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Turbomachinery Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received January 7, 2017; final manuscript received June 28, 2017; published online July 19, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Haixin Chen.

J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 139(11), 112602 (Jul 19, 2017) (9 pages) Paper No: GTP-17-1006; doi: 10.1115/1.4037193 History: Received January 07, 2017; Revised June 28, 2017

Compared to other engines, turbine-based combined cycle (TBCC) engine is one of the most suitable propulsion systems for hypersonic vehicle. Because of its fine reusability, wide flight envelope, and safety margins, TBCC engine is becoming a more and more important hotspot of research. In this paper, a three-dimensional (3D) over–under TBCC exhaust system is designed, simulated, and the results are discussed, wherein the ramjet flowpath is designed by the quasi-two-dimensional method of characteristics (MOC). A new scheme of rotating around the rear shaft is proposed to regulate the throat area of turbine flowpath. Cold flow experiments are conducted to gain a thorough and fundamental understanding of TBCC exhaust system at on and off-design conditions. To characterize the flow regimes, static pressure taps and schlieren apparatus are employed to obtain the wall pressure distributions and flowfield structures during the experiments. Detailed flow features, as well as the thrust performance, are simulated by the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method. Both the numerical and experimental results show that the TBCC exhaust nozzle in this study can provide sufficient thrust during the whole flight envelop despite a little deterioration at the beginning of the mode transition. The research provides a new and effective scheme for the exhaust system of TBCC engine.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

McDaniel, J. C. , Chelliah, H. , and Goyne, C. P. , 2009, “ US National Center for Hypersonic Combined Cycle Propulsion: An Overview,” AIAA Paper No. 2009-72800.
Heiser, W. H. , Pratt, D. T. , and Daley, D. , 2010, Hypersonic Airbreathing Propulsion, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Washington, DC, Chap. 1.
Bartolotta, P. A. , McNelis, N. B. , and Shafer, D. G. , 2003, “ High Speed Turbines: Development of a Turbine Accelerator (RTA) for Space Access,” AIAA Paper No. 2003-6943.
Harada, K. , Tanatsugu, N. , and Sato, T. , 2001, “ Development Study of a Precooler for the Air-Turboramjet Expander-Cycle Engine,” J. Propul. Power, 17(6), pp. 1233–1238. [CrossRef]
Tanatsugu, N. , Naruo, Y. , Sato, T. , and Rokutanda, I. , 1992, “ Development Study on Air Turbo Ramjet for a Future Spaceplane,” J. Space Technol. Sci., 8(2), pp. 2_38–2_48.
Hannemann, K. , Martinez Schramm, J. , Laurence, S. , Karl, S. , Langener, T. , and Steelant, J. , 2014, “ Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Small Scale LAPCAT—II: Scramjet Flow Path in High Enthalpy Shock Tunel Conditions,” Space Propulsion, Cologne, Germany, May 19–22, pp. 1–8. http://elib.dlr.de/89068/
Steelant, J. , 2008, “ Achievements Obtained for Sustained Hypersonic Flight Within the LAPCAT Project,” AIAA Paper No. 2008-2578.
Moses, P. L. , Bouchard, K. A. , Vause, R. F. , and Pinckney, S. Z. , 1999, “ An Airbreathing Launch Vehicle Design With Turbine-Based Low-Speed Propulsion and Dual Mode Scramjet High-Speed Propulsion,” AIAA Paper No. 99-4948.
Chen, M. , Tang, H. , Zhang, K. , Hui, O. , and Wang, Y. , 2012, “ Turbine-Based Combined Cycle Propulsion System Integration Concept Design,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part G, 227(7), pp. 1068–1089. [CrossRef]
Spoth, K. A. , and Moses, P. L. , 1993, “ Structural Design and Analysis of a Mach Zero to Five Turbo-Ramjet System,” AIAA Paper No. 93-1983.
Benson, T. J. , Trefny, C. J. , and Walker, J. F. , 1997, “ Interactive Design Tool for Turbine Based Combined Cycle Engines,” AIAA Paper No. 97-3160.
Huang, W. , Yan, L. , and Tan, J. , 2014, “ Survey on the Mode Transition Technique in Combined Cycle Propulsion Systems,” Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 39, pp. 685–691. [CrossRef]
Dusa, D. J. , 1989, “ Exhaust Nozzle System Design Considerations for Turboramjet Propulsion Systems,” ISABE Paper No. 89-7077.
Espinosa, A. M. , 2003, “ Integration of Turbine Engines in Hypersonic Airbreathing Vehicles,” AIAA Paper No. 2003-4408.
Lam, D. W. , 1995, “ Use of the PARC Code to Estimate the Off-Design Transonic Performance of an Over/Under Turboramjet Nozzle,” AIAA Paper No. 95-2616.
Berens, T. , 1995, “ Experimental and Numerical Analysis of a Two-Duct Nozzle/Afterbody Model at Supersonic Mach Numbers,” AIAA Paper No. 95-6085.
Gamble, E. , and Haid, D. , 2004, “ Improving Off-Design Nozzle Performance Using Fluidic Injection,” AIAA Paper No. 2004-1206.
Mo, J. , Xu, J. , and Zhang, L. , 2014, “ Design and Experimental Study of an Over-Under TBCC Exhaust System,” ASME J. Eng. Gas. Turbines Power, 136(1), pp. 145011–145018.
Eggers, T. , 2002, “ Aerodynamic Analysis of the Dual-Mode Ramjet Vehicle JAPHAR,” New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics III, Springer, Berlin, pp. 137–144. [CrossRef]
Thompson, H. D. , and Murthy, S. N. B. , 1966, “ Design of Optimized Three-Dimensional Nozzles,” AIAA J. Spacecr. Rockets, 3(9), pp. 1384–1393. [CrossRef]
Wang, X. , and Damodaran, M. , 2002, “ Optimal Three-Dimensional Nozzle Shape Design Using CFD and Parallel Simulated Annealing,” J. Propul. Power, 18(1), pp. 217–221. [CrossRef]
Mo, J. , Xu, J. , Gu, R. , and Fan, Z. , 2015, “ Design of an Asymmetric Scramjet Nozzle With Circular to Rectangular Shape Transition,” J. Propul. Power, 30(3), pp. 812–819. [CrossRef]
Zucrow, M. J. , and Hoffman, J. D. , 1976, Gas Dynamics, Vol. 2, Wiley, New York, pp. 186–234.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Differential element for a quasi-two-dimensional flow

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Ramjet nozzle design procedure by the MOC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Sketch of the conventional over–under TBCC exhaust system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Sketch of the new over–under TBCC exhaust system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Cross-sectional and rear views of the over–under TBCC exhaust nozzle model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Static pressure distribution along rotating ramp for different turbulence models at test point 5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Computational grid and boundary conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Static pressure distribution along rotating ramp for different grids at test point 5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Mach number distribution at the nozzle outlet for different grids at test point 5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Mach contour and pressure distribution of test point 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Mach contour and pressure distribution of test point 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Mach contour and pressure distribution of test point 5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Comparison of the schlieren image and the CFD result at test point 5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Comparisons of the schlieren images and the CFD results under the same NPRt of 8.5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Pressure distributions under the same NPRt of 8.5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Comparisons of the experimental data and CFD result at test point 6

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Comparisons of the experimental data and CFD result at test point 7

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Thrust coefficient over the flight envelop

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In